-
Journal of Medicine and Life May 2022This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the overexpression rate of HER2 in patients with salivary gland tumors. We included peer-reviewed... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the overexpression rate of HER2 in patients with salivary gland tumors. We included peer-reviewed publications from 1995 to 2020, indexed in medical databases, using search terms such as "human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)" and "salivary gland tumors", and extracted relevant data. The extracted data were analyzed with RevMan 5.3 software. Intra-and intergroup post hoc analyses of outcome variables were performed using t-tests, and the rates of HER2 positivity among studies were evaluated. 80 studies were included in the analysis. The positive rates of HER2 ranged from 3.3% to 84.0% and 1% to 9% in malignant and benign subtypes, respectively. The highest HER2 overexpression rate among malignant tumors was in salivary ductal carcinomas (SDC), with a 45% positive rate (CI 95%: 21.9-70.3%). Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) had the highest positive rate of 84% (CI 95%: 74.1-90.0%). Among benign salivary gland tumors, the highest rate was found in myoepithelioma, with a positive rate of 9% (CI 95%: 1.7-33.6%). The highest rate of HER2 overexpression is present in malignant subtypes of salivary gland tumors, more specifically in salivary ductal carcinoma, mucoepidermoid carcinomas, salivary duct carcinoma in situ, and carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Mucoepidermoid; Humans; Receptor, ErbB-2; Salivary Gland Neoplasms; Salivary Glands
PubMed: 35815077
DOI: 10.25122/jml-2021-0394 -
ESMO Open Aug 2022Pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1/2 genes account for ∼6% of breast and 20% of ovarian cancers. Most breast tumors developed by BRCA1 carriers are triple negative....
BACKGROUND
Pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1/2 genes account for ∼6% of breast and 20% of ovarian cancers. Most breast tumors developed by BRCA1 carriers are triple negative. BRCA2 tumors have similar rates of estrogen receptor positivity as sporadic controls but are less likely to be human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive. Prevalence of HER2 positivity among breast cancers (BCs) in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers is poorly and variably described, ranging from 0% to 10% and 0% to 13% in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, respectively.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We assessed the prevalence of HER2 positivity among a single institutional cohort of 398 BCs developed in carriers of BRCA1/2 PVs (240 BRCA1, 158 BRCA2). Subsequently, a systematic review of the literature and pooled analysis was carried out.
RESULTS
In our series we found a 7% HER2 positivity rate among all first BRCA1/2 BCs overall. In BRCA1 carriers, 5.4% of BCs were HER2-positive compared with 9.5% in BRCA2-mutated patients. Among bilateral BCs, HER2-positive cases were 15.2% in the BRCA1 group and 23.1% in the BRCA2 group. Notably, six BRCA1 and eight BRCA2 carriers showed discordant HER2 status between BC and bilateral BC (23.7%, 14/59). The systematic review included 21 083 BRCA1/2 patients from 73 eligible studies. The pooled rate of BRCAmut/HER2-positive BCs is 9.1% (95% confidence interval 7.3% to 11.2%). BRCA1 and BRCA2 when reported as separate data ranged from 0% to 33.3% (mean 8.3%) and from 0% to 86% (mean 10.3%), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
As compared with sporadic cases, BCs occurring in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 PVs carriers are less frequently HER2-positive. Prevalence of HER2 positivity in our series was consistent with pooled analysis and did not exceed 10%. Although not common, co-existence of BRCA mutations and HER2 overexpression and/or gene amplification should be acknowledged. More research is needed to better characterize this subgroup of patients who should not be excluded a priori from clinical trials of targeted therapy for BRCA1/2-driven cancers.
Topics: Breast Neoplasms; Female; Genes, BRCA2; Humans; Receptor, ErbB-2
PubMed: 35810556
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100531 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2022Up to 80% of breast cancers (BCa) are estrogen receptor positive and current treatments target the estrogen receptor (endocrine therapies) and/or CDK4/6 (CDK4/6... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Up to 80% of breast cancers (BCa) are estrogen receptor positive and current treatments target the estrogen receptor (endocrine therapies) and/or CDK4/6 (CDK4/6 inhibitors). encodes the protein cyclin D1, responsible for regulation of G1 to S phase transition in the cell cycle. amplification is common in BCa and contributes to increased cyclin D1 expression. As there are signalling interactions between cyclin D1 and the estrogen receptor, understanding the impact of amplification on estrogen receptor positive patients' disease outcomes, is vital. This review aims to evaluate amplification as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in BCa.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Publications were retrieved from the databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane library. Exclusion criteria were duplication, publication type, non-English language, and animal studies, not BCa, male BCa, premenopausal BCa, cohort size <35, amplification not reported. Publications with cohort duplication, and inadequate recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) data, were also excluded. Included publications were assessed for Risk of Bias (RoB) using the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool. Statistical analyses (Inverse Variance and Mantel-Haenszel) were performed in Review Manager. The PROSPERO registration number is [CRD42020208179].
RESULTS
amplification was significantly associated with positive estrogen receptor status (OR:1.70, 95% CI:1.19-2.43, p = 0.004) and cyclin D1 overexpression (OR: 5.64, 95% CI: 2.32-13.74, p=0.0001). amplification was significantly associated with shorter RFS (OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.13-2.38, p = 0.009), and OS (OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.19-1.92, p = 0.0008) after removal of studies with a high RoB. In endocrine therapy treated patients specifically, amplification predicted shorter RFS (HR: 2.59, 95% CI: 1.96-3.41, p < 0.00001) and OS (HR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.00-2.49, p = 0.05) also after removal of studies with a high RoB.
CONCLUSION
While a lack of standardised approach for the detection of amplification is to be considered as a limitation, amplification was found to be prognostic of shorter RFS and OS in BCa. amplification is also predictive of reduced RFS and OS in endocrine therapy treated patients specifically. With standardised methods and cut offs for the detection of amplification, amplification would have potential as a predictive biomarker in breast cancer patients.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020208179.
Topics: Breast Neoplasms; Cyclin D1; Gene Amplification; Humans; Postmenopause; Prognosis; Receptors, Estrogen
PubMed: 35784572
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.895729 -
Medicine Jul 2022Regulator of cullins 1 (ROC1) is frequently overexpressed in multiple tumors, and many pieces of research demonstrate that ROC1 is associated with the prognosis and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Regulator of cullins 1 (ROC1) is frequently overexpressed in multiple tumors, and many pieces of research demonstrate that ROC1 is associated with the prognosis and development of a diversity of neoplasms and it is able to serve as a promising prognostic biomarker. Here we performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic and clinicopathological significance of ROC1 in patients suffering from cancer.
METHODS
We searched Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WanFang database. The role of ROC1 in cancers was evaluated by pooled hazard ratios (HRs), odd ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
In total, 9 studies including 1002 patients were enrolled in this analysis. The pooled results showed that patients with high expression of ROC1 had poor overall survival (OS) (HR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.48-2.60, P < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR: 1.727, 95% CI: 0.965-2.488, P < 0.001). Additionally, elevated expression of ROC1 was significantly correlated with advanced clinical Tumor Node Metastasis stage (OR: 2.708, 95% CI: 1.856-3.951, P < 0.001), positive lymph node metastasis (OR: 1.968; 95% CI: 1.294-2.993, P = .002), large tumor size (OR: 1.522, 95% CI: 1.079-2.149, P = .017) and poor tumor differentiation (OR: 2.448, 95% CI: 1.793-3.344, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Elevated ROC1 expression predicted worse prognosis and advanced pathological parameters in various cancers. ROC1 was a significant prognostic biomarker for poor survival in human cancers.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Carrier Proteins; Cullin Proteins; Humans; Lymphatic Metastasis; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases
PubMed: 35777041
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029806 -
Medicine Jun 2022Cumulative evidence suggests that A-kinase interacting protein 1 (AKIP1) plays an important role in tumor progression. However, the prognostic value of AKIP1 expression... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Cumulative evidence suggests that A-kinase interacting protein 1 (AKIP1) plays an important role in tumor progression. However, the prognostic value of AKIP1 expression in various cancers remains unclear. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of AKIP1 expression in patients with cancer.
METHODS
The PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were systematically searched to identify studies in which the effect of AKIP1 expression on prognosis (overall survival or disease-free survival) was investigated. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined to assess the effect of AKIP1 expression on patient survival. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were pooled to estimate the association between AKIP1 expression and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with cancer.
RESULTS
Nineteen eligible studies, encompassing 3979 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. AKIP1 expression was negatively associated with overall survival (HR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.58-2.18, P < .001) and disease-free survival (HR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.53-1.87, P < .001) in patients with cancer. Moreover, AKIP1 overexpression was positively correlated with adverse clinicopathological features, such as tumor size (OR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.67-2.94, P < .001), clinical stage (OR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.45-2.90, P < .001), depth of tumor invasion (OR = 2.98, 95% CI: 2.21-4.02, P < .001), and degree of lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.75-2.57, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS
High AKIP1 expression is an unfavorable prognostic biomarker and may serve as a potential therapeutic target in patients with cancer.
Topics: Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing; Biomarkers, Tumor; China; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Lymphatic Metastasis; Nuclear Proteins; Prognosis
PubMed: 35758348
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029203 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2022ANO1, a calcium-activated chloride channel (CACC), is also known as transmembrane protein 16A (TMEM16A). It plays a vital role in the occurrence, development,...
ANO1, a calcium-activated chloride channel (CACC), is also known as transmembrane protein 16A (TMEM16A). It plays a vital role in the occurrence, development, metastasis, proliferation, and apoptosis of various malignant tumors. This article reviews the mechanism of ANO1 involved in the replication, proliferation, invasion and apoptosis of various malignant tumors. Various molecules and Stimuli control the expression of ANO1, and the regulatory mechanism of ANO1 is different in tumor cells. To explore the mechanism of ANO1 overexpression and activation of tumor cells by studying the different effects of ANO1. Current studies have shown that ANO1 expression is controlled by 11q13 gene amplification and may also exert cell-specific effects through its interconnected protein network, phosphorylation of different kinases, and signaling pathways. At the same time, ANO1 also resists tumor apoptosis and promotes tumor immune escape. ANO1 can be used as a promising biomarker for detecting certain malignant tumors. Further studies on the channels and the mechanism of protein activity of ANO1 are needed. Finally, the latest inhibitors of ANO1 are summarized, which provides the research direction for the tumor-promoting mechanism of ANO1.
PubMed: 35734591
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.922838 -
Cancer Reports (Hoboken, N.J.) Sep 2022Circular RNA (circRNA) myosin light chain kinase (circMYLK) has recently received increasing attention in cancer biology. Several studies have suggested that circMYLK... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Circular RNA (circRNA) myosin light chain kinase (circMYLK) has recently received increasing attention in cancer biology. Several studies have suggested that circMYLK expression is linked to prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics of various malignancies.
AIMS
This study was carried out to systematically review the impact of circMYLK on the progression of multiple cancers and assess the significance of circMYLK in the prognosis and clinicopathological features of the patients.
METHODS
PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were systematically searched until July 2, 2021. For qualitative synthesis, the signaling pathways of circMYLK in the progression of different cancers were summarized. Regarding the meta-analysis, overall survival (OS) and eight clinicopathological characteristics of patients with cancers were addressed. Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated to assess the association of circMYLK with prognostic and clinicopathological features.
RESULTS
Twelve studies investigating the role of circMYLK in cancer progression met the inclusion criteria. Among these, seven studies investigated the prognostic significance of circMYLK, and nine studies ascertained the clinicopathological importance of circMYLK in patients with various malignancies. CircMYLK acts as a tumor promoter circRNA, leading to migration, proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of neoplastic cells and inhibiting their apoptosis through interaction with several miRNAs and corresponding downstream signaling pathways. Overexpression of circMYLK was correlated with poor OS (HR = 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52-2.02) and larger tumor size (OR = 2.90; 95% CI 1.03-8.15), higher T stage (OR = 2.49; 95% CI 1.20-5.18), lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.55; 95% CI 1.41-4.62), and higher TNM stage (OR = 4.62; 95% CI 2.99-7.14).
CONCLUSIONS
CircMYLK is involved in the progression of numerous cancers via different signaling pathways. This circRNA can serve as a promising prognostic biomarker for several types of malignancies. Furthermore, high expression of circMYLK is associated with advanced clinicopathological characteristics in various tumors.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Calcium-Binding Proteins; Humans; Lymphatic Metastasis; Myosin-Light-Chain Kinase; Neoplasms; Prognosis; RNA, Circular
PubMed: 35701309
DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1653 -
Frontiers in Genetics 2022Globally more than two billion people suffer from micronutrient malnutrition (also known as "hidden hunger"). Further, the pregnant women and children in developing...
Globally more than two billion people suffer from micronutrient malnutrition (also known as "hidden hunger"). Further, the pregnant women and children in developing nations are mainly affected by micronutrient deficiencies. One of the most important factors is food insecurity which can be mitigated by improving the nutritional values through biofortification using selective breeding and genetic enhancement techniques. Chickpea is the second most important legume with numerous economic and nutraceutical properties. Therefore, chickpea production needs to be increased from the current level. However, various kind of biotic and abiotic stresses hamper global chickpea production. The emerging popular targets for biofortification in agronomic crops include targeting cytokinin dehydrogenase (). The play essential roles in both physiological and developmental processes and directly impact several agronomic parameters i.e., growth, development, and yield. Manipulation of genes using genome editing tools in several crop plants reveal that are involved in regulation yield, shoot and root growth, and minerals nutrition. Therefore, have become popular targets for yield improvement, their overexpression and mutants can be directly correlated with the increased yield and tolerance to various stresses. Here, we provide detailed information on the different roles of genes in chickpea. In the end, we discuss the utilization of genome editing tool clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR associated protein 9 (CRISPR/Cas9) to engineer genes that can facilitate trait improvement. Overall, recent advancements in and their role in plant growth, stresses and nutrient accumulation are highlighted, which could be used for chickpea improvement.
PubMed: 35669196
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.900324 -
Biology May 2022Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have long been used in research for bone regeneration, with evidence of their beneficial properties. In the segmental area of MSC-based... (Review)
Review
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have long been used in research for bone regeneration, with evidence of their beneficial properties. In the segmental area of MSC-based therapies, MSC-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) have also shown great therapeutic effects in several diseases, including bone healing. This study aimed to assess whether the conditioning of MSCs improves the therapeutic effects of their derived extracellular vesicles for bone regeneration. Electronic research was performed until February 2021 to recover the studies in the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The studies were screened based on the inclusion criteria. Relevant information was extracted, including in vitro and in vivo experiments, and the animal studies were evaluated for risk of bias by the SYRCLE tool. A total of 463 studies were retrieved, and 18 studies met the inclusion criteria (10 studies for their in vitro analysis, and 8 studies for their in vitro and in vivo analysis). The conditioning methods reported included: osteogenic medium; dimethyloxalylglycine; dexamethasone; strontium-substituted calcium silicate; hypoxia; 3D mechanical microenvironment; and the overexpression of miR-375, bone morphogenetic protein-2, and mutant hypoxia-inducible factor-1α. The conditioning methods of MSCs in the reported studies generate exosomes able to significantly promote bone regeneration. However, heterogeneity regarding cell source, conditioning method, EV isolation and concentration, and defect model was observed among the studies. The different conditioning methods reported in this review do improve the therapeutic effects of MSC-derived EVs for bone regeneration, but they still need to be addressed in larger animal models for further clinical application.
PubMed: 35625461
DOI: 10.3390/biology11050733 -
BMC Cancer May 2022Long non-coding RNA P73 antisense RNA 1 T (non-protein coding), also known as Lnc RNA TP73-AS1, is dysregulated in various tumors but the correlation between its... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Long non-coding RNA P73 antisense RNA 1 T (non-protein coding), also known as Lnc RNA TP73-AS1, is dysregulated in various tumors but the correlation between its expression and clinicopathological parameters and/or prognoses in cancer patients is inconclusive. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of Lnc RNA TP73-AS1 for malignancies.
METHODS
We systematically searched four online databases including PubMed, the Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for eligible articles published up to June 29/2020. Odds ratios (ORs) and Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to assess the association of TP73-AS1 expression with prognostic and clinicopathological parameters. We further validated TP73-AS1 expression in various malignancies and its potential prognostic value using the GEPIA online database. We predicted potential biological processes and relevant signal mechanisms through the public databases.
RESULTS
A total of 26 studies examining 14 cancers were analyzed to evaluate the relationship between TP73-AS1 expression, clinicopathological features and prognostic indicators. The results indicated that TP73-AS1 expression markedly correlates with TNM stage (OR = 3.27,95% CI:2.43-4.39, P < 0.00001), tumor size (OR = 3.00, 95%CI:2.08-4.35, P < 0.00001), lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.77, 95%CI:1.42-5.38,P < 0.00001) and distant metastasis (OR = 4.50,95%CI:2. 62-7.73,P < 0.00001). No correlation with age (OR = 1.12,95%CI:0.77-1.64, P > 0.05), gender (OR = 1.08, 95%CI:0.84-1.38, P > 0.05) or differentiation (OR = 1.39, 95%CI:0.71-2.70, P = 0.340) was observed. TP73-AS1 overexpression was a biomarker of poor Overall survival(OS)(HR = 1.85,95%CI:1.53-2.22, P < 0.00001) and Disease-Free-Survival (DFS) (HR = 1.57,95%CI:1.03-2.42, P < 0.05). Dysregulated TP73-AS1 expression and its prognostic value in various cancers was validated based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Further biological function predictions indicated that TP73-AS1 was involved in pro-oncogenic signaling.
CONCLUSIONS
The upregulation of Lnc RNA TP73-AS1 was related to detrimental clinicopathological parameters and can be considered an indicator of poor prognosis for cancer malignancies.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Computational Biology; Humans; Lymphatic Metastasis; Neoplasms; Prognosis; RNA, Long Noncoding; Tumor Protein p73
PubMed: 35614413
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09658-2