-
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2022Brugada syndrome (BrS) is associated with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, the presence of electrical strom (ES) and its management still debated.
BACKGROUND
Brugada syndrome (BrS) is associated with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, the presence of electrical strom (ES) and its management still debated.
OBJECTIVES
We present the outcome and management of 44 BrS patients suffering from ES.
METHODS
A systematic literature review and pooled analysis Through database review including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Libary and Cinahl studies were analyzed. Evidence from 7 reports of 808 BrS patients was identified.
RESULTS
The mean age of patients suffering from ES was 34 ± 9.5 months (94.7% males, 65.8% spontaneous BrS type I). Using electrophysiological study ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation were inducible in 12/23 (52.2%). Recurrence of ES was documented in 6.1%. Death from ES was 8.2% after a follow-up of 83.5 ± 53.4. In up to 27 ES resolved without treatment. External shock was required in 35.6%, internal ICD shock in 13.3%, Overdrive pacing, left cardiac sympathetic block and atropin in 2.2%. Short-term antiarrhythmic management was as the following: Isopreterenol or Isopreterenol in combination with quinidine 35.5%, orciprenaline in 2.2%, quinidine 2.2%, disopyramide 2.2% or denopamide 2.2%. However, lidocaine, magensium sulfate, mexiletine and propanolol failed to control ES.
CONCLUSION
Although ES is rare in BrS, this entity challenges physicians. Despite its high mortality rate, spontaneous termination is possible. Short-term management using Isoproterenol and/or quinidine might be safe. Prospective studies on management of ES are warranted.
PubMed: 36386327
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.981715 -
Cardiology and Therapy Dec 2022Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic disorder caused by pathogenic variants in sarcomeric genes, leading to left ventricular hypertrophy and complex phenotypic... (Review)
Review
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic disorder caused by pathogenic variants in sarcomeric genes, leading to left ventricular hypertrophy and complex phenotypic heterogeneity. While HCM is the most common inherited cardiomyopathy, pharmacological treatment options have previously been limited and were predominantly directed towards symptom control owing to left ventricular outflow obstruction. These therapies, including beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, and disopyramide, have not been shown to affect the natural history of the disease, which is of particular concern for younger patients who have an increased lifetime risk of experiencing arrhythmias, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death. Increased knowledge of the genetic mechanisms underlying this disease in recent years has led to the development of targeted, potentially disease-modifying therapies for both obstructive and nonobstructive phenotypes that may help to prevent or ameliorate left ventricular hypertrophy. In this review article, we will define the etiology and clinical phenotypes of HCM, summarize the conventional therapies for obstructive HCM, discuss the emerging targeted therapies as well as novel invasive approaches for obstructive HCM, describe the therapeutic advances for nonobstructive HCM, and outline the future directions for the treatment of HCM.
PubMed: 36243823
DOI: 10.1007/s40119-022-00283-5 -
International Journal of Cardiology Jan 2023Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) is present in 1/3 of children with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM). Disopyramide improves symptoms associated with...
BACKGROUND
Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) is present in 1/3 of children with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM). Disopyramide improves symptoms associated with LVOTO and delays surgical intervention in adults, but it is not licensed in children.
AIM
To describe a single-centre thirty-year experience of using disopyramide to treat LVOTO-related symptoms in a paediatric HCM cohort.
METHODS
Clinical data were collected for all patients meeting diagnostic criteria for HCM (<18 years) at the time of initiation, 6 months after, and last follow-up or end of disopyramide treatment. It included demographics, clinical history, 12‑lead electrocardiography, and echocardiography. Comparisons between baseline and 6 month follow up, and end of follow up respectively were performed.
RESULTS
Fifty-one patients with HCM were started on disopyramide at a mean age 10.2±5.3 years. At 6 months, of those previously symptomatic, 33(86.8%) reported an improvement of symptoms and 12(31.6%) were asymptomatic. PR interval, corrected QT interval and maximal LVOT gradient had not significantly changed, but fewer participants were noted to have systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve 31 (72.1%) vs. 26 (57.80%). Patients were followed up for a median of 1.9 years (IQR 0.83-4.5). Nine patients (17.6%) reported side effects, and eleven patients (33.3%) with initial improvement in symptoms reported a return or worsening of symptoms requiring a change in medication (n = 4, 12.1%) or left ventricular septal myomectomy (n = 7, 21.2%) during follow up.
CONCLUSION
Disopyramide is a safe and effective treatment for LVOTO-related symptoms in childhood obstructive HCM. Any delay in the need for invasive intervention, particularly during childhood, is of clear clinical benefit.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Child; Child, Preschool; Adolescent; Disopyramide; Ventricular Outflow Obstruction; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic; Echocardiography; Heart Ventricles
PubMed: 36174821
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.09.044 -
Yakugaku Zasshi : Journal of the... 2022The management of syncope is clinically important for heart failure (HF) patients. We herein describe a case on the efficacy of disopyramide for refractory syncope in HF...
The management of syncope is clinically important for heart failure (HF) patients. We herein describe a case on the efficacy of disopyramide for refractory syncope in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). An 82-year-old man was hospitalized for respiratory distress and lower limb edema and was subsequently diagnosed with HFpEF. The use of diuretics improved HF symptoms; however, on day 10 after hospitalization, a rapid decrease in blood pressure and transient loss of consciousness developed. After neurologic examination, he was diagnosed with pure autonomic failure. Although he was administered midodrine 8 mg/d, fludrocortisone 0.1 mg/d, and droxidopa 300 mg/d, syncope was observed once a day on average. According to the Holter electrocardiogram, the patient's heart rate and coefficient of variation of R-R intervals (CVRR) during the day were unstable. In addition, high frequency power (parasympathetic nerve activity) was significantly higher than low frequency power (both sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves activity), suggesting that the parasympathetic nerves may have been highly active while the sympathetic nerves would have been blocked. On day 29, a pharmacist proposed disopyramide 300 mg/d, which blocks parasympathetic nerves and improves neural-mediated syncope, to the attending doctor. After the initiation of disopyramide, transient loss of consciousness was not observed. Furthermore, the diurnal variation in the heart rate and CVRR completely disappeared. In conclusion, disopyramide would be effective for refractory syncope in patients with HFpEF, and the Holter electrocardiogram may be a useful tool for the assessment of drug efficacy by pharmacists.
Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Disopyramide; Electrocardiography, Ambulatory; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Stroke Volume; Syncope
PubMed: 35908952
DOI: 10.1248/yakushi.22-00047 -
Journal of Thoracic Disease Jun 2022The prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is estimated to be 1 in 200 to 500 individuals, with systolic anterior motion (SAM) of the mitral valve (MV) and left... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
The prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is estimated to be 1 in 200 to 500 individuals, with systolic anterior motion (SAM) of the mitral valve (MV) and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction present in 60% to 70%. In this narrative review, we aim to elucidate the pathophysiology of SAM-septal contact and LVOT obstruction in HCM by presenting a detailed review on the anatomy of the MV apparatus in HCM, examining the various existing theories pertaining to the SAM phenomenon as supported by cardiac imaging, and providing a critical assessment of management strategies for SAM in HCM.
METHODS
A literature review was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library, of all scientific articles published through December 2021. A focus was placed on descriptive studies, reports correlating echocardiographic findings with pathologic diagnosis, and outcomes studies.
KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS
The pathophysiology of SAM involves the complex interplay between HCM morphology, MV apparatus anatomic abnormalities, and labile hemodynamic derangements. Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) vector flow mapping have identified drag forces, as opposed to the "Venturi effect", as the main hydraulic forces responsible for SAM. The degree of mitral regurgitation with SAM is variable, and its severity is correlated with degree of LVOT obstruction and outcomes. First line therapy for the amelioration of SAM and LVOT obstruction is medical therapy with beta-blockers, non-dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers, and disopyramide, in conjunction with lifestyle modifications. In refractory cases septal reduction therapy is performed, which may be combined with a 'resect-plicate-release' procedure, anterior mitral leaflet extension, surgical edge-to-edge MV repair, anterior mitral leaflet retention plasty, or secondary chordal cutting.
CONCLUSIONS
Recent scientific advances in the field of HCM have allowed for a maturation of our understanding of the SAM phenomenon. Cardiac imaging plays a critical role in its diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance, and in our ability to apply the appropriate therapeutic regimens. The increasing prevalence of HCM places an emphasis on continued basic and clinical research to further improve outcomes for this challenging population.
PubMed: 35813751
DOI: 10.21037/jtd-22-182 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Jul 2022Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) has been studied primarily in comprehensive centers of excellence. Broadening the understanding of patients with oHCM in...
Clinical Characteristics and Healthcare Resource Utilization among Patients with Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Treated in a Range of Settings in the United States.
Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) has been studied primarily in comprehensive centers of excellence. Broadening the understanding of patients with oHCM in the general population may improve identification and treatment in other settings. This retrospective cohort study identified adults with oHCM from a large electronic medical record database comprising data from 39 integrated delivery networks (IBM Explorys; observational period: January 2009-July 2019). Clinical characteristics, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and outcomes were reported. Of 8791 patients, 53.0% were female and the mean index age was 61.8 years. Cardiovascular drugs prescribed included beta-blockers (80.5%), calcium channel blockers (46.0%), and disopyramide (2.4%). Over time, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and ventricular arrhythmias increased. Surgical procedures included septal myectomy (22.0%), alcohol septal ablation (0.6%), and heart transplantation (0.3%). Implantable cardioverter defibrillators were present in 11.2% of patients. After initial septal reduction therapy (SRT), HCRU increased and 550 patients (27.7%) required a reintervention. Of the overall group, 2.7% experienced sudden cardiac arrest by end of study. In conclusion, this cohort of patients with oHCM had guideline-recommended drug therapy and procedures. Despite this, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and ventricular arrhythmias increased, and more than a quarter of patients undergoing SRT required reintervention. These unresolved issues emphasize the unmet need for new, effective therapies for patients with oHCM.
PubMed: 35807183
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11133898 -
Journal of Pharmacological Sciences Aug 2022Since information is still limited whether atrial I may become a potential therapeutic target to terminate persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), we assessed it by using...
Roles of I for perpetuating atrial fibrillation: Effects of atrial-selective K channel inhibitor AVE0118 and class I drugs on the persistent atrial fibrillation canine model.
Since information is still limited whether atrial I may become a potential therapeutic target to terminate persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), we assessed it by using the persistent AF canine model with representative I inhibitor AVE0118 and class I drugs. AVE0118 (6 mg/kg, n = 7), disopyramide (3 mg/kg, n = 7) and cibenzoline (3 mg/kg, n = 6) terminated the AF in 3/7, 1/7 and 2/6 animals, respectively, whereas aprindine (3 mg/kg, n = 6) did not suppress it. These findings suggest that I inhibition in addition to open-state I suppression with slow dissociation kinetics can synergistically exert potent antiarrhythmic action against persistent AF.
Topics: Action Potentials; Animals; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Biphenyl Compounds; Dogs; Heart Atria
PubMed: 35717070
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphs.2022.05.004 -
Drugs Jun 2022Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), the most common inherited heart disease, is still orphan of a specific drug treatment. The erroneous consideration of HCM as a rare... (Review)
Review
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), the most common inherited heart disease, is still orphan of a specific drug treatment. The erroneous consideration of HCM as a rare disease has hampered the design and conduct of large, randomized trials in the last 50 years, and most of the indications in the current guidelines are derived from small non-randomized studies, case series, or simply from the consensus of experts. Guideline-directed therapy of HCM includes non-selective drugs such as disopyramide, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, or β-adrenergic receptor blockers, mainly used in patients with symptomatic obstruction of the outflow tract. Following promising preclinical studies, several drugs acting on potential HCM-specific targets were tested in patients. Despite the huge efforts, none of these studies was able to change clinical practice for HCM patients, because tested drugs were proven to be scarcely effective or hardly tolerated in patients. However, novel compounds have been developed in recent years specifically for HCM, addressing myocardial hypercontractility and altered energetics in a direct manner, through allosteric inhibition of myosin. In this paper, we will critically review the use of different classes of drugs in HCM patients, starting from "old" established agents up to novel selective drugs that have been recently trialed in patients.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic; Humans
PubMed: 35696053
DOI: 10.1007/s40265-022-01728-w -
Cardiology and Therapy Jun 2022There is limited evidence on therapies for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and data regarding treatment patterns and cost are scarce. This study assessed...
INTRODUCTION
There is limited evidence on therapies for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and data regarding treatment patterns and cost are scarce. This study assessed treatment patterns and economic outcomes in patients with symptomatic obstructive HCM.
METHODS
Adults with symptomatic obstructive HCM as per study design and treated with pharmacotherapies [beta blockers (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), BB + CCB, or disopyramide] or procedures (septal reduction therapy, heart transplantation, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and pacemaker implantation) were identified from the IBM® MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental database (January 2009-March 2019). Patients had 12-month continuous eligibility before and after (study period) treatment initiation (index treatment). Healthcare resource utilization (HRU), costs, and treatment changes were assessed.
RESULTS
Of the 4883 patients included in the analysis, 85% received pharmacotherapies (BB 52.5%; CCB 11.7%; BB + CCB 17.7%; disopyramide 2.4%) and 15.7% underwent procedures. During the study period, 38, 34, and 100% of all patients had ≥ 1 inpatient stay, emergency room (ER) visit, and outpatient visit, respectively; mean total healthcare costs were US$53,053. Patients undergoing procedures had the highest HRU and costs across groups. Among patients receiving pharmacotherapies, HRU was lowest with BBs and highest with disopyramide. Treatment changes were observed in 43.8% of patients receiving pharmacotherapies.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients experienced high rates of treatment changes, and the economic burden associated with symptomatic obstructive HCM increased as therapy escalated. More effective therapies are needed to stabilize or decrease the economic burden of obstructive HCM.
PubMed: 35230625
DOI: 10.1007/s40119-022-00257-7