-
Clinical Epidemiology 2024In the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR), covering all Danish hospitals and widely used in research, diseases have been recorded using (ICD) codes, transitioning...
PURPOSE
In the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR), covering all Danish hospitals and widely used in research, diseases have been recorded using (ICD) codes, transitioning from the to the in 1994. Uncertainty exists regarding whether including ICD-8 codes alongside ICD-10 is needed for complete disease identification. We assessed the extent of left-truncation and left-censoring in the DNPR arising from omitting ICD-8 codes.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We sampled 500,000 Danes ≥40 years of age in 1995, 2010, and 2018. From the DNPR, we identified cardiovascular, endocrine, gastrointestinal, neurological, pulmonary, rheumatic, and urogenital diseases as well as fractures. We obtained the number of people with a disease recorded with ICD-8 codes only (, the ICD-8 record would be left-truncated by not using ICD-8 codes), ICD-8 ICD-10 codes (, the ICD-8 record would be left-censored by not using ICD-8 codes), and ICD-10 codes only. For each ICD group, we calculated the proportion of people with the disease relative to the total sample (, 500,000 people) and the total number of people with the disease across all ICD groups.
RESULTS
Overall, the left-truncation issue decreased over the years. Relative to all people with a disease, the left-truncated proportion was for example 59% in 1995 and <2% in 2018 for diabetes mellitus; 93% in 1995, and 54% in 2018 for appendicitis. The left-truncation issue increased with age group for most diseases. The proportion of disease records left-censored by not using ICD-8 codes was generally low but highest for chronic diseases.
CONCLUSION
The left-truncation issue diminished over sample years, particularly for chronic diseases, yet remained rather high for selected surgical diseases. The left-truncation issue increased with age group for most diseases. Left-censoring was overall a minor issue that primarily concerned chronic diseases.
PubMed: 38783995
DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S456171 -
Cirugia Y Cirujanos 2024Acute appendicitis remains as a differential diagnosis in older patients with abdominal pain. The Alvarado scale may assist to guide the diagnosis and treatment of this...
BACKGROUND
Acute appendicitis remains as a differential diagnosis in older patients with abdominal pain. The Alvarado scale may assist to guide the diagnosis and treatment of this entity. The operative characteristics of the scale are little known in this population.
METHOD
We conducted a systematic review of original studies published between 1986 and 2022 evaluating the diagnostic performance of the Alvarado scale in older adults with suspected acute appendicitis. The review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. The evaluation of the methodological quality of the studies was performed according to the ROBINS-I criteria.
RESULTS
Four original studies of retrospective design including 480 patients were identified. The heterogeneity and poor methodological quality limited an aggregate statistical analysis (meta-analysis). The value of the ROC curve of the scale varies between 0.799 and 0.969. From the available studies, the value of the ROC curve is lower in comparison to the RIPASA scale and comparable to the Lintula scale.
CONCLUSIONS
The evidence on the diagnostic performance of the Alvarado scale in older adults is limited. The poor methodological quality of the available studies calls for a prudent use of this tool in this population. Our findings offer opportunities for future research.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Humans; Abdominal Pain; Acute Disease; Appendicitis; Diagnosis, Differential; Retrospective Studies; ROC Curve
PubMed: 38782393
DOI: 10.24875/CIRU.23000155 -
Cureus Apr 2024Femoral hernias carry an increased risk of incarceration. De Garengeot hernia, a rare subset, occurs when the appendix herniates through the femoral canal. Due to its...
Femoral hernias carry an increased risk of incarceration. De Garengeot hernia, a rare subset, occurs when the appendix herniates through the femoral canal. Due to its rarity, various surgical approaches have been explored, including isolated groin incisions, combined approaches, and exclusive laparoscopic interventions. This case involved a 58-year-old female diagnosed with a De Garengeot hernia and nonperforated acute appendicitis, managed through a combined laparoscopic and an inguinal approach, and underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and open repair of femoral hernia using a biologic mesh. In this case, the combined approaches facilitated a successful hernia repair and appendectomy while enabling a swift recovery. This case highlights the effectiveness of the combined minimally invasive and inguinal approach in optimizing outcomes for patients with De Garengeot hernia.
PubMed: 38779266
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58771 -
SAGE Open Medical Case Reports 2024This case presents a diagnostic challenge in a 28-year-old male initially evaluated for severe abdominal pain, vomiting, and constipation, leading to the presumption of...
This case presents a diagnostic challenge in a 28-year-old male initially evaluated for severe abdominal pain, vomiting, and constipation, leading to the presumption of post-appendectomy complications. Clinical examination revealed abdominal distension, tenderness, and signs of peritonism, along with a reducible inguinal hernia. On subsequent CT scan, a large, inflamed area of omentum localized to the right abdomen extending up to the defect in the inguinal region with mild ascites was revealed. Upon exploration, it was discovered that the patient's initial surgery had focused solely on an appendix deemed mildly inflamed by the operating surgeon, while a concurrent diagnosis of secondary omental torsion was missed. This oversight underscores the challenges in diagnosing abdominal pathologies, with the initial misdiagnosis leading to ongoing patient distress. Meticulous adhesiolysis and omentectomy were performed, resulting in the resolution of the patient's symptoms.
PubMed: 38778908
DOI: 10.1177/2050313X241252352 -
Galen Medical Journal 2023Appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal surgeries. The importance of parasitic etiologies in the pathogenesis of appendicitis is not well known...
BACKGROUND
Appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal surgeries. The importance of parasitic etiologies in the pathogenesis of appendicitis is not well known in appendectomy specimens on a large scale in southwestern Iran. The current study aimed to retrospectively assess the demographic data and histopathological records of appendicitis in a 28-year period in Fars province, southwestern Iran.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Histopathological records of 13,013 patients who had undergone surgeries for appendicitis at Dr. Ali Shariati Hospital, affiliated with the Fasa University of Medical Sciences from December 1993 to January 2021 were reviewed and data concerning the patients' demographic data and histopathological records were retrieved from each record. More than 6800 archived microscopic glass slides were also reviewed.
RESULTS
From a total of 13,013 histopathological records of surgical excisions of appendicitis that were reviewed over a 28-year period, 8,189 (62.9%) were male and 4,842 (37.1%) were female. Patients' age ranged from 2 to 98 years, with a mean age of 24.68±19.87 years. The most common inflammatory changes were 5,687 (43.7%), 1,228 (9.4%), 670 (5.1%), 522 (4%), and 363 (2.8%) cases of acute appendicitis, suppurative appendicitis, early acute appendicitis, gangrenous appendicitis, and perforated appendicitis respectively. Microscopically, no viral inclusions, fungal elements, and histopathologic findings of bacterial causes were found. Parasitic infections such as helminthiasis were detected in 74 (0.6%) cases aged from 6 to 63. Enterobiasis (Syn. oxyuriasis, pinworm infection) accounted for 73 (98.6%) of the 74 helminthiases, while ascariasis accounted for 1 (1.4%). Out of 74 cases, 29 (39.2%) showed evidence of appendicitis.
CONCLUSION
The results suggest that although parasitic agents are minor causes of appendicitis, these agents should be kept in mind during differential diagnosis. However, whether every parasitic infection leads to appendicitis is controversial.
PubMed: 38774854
DOI: 10.31661/gmj.v12i.2482 -
Surgical Case Reports May 2024Interval appendectomy is widely recommended for patients with abscesses due to perforated appendicitis. A concomitant malignancy-related problem was reported after...
BACKGROUND
Interval appendectomy is widely recommended for patients with abscesses due to perforated appendicitis. A concomitant malignancy-related problem was reported after conservative treatment of acute appendicitis with abscess, but perforated appendicitis-associated tuberculous peritonitis was never reported.
CASE PRESENTATION
A 67-year-old male patient with a laryngeal cancer history presented to our hospital with an acute appendicitis-associated ileal abscess. He was scheduled for an interval appendectomy after conservative treatment. Fortunately, the symptoms subsided, and the patient was discharged for a later scheduled appendectomy. However, after 3 months, he was readmitted to our hospital with fever and abdominal pain, and emergency surgery was performed, which was suspected to be peritonitis. Intraoperative results revealed numerous white nodules in the abdominal cavity. The condition was diagnosed as tuberculous peritonitis based on macroscopic results, later pathological findings, and positive T-SPOT.TB. The antituberculosis medications were effective, and the patient recovered and was discharged from the hospital 8 days thereafter.
CONCLUSION
Patients, particularly those immunocompromised, may develop tuberculous peritonitis after conservative treatment for acute perforated appendicitis.
PubMed: 38771503
DOI: 10.1186/s40792-024-01928-4 -
African Journal of Paediatric Surgery :... May 2024Evaluation of quality of life (QoL) in paediatric surgical patients has not always received enough attention in the past. Our aim was to follow up patients with...
BACKGROUND
Evaluation of quality of life (QoL) in paediatric surgical patients has not always received enough attention in the past. Our aim was to follow up patients with abdominal wall defects for a decade and (1) to analyse children's view on QoL and to analyse parent's view on QoL, (2) to evaluate satisfaction and psychological problems, (3) to assess present complaints including subjective aspects such as food intake, reduced appetite, pain in scar area and general abdominal pain and (4) verifiable clinical symptoms assessed through a physical examination and ultrasound. It was hypothesised that QoL would differ from gastroschisis (GS) and omphalocele (OC) children depending on the type of abdominal wall defect.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
A retrospective case-control design was used to compare children with GS (n = 36) and OC (n = 18). A clinical examination, including abdominal inspection, palpation and auscultation of bowel sounds with abdominal ultrasound, was offered, combined with a structured interview and specific QoL questionnaire (KINDL®). The focus was on QoL, child development, present complaints and satisfaction with the cosmetic outcome.
RESULTS
During clinical examinations with ultrasound, GS children were significantly more likely to have bowel loops stuck at the scar area (P = 0.008) with bowel malrotation and abnormal appendix position, compared to OC children (P = 0.037). They were significantly more likely to report irregular stools (P = 0.02) but were satisfied with the cosmetic outcome of the abdominal skin scar in 81% of cases. The KINDL® evaluation showed in the dimensions of QoL, namely 'body awareness', 'mental health', 'self-esteem', 'family', 'friends' and 'school', that there were no significant differences to healthy children. OC/GS parents were satisfied with their children's physical development and QoL, noting no limitations in normal daily activities. Parents of OC children reported suffering from OC/GS-associated problems (P = 0.028) at the time point of interview.
CONCLUSION
Subjective QoL did not differ significantly between OC and GS children. The satisfaction with the cosmetic outcome of the abdominal skin scar was good. On ultrasound examination, adherent bowel loops and bowel malrotation with resulting stool irregularities affect GS children. OC children's parents reported suffering from OC/OS-associated problems, and all parents need to be educated about the symptoms of recurrent sub-ileus events or atypical appendicitis.
PubMed: 38770839
DOI: 10.4103/ajps.ajps_140_22 -
Cureus May 2024Introduction The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the implementation of novel guidelines for managing appendicitis, prompting an evaluation of its effects...
Introduction The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the implementation of novel guidelines for managing appendicitis, prompting an evaluation of its effects on patient presentation and treatment at a district general hospital. Healthcare facilities worldwide have adapted protocols to meet the unique challenges of the pandemic, ensuring safe and efficient care. Our study assesses the pandemic's influence on patient demographics, clinical outcomes, surgical procedures, and adherence to guidelines among individuals undergoing emergency appendicitis surgery. Through this investigation, we aimed to determine whether significant deviations occurred in managing acute appendicitis amidst the pandemic. Methodology Consecutive adult patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with acute appendicitis were included in two cohorts for this retrospective analysis, comparing cases treated during the COVID-19 pandemic period (April to September 2020) with those treated one year prior. All patients underwent standardized assessments upon emergency department admission, including imaging studies and COVID-19 testing. Demographics, laboratory results, surgical details, and outcomes were compared between the pre- and post-pandemic groups, focusing on their overall management. Results The research involved a total of 172 individuals. During the pandemic (April to September 2020), 91 of these participants underwent surgery, which is more than the 81 individuals who had surgery during the same period the previous year (April to September 2019). Preoperative C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher in the pandemic group ( = 0.0455). The time from admission to surgery was shorter in the pandemic group (7.5 ± 4.6 vs. 5.8 ± 4.9; = 0.0155). The overall operative and laparoscopic operative times were longer in the pandemic group (65 vs. 71 minutes, = 0.391, and 55 vs. 62 minutes, = 0.1424, respectively). However, these differences were not statistically significant. The number of patients presenting with complicated appendicitis was significantly higher in the pandemic group than in the nonpandemic group (44.4% vs. 61.4%; = 0.034). The length of stay was shorter in the pandemic group ( = 0.53). Conclusions Our study suggests that surgery for acute appendicitis remains safe and feasible during the COVID-19 pandemic, with comparable outcomes. However, we noted an increase in the number of patients presenting with complicated appendicitis, possibly influenced by national pandemic guidelines in the United Kingdom. Despite this trend, our findings affirm the continued effectiveness of surgical management for acute appendicitis during the pandemic, highlighting the adaptability of healthcare systems in addressing emergent medical needs under challenging circumstances.
PubMed: 38770054
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60674 -
Revista Espanola de Enfermedades... May 2024A 16-year-old woman complained of intermittent epigastric pain for one year. The gastroscopy, colonoscopy and laboratory findings were normal. Physical examination was...
A 16-year-old woman complained of intermittent epigastric pain for one year. The gastroscopy, colonoscopy and laboratory findings were normal. Physical examination was unremarkable other than upper abdominal tenderness. The symptom was not relieved in past medical treatment. The abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan revealed appendix wall swelling and suspected appendicitis. Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) with eyeMax (Micro-tech, China) was proposed to perform after informed consent obtained. A colonoscopy with a transparent cap (Olympus, Japan) attached to the tip was inserted into the cecum, and advanced the level of appendicular orifice. Subsequently, the Gerlach's valve was pushed aside using the transparent cap. Finally, the eyeMax was placed in the appendicular orifice, slowly moved forward in appendicular lumen. The eyeMax showed a lot of appendicular stones, and irrigated repeatedly. The stones were expulsed smoothly. The patient was discharged two days later without recurrent epigastric pain on follow-up and to date.
PubMed: 38767030
DOI: 10.17235/reed.2024.10500/2024 -
Revista Espanola de Enfermedades... May 2024Appendicitis stands as the most common surgical emergency in pediatric populations. Despite the existence of numerous diagnostic biomarkers, their utility is constrained...
Appendicitis stands as the most common surgical emergency in pediatric populations. Despite the existence of numerous diagnostic biomarkers, their utility is constrained by limitations in cost-effectiveness, potentially leading to therapeutic delays. This research aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) in appendicitis. Although its role in this context has been recently described, this is the first study to compare its performance against acute-phase reactants routinely employed in clinical practice. Following approval from the Research Committee (2023/390894), a diagnostic study was conducted including patients under 15 years old undergoing surgery for acute appendicitis (AA) and those presenting with non-surgical abdominal pain (AP).
PubMed: 38767016
DOI: 10.17235/reed.2024.10497/2024