-
Journal of Child and Adolescent... Apr 2024This study aimed to examine switch from first-line methylphenidate (MPH) to lisdexamfetamine (LDX) in school-aged children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
This study aimed to examine switch from first-line methylphenidate (MPH) to lisdexamfetamine (LDX) in school-aged children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This is a retrospective observational study based on systematic review of patient records of all children (7-13 years) diagnosed with ADHD and referred to a Danish specialized outpatient clinic. The study included 394 children switching from MPH to LDX as either second-line or third-line treatment (atomoxetine [ATX] as second-line treatment) during the study period from April 1, 2013, to November 5, 2019. One in five children switched from MPH to LDX at some point during the study period. The most frequent reasons for switching to LDX were adverse effects (AEs; 70.0% for MPH, 68.3% for ATX) and lack of efficiency (52.0% for MPH, 72.7% for ATX). Top five AEs of LDX were decreased appetite (62.4%), insomnia (28.7%), irritability/aggression (26.1%), weight decrease (21.1%), and mood swings (13.9%). MPH and LDX had similar AE profiles, yet most AEs were less frequent after switching to LDX. At the end of the study period, the majority were prescribed LDX as second-line rather than third-line treatment (86.1% in 2019). However, the likelihood of LDX as second-line treatment decreased with the number of psychiatric comorbidities, ADHD symptom severity as assessed by parents, and if AEs were a reason for MPH discontinuation. Among children observed for at least 1 year after initiation of LDX, 41.3% continued LDX treatment for a year or longer. LDX continuation was less likely if AEs were a reason for MPH discontinuation. Similarly to MPH and ATX, the most frequent reasons for LDX discontinuation were AEs (74.4%) and lack of efficiency (34.7%). The findings support LDX as an important option in the personalized treatment of children with ADHD and may support prescribers in the clinical decision-making on switching medication.
Topics: Child; Humans; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate; Cohort Studies; Methylphenidate; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Ambulatory Care Facilities; Denmark
PubMed: 38608011
DOI: 10.1089/cap.2023.0077 -
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Medications and Work Disability and Mental Health Outcomes.JAMA Network Open Mar 2024Individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) often have comorbid psychiatric conditions. Relatively little is known about how specific ADHD...
IMPORTANCE
Individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) often have comorbid psychiatric conditions. Relatively little is known about how specific ADHD medications are associated with overall treatment outcomes among these patients.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the association of the use of specific ADHD medications with hospitalization outcomes and work disability among adolescents and adults with ADHD.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This nationwide register-based cohort study identified individuals (aged 16-65 years) with ADHD from Swedish nationwide registers of inpatient health care, specialized outpatient health care, sickness absence, and disability pension during the years 2006 to 2021. Data analysis was performed from November 2022 to August 2023.
EXPOSURE
Use of specific ADHD medications.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The main outcome measure was psychiatric hospitalization, and secondary outcomes were suicide attempt and/or death by suicide, nonpsychiatric hospitalization, and work disability (ie, sickness absence or disability pension). The risk of outcomes between use vs nonuse periods of ADHD medications was compared in a within-individual design, where a person acts as their own control, and was analyzed with stratified Cox models.
RESULTS
A total of 221 714 persons with ADHD were included in the study cohort (mean [SD] age, 25.0 [11.2] years; 120 968 male individuals [54.6%]). Methylphenidate was the most commonly used ADHD medication (151 837 individuals [68.5%]), followed by lisdexamphetamine (78 106 individuals [35.2%]) during the follow-up (mean [SD], 7.0 [4.7] years). The following medications were associated with a decreased risk of psychiatric hospitalization: amphetamine (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.61-0.90), lisdexamphetamine (aHR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.78-0.82), ADHD drug polytherapy (aHR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.82-0.88), dexamphetamine (aHR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.94), and methylphenidate (aHR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.92-0.95). No associations were found for modafinil, atomoxetine, clonidine, and guanfacine. Decreased risk of suicidal behavior was associated with the use of dexamphetamine (aHR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.89), lisdexamphetamine (aHR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.68-0.84), and methylphenidate (aHR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.98). None of the medications was associated with increased risk of nonpsychiatric hospitalization; instead, use of amphetamine, lisdexamphetamine, polytherapy, dexamphetamine, methylphenidate, and atomoxetine were associated with decreased risk of nonpsychiatric hospitalization. The results regarding work disability were significant only for the use of atomoxetine (aHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97), especially among adolescents and young adults aged 16 to 29 years, (aHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73-0.92).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this nationwide cohort study of adolescents and adults with ADHD, the use of ADHD medication was associated with fewer hospitalizations for both psychiatric and nonpsychiatric morbidity and lower suicidal behavior.
Topics: Adolescent; Young Adult; Humans; Male; Adult; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Cohort Studies; Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate; Methylphenidate; Amphetamine
PubMed: 38506810
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2859 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... Jul 2024Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is a childhood-onset neurodevelopmental disorder that frequently persists into adulthood with 3% of adult women having a... (Review)
Review
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is a childhood-onset neurodevelopmental disorder that frequently persists into adulthood with 3% of adult women having a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Many women are diagnosed and treated during their reproductive years, which leads to management implications during pregnancy and the postpartum period. We know from clinical practice that attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms frequently become challenging to manage during the perinatal period and require additional support and attention. There is often uncertainty among healthcare providers about the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the perinatal period, particularly the safety of pharmacotherapy for the developing fetus. This guideline is focused on best practices in managing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the perinatal period. We recommend (1) mitigating the risks associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder that worsen during the perinatal period via individualized treatment planning; (2) providing psychoeducation, self-management strategies or coaching, and psychotherapies; and, for those with moderate or severe attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, (3) considering pharmacotherapy for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, which largely has reassuring safety data. Specifically, providers should work collaboratively with patients and their support networks to balance the risks of perinatal attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medication with the risks of inadequately treated attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder during pregnancy. The risks and impacts of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in pregnancy can be successfully managed through preconception counselling and appropriate perinatal planning, management, and support.
Topics: Humans; Female; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Postpartum Period; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Methylphenidate; Psychotherapy; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 38432409
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.02.297 -
Journal of Attention Disorders Apr 2024To compare PRC-063 (multilayer-release methylphenidate) and lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) on the driving performance of young adults with attention deficit... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
A Randomized, Phase 3, Double-Blind, Crossover Comparison of Multilayer, Extended-Release Methylphenidate (PRC-063), and Lisdexamfetamine in the Driving Performance of Young Adults With ADHD.
OBJECTIVE
To compare PRC-063 (multilayer-release methylphenidate) and lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) on the driving performance of young adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study.
METHOD
Following up to 21 days of each treatment in each treatment course (PRC-063/LDX or LDX/PRC-063), subjects completed a 15-hour driving simulator laboratory assessment. The primary outcome measure was the Tactical Driving Quotient (TDQ) and the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scale was a secondary outcome measure.
RESULTS
Forty-four subjects completed the study. PRC-063 and LDX had equivalent effects on driving performance through a 15-hour time period (least square mean difference -0.3 [standard error 1.08], 95% confidence interval [-2.4, 1.8], = .793). Consistent improvement in CGI-I was observed. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar for each treatment sequence.
CONCLUSIONS
PRC-063 and LDX had comparable effects on driving performance, from 1 through 15 hours, the last time point measured.
Topics: Humans; Young Adult; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate; Methylphenidate; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38404033
DOI: 10.1177/10870547241226634 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023Children with acquired hypothalamic obesity, e.g. following treatment for pediatric craniopharyngioma are at great risk for metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular health... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Children with acquired hypothalamic obesity, e.g. following treatment for pediatric craniopharyngioma are at great risk for metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular health problems and premature mortality. Treatment for acquired hypothalamic obesity has thus far been disappointing. Several interventions were reported to be partially successful, including dextro-amphetamine and GLP-1R agonists, although results in acquired hypothalamic obesity are conflicting. Disruption of signaling through the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) pathway results in hyperphagia and severe early-onset hypothalamic obesity. Recently, the MC4R agonist setmelanotide has shown promising results in children with genetic forms of hypothalamic obesity; POMC, PCSK1 and LEPR. Patient quotes such as "we have our family life back" illustrate the magnitude of the effect. Targeted hormone replacement therapy with a MC4R agonist for acquired hypothalamic obesity could be a game-changer. Preliminary results of setmelanotide treatment in 14, mostly pediatric, patients with acquired hypothalamic obesity are promising. The FDA has recommended that a prospective, randomized, blinded trial be conducted over a 12 months treatment period, comparable to pivotal trials for other obesity drugs. It may be discussed whether setmelanotide should be regarded as an obesity drug or whether it may be envisioned as an agent for hypothalamic substitution therapy. In this commentary we discuss the trial that is currently recruiting patients with acquired hypothalamic obesity.
Topics: Humans; Child; Prospective Studies; Obesity; alpha-MSH; Obesity, Morbid; Hypothalamic Diseases
PubMed: 38239988
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1307889 -
BMJ Open Dec 2023Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects 5%-10% of paediatric population and is reportedly more common in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D),...
Lisdexamphetamine versus methylphenidate for paediatric patients with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and type 1 diabetes (LAMAinDiab): protocol for a multicentre, randomised cross-over clinical trial in an outpatient telemedicine-supported setting.
INTRODUCTION
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects 5%-10% of paediatric population and is reportedly more common in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D), exacerbating its clinical course. Proper treatment of ADHD in such patients may thus provide neurological and metabolic benefits. To test this, we designed a non-commercial second phase clinical trial comparing the impact of different pharmacological interventions for ADHD in children with T1D.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS
This is a multicentre, randomised, open-label, cross-over clinical trial in children and adolescents with ADHD and T1D. The trial will be conducted in four reference paediatric diabetes centres in Poland. Over 36 months, eligible patients with both T1D and ADHD (aged 8-16.5 years, T1D duration >1 year) will be offered participation. Patients' guardians will undergo online once-weekly training sessions behaviour management for 10 weeks. Afterward, children will be randomised to methylphenidate (long-release capsule, doses 18-36-54 mg) versus lisdexamphetamine (LDX, 30-50-70 mg). Pharmacotherapy will continue for 6 months before switching to alternative medication. Throughout the trial, the participants will be evaluated every 3 months by their diabetologist and online psychological assessments. The primary endpoint (ADHD symptom severity, Conners 3.0 questionnaire) will be assessed by a blinded investigator. Secondary endpoints will include HbA1c, continuous glucose monitoring indices and quality-of-life (PedsQL).
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION
The trial is approved by Bioethical Committee at Medical University of Lodz and Polish regulatory agency (RNN/142/22/KE, UR/DBL/D/263/2022). The results will be communicated to the research and clinical community, and Polish agencies responsible for healthcare policy. Patient organisations focused on paediatric T1D will be notified by a consortium member. We hope to use the trial's results to promote collaboration between mental health professionals and diabetes teams, evaluate the economic feasibility of using LDX in patients with both diseases and the long run improve ADHD treatment in children with T1D.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS
EU Clinical Trials Register (EU-CTR, 2022-001906-24) and NCT05957055.
Topics: Adolescent; Humans; Child; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Methylphenidate; Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Outpatients; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Blood Glucose; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Treatment Outcome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Multicenter Studies as Topic
PubMed: 38086595
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078112 -
Life (Basel, Switzerland) Nov 2023This review delves into the therapeutic applications of amphetamine-type stimulants such as lisdexamphetamine dimesylate, mixed amphetamine salts,... (Review)
Review
This review delves into the therapeutic applications of amphetamine-type stimulants such as lisdexamphetamine dimesylate, mixed amphetamine salts, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), dextroamphetamine, and phentermine. These compounds have been investigated for their potential in treating a range of psychiatric disorders, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), drug dependence, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and obesity. Lisdexamphetamine dimesylate has shown promise in effectively treating ADHD symptoms in both children and adults. Additionally, it has been explored as a potential treatment for drug dependency and withdrawal, demonstrating encouraging results. Mixed amphetamine salts have also exhibited efficacy in reducing ADHD symptoms in adults. Future research should explore their potential use in treating bipolar disorder and cocaine dependence, considering the associated risks and benefits. MDMA-assisted psychotherapy has emerged as an innovative approach to treating PTSD, leading to sustained reductions in symptoms and even promoting post-traumatic growth. Furthermore, it has shown promise in managing anxiety related to life-threatening illnesses. Dextroamphetamine and phentermine have demonstrated efficacy in treating cocaine and opioid dependence, ADHD, and obesity. However, careful consideration and monitoring by medical professionals are essential due to the potential risks and benefits associated with them. In conclusion, amphetamine-type stimulants present a promising avenue for therapeutic interventions in various psychiatric conditions. Nevertheless, further research is necessary to comprehensively understand their mechanisms of action, dosage requirements, and long-term effects in different patient populations.
PubMed: 38004320
DOI: 10.3390/life13112180 -
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy =... Dec 2023Intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) of the medial forebrain bundle in mice is an experimental model use to assess the relative potential of reward-seeking behaviors....
Abused drug-induced intracranial self-stimulation is correlated with the alteration of dopamine transporter availability in the medial prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens of mice.
Intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) of the medial forebrain bundle in mice is an experimental model use to assess the relative potential of reward-seeking behaviors. Here, we used the ICSS model to evaluate the abuse potential of 18 abused drugs: 3-Fluoroethamphetamine (3-FEA); methylphenidate; cocaine; dextroamphetamine; alpha-Pyrrolidinobutyrophenone (α-PBT); 4'-Fluoro-4-methylaminorex (4-FPO); methamphetamine; larocaine; phentermine; paramethoxymethamphetamine (PMMA); phendimetrazine; N-(1-adamantyl)-1-pentyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide (AKB-48); Naphthalen-1-yl-(4-pentyloxynaphthalen-1-yl)methanone (CB-13); 4-Ethylnaphthalen-1-yl-(1-pentylindol-3-yl)methanone (JWH-210); Naphthalen-1-yl-(1-pentylindol-3-yl)methanone (JWH-018); N-(ortho-methoxybenzyl)-4-ethylamphetamine (4-EA-NBOMe); N-[(2-Methoxyphenyl)methyl]-N-methyl-1-(4-methylphenyl)propan-2-amine (4-MMA-NBOMe); and 1-[1-(4-methoxyphenyl)cyclohexyl]piperidine (4-MeO-PCP). We determined dopamine transporter (DAT) availability in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), striatum, and nucleus accumbens (NAc) after drug treatment. DAT availability in the mPFC and NAc significantly correlated with the ICSS threshold after drug treatment. Extracellular dopamine and calcium levels in PC-12 cells were measured following drug treatment. After drug treatment, Spearman rank and Pearson correlation analyses showed a significant difference between the extracellular dopamine level and the ICSS threshold. After drug treatment, Spearman rank correlation analysis showed a significant correlation between Ca signaling and the ICSS threshold. A positive correlation exists between the ICSS threshold and DAT availability in the mPFC and NAc provoked by abused drugs. The relative potential of drug-induced reward-seeking behavior may be related to DAT availability-mediated extracellular dopamine levels in the mPFC and NAc.
Topics: Animals; Mice; Dopamine; Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins; Nucleus Accumbens; Prefrontal Cortex; Self Stimulation
PubMed: 37948992
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115860 -
Neuropharmacology Dec 2023Rats communicate through auditory signals in the ultrasonic range, so-called ultrasonic vocalizations (USV). Short, high-frequency 50-kHz USV are associated with...
Acute anxiogenic effects of escitalopram are associated with mild alterations in D-amphetamine-induced behavior and social approach evoked by playback of 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations in rats.
Rats communicate through auditory signals in the ultrasonic range, so-called ultrasonic vocalizations (USV). Short, high-frequency 50-kHz USV are associated with positive affective states and are emitted in appetitive situations, often rewarding social interactions, such as rough-and-tumble play and mating. Exaggerated levels of 50-kHz USV emission can be observed in response to psychostimulants, most notably d-amphetamine (AMPH). There is robust evidence suggesting that 50-kHz USV serve as affiliative signals and help to maintain or re-establish social proximity. A key neurotransmitter involved in behavioral regulation is serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT). This includes both, the regulation of anxiety-related behavior and ultrasonic communication. Here, we show that acute treatment with the selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) escitalopram (ESC) leads to increased anxiety-related behavior in the elevated plus maze and tested whether such acute anxiogenic effects of ESC result in alterations in ultrasonic communication in sender and/or receiver. To this aim, we conducted a dose-response study in male rats and assessed AMPH-induced hyperactivity and 50-kHz ultrasonic calling in the sender and social approach behavior evoked by playback of pro-social 50-kHz USV in the receiver. Acute ESC treatment affected both, sender and receiver. This was reflected in a lack of AMPH-induced changes in acoustic features of 50-kHz USV and absence of social exploratory behavior evoked by 50-kHz USV playback, respectively. Albeit the SSRI effects were relatively mild, this supports the notion that the 5-HT system is involved in the regulation of a key aspect of the social behavior repertoire of rodents, namely socio-affective communication through 50-kHz USV.
Topics: Rats; Male; Animals; Ultrasonics; Dextroamphetamine; Vocalization, Animal; Escitalopram; Serotonin; Amphetamine; Social Behavior; Rodentia
PubMed: 37813275
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2023.109734