-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2015Bone disease is common in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and when untreated may result in bone deformities, bone pain, fractures and reduced growth rates.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Bone disease is common in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and when untreated may result in bone deformities, bone pain, fractures and reduced growth rates. This is an update of a review first published in 2010.
OBJECTIVES
This review aimed to examine the benefits (improved growth rates, reduced risk of bone fractures and deformities, reduction in PTH levels) and harms (hypercalcaemia, blood vessel calcification, deterioration in kidney function) of interventions (including vitamin D preparations and phosphate binders) for the prevention and treatment of metabolic bone disease in children with CKD.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register to 8 September 2015 through contact with the Trial's Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant for this review.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different interventions used to prevent or treat bone disease in children with CKD stages 2 to 5D.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Data were assessed for study eligibility, risk of bias and extracted independently by two authors. Results were reported as risk ratios (RR) or risk differences (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes. For continuous outcomes the mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was used. Statistical analyses were performed using the random-effects model.
MAIN RESULTS
This review included 18 studies (576 children); three new studies were added for this update. Adequate sequence generation and allocation concealment were reported in 12 and 11 studies respectively. Only four studies reported blinding of children, investigators or outcome assessors. Nine studies were at low risk of attrition bias and 12 studies were at low risk of selective reporting bias.Eight different interventions were compared. Two studies compared intraperitoneal (IP) with oral calcitriol. PTH levels were significantly lower with IP compared with oral calcitriol (1 study: MD -501.00 pg/mL, 95% CI -721.54 to -280.46) but the number of children with abnormal bone histology did not differ between treatments. Three studies compared intermittent with daily oral calcitriol. The change in mean height SDS (1 study: MD 0.13, 95% CI -0.22 to 0.48) and the percentage fall in parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels at eight weeks (1 study: MD -5.50%, 95% CI -32.37 to 21.37) and 12 months (1 study: MD -6.00% 95% CI -25.27 to 13.27) did not differ between treatments.Four studies compared active vitamin D preparations (calcitriol, paricalcitol, 1α-hydroxyvitamin D) with placebo or no specific treatment. One study reported vitamin D preparations significantly reduced PTH levels (-55.00 pmol/L, 95% CI -83.03 to -26.97). There was no significant difference in hypercalcaemia risk with vitamin D preparations compared with placebo or no specific treatment (4 studies, 103 children: RD 0.08 mg/dL, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.24). However, there was heterogeneity (I(2) = 55%) with one study showing a significantly greater risk of hypercalcaemia with intravenous (IV) calcitriol administration. Two studies (97 children) compared calcitriol with other vitamin D preparations and both found no significant differences in growth between preparations.Two studies compared ergocalciferol in patients with CKD and vitamin D deficiency. Elevated PTH levels developed significantly later in ergocalciferol treated children (1 study: hazard ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.93) though the number with elevated PTH levels did not differ between groups (1 study, 40 children: RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.05).Two studies compared calcium carbonate with aluminium hydroxide as phosphate binders. One study (17 children: MD -0.86 SDS, 95% CI -2.24 to 0.52) reported no significant difference in mean final height SDS between treatments. Three studies compared sevelamer with calcium-containing phosphate binders. There were no significant differences in the final calcium, phosphorus or PTH levels between binders. More episodes of hypercalcaemia occurred with calcium-containing binders. One study reported no significant differences between calcitriol and doxercalciferol in bone histology or biochemical parameters.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Bone disease, assessed by changes in PTH levels, is improved by all vitamin D preparations. However, no consistent differences between routes of administration, frequencies of dosing or vitamin D preparations were demonstrated. Although fewer episodes of high calcium levels occurred with the non-calcium-containing phosphate binder, sevelamer, compared with calcium-containing binders, there were no differences in serum phosphorus and calcium overall and phosphorus values were reduced to similar extents. All studies were small with few data available on patient-centred outcomes (growth, bone deformities) and limited data on biochemical parameters or bone histology resulting in considerable imprecision of results thus limiting the applicability to the care of children with CKD.
Topics: Aluminum Hydroxide; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Bone Diseases, Metabolic; Calcitriol; Calcium; Calcium Carbonate; Child; Chronic Disease; Ergocalciferols; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Parathyroid Hormone; Phosphorus; Polyamines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sevelamer; Vitamin D
PubMed: 26561037
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008327.pub2 -
American Journal of Nephrology 2015In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), impaired renal function leads to decreased vitamin D levels, which causes an increase in parathyroid hormone (PTH)... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), impaired renal function leads to decreased vitamin D levels, which causes an increase in parathyroid hormone (PTH) production and contributes to the development of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). This may result in adverse clinical effects such as bone disorders, vascular calcification, cardiovascular disease, and increased mortality. Current treatment practices and associated outcomes with active vitamin D treatment in patients with CKD were reviewed with the objective to assess parameters (such as PTH and serum calcium levels) that may be used to define the failure of vitamin D treatment.
SUMMARY
Reports based on observational data have noted improved outcomes with active vitamin D treatment (calcitriol, paricalcitol, alfacalcidol, or doxercalciferol) in patients with CKD. Criteria for the identification of active vitamin D treatment failure are unclear from current guidelines, although up to 50% of patients may experience treatment failure eventually because of development of hypercalcemia or resistant SHPT, characterized by an elevated intact PTH (iPTH) level despite treatment. We propose a definition of vitamin D treatment failure as iPTH >600 pg/ml after 6 months of intravenous active vitamin D treatment and corrected total calcium serum levels >10.2 mg/dl, and review factors that may predict the response to vitamin D treatment. Key Message: Active vitamin D treatment failure is an important challenge in clinical practice. The aim of the proposed definition is to suggest a possible framework for hypothesis generation and to encourage further research into this common problem.
Topics: Bone Density Conservation Agents; Humans; Hyperparathyroidism, Secondary; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Treatment Failure; Vitamin D; Vitamin D Deficiency
PubMed: 26439891
DOI: 10.1159/000441095 -
The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and... Nov 2016Arabinocytosine (AraC, also known as cytarabine) is one of the mainstays of AML therapy, but like other DNA damaging therapeutic agents it is rarely curative by itself....
Arabinocytosine (AraC, also known as cytarabine) is one of the mainstays of AML therapy, but like other DNA damaging therapeutic agents it is rarely curative by itself. There is an emerging realization that the therapeutic outcomes may be improved by combining AraC with other compounds. Here we report that the addition of a differentiating agent combination immediately following AraC damage to AML blasts, selectively increases the cell kill. The experiments were performed using cultured cells from established cell lines of AML (HL60 and U937). The cells were exposed to 100nM AraC, a concentration which produced approximately 25-50% cell kill, followed by a combination of 100nM 1alpha-hydroxyvitamin D2 (1-D2) and 10μM carnosic acid (CA), which together can serve as a powerful differentiating agent combination for AML cells, but are not toxic alone. AraC-induced cell death, measured by annexin V/propidium iodide, was significantly (p<0.01) increased by the 1-D2/CA combination in both cell lines, but not by 1-D2 or CA alone. The enhancement of cell death occurred by both apoptosis and necrosis, was associated with increased DNA damage and with higher levels of DNA damage response (DDR) activated marker Chk1, but the expression of p27, a cell cycle inhibitor protein, was not enhanced by 1-D2/CA. The principal finding is that a vitamin D analog 1-D2 combined with a plant-derived antioxidant CA can markedly augment the cytotoxic action of AraC, an anti-leukemia therapeutic agent.
Topics: Abietanes; Annexin A5; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antioxidants; Apoptosis; Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Cell Cycle Proteins; Cell Differentiation; Comet Assay; Cytarabine; DNA Damage; Ergocalciferols; HL-60 Cells; Humans; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Phosphorylation; Propidium; U937 Cells
PubMed: 26319201
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2015.08.023 -
PloS One 2015Osteocytic protein expression is dysregulated in CKD and is affected by changes in mineral metabolism; however the effects of active vitamin D sterol therapy on...
BACKGROUND
Osteocytic protein expression is dysregulated in CKD and is affected by changes in mineral metabolism; however the effects of active vitamin D sterol therapy on osteocyte protein expression in advanced CKD is unknown.
METHODS
Eleven pediatric patients with end stage kidney disease underwent bone biopsy, were treated for 8 months with doxercalciferol, and then underwent a second bone biopsy. Bone expression of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), dentin matrix protein 1 (DMP1), and sclerostin were determined by immunohistochemistry and quantified by Ariol Scanning. Western blot analysis and qRT-PCR was performed on bone abstracts of a subset of study subjects to determine the nature (i.e. size) of FGF23 and DMP1 in bone before and after therapy.
RESULTS
As assessed by immunohistochemistry, bone FGF23, DMP1 and sclerostin protein all increased with therapy. In the case of FGF23, this increase was due to an increase in the full-length molecule without the appearance of FGF23 fragments. DMP1 was present primarily in its full-length form in healthy controls while 57kDa and 37kDa fragments of DMP1 were apparent in bone of dialysis patients at baseline and the 57 kDa appeared to decrease with therapy.
CONCLUSION
Marked changes in osteocytic protein expression accompany doxercalciferol therapy, potentially impacting bone mineralization and the skeletal response to PTH. The effects of these bone changes on long-term outcomes remain to be determined.
Topics: Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing; Adolescent; Biopsy; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Bone Morphogenetic Proteins; Bone and Bones; Child; Ergocalciferols; Extracellular Matrix Proteins; Female; Fibroblast Growth Factor-23; Fibroblast Growth Factors; Gene Expression; Genetic Markers; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Osteocytes; Osteolysis; Phosphoproteins; Renal Dialysis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 25774916
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120856 -
Peritoneal Dialysis International :... 2015Limited well-controlled research exists examining the impact of different formulations of oral vitamin D on clinical outcomes in dialysis patients, specifically those on... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Limited well-controlled research exists examining the impact of different formulations of oral vitamin D on clinical outcomes in dialysis patients, specifically those on peritoneal dialysis. For this retrospective mortality analysis, we compared mortality rates of patients on 3 of the most commonly prescribed vitamin D agents.
METHODS
We examined 2 years (7/1/2008 to 6/30/2010) of oral medication records of peritoneal dialysis patients from a large US dialysis organization. Patients were identified whose physicians prescribed a single form of vitamin D (calcitriol, paricalcitol, or doxercalciferol) for ≥ 90% of all patient-months. We excluded incident patients (< 90 days on dialysis) and patients whose physicians treated < 5 peritoneal dialysis patients at a dialysis facility, and we assessed mortality.
RESULTS
The analysis inclusion criteria identified 1,707 patients. The subset in this analysis included 12.6% of all prevalent peritoneal dialysis patients and 11.8% of prevalent patient-months. Patients with physicians who predominately prescribed calcitriol had a lower mortality rate: 9.33 (confidence interval (CI) 7.06, 11.60) deaths per 100 patient-years than the doxercalciferol, 12.20 (CI 9.34, 15.06) or paricalcitol, 12.27 (CI 9.27, 15.28) groups. However, these differences were not statistically significant. A Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for differences in age, vintage, gender, race, body mass index, and comorbidities also showed no significant differences.
CONCLUSIONS
For this peritoneal dialysis population, instrumental variable analyses showed no significant difference in mortality in patients taking the most common oral vitamin D formulations (calcitriol, doxercalciferol, paricalcitol).
Topics: Adult; Aged; Calcitriol; Cause of Death; Cohort Studies; Confidence Intervals; Dietary Supplements; Drug Administration Schedule; Ergocalciferols; Female; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Peritoneal Dialysis; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Reference Values; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin D
PubMed: 24584595
DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2012.00324