-
Arthritis Research & Therapy Mar 2024Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are widely used for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, there are no established biomarkers to predict a... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Urinary prostanoids are elevated by anti-TNF and anti-IL6 receptor disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs but are not predictive of response to treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis.
BACKGROUND
Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are widely used for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, there are no established biomarkers to predict a patient's response to these therapies. Prostanoids, encompassing prostaglandins, prostacyclins, and thromboxanes, are potent lipid mediators implicated in RA progression. Nevertheless, the influence of DMARDs on prostanoid biosynthesis in RA patients remains poorly understood. This study aims to assess the impact of various DMARDs on urinary prostanoids levels and to explore whether urinary prostanoid profiles correlate with disease activity or response to therapy.
METHODS
This study included 152 Swedish female patients with early RA, all rheumatoid factor (RF) positive, enrolled in the NORD-STAR trial (registration number: NCT01491815). Participants were randomized into four therapeutic regimes: methotrexate (MTX) combined with (i) prednisolone (arm ACT), (ii) TNF-α blocker certolizumab pegol (arm CZP), (iii) CTLA-4Ig abatacept (arm ABA), or (iv) IL-6R blocker tocilizumab (arm TCZ). Urine samples, collected before start of treatment and at 24 weeks post-treatment, were analyzed for tetranor-prostaglandin E metabolite (tPGEM), tetranor-prostaglandin D metabolite (tPGDM), 2,3-dinor thromboxane B (TXBM), 2,3-dinor-6-keto prostaglandin F (PGIM), leukotriene E (LTE) and 12-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (12-HETE) using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were used to analyze the change in urinary eicosanoids and their correlations to clinical outcomes.
RESULTS
Patients receiving MTX combined with CZP or TCZ exhibited significant elevations in urinary tPGEM and TXBM levels after 24 weeks of treatment. Other eicosanoids did not show significant alterations in response to any treatment. Baseline urinary eicosanoid levels did not correlate with baseline clinical disease activity index (CDAI) levels, nor with changes in CDAI from baseline to week 24. Their levels were also similar between patients who achieved CDAI remission and those with active disease at week 24.
CONCLUSIONS
Treatment with anti-TNF or anti-IL6R agents in early RA patients leads to an increased systemic production of proinflammatory and prothrombotic prostanoids. However, urinary eicosanoid levels do not appear to be predictive of the response to DMARDs therapy.
Topics: Humans; Female; Prostaglandins; Antirheumatic Agents; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Methotrexate; Certolizumab Pegol; Dimaprit
PubMed: 38444034
DOI: 10.1186/s13075-024-03295-9 -
Microbiology Spectrum Apr 2024Studies investigating the immunogenicity of additional COVID-19 vaccine doses in immunosuppressed patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) are still limited....
The serological immunogenicity of the third and fourth doses of COVID-19 vaccine in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases on different biologic or targeted DMARDs: a Swedish nationwide study (COVID-19-REUMA).
UNLABELLED
Studies investigating the immunogenicity of additional COVID-19 vaccine doses in immunosuppressed patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) are still limited. The objective was to explore the antibody response including response to omicron virus subvariants (sBA.1 and sBS.2) after third and fourth COVID-19 vaccine doses in Swedish IRD patients treated with immunomodulating drugs compared to controls. Antibody levels to spike wild-type antigens (full-length protein and S1) and the omicron variants sBA.1 and sBA.2 (full-length proteins) were measured. A positive response was defined as having antibody levels over cut-off or ≥fourfold increase in post-vaccination levels for both antigens. Patients with arthritis, vasculitis, and other autoimmune diseases ( = 414), and controls ( = 61) receiving biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) with or without conventional synthetic DMARDs participated. Of these, blood samples were available for 370 patients and 52 controls after three doses, and 65 patients and 15 controls after four doses. Treatment groups after three vaccine doses were rituximab ( = 133), abatacept ( = 22), IL6r inhibitors ( = 71), JAnus Kinase inhibitors (JAK-inhibitors) ( = 56), tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNF-inhibitors) ( = 61), IL12/23/17 inhibitors ( = 27), and controls ( = 52). The percentage of responders after three and four vaccine doses was lower in rituximab-treated patients (59% and 57%) compared to controls (100%) ( < 0.001). After three doses, the percentage of responders in all other groups was 100%, including response to omicron sBA.1 and sBA.2. In rituximab-treated patients, higher baseline immunoglobulin G (IgG) and longer time-period between rituximab and vaccination predicted better response. In this Swedish nationwide study including IRD patients three and four COVID-19 vaccine doses were immunogenic in patients treated with IL6r inhibitors, TNF-inhibitors, JAK-inhibitors, and IL12/23/17-inhibitors but not in rituximab. As >50% of rituximab patients responded to vaccines including omicron subvariants, these patients should be prioritized for additional vaccine doses.
IMPORTANCE
Results from this study provide further evidence that additional doses of COVID-19 vaccines are immunogenic and result in satisfactory antibody response in a majority of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) receiving potent immunomodulating treatments such as biological or targeted disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) given as monotherapy or combined with traditional DMARDs. We observed that rituximab treatment, both as monotherapy and combined with csDMARDs, impaired antibody response, and only roughly 50% of patients developed a satisfactory antibody response including response to omicron subvariants after the third vaccine. In addition, higher IgG levels at the last rituximab course before the third vaccine dose and a longer time after the last rituximab treatment increased the chance of a satisfactory antibody response. These results indicate that rituximab-treated patients should be prioritized for additional vaccine doses.
CLINICAL TRIALS
EudraCT (European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database) with number 2021-000880-63.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19 Vaccines; COVID-19; Rituximab; Sweden; SARS-CoV-2; Antirheumatic Agents; Rheumatic Fever; Immunoglobulin G; Interleukin-12; Antibodies, Viral; Immunogenicity, Vaccine
PubMed: 38441463
DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.02981-23 -
Journal of Pharmaceutical and... May 2024T-cells play a significant role in the development of autoimmune diseases. The CD28-B7 costimulatory pathway is crucial for activating T-cells, and blocking this pathway...
T-cells play a significant role in the development of autoimmune diseases. The CD28-B7 costimulatory pathway is crucial for activating T-cells, and blocking this pathway is essential for treating autoimmune diseases. Therapeutic antibodies and fusion proteins that target costimulatory molecules like CD80, CD86, CTLA-4, and CD28 have been developed to explore the costimulation process and as targeted treatments. To advance our understanding of costimulation in autoimmunity and the inhibition of the costimulatory pathway, it is crucial to have an accurate, precise, and direct method for detecting and quantifying the soluble form of these molecules in body fluids and various biological systems. Herein, we developed a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for quantifying the four costimulatory proteins depending on the signature peptides derived from the soluble isoform of these proteins in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. The method was validated using the US FDA guidelines. The LOQ was determined as ∼0.5 nM for the four analytes, with quantification extended to 20 nM with a correlation coefficient of R>0.998. The developed MRM method was used to analyze on-bead digested protein mixtures to establish a competitive assay for the CD28-B7 costimulatory pathway using CTLA4-Ig (Abatacept ™) as an FDA-approved drug for rheumatoid arthritis. The IC was determined to be 2.99 and 159.8 nM for sCD80 and sCD86, respectively. A straightforward MRM-based competitive assay will advance the knowledge about the costimulatory role in autoimmunity and the autoimmune therapeutic drug discovery, with the need for broad application on different in vitro and in vivo models to discover new targeted inhibitors.
Topics: Humans; CD28 Antigens; Antigens, CD; B7-2 Antigen; Chromatography, Liquid; Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Immunoconjugates; B7-1 Antigen; Abatacept; Autoimmune Diseases
PubMed: 38422671
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2024.116034 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2024The evaluation of microvascular alterations might provide clinically useful information for patients with an increased cardiovascular (CV) risk, such as those with...
Retinal microvascular alterations in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis without cardiovascular risk factors: the potential effects of T cell co-stimulation blockade.
BACKGROUND
The evaluation of microvascular alterations might provide clinically useful information for patients with an increased cardiovascular (CV) risk, such as those with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), being the small artery remodeling the earliest form of target organ damage in primary CV diseases, such as arterial hypertension. The evaluation of retinal arterioles is a non-invasive technique aimed to identify an early microvascular damage, represented by the increase of the wall-to-lumen ratio (WLR) index. Abatacept (ABA), a T-cell co-stimulator blocker, is used to treat RA. A CV protective action was hypothesized for its peculiar mechanism of action in the modulation of T-cells, potentially involved in the pathogenesis of CV comorbidity. The study aimed to non-invasively investigate morphological characteristics of retinal arterioles in a cohort of RA patients treated with ABA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Seventeen RA patients [median (25th-75thpercentile) age = 58 (48-64) years, baseline 28-joint Disease Activity Score DAS28-C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) = 4.4 (3.9-4.6), body mass index (BMI) = 24.2 (23.4-26) kg/m, rheumatoid factor positive:52.9%, anti-citrullinated peptide autoantibodies positive:76.5%] without known CV risk factors (arterial hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, previous CV events, smoking) were evaluated by the adaptive optics imaging system of retinal arterioles before and every 6 months of therapy with ABA (T0, T6 and T12). Office blood pressure evaluation, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and tissue-doppler echocardiography were also performed.
RESULTS
A progressive significant reduction of the WLR of retinal arterioles was observed [T0 = 0.28 (0.25-0.30), T6 = 0.27 (0.24-0.31), T12 = 0.23 (0.23-0.26); p T0 vs. T6 = 0.414; p T6 vs. T12 = 0.02; p T0 vs. T12 = 0.009], without significant variations in other parameters. The T0-T12 reduction of WLR was correlated with that of DAS28-CRP (r:0.789; = 0.005). Moreover, a significant reduction of diastolic office blood pressure and a trend for reduction of daily pressure measured by ambulatory monitoring were observed.
CONCLUSION
In a cohort of RA patients without known CV risk factors, a reduction of retinal microvascular alterations was demonstrated after treatment for 12 months with ABA, in parallel with the reduction of disease activity. These results might suggest the possibility of microvascular abnormalities regression induced by the immune system modulation.
PubMed: 38420362
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1247024 -
Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) Feb 2024Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is a class of anti-rheumatic medicines that are frequently prescribed to patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis... (Review)
Review
Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is a class of anti-rheumatic medicines that are frequently prescribed to patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methotrexate, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, and azathioprine are examples of non-biologic DMARDs that are being used for alleviating pain and preventing disease progression. Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) like infliximab, rituximab, etanercept, adalimumab, tocilizumab, certolizumab pegol, and abatacept have greater effectiveness with fewer adverse effects in comparison to non-biologic DMARDs. This review article delineates the classification of DMARDs and their characteristic attributes. The poor aqueous solubility or permeability causes the limited oral bioavailability of synthetic DMARDs, while the high molecular weights along with the bulky structures of bDMARDs have posed few obstacles in their drug delivery and need to be addressed through the development of nanoformulations like cubosomes, nanospheres, nanoemulsions, solid lipid nanoparticles, nanomicelles, liposome, niosomes, and nanostructured lipid carrier. The main focus of this review article is to highlight the potential role of nanotechnology in the drug delivery of DMARDs for increasing solubility, dissolution, and bioavailability for the improved management of RA. This article also focusses on the different aspects of nanoparticles like their applications in biologics, biocompatibility, body clearance, scalability, drug loading, and stability issues.
PubMed: 38399463
DOI: 10.3390/ph17020248 -
Lancet (London, England) Mar 2024Individuals with serum antibodies to citrullinated protein antigens (ACPA), rheumatoid factor, and symptoms, such as inflammatory joint pain, are at high risk of... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Individuals with serum antibodies to citrullinated protein antigens (ACPA), rheumatoid factor, and symptoms, such as inflammatory joint pain, are at high risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis. In the arthritis prevention in the pre-clinical phase of rheumatoid arthritis with abatacept (APIPPRA) trial, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and acceptability of treating high risk individuals with the T-cell co-stimulation modulator abatacept.
METHODS
The APIPPRA study was a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, parallel, placebo-controlled, phase 2b clinical trial done in 28 hospital-based early arthritis clinics in the UK and three in the Netherlands. Participants (aged ≥18 years) at risk of rheumatoid arthritis positive for ACPA and rheumatoid factor with inflammatory joint pain were recruited. Exclusion criteria included previous episodes of clinical synovitis and previous use of corticosteroids or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer-generated permuted block randomisation (block sizes of 2 and 4) stratified by sex, smoking, and country, to 125 mg abatacept subcutaneous injections weekly or placebo for 12 months, and then followed up for 12 months. Masking was achieved by providing four kits (identical in appearance and packaging) with pre-filled syringes with coded labels of abatacept or placebo every 3 months. The primary endpoint was the time to development of clinical synovitis in three or more joints or rheumatoid arthritis according to American College of Rheumatology and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology 2010 criteria, whichever was met first. Synovitis was confirmed by ultrasonography. Follow-up was completed on Jan 13, 2021. All participants meeting the intention-to-treat principle were included in the analysis. This trial was registered with EudraCT (2013-003413-18).
FINDINGS
Between Dec 22, 2014, and Jan 14, 2019, 280 individuals were evaluated for eligibility and, of 213 participants, 110 were randomly assigned to abatacept and 103 to placebo. During the treatment period, seven (6%) of 110 participants in the abatacept group and 30 (29%) of 103 participants in the placebo group met the primary endpoint. At 24 months, 27 (25%) of 110 participants in the abatacept group had progressed to rheumatoid arthritis, compared with 38 (37%) of 103 in the placebo group. The estimated proportion of participants remaining arthritis-free at 12 months was 92·8% (SE 2·6) in the abatacept group and 69·2% (4·7) in the placebo group. Kaplan-Meier arthritis-free survival plots over 24 months favoured abatacept (log-rank test p=0·044). The difference in restricted mean survival time between groups was 53 days (95% CI 28-78; p<0·0001) at 12 months and 99 days (95% CI 38-161; p=0·0016) at 24 months in favour of abatacept. During treatment, abatacept was associated with improvements in pain scores, functional wellbeing, and quality-of-life measurements, as well as low scores of subclinical synovitis by ultrasonography, compared with placebo. However, the effects were not sustained at 24 months. Seven serious adverse events occurred in the abatacept group and 11 in the placebo group, including one death in each group deemed unrelated to treatment.
INTERPRETATION
Therapeutic intervention during the at-risk phase of rheumatoid arthritis is feasible, with acceptable safety profiles. T-cell co-stimulation modulation with abatacept for 12 months reduces progression to rheumatoid arthritis, with evidence of sustained efficacy beyond the treatment period, and with no new safety signals.
FUNDING
Bristol Myers Squibb.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Humans; Abatacept; Arthralgia; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Pain; Rheumatoid Factor; Synovitis
PubMed: 38364839
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02649-1 -
Bone Marrow Transplantation May 2024Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) offers a curative option for patients with certain non-malignant hematological diseases. High-dose...
Low dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide and sirolimus induce mixed chimerism with CTLA4-Ig or lymphocyte depletion in an MHC-mismatched murine allotransplantation model.
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) offers a curative option for patients with certain non-malignant hematological diseases. High-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) (200 mg/kg) and sirolimus (3 mg/kg), (HiC) synergistically induce stable mixed chimerism. Further, sirolimus and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 immunoglobulin (CTLA4-Ig), also known as Abatacept (Aba), promote immune tolerance and allograft survival. Here, in a major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-mismatched allo-HCT murine model, we combined Aba and/or T-cell depleting anti-Thy1.2 (Thy) with a lower dose of PT-Cy (50 mg/kg) and Sirolimus (3 mg/kg), (LoC). While mice in the LoC group showed graft rejection, the addition of Thy to LoC induced similar donor chimerism levels when compared to the HiC group. However, the addition of Aba to LoC led to graft acceptance only in younger mice. When Thy was added to the LoC+Aba setting, graft acceptance was restored in both age groups. Engrafted groups displayed significantly reduced frequencies of recipient-specific interferon-γ-producing T cells as well as an increased frequency in regulatory T cells (Tregs) except in the LoC+Aba group. Splenocytes from engrafted mice showed no proliferation upon restimulation with Balb/c stimulators. Collectively, in combination with Aba or Thy, LoC may be considered to reduce graft rejection in patients who undergo allo-HCT.
Topics: Animals; Cyclophosphamide; Sirolimus; Mice; Abatacept; Lymphocyte Depletion; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Transplantation Chimera; Transplantation, Homologous; Allografts
PubMed: 38347187
DOI: 10.1038/s41409-024-02237-y -
Arthritis Research & Therapy Feb 2024Machine learning models can support an individualized approach in the choice of bDMARDs. We developed prediction models for 5 different bDMARDs using machine learning...
OBJECTIVES
Machine learning models can support an individualized approach in the choice of bDMARDs. We developed prediction models for 5 different bDMARDs using machine learning methods based on patient data derived from the Austrian Biologics Registry (BioReg).
METHODS
Data from 1397 patients and 19 variables with at least 100 treat-to-target (t2t) courses per drug were derived from the BioReg biologics registry. Different machine learning algorithms were trained to predict the risk of ineffectiveness for each bDMARD within the first 26 weeks. Cross-validation and hyperparameter optimization were applied to generate the best models. Model quality was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC). Using explainable AI (XAI), risk-reducing and risk-increasing factors were extracted.
RESULTS
The best models per drug achieved an AUROC score of the following: abatacept, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54-0.78); adalimumab, 0.70 (95% CI, 0.68-0.74); certolizumab, 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.89); etanercept, 0.68 (95% CI, 0.55-0.87); tocilizumab, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.69-0.77). The most risk-increasing variables were visual analytic scores (VAS) for abatacept and etanercept and co-therapy with glucocorticoids for adalimumab. Dosage was the most important variable for certolizumab and associated with a lower risk of non-response. Some variables, such as gender and rheumatoid factor (RF), showed opposite impacts depending on the bDMARD.
CONCLUSION
Ineffectiveness of biological drugs could be predicted with promising accuracy. Interestingly, individual parameters were found to be associated with drug responses in different directions, indicating highly complex interactions. Machine learning can be of help in the decision-process by disentangling these relations.
Topics: Humans; Antirheumatic Agents; Etanercept; Adalimumab; Abatacept; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Austria; Biological Products; Certolizumab Pegol; Registries; Artificial Intelligence
PubMed: 38331930
DOI: 10.1186/s13075-024-03277-x -
BMJ Open Feb 2024Obesity is associated with lower treatment response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In patients with obesity, abatacept was suggested as a preferable option... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
OBJECTIVES
Obesity is associated with lower treatment response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In patients with obesity, abatacept was suggested as a preferable option to tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors. We aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of etanercept, infliximab and abatacept, compared with adalimumab, in patients with RA with obesity. Secondarily, we also investigated this in patients with overweight and normal weight for completeness.
DESIGN
Observational cohort study.
SETTING
Swiss Clinical Quality Management in Rheumatic Diseases (SCQM) registry (1997-2019).
PARTICIPANTS
Adult patients with RA from the SCQM registry who received etanercept, infliximab, abatacept or adalimumab as their first biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug were classified based on their body mass index (BMI) at the start of that treatment in three cohorts: obese, overweight, normal weight. They were followed for a maximum of 1 year.
EXPOSURE
The study exposure of interest was the patients' first biological, particularly: etanercept, infliximab and abatacept, compared with adalimumab.
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES
The primary study outcome was remission within 12 months, defined as 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) <2.6. Missingness was addressed using confounder-adjusted response rate with attrition correction. Logistic regression was used to compare the effectiveness of etanercept, infliximab and abatacept versus adalimumab. Each BMI cohort was addressed and analysed separately.
RESULTS
The study included 443 obese, 829 overweight and 1243 normal weight patients with RA. There were no statistically significant differences in the odds of DAS28-remission at ≤12 months for etanercept, infliximab and abatacept, compared with adalimumab, in any of the BMI cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS
No differences in DAS28-remission were found between the study drugs and adalimumab as first biologic in patients with RA, independently of the BMI cohort. We did not find evidence that treatment with abatacept increased the likelihood of remission compared with adalimumab among obese patients with RA.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Etanercept; Adalimumab; Infliximab; Abatacept; Body Mass Index; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Cohort Studies; Overweight; Switzerland; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Antirheumatic Agents; Biological Factors; Biological Products; Registries; Obesity
PubMed: 38331859
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074864 -
Frontiers in Bioscience (Landmark... Jan 2024Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a relatively common systemic autoimmune disease with an estimated prevalence of approximately 1% worldwide. Patients present predominantly... (Review)
Review
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a relatively common systemic autoimmune disease with an estimated prevalence of approximately 1% worldwide. Patients present predominantly with symmetrical small joint inflammatory arthritis, which involves dysregulated immune responses, leading to bone and cartilage deformities due to extensive erosive damage. The introduction of biological based therapies for the management of this life-altering condition, over the past three decades, has led to marked improvements in patients' quality of life. A wide range of both innate and adaptive immune cells are involved in the pathogenesis of RA, with a complex interplay of cytokines, T-cells, B-cells, and dendritic cells. Some of these cells have been successfully targeted in the treatment of RA by the use of biologics-based therapies. For example, rituximab therapy blocks B cell activation and abatacept effectively blocks T cell activation in patients with RA. Despite these advances, there remain some patients who are resistant to all current therapeutic options, which has encouraged further research into understanding the primary signal transduction pathways that mediate the disease. In this review we discuss the roles of the main signalling pathways, including metabolic reprogramming that have been implicated in RA disease progression, in order to develop a conceptual framework for more precise deployment of existing therapies, and to provide a rationale for producing molecular inhibitors of these pathways. Improved knowledge of the many intracellular signalling pathways in RA will complement current precision medicine strategies, particularly for the patients with difficult-to-treat RA, and especially in those with multidrug resistance disease.
Topics: Humans; Quality of Life; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cytokines; Signal Transduction; Disease Progression
PubMed: 38287839
DOI: 10.31083/j.fbl2901042