-
Canadian Association of Radiologists... May 2024Artificial intelligence (AI) is a rapidly growing field with significant implications for radiology. Acute abdominal pain is a common clinical presentation that can... (Review)
Review
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a rapidly growing field with significant implications for radiology. Acute abdominal pain is a common clinical presentation that can range from benign conditions to life-threatening emergencies. The critical nature of these situations renders emergent abdominal imaging an ideal candidate for AI applications. CT, radiographs, and ultrasound are the most common modalities for imaging evaluation of these patients. For each modality, numerous studies have assessed the performance of AI models for detecting common pathologies, such as appendicitis, bowel obstruction, and cholecystitis. The capabilities of these models range from simple classification to detailed severity assessment. This narrative review explores the evolution, trends, and challenges in AI applications for evaluating acute abdominal pathologies. We review implementations of AI for non-traumatic and traumatic abdominal pathologies, with discussion of potential clinical impact, challenges, and future directions for the technology.
PubMed: 38715249
DOI: 10.1177/08465371241250197 -
Surgery Open Science Jun 2024An alternative method to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC) is the "fundus first" method (FFLC). Concerns have been raised that FFLC can lead to...
BACKGROUND
An alternative method to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC) is the "fundus first" method (FFLC). Concerns have been raised that FFLC can lead to misinterpretation of important anatomical structures, thus causing complications of a more serious kind than SLC. Comparisons between the methods are complicated by the fact that FFLC is often used as a rescue procedure in complicated cases. To avoid confounding related to this we conducted a population-based study with comparisons on the surgeon level.
METHOD
In GallRiks, the Swedish registry for Gallbladder surgery, we stratified all cholecystectomies performed 2006-2020 in three groups: surgeries carried out by surgeons that uses FFLC in <20 % of the cases (N = 150,119), in 20-79 % of the cases (N = 10,212) and in 80 % or more of the cases (N = 3176). We compared the groups with logistic regression, adjusting for sex, age, surgical experience, year of surgery and history of acute cholecystitis. All surgical complications (bleeding, gallbladder perforation, visceral perforation, infection, and bile duct injury) were included as outcome. A separate analysis was done with regards to operation time.
RESULTS
No difference in incidence of all surgical complications or bile duct injury were seen between groups. The rates of bleeding (OR 0.34 [0.14-0.86]) and gallbladder perforation (OR 0.61 [0.45-0.82]) were significantly lower in the "fundus first > 80% group" and the operative time was shorter (OR 0.76 [0.69-0.83]).
CONCLUSION
In this study including >160,000 cholecystectomies, both methods was found to be equally safe.
KEY MESSAGE
During laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the standard method of dissection and fundus first dissection are equally safe surgical techniques. Surgeons need to learn both methods to be able to use the one most appropriate for each individual case.
PubMed: 38706518
DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.04.004 -
Journal of Surgical Case Reports May 2024The use of indocyanine green for fluorescent cholangiography in patients with cholecystitis initially treated with percutaneous cholecystostomy drainage catheters was...
The use of indocyanine green for fluorescent cholangiography in patients with cholecystitis initially treated with percutaneous cholecystostomy drainage catheters was described in this two case series. Two patients underwent robotic assisted cholecystectomy with fluorescent cholangiography and indocyanine green through percutaneous cholecystostomy drainage catheters. The patients were diagnosed with acute cholecystitis. Directed injection of indocyanine green allowed for direct visualization of the biliary system allowing for a safe identification of the critical view of safety. Injection of indocyanine green for fluorescent cholangiography through percutaneous cholecystostomy drainage catheters is reliable to assess the critical view of safety and allows for improved identification of the biliary tree anatomy. Administration of indocyanine green through the percutaneous cholecystostomy drainage catheters avoided background hepatic fluorescence and increased contrast between biliary structures.
PubMed: 38706473
DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjae275 -
Surgical Endoscopy Jun 2024When pregnant patients present with nonobstetric pathology, the physicians caring for them may be uncertain about the optimal management strategy. The aim of this...
BACKGROUND
When pregnant patients present with nonobstetric pathology, the physicians caring for them may be uncertain about the optimal management strategy. The aim of this guideline is to develop evidence-based recommendations for pregnant patients presenting with common surgical pathologies including appendicitis, biliary disease, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
METHODS
The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Guidelines Committee convened a working group to address these issues. The group generated five key questions and completed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. An expert panel then met to form evidence-based recommendations according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Expert opinion was utilized when the available evidence was deemed insufficient.
RESULTS
The expert panel agreed on ten recommendations addressing the management of appendicitis, biliary disease, and IBD during pregnancy.
CONCLUSIONS
Conditional recommendations were made in favor of appendectomy over nonoperative treatment of appendicitis, laparoscopic appendectomy over open appendectomy, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy over nonoperative treatment of biliary disease and acute cholecystitis specifically. Based on expert opinion, the panel also suggested either operative or nonoperative treatment of biliary diseases other than acute cholecystitis in the third trimester, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography rather than common bile duct exploration for symptomatic choledocholithiasis, applying the same criteria for emergent surgical intervention in pregnant and non-pregnant IBD patients, utilizing an open rather than minimally invasive approach for pregnant patients requiring emergent surgical treatment of IBD, and managing pregnant patients with active IBD flares in a multidisciplinary fashion at centers with IBD expertise.
Topics: Humans; Pregnancy; Female; Pregnancy Complications; Laparoscopy; Appendicitis; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Appendectomy; Biliary Tract Diseases
PubMed: 38700549
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10810-1 -
Cureus Apr 2024Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) is widely recognized as a tumor marker primarily associated with pancreatic cancer. However, its elevation in benign...
Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) is widely recognized as a tumor marker primarily associated with pancreatic cancer. However, its elevation in benign pancreaticobiliary conditions complicates its diagnostic utility. We present the case of a 39-year-old male with no significant medical history who presented with symptoms of abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. The initial diagnosis suggested viral enteritis, but the subsequent worsening of symptoms led to further investigation. Elevated white blood cell counts, bilirubin levels, and liver function tests prompted magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), which revealed dilated bile ducts and acute cholecystitis. Following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), significant hemobilia was observed, raising suspicions of cholangiocarcinoma. Despite extensive investigations, including CT angiography, MRCP, and repeat ERCPs, no malignancy was detected. Remarkably, the CA 19-9 level was elevated to 904 U/mL after the initial ERCP and uptrended to 7380 U/mL. These levels, however, normalized to 13 U/mL within two weeks of discharge. While CA 19-9 is a valuable marker in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, its elevation in benign pancreaticobiliary conditions necessitates cautious interpretation. In our case, choledocolithasis, cholangitis, and biliary manipulation appeared to have contributed to a transiently elevated CA 19-9. Clinicians must consider the entire clinical context when evaluating elevated CA 19-9 levels to avoid misdiagnosis and ensure appropriate patient management.
PubMed: 38699139
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57469 -
Cureus Apr 2024Anatomic variants of hepatic ligaments are rare, and complications attributable to these variants may be difficult to diagnose. Our aim is to contribute to the...
Anatomic variants of hepatic ligaments are rare, and complications attributable to these variants may be difficult to diagnose. Our aim is to contribute to the literature surrounding the incidental finding of a congenital absence of the falciform ligament. We report the case of a 37-year-old man who underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. During the operation, the patient was noted to have an apparent absence of the falciform ligament attachment to the liver. The round ligament was attached from the liver to the anterior abdominal wall at the level of the umbilicus. The round ligament is inserted into the inferior surface of the liver as a thick, cordlike structure encased in fat. In rare cases, the small intestine can pass through a falciform ligament defect and become trapped while remaining within the peritoneal cavity, leading to difficult-to-diagnose internal hernias. This condition can lead to intestinal obstruction, incarceration, and strangulation. This directed our decision to divide the remaining round ligament at the liver and close to the abdominal wall. When defects of hepatic ligaments are found incidentally during laparoscopic surgery, these investigators recommend that the operating surgeon consider dividing the remaining ligament as a protective procedure to prevent complications such as internal hernias, intestinal obstruction, incarceration, and strangulation.
PubMed: 38699120
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57459 -
Turkish Journal of Surgery Dec 2023There is growing evidence for reduced post-operative complications, and lower hospital costs associated with early cholecystectomy for acute calculus cholecystitis (AC)...
OBJECTIVES
There is growing evidence for reduced post-operative complications, and lower hospital costs associated with early cholecystectomy for acute calculus cholecystitis (AC) compared to delayed surgery. Limited high-quality evidence exists for how early, if at all, should surgeons be operating emergently for AC based on symptom onset.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Seven hundred seventy-four patients who had cholecystectomy performed by a single surgeon between January 2015-October 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Five hundred fourty-one patients were analysed. Patients were divided into three groups based on symptom onset: Group 1: 0-72 hours (n= 305), Group 2: 72 hrs-1 week (n= 154) and Group 3: >1 week (n= 82).
RESULTS
Median operative time was most prolonged in Group 2 (96.5 minutes), and had the greatest proportion of reconstituting 95% cholecystectomies (n= 22/154, 14.29%) compared to Group 1 (p> 0.05). The conversion to open was between 0.65-1.64% in all groups. The greatest proportion of bile leak occurred in Group 1 (n= 7/305, 2.3%) followed by Group 3 (n= 1/82, 1.22%) (p> 0.05). All were successfully managed with ERCP and biliary stent. Median hospital stay was significantly prolonged in Group 2 (2.3 days) compared to Group 1 (2 days) (p= 0.03). The proportion of 95% cholecystectomies in Group 2 and 3 were not significant compared to Group 1.
CONCLUSION
Early cholecystectomy for calculus cholecystitis, irrespective of the timing of symptoms appears to have safe postoperative outcomes. Surgeons do not necessarily need to limit early cholecystectomy for within 72 hours of symptom onset.
PubMed: 38694534
DOI: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.6165 -
Annals of Medicine and Surgery (2012) May 2024Pucker sign is the depression of the liver in the region of the gallbladder due to a high degree of chronic contractive inflammation of the gallbladder. It usually...
INTRODUCTION
Pucker sign is the depression of the liver in the region of the gallbladder due to a high degree of chronic contractive inflammation of the gallbladder. It usually develops in patients who have a delayed cholecystectomy after acute cholecystitis due to a high degree of chronic contractive inflammation of the gallbladder and contraction of the cystic plate. It is an essential finding either preoperatively or intraoperatively as it can act as a stopping rule during cholecystectomy (act as a guide that cholecystectomy will be difficult).
CASE SERIES
The authors here report three cases of pucker sign that were incidentally discovered during laparoscopy.
DISCUSSION
Chronic cholecystitis is a prolonged, subacute condition caused by inflammation of the gallbladder, which mostly occurs in the setting of cholelithiasis. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the procedure of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Hence, it would be beneficial to be aware of reliable signs that predict difficult Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pucker sign usually predicts increased operative difficulty as there is an operative danger of biliary or vascular injury.
CONCLUSION
The pucker sign is a novel indicator of significant persistent inflammation and heightened difficulty during surgery. It might establish a halting rule that modifies the procedure's management and raises its level of safety.
PubMed: 38694274
DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002017 -
Kansas Journal of Medicine 2024
PubMed: 38694174
DOI: 10.17161/kjm.vol17.21594 -
Avicenna Journal of Medicine Jan 2024Conflicting evidence regarding the laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy outcomes in scientific literature impacts the medical decision-making for patients with... (Review)
Review
Conflicting evidence regarding the laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy outcomes in scientific literature impacts the medical decision-making for patients with gallbladder disease. This study aimed to compare a range of primary and secondary outcomes between patients receiving laparoscopic cholecystectomy and those with open intervention. Articles published from 1993 to 2023 were explored by utilizing advanced filters of PubMed Central/Medline, Web of Science, CINAHL, JSTOR, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and EBSCO. The gallbladder disease was determined by the presence of one or more of the following conditions: 1) Gangrenous cholecystitis, 2) acute cholecystitis, 3) chronic gallbladder diseases, and 4) cholelithiasis. The primary end-point was mortality, while the secondary outcome included (1) bile leakage, 2) common bile duct injury, 3) gangrene, 4) hospital stay (days), 5) major complications, 6) median hospital stay (days), (7) pneumonia, 8) sick leaves (days), and 9) wound infection. Statistically significant reductions were observed in mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30, 0.45, < 0.00001), mean hospital stay duration (mean difference: -2.68, 95% CI: -3.66, -1.70, < 0.00001), major complications (OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.64, = 0.0005), post/intraoperative wound infection (OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.51, < 0.0001), and sick leaves (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.80, = 0.01) in patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with those with the open intervention. No statistically significant differences were recorded between the study groups for bile leakage, common bile duct injury, gangrene, median hospital stay days, and pneumonia ( > 0.05). The pooled outcomes favored the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy over the open procedure in patients with gallbladder disease. The consolidated findings indicate the higher impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in improving patient outcomes, including safety episodes, compared with open cholecystectomy.
PubMed: 38694141
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777710