-
Hematology/oncology and Stem Cell... Jun 2022Numerous studies have been published regarding outcomes of cancer patients infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus causing... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Numerous studies have been published regarding outcomes of cancer patients infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus causing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. However, most of these are single-center studies with a limited number of patients. To better assess the outcomes of this new infection in this subgroup of susceptible patients, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 infection on cancer patients. We performed a literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus for studies that reported the risk of infection and complications of COVID-19 in cancer patients and retrieved 22 studies (1018 cancer patients). The analysis showed that the frequency of cancer among patients with confirmed COVID-19 was 2.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-3) in the overall cohort. These patients had a mortality of 21.1% (95% CI: 14.7-27.6), severe/critical disease rate of 45.4% (95% CI: 37.4-53.3), intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate of 14.5% (95% CI: 8.5-20.4), and mechanical ventilation rate of 11.7% (95% CI: 5.5-18). The double-arm analysis showed that cancer patients had a higher risk of mortality (odds ratio [OR]=3.23, 95% CI: 1.71-6.13), severe/critical disease (OR=3.91, 95% CI: 2.70-5.67), ICU admission (OR=3.10, 95% CI: 1.85-5.17), and mechanical ventilation (OR=4.86, 95% CI: 1.27-18.65) than non-cancer patients. Furthermore, cancer patients had significantly lower platelet levels and higher D-dimer levels, C-reactive protein levels, and prothrombin time. In conclusion, these results indicate that cancer patients are at a higher risk of COVID-19 infection-related complications. Therefore, cancer patients need diligent preventive care measures and aggressive surveillance for earlier detection of COVID-19 infection.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Respiration, Artificial; Intensive Care Units; Prognosis; Neoplasms
PubMed: 32745466
DOI: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2020.07.005 -
Journal of Medical Virology Feb 2021The outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has posed a grave threat to the global public health. The COVID-19-induced infection is closely related to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has posed a grave threat to the global public health. The COVID-19-induced infection is closely related to coagulation dysfunction in the affected patients. This paper attempts to conduct a meta-analysis and systematically review the blood coagulation indicators in patients with severe COVID-19. A meta-analysis of eligible studies was performed to compare the blood coagulation indicators in patients with severe and nonsevere COVID-19. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between 1 December 2019 and 7 May 2020. A total of 13 studies with 1341 adult patients were enrolled in this analysis. Platelet (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -24.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -34.12 to -15.54; P < .001), d-dimer (WMD = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.09-0.29; P < .001), and fibrinogen (WMD = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.50-1.54; P < .001) were significantly associated with the severity in patients with COVID-19. The meta-analysis revealed that no correlation was evident between an increased severity risk of COVID-19 and activated partial thromboplastin time (WMD = -1.56, 95% CI: -5.77 to 2.64; P = .468) or prothrombin time (WMD = 0.19, 95% CI: -0.13 to 0.51; P = .243). The single arm meta-analysis showed that compared with the nonsevere group, the severe group had a lower pooled platelet (165.12 [95% CI: 157.38-172.85] vs 190.09 [95% CI: 179.45-200.74]), higher d-dimer (0.49 [95% CI: 0.33-0.64] vs 0.27 [95% CI: 0.20-0.34]), and higher fibrinogen (4.34 [95% CI: 1.98-6.70] vs 3.19 [95% CI: 1.13-5.24]). Coagulation dysfunction is closely related to the severity of patients with COVID-19, in which low platelet, high d-dimer, and fibrinogen upon admission may serve as risk indicators for increased aggression of the disease. These findings are of great clinical value for timely and effective treatment of the COVID-19 cases.
Topics: Blood Coagulation Disorders; Blood Platelets; COVID-19; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Fibrinogen; Hospitalization; Humans; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index
PubMed: 32706426
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26346 -
Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) Apr 2021Several recent studies have reported an abnormal liver chemistry profile among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), although its clinical significance... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Several recent studies have reported an abnormal liver chemistry profile among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), although its clinical significance remains unknown.
APPROACH AND RESULTS
This systematic review and meta-analysis identified six studies of 586 patients delineating liver chemistries among patients with severe/critical illness versus mild cases of COVID-19 infection. Patients with severe/critical illness with COVID-19 infection have increased prevalence of coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as compared with mild cases. A significant association between severe/critical COVID-19 infections with elevations in aspartate aminotransferase (pooled mean difference [MD], 11.70 U/L; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.97, 20.43; P = 0.009), elevated total bilirubin (pooled MD, 0.14 mg/dL; 95% CI, 0.06, 0.22; P = 0.0005), and decreased albumin (pooled MD, -0.68 g/L; 95% CI, -0.81, -0.55; P < 0.00001) was noted. There was also a trend toward elevated alanine aminotransferase levels among these severe cases (pooled MD, 8.84 U/L; 95% CI, -2.28, 19.97; P = 0.12); however, this did not reach statistical significance. More severe/critically ill cases were associated with leukocytosis, neutrophilia, lymphopenia, elevated creatinine kinase, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and elevated prothrombin time (PT).
CONCLUSIONS
Comorbidities, including coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, are more prevalent in hospitalized Chinese patients with severe/critical illness from COVID-19, and these patients are more likely to manifest with abnormal liver chemistries. Further prospective studies are crucial to understand the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying the hepatic manifestations of the novel COVID-19 infection and its clinical significance.
Topics: Alanine Transaminase; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Bilirubin; Biomarkers; COVID-19; China; Comorbidity; Critical Illness; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Liver; Liver Diseases; Liver Function Tests; Male; SARS-CoV-2; Serum Albumin; Severity of Illness Index
PubMed: 32692464
DOI: 10.1002/hep.31472 -
Thrombosis and Haemostasis Nov 2020The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the prevalence of coagulation dysfunction in Chinese COVID-19 patients and to determine the association of coagulopathy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the prevalence of coagulation dysfunction in Chinese COVID-19 patients and to determine the association of coagulopathy with the severity and prognosis of COVID-19.
METHODS
A meta-analysis of the prevalence of different abnormal coagulation indicators in COVID-19 patients in China was performed. The difference of coagulation indicators and the incidence of DIC were compared between severe cases and nonsevere cases as well as nonsurvivors and survivors, respectively.
RESULTS
A total of 22 Chinese studies involving 4,889 confirmed COVID-19 inpatients were included. The average D-dimer value of COVID-19 patients is 0.67 µg/mL (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.78), and 29.3% (95% CI: 20.1-38.5%) of patients showed elevated D-dimer values. Severe patients had significantly higher D-dimer levels and prolonged prothrombin time (PT) compared with nonsevere patients. Nonsurvivors had significantly higher D-dimer levels, prolonged PT, and decreased platelet count compared with survivors. In total, 6.2% (95% CI: 2.6-9.9%) COVID-19 patients were complicated by disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), in which the log risk ratio in nonsurvivors was 3.267 (95% CI: 2.191-4.342, = 5.95, < 0.05) compared with that in survivors.
CONCLUSION
The prevalence of coagulopathy in Chinese COVID-19 inpatients is high, and both the abnormal coagulation indicators and DIC are closely associated with the severity and poor prognosis of these COVID-19 patients. Therefore, attention should be paid to coagulation dysfunction in COVID-19 patients. Closely monitoring of coagulation indicators and application of appropriate anticoagulation may improve the prognosis of COVID-19 inpatients in China.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Blood Coagulation Disorders; COVID-19; China; Coronavirus Infections; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pandemics; Pneumonia, Viral; Prevalence; Prognosis; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index
PubMed: 32679593
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714369 -
Medicine Jun 2020This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of glucocorticoid versus traditional therapy for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related acute-on-chronic liver... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of glucocorticoid versus traditional therapy for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF).
METHODS
PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, and EMBASE were searched. All clinical studies, including randomized controlled studies and cohort studies, comparing glucocorticoids with traditional treatments (until November 1, 2018), were included.
RESULTS
A total of 3 randomized controlled trials and 5 cohort studies (including 3 retrospective cohort studies), involving 538 patients, were subjected to the meta-analysis. The total bilirubin levels before treatment were not significantly different (odds ratio [OR]: -0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.56 to 0.62; P = .23), and, however, they were significantly reduced after treatment in the corticosteroid group compared with the traditional treatment group (OR: -8.83; 95% CI: -14.99 to 2.67; P = .005). Moreover, prothrombin time was significantly long before treatment in either group, with no significant differences (OR: 0.28; 95% CI: -0.79 to 1.34; P = 0.61). However, after treatment, prothrombin time was significantly shortened in the traditional treatment group (OR: 31.71; 95% CI: 3.62-59.81; P = .03). Furthermore, inpatient mortality (OR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.08-0.67; P = .007) and ascites events (OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.18-0.67; P = .90) were significantly lower in the corticosteroid treatment group.
CONCLUSIONS
Glucocorticoid is more effective for reducing the T-bili level, significantly decreasing in-hospital mortality and ascites events in HBV-related ACLF patients. Moreover, bilirubin may play a pivotal role in the early stage of HBV-related ACLF progression to advanced liver failure.
Topics: Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure; Antiviral Agents; Bilirubin; Cohort Studies; Disease Progression; Glucocorticoids; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 32569189
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020604 -
International Journal of... Apr 2020Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). APL is famed with some special blood coagulation disorders such as disseminated... (Review)
Review
Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is a subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). APL is famed with some special blood coagulation disorders such as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The therapeutic methods of APL contain All Trans Retinoic Acid (ATRA), arsenic trioxide (ATO) or/and chemotherapy. Many studies have been done on APL blood disorders and its treatment. These studies have shown different results. In this systematic article, we tried to review the effect of ATO therapy with or without ATRA and chemotherapy on DIC parameters (D-dimer, Prothrombin Time, Activated Partial Thrombin Time, Platelet count) in APL patients. The result of included studies demonstrated that although ATO can reduce the number of malignant cells in the bone marrow and peripheral blood, it does not have enough potential to attenuate the danger of high score DIC that is usual in APL patients and should be better to be used with other therapeutic methods.
PubMed: 32461798
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Medical Virology Oct 2020Recently, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is the most significant global health crisis. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to find the association... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Recently, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is the most significant global health crisis. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to find the association between liver injuries and the severity of COVID-19 disease. Online databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Science direct, were searched to detect relevant publications up to 16 April 2020. Depending on the heterogeneity between studies, a fixed- or random-effects model was applied to pool data. Publication bias Egger's test was also performed. Meta-analysis of 20 retrospective studies (3428 patients), identified that patients with a severe manifestation of COVID-19 exhibited significantly higher levels of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and bilirubin values with prolonged prothrombin time. Furthermore, lower albumin level was associated with a severe presentation of COVID-19. Liver dysfunction was associated with a severe outcome of COVID-19 disease. Close monitoring of the occurrence of liver dysfunction is beneficial in early warning of unfavorable outcomes.
Topics: Alanine Transaminase; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Bilirubin; COVID-19; Humans; Liver; Liver Diseases; Prothrombin Time
PubMed: 32445489
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.26055 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine May 2020The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infection has been predominantly linked to respiratory distress syndrome, but... (Review)
Review
The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infection has been predominantly linked to respiratory distress syndrome, but gastrointestinal symptoms and hepatic injury have also been reported. The mechanism of liver injury is poorly understood and may result as a consequence of viral hepatitis, systemic inflammatory response, gut barrier and microbiome alterations, intensive care treatment or drug toxicity. The incidence of hepatopathy among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unclear, but studies have reported liver injury in patients with SARS and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS). We aimed to systematically review data on the prevalence of hepatic impairments and their clinical course in SARS and MERS infections. A systematic literature search (PubMed/Embase/Cinahl/Web of Science) according to preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA) was conducted from database inception until 17/03/2020 for studies that evaluated the incidence of hepatic abnormalities in SARS CoV-1, SARS CoV-2 and MERS infected patients with reported liver-related parameters. A total of forty-three studies were included. Liver anomalies were predominantly mild to moderately elevated transaminases, hypoalbuminemia and prolongation of prothrombin time. Histopathology varied between non-specific inflammation, mild steatosis, congestion and massive necrosis. More studies to elucidate the mechanism and importance of liver injury on the clinical course and prognosis in patients with novel SARS-CoV-2 infection are warranted.
PubMed: 32403255
DOI: 10.3390/jcm9051420 -
Thrombosis and Haemostasis Jun 2020The novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is clinically characterized by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which is responsible for a high number...
The novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) is clinically characterized by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which is responsible for a high number of patients needing mechanical ventilation or intensive care units treatment and for the elevated mortality risk. A link between COVID-19 and multiorgan failure may be dependent on the fact that most COVID-19 patients are complicated by pneumonia, which is known to be associated with early changes of clotting and platelet activation and artery dysfunction; these changes may implicate in thrombotic-related events such as myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke. Recent data showed that myocardial injury compatible with coronary ischemia may be detectable in SARS-CoV-2 patients and laboratory data exploring clotting system suggest the presence of a hypercoagulation state. Thus, we performed a systematic review of COVID-19 literature reporting measures of clotting activation to assess if changes are detectable in this setting and their relationship with clinical severity. Furthermore, we discussed the biologic plausibility of the thrombotic risk in SARS-CoV-2 and the potential use of an antithrombotic treatment.
Topics: Algorithms; Betacoronavirus; COVID-19; Cardiology; Coronavirus Infections; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Fibrinolytic Agents; Humans; Liver Failure; Pandemics; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Platelet Count; Pneumonia, Viral; Prothrombin Time; Risk; SARS-CoV-2; Thrombophilia; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32349133
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1710317 -
BioMed Research International 2020Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic agent, interferes with fibrinolysis and has been used for many years to reduce blood loss during spine surgery. The purpose of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic agent, interferes with fibrinolysis and has been used for many years to reduce blood loss during spine surgery. The purpose of our meta-analysis was to compare the effect of intravenous versus topical administration of TXA in patients undergoing nondeformity spine surgery.
METHODS
We searched multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, CNKI, WanFang database, and VIP to find studies that met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis was performed according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook.
RESULTS
Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified, including 660 patients. The surgical methods used in the included studies were nondeformity spine surgery. No significant differences were found in the two groups regarding total blood loss, intraoperative blood loss, hidden blood loss, hematocrit, hemoglobin, fibrinogen, postoperative prothrombin time (PT), postoperative activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), drainage volume, and blood transfusion rate. There were statistically significant differences in the two groups in terms of preoperative PT (MD = -0.39, 95% CI: [-0.63, -0.15], =0.002) and preoperative APTT (MD = 1.12, 95% CI: [0.57, 1.68], =0.002) and preoperative APTT (MD = 1.12, 95% CI: [0.57, 1.68].
CONCLUSION
During nondeformity spine surgery, intravenous administration of TXA did not have a significant effect on the decrease of blood loss and blood transfusion rate compared with the topical group. According to the pooled analysis of PT and APTT, intravenous and topical application of TXA may have different effects on the coagulation pathway. More high-quality RCTs are needed to explore the optimal dosage, method, timing in the future in order to recommend TXA widespread use in spine surgery.
Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Antifibrinolytic Agents; Blood Loss, Surgical; Blood Transfusion; Databases, Factual; Drainage; Fibrinogen; Fibrinolysis; Hematocrit; Hemoglobins; Humans; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Postoperative Period; Spine; Tranexamic Acid
PubMed: 32219141
DOI: 10.1155/2020/7403034