-
JAMA Network Open Aug 2019Median survival after lung transplant is less than 6 years. Standard maintenance therapy typically includes tacrolimus and an antimetabolite (mycophenolate mofetil or... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
IMPORTANCE
Median survival after lung transplant is less than 6 years. Standard maintenance therapy typically includes tacrolimus and an antimetabolite (mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine). Replacing the antimetabolite with sirolimus after postoperative wound healing may improve long-term survival due to antifibrotic, antiproliferative, and antiaging effects of sirolimus.
OBJECTIVES
To compare survival between patients receiving sirolimus plus tacrolimus vs mycophenolate mofetil plus tacrolimus (the most common maintenance therapy) and to identify the combination of induction and maintenance therapy associated with the highest survival.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This cohort study of US recipients of lung transplants from January 1, 2003, through August 31, 2016, analyzed United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data from January 1 through September 13, 2018. Because initiation of sirolimus therapy is usually delayed 3 to 12 months after lung transplant, primary analyses were based on patients alive and free of chronic rejection and malignant disease at 1 year in all groups, whereas sensitivity analyses used appropriate methods to include all patients from transplant time. Regression models adjusted for available potential confounders, including transplant center performance.
EXPOSURES
Cell cycle inhibitor maintenance therapies, including sirolimus (n = 219), mycophenolate mofetil (n = 5782), mycophenolate sodium (n = 408), azathioprine (n = 2556), and concurrent sirolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (n = 54), were compared within a tacrolimus-based regimen. Combinations of each induction (basiliximab, daclizumab, antithymocyte globulin, alemtuzumab, or none) and maintenance (tacrolimus plus sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, or azathioprine) therapy were also compared.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Survival was the primary outcome; chronic rejection incidence and subsequent mortality were secondary outcomes.
RESULTS
Among this population of 9019 patients (median age, 57 years [interquartile range {IQR}, 46-63 years]; 5194 men [57.6%]), sirolimus plus tacrolimus was associated with better survival than mycophenolate mofetil plus tacrolimus (median, 8.9 years [IQR, 4.4-12.7 years] vs 7.1 years [IQR, 3.6-12.1 years]; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.89; P = .003). Chronic rejection incidence (aHR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.92) and mortality after chronic rejection (aHR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31-0.81) were lower with sirolimus plus tacrolimus. Compared with mycophenolate mofetil plus tacrolimus, survival differences for sirolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil plus tacrolimus (aHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.79-1.65), mycophenolate sodium plus tacrolimus (aHR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.77-1.17), and azathioprine plus tacrolimus (aHR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.84-1.02) were not significant. The induction-maintenance combination with the highest survival was sirolimus plus tacrolimus without induction therapy (median survival, 10.7 years [IQR, 7.3-12.7 years]; aHR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.31-0.76; P = .002) compared with mycophenolate mofetil plus tacrolimus with induction therapy (median survival, 7.4 years [IQR, 3.9-12.6 years]).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Sirolimus plus tacrolimus was associated with improved patient survival after lung transplant compared with mycophenolate mofetil plus tacrolimus; no antibody induction therapy with sirolimus plus tacrolimus was associated with maximal survival.
Topics: Drug Therapy, Combination; Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Graft Rejection; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Incidence; Lung Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Mycophenolic Acid; Retrospective Studies; Sirolimus; Survival Analysis; Tacrolimus; Transplant Recipients; United States
PubMed: 31461151
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10297 -
Clinical Kidney Journal Aug 2019Interleukin-2 (IL-2) antagonist has been used as an induction therapy in many centres in calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimens. Tacrolimus has overwhelmingly replaced...
BACKGROUND
Interleukin-2 (IL-2) antagonist has been used as an induction therapy in many centres in calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimens. Tacrolimus has overwhelmingly replaced cyclosporine in the maintenance immunosuppressive protocols in many transplant centres. The aim of our study and meta-analysis is to explore the effect of IL-2 induction therapy on the rate of rejection and patient and graft survival in standard-risk renal transplant patients with tacrolimus-based maintenance immunotherapy. Secondary aims included assessment of the effect of IL-2 induction therapy on creatinine change and the risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review in different databases to identify studies and research work that assessed the effect of IL-2 antibody induction therapy on renal transplant outcomes. Inclusion criteria for our meta-analysis were all studies that compared IL-2 induction therapy with placebo or no induction therapy in standard-risk renal transplant recipients on tacrolimus-based maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. Data collected were the name of the first author, journal title, year of publication, country where the study was conducted, number of patients in the IL-2 induction therapy arm and in the placebo arm, number of patients who had biopsy-proven rejection and graft survival in each arm. A random effects model was used for the meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Of the 470 articles found in different databases, 7 were included in the meta-analysis. Forest plot analysis for rate of rejection during the follow-up period post-transplant showed no significant difference between the groups. There was no evidence of heterogenicity between included studies ( = 21.8%, P = 0.27). The overall risk difference was -0.02 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.05-0.01]. A random effects meta-analysis for patient and graft survival was performed using forest plot analysis and showed no significant effect of IL-2 receptor (IL-2R) antibody induction on patient or graft survival compared with placebo. The overall risk difference was -0.01 (95% CI -0.04-0.01) and 0.00 (95% CI -0.00-0.01), respectively. Three of the included studies showed no effect of basiliximab on creatinine change, two showed no effect on risk of CMV infection and two showed less risk of post-transplant diabetes in the basiliximab group.
CONCLUSION
IL-2R antibody induction therapy has no significant effect on the rate of rejection or patient or graft survival in standard-risk renal transplant recipients on tacrolimus-based maintenance immunotherapy. More randomized controlled studies are needed.
PubMed: 31384453
DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfy132 -
Autoimmune Diseases 2019Monoclonal antibodies constitute a potent and broadly tolerable drug class, representing for some conditions the first newly approved treatment in years. As such, many... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Monoclonal antibodies constitute a potent and broadly tolerable drug class, representing for some conditions the first newly approved treatment in years. As such, many are afforded "fast-track" or "breakthrough therapy" designations by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, leading to provisional approval before Phase III clinical trials are reported. Although these drugs are usually safe, some patients experience life-threatening complications-myositis and encephalitis have led to permanent or temporary recalls. Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a hypersensitivity condition easily missed due to its long incubation period and nonspecific presentation. This minireview is primarily intended as an abbreviated guide for practitioners who may be using these powerful treatments.
METHODOLOGY
We searched PubMed using a string of symptoms consistent with DRESS syndrome and monoclonal antibodies approved by the FDA since 2015. Then, we excluded studies reporting dermatological complications of reactivation of nonherpetic infection, immunodeficiency-related infection, or reactions to the injection site or infusion. We searched for and accessed prior reviews and background studies via PubMed, Mendeley, and Google Scholar.
RESULTS
Two cases of DRESS syndrome were identified in the literature, both the result of treatment with daclizumab. There was one additional case of encephalitis without cutaneous symptoms caused by daclizumab. Drug-induced hypersensitivity dermatitis was reported following treatment with nivolumab and two cases of combination treatment with ipilimumab and either nivolumab or durvalumab produced maculopapular rash and bullae in the first patient and lichenoid dermatitis and blisters in the second patient.
CONCLUSIONS
Daclizumab was the only recently approved monoclonal antibody associated with DRESS syndrome as such. Limitations in the diagnostic reliability of DRESS syndrome as a clinical entity and the lack of negative clinical trial reporting suggest enhanced vigilance on the part of clinicians and regulators may be warranted.
PubMed: 31308976
DOI: 10.1155/2019/7595706 -
Respiratory Medicine Mar 2019Several drugs have been associated with druginduced sarcoidosis-like reactions (DISRs) that are clinically indistinguishable from sarcoidosis. Daclizumab is a humanized... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
INTRODUCTION
Several drugs have been associated with druginduced sarcoidosis-like reactions (DISRs) that are clinically indistinguishable from sarcoidosis. Daclizumab is a humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody that binds to CD25 that has been studied for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). During MS clinical trials of daclizumab, 12 subjects developed clinical conditions potentially consistent with sarcoidosis. Therefore, an independent adjudication committee of individuals with expertise in sarcoidosis was organized to determine the likelihood of these cases representing sarcoidosis.
METHODS
The adjudication committee consisted of a pulmonologist, pathologist, and radiologist with clinical experience in sarcoidosis. The committee had access to the subjects' laboratory data, narratives of all suspect adverse reaction reports, radiographic imaging and histology from biopsies. A priori, a grading system was developed to determine criteria to establish the likelihood that the patient had developed sarcoidosis.
RESULTS
The adjudication confirmed sarcoidosis in 11/12 subjects. The committee's decisions were unanimous in all cases. Biopsies were available in 7/11 of these. In the 4 subjects who did not have a biopsy, they all had presentations, clinical findings, and/or laboratory findings that were highly specific for sarcoidosis. Alternative causes for these clinical findings were reasonably excluded in all cases. The lung (8/11) and skin (6/11) were the most common organs involved. The mean daclizumab dose given when signs or symptoms of sarcoidosis occurred was 5413 ± 2704 mg and the median time from first daclizumab dose was 996 days. The incidence rate of developing sarcoidosis in those participating in these daclizumab trials was 154/100,000 patient-years compared with incidence rates of sarcoidosis in the United States of 3.2-17.8/100,000/year. These data suggest that these sarcoidosis cases may have represented DISRs related to daclizumab therapy.
CONCLUSIONS
Given the clinical presentation and subsequent evaluation of these 11 subjects, we suspect that they had DISRs from daclizumab.
Topics: Adult; Daclizumab; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Incidence; Lung Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Multiple Sclerosis; Pharmacovigilance; Sarcoidosis; Skin Diseases
PubMed: 30885425
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.01.015 -
Biomedicines Mar 2019Daclizumab (DAC) is a humanized, monoclonal antibody that blocks CD25, a critical element of the high-affinity interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R). DAC HYP blockade of CD25... (Review)
Review
Daclizumab: Mechanisms of Action, Therapeutic Efficacy, Adverse Events and Its Uncovering the Potential Role of Innate Immune System Recruitment as a Treatment Strategy for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.
Daclizumab (DAC) is a humanized, monoclonal antibody that blocks CD25, a critical element of the high-affinity interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R). DAC HYP blockade of CD25 inhibits effector T cell activation, regulatory T cell expansion and survival, and activation-induced T-cell apoptosis. Because CD25 blockade reduces IL-2 consumption by effector T cells, it increases IL-2 bioavailability allowing for greater interaction with the intermediate-affinity IL-2R, and therefore drives the expansion of CD56 natural killer (NK) cells. Furthermore, there appears to be a direct correlation between CD56 NK cell expansion and DAC HYP efficacy in reducing relapses and MRI evidence of disease activity in patients with RMS in phase II and phase III double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled trials. Therapeutic efficacy was maintained during open-label extension studies. However, treatment was associated with an increased risk of rare adverse events, including cutaneous inflammation, autoimmune hepatitis, central nervous system Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome, and autoimmune Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) alpha immunoglobulin-associated encephalitis. As a result, DAC HYP was removed from clinical use in 2018. The lingering importance of DAC is that its use led to a deeper understanding of the underappreciated role of innate immunity in the potential treatment of autoimmune disease.
PubMed: 30862055
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines7010018 -
Neurology(R) Neuroimmunology &... Mar 2019
Topics: Adult; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Daclizumab; Female; Hepatic Insufficiency; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Leukemic Infiltration; Leukocytes; Liver Failure; Multiple Sclerosis
PubMed: 30800722
DOI: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000539 -
Blood Advances Feb 2019Familial HLH can present as chronic isolated neuroinflammation. CNS-isolated HLH responds to hematopoietic cell transplantation.
Familial HLH can present as chronic isolated neuroinflammation. CNS-isolated HLH responds to hematopoietic cell transplantation.
Topics: Brain; Child; Female; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Inflammation; Lymphohistiocytosis, Hemophagocytic; Transplantation, Homologous
PubMed: 30760465
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018027417 -
Noro Psikiyatri Arsivi 2018Since the first approved parenteral drug for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) in 1993 (interferon [IFN] beta, and later glatiramer acetate [GA]), today there are... (Review)
Review
Since the first approved parenteral drug for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) in 1993 (interferon [IFN] beta, and later glatiramer acetate [GA]), today there are both parenteral and oral treatment options for MS. After IFN beta preparations, glatiramer acetate was developed; and, until the approval of natalizumab in 2006, those dominated the treatment of MS. Later on, among oral drug options, cladribine made a promising entry; however, due to safety concerns, it was withdrawn soon. Afterwards, with the understanding of the role of sphingosine-1 phosphate (S1P) receptors in the pathogenesis of MS, fingolimod was approved in 2010, which was followed by other oral agents such as teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate. Recently newer IV treatment options such as alemtuzumab, rituximab and ocrelizumab have widened the treatment arena. Recently, after submitting new efficacy and safety data, cladribine was approved for MS by EMA, in 2017. Moreover, seven years after its rejection due to safety reasons, in August 2018 FDA accepted to re-evaluate the data of cladribine as a treatment option for relapsing remitting MS (RRMS). Another oral treatment option, Laquinimod, was not approved because it could not be shown to slow disability progression despite favourable effect in relapsing MS. Newer generation S1P receptor modulators are being investigated currently, and they are expected to come into the treatment arena soon. In this article, mechanisms of actions, clinical trial results, and side effects of the newer drugs used for MS, are reviewed. IFN beta and glatiramer acetate were not included since they have clinical experience nearing 30 years.
PubMed: 30692849
DOI: 10.29399/npa.23402 -
Cell Transplantation Mar 2019The need for chronic immune suppression (IS) is one of the hurdles precluding widespread use of islet cell transplantation to restore glycemic control in patients with...
The need for chronic immune suppression (IS) is one of the hurdles precluding widespread use of islet cell transplantation to restore glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes. We report the case of a healthy nonhuman primate (NHP) treated on and off for over 2.5 years with steroid-free IS, consisting of daclizumab induction and maintenance therapy with rapamycin and low dose tacrolimus. Treatment for 1 year resulted in a striking destabilization of glycemic control, with concomitant decreases in fasting c-peptide and insulin levels. Although these changes gradually reversed during a wash out period of 7 months, retreatment with the same therapy led to accelerated deterioration in glycemic control. Intravenous glucose tolerance and percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin testing further supported a dramatic effect on metabolic control. IS also led to decreases in weight during treatment. Histological evaluation of the pancreas revealed islet hyperplasia, with varying sizes and endocrine cell ratios that differed from normal islet composition, and parenchymal infiltration with adipose tissue. These deleterious effects of IS on glucose control and endocrine components in the native pancreas of a healthy NHP suggest that IS agents commonly utilized for islet transplantation may contribute to failure in islet allograft function in long-term transplant patients.
Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Daclizumab; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Glucose Tolerance Test; Graft Survival; Immunosuppression Therapy; Islets of Langerhans; Islets of Langerhans Transplantation; Macaca fascicularis; Male; Sirolimus; Tacrolimus; Transplantation, Homologous
PubMed: 30675800
DOI: 10.1177/0963689718823505 -
Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical... 2018Daclizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks CD25, the high affinity alpha subunit of the interleukin-2 receptor. Daclizumab therapy targets T regulatory...
BACKGROUND
Daclizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks CD25, the high affinity alpha subunit of the interleukin-2 receptor. Daclizumab therapy targets T regulatory cell and activated effector T cell proliferation to suppress autoimmune disease activity, in inflammatory conditions like relapsing and remitting multiple sclerosis. Here, we present the first report of agranulocytosis with daclizumab therapy in a patient with relapsing and remitting multiple sclerosis.
CASE PRESENTATION
Our patient was a 24-year-old Australian female with a clinical history of atopy, lymphocytic enteritis complicated by B12 deficiency, relapsing and remitting multiple sclerosis, recurrent lower respiratory tract infections, vulval/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and melanoma. She was commenced on daclizumab therapy after failing several lines of treatment for relapsing and remitting multiple sclerosis. During a hospital admission for lymphocytic enteritis, she was incidentally diagnosed with combined immunodeficiency with hypogammaglobulinaemia and declined proposed regular intravenous immunoglobulin infusions. Following six months of daclizumab therapy, our patient presented to hospital with febrile neutropenia. No clear infective cause was found, despite numerous investigations. However, bone marrow biopsy revealed agranulocytosis with an apparent maturation block at the myeloblasts stage. Neustrophil recovery occurred following cessation of daclizumab and the initiation of T cell immunosuppressive agents including systemic corticosteroids and methotrexate. The patient was further investigated for combined immunodeficiency and whole exome sequencing revealed a novel heterozygous missense variant in (), leading to a diagnosis of CTLA-4 haploinsufficiency with autoimmune infiltration (CHAI).
CONCLUSION
This case demonstrates that autoimmune disease may be the presenting feature of primary immunodeficiency and should be appropriately investigated prior to the commencement of immunotherapy. Genetic clarification of underlying primary immunodeficiency may provide critical clinical information that alters the safety of the proposed treatment strategy.
PubMed: 30377434
DOI: 10.1186/s13223-018-0272-7