-
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica... Jul 2024There is a paucity of objectively verified data on substance use among Danish pregnant women. We estimated the prevalence of substance use including alcohol and nicotine...
INTRODUCTION
There is a paucity of objectively verified data on substance use among Danish pregnant women. We estimated the prevalence of substance use including alcohol and nicotine among the general population of Danish pregnant women.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
In this anonymous, national, cross-sectional, descriptive study, pregnant women were invited when attending an ultrasound scan between November 2019 and December 2020 at nine Danish hospitals. Women submitted a urine sample and filled out a questionnaire. Urine samples were screened on-site with a qualitative urine dipstick for 15 substances including alcohol, nicotine, opioids, amphetamines, cannabis, and benzodiazepines. All screen-positive urine samples underwent secondary quantitative analyses with gold standard, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis. Results were compared to questionnaire information to analyze the validity of self-reporting and to examine possible cross-reactions.
RESULTS
A total of 1903 of 2154 invited pregnant women participated (88.3%). The prevalence of dipstick-positive urine samples was 25.0%. 44.0% of these were confirmed positive, resulting in a total confirmed prevalence of 10.8%. The prevalence of nicotine use was 10.1%-and for all other substances, <0.5%. Nicotine use was more prevalent among younger pregnant women, while other substance use appeared evenly distributed over age groups. Self-reporting of use of nicotine products was high (71.1%), but low for cannabis and alcohol intake (0% and 33.3%, respectively). Prescription medication explained almost all cases of oxycodone, methylphenidate, and benzodiazepine use.
CONCLUSIONS
Substance use among pregnant women consisted mainly of nicotine. Dipstick screening involved risks of false negatives and false positives. Except for alcohol intake and cannabis use, dipstick analyses did not seem to provide further information than self-reporting. LC-MS/MS analyses remain gold standard, and future role of dipstick screenings should be discussed.
Topics: Humans; Female; Pregnancy; Cross-Sectional Studies; Denmark; Adult; Substance-Related Disorders; Substance Abuse Detection; Prevalence; Pregnancy Complications; Surveys and Questionnaires; Young Adult; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Chromatography, Liquid
PubMed: 38778571
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14862 -
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine May 2024Although several studies have noted that patients are routinely overprescribed opioids, few have reported usage after arthroscopic surgery.
BACKGROUND
Although several studies have noted that patients are routinely overprescribed opioids, few have reported usage after arthroscopic surgery.
PURPOSE
To determine opioid consumption and allocation for unused opioids after common arthroscopic surgeries.
STUDY DESIGN
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
Patients between the ages of 15 and 40 years who were scheduled to undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), labral repair of the hip or shoulder, meniscectomy, or meniscal repair were prospectively enrolled. Patients were prescribed either 5 mg hydrocodone-325 mg acetaminophen or 5 mg oxycodone-325 mg acetaminophen based on surgeon preference. Patients completed a daily opioid usage survey during the 2-week postoperative period. In addition, patients completed a survey on postoperative day 21 inquiring about continued opioid use and medication disposal, if applicable. Opioid medication consumption was converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs).
RESULTS
Of the 200 patients who were enrolled in the study, 176 patients had sufficient follow-up after undergoing 85 (48%) ACLR, 26 (14.8%) hip labral repair, 34 (19.3%) shoulder labral repair, 18 (10.2%) meniscectomy, and 13 (7.4%) meniscal repair procedures. Mean age was 26.1 years (SD, 7.38); surgeons prescribed a mean of 26.6 pills whereas patients reported consuming a mean of 15.5 pills. The mean MME consumption in the 14 days after each procedure was calculated: ACLR (95.7; 44% of prescription), hip labral repair (84.8; 37%), shoulder labral repair (57.2; 35%), meniscectomy (18.4; 27%), and meniscal repair (32.1; 42%). This corresponded to approximately 39% of the total opioid prescription being utilized across all procedures. Mean MME consumption was greatest on postoperative day 1 in hip, shoulder, and meniscal procedures and on postoperative day 2 in ACLR. Only 7.04% of patients reported continued opioid use in the third postoperative week. Patients had a mean of 11 unused pills or 77.7 MMEs remaining. Of the patients with remaining medication, 24.7% intended to keep their medication for future use.
CONCLUSION
The results of our study indicate that patients who undergo the aforementioned arthroscopic procedures consume <75 MMEs in the 2-week postoperative period, translating into a mean of 10 to 15 pills consumed. Approximately 60% of total opioids prescribed went unused, and one-fourth of patients intended to keep their remaining medication for future usage. We have provided general prescribing guidelines and recommend that surgeons carefully consider customizing their opioid prescriptions on the basis of procedure site to balance optimal postoperative analgesia with avoidance of dissemination of excess opioids.
PubMed: 38757068
DOI: 10.1177/23259671241249688 -
Gynecologic Oncology Reports Jun 2024Across specialties, surgeons over-prescribe opioids to patients after surgery. We aimed to develop and implement an evidence-based calculator to inform post-discharge...
INTRODUCTION
Across specialties, surgeons over-prescribe opioids to patients after surgery. We aimed to develop and implement an evidence-based calculator to inform post-discharge opioid prescription size for gynecologic oncology patients after laparotomy.
METHODS
In 2021, open surgical gynecologic oncology patients were called 2-4 weeks after surgery to ask about their home opioid use. This data was used to develop a calculator for post-discharge opioid prescription size using two factors: 1) age of the patient, 2) oral morphine equivalents (OME) used by patients the day before hospital discharge. The calculator was implemented on the inpatient service from 8/21/22 and patients were contacted 2-4 weeks after surgery to again assess their opioid use at home.
RESULTS
Data from 95 surveys were used to develop the opioid prescription size calculator and are compared to 95 post-intervention surveys. There was no difference pre- to post-intervention in demographic data, surgical procedure, or immediate postoperative recovery. The median opioid prescription size decreased from 150 to 37.5 OME (p < 0.01) and self-reported use of opioids at home decreased from 22.5 to 7.5 OME (p = 0.05). The refill rate did not differ (12.6 % pre- and 11.6 % post-intervention, p = 0.82). The surplus of opioids our patients reported having at home decreased from 1264 doses of 5 mg oxycodone tabs in the pre-intervention cohort, to 490 doses in the post-intervention cohort, a 61 % reduction.
CONCLUSIONS
An evidence-based approach for prescribing opioids to patients after laparotomy decreased the surplus of opioids we introduced into our patients' communities without impacting refill rates.
PubMed: 38725997
DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101396 -
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Feb 2024Total hip replacement (THR) is frequently associated with intense post-surgical pain. Effective pain management is of crucial importance to improving patient's condition...
BACKGROUND
Total hip replacement (THR) is frequently associated with intense post-surgical pain. Effective pain management is of crucial importance to improving patient's condition and increasing his/her satisfaction in the post-operative time.
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to compare the analgesic effect and safety of oxycodone and fentanyl after THR.
METHODS
Seventy-two cases scheduled for elective THR were included in this randomized, triple-blind trial. The patients were equally randomized into 2 groups: Fentanyl group (50 ug of fentanyl) and oxycodone group (oxycodone 4 mg). Drugs were received 20 min prior to the end of the operation.
RESULTS
Post-operative visual analog scale (VAS) measurements at rest and movement at the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and in the ward, 2 h, 4 h, and 8 h post-operatively exhibited a significantly reduced value in the oxycodone group compared to the fentanyl group (P-value < 0.05). Time to first rescue for analgesia was delayed significantly in the oxycodone compared to the fentanyl group (P-value < 0.001). Fentanyl consumption (ug) in the 1st post-operative 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h decreased significantly in the oxycodone group compared to the fentanyl group (P-value < 0.001). Post-operative nausea, vomiting, headache, and pruritus were matched between the 2 groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
A bolus dose of 4 mg of oxycodone provided superior analgesic efficacy than 50 ug fentanyl as evidenced by significantly lower pain score, delayed onset to first request for analgesia, and the smaller amount of fentanyl consumption at 12, 24, and 48 h post-total hip arthroplasty compared to fentanyl. The incidence of adverse events was comparable between the 2 groups.
PubMed: 38725916
DOI: 10.5812/aapm-142710 -
Frontiers in Surgery 2024We aimed to compare the anesthesia induction effects of oxycodone and sufentanil on postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic gallbladder-preserving...
Comparison of the analgesic effects of oxycodone vs. sufentanil on postoperative pain after laparoscopic gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
BACKGROUND
We aimed to compare the anesthesia induction effects of oxycodone and sufentanil on postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy, as well as changes in serum levels of inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10) in the perioperative period.
METHODS
Sixty patients who underwent laparoscopic gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy were evenly divided into oxycodone (O) and sufentanil (S) groups. In groups O and S, oxycodone (0.3 mg/kg) and sufentanil (0.3 ug/kg) were administered, respectively, followed by propofol (2 mg/kg) and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg). In both groups, the intraoperative electroencephalography double-frequency index was used to guide the use of sedative and analgesic drugs, assessing the follow-up analgesic effect (VAS), degree of sedation (Ramsey), and postoperative complications at seven different time points (0, 0.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 h postoperatively).
RESULTS
Compared with the S group, patients in the O group exhibited lower VAS scores within 24 h postoperatively ( < 0.001), but there was no statistical difference between wound and shoulder pain scores (> 0.05). Regarding postoperative awakening and extubation duration, O group patients experienced shorter times and better remedial analgesia ( < 0.05). In terms of the degree of sedation, the Ramsay score decreased at 0 h postoperatively compared with the S group ( < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Compared with sufentanil, oxycodone anesthesia induced better postoperative analgesia and less inflammatory responses in patients undergoing laparoscopic gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University Shougang Hospital, with ethical approval (No. IRBK-2020-009), and has completed registration in the Chinese Clinical Trials Register (http://www.chictr.org.cn/) (ChiCTR2000031230).
PubMed: 38721023
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1382759 -
The Journal of Innovations in Cardiac... Apr 2024Providing adequate analgesia perioperatively during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation can be a challenge. The objective of our...
Providing adequate analgesia perioperatively during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation can be a challenge. The objective of our study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block technique in providing analgesia and minimizing the risk of opioid use in high-risk patient populations. We enrolled consecutive patients >18 years of age undergoing S-ICD implantation from February 2020 to February 2022 at our center prospectively. Patients were randomly assigned to receive the ESP block or traditional wound infiltration. A total of 24 patients were enrolled, including 13 patients randomized to ESP block and 11 patients as controls who received only wound infiltration. The primary outcome assessed was the overall use of perioperative analgesic medications in the ESP block group versus the surgical wound infiltration group. A significant reduction in intraoperative fentanyl use was observed [median ([interquartile range]) in the ESP block group (0 [0-50] μg) compared to the wound infiltration block group (75 [50-100] μg) ( = .001). The overall postoperative day (POD) 0 fentanyl use was also significantly decreased (75 [50-100] μg) in the ESP block group compared to the surgical wound infiltration group (100 [87.5-150] μg) ( = .049). There was also a trend of decreased POD 0 oxycodone-acetaminophen use. Finally, the number of days to discharge was less in the ESP block group. These results indicate that ESP block is an innovative, safe, and effective technique that decreases intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption and may be a useful adjunct pain-management technique in these high-risk patients. Larger studies are needed to further validate its use.
PubMed: 38715552
DOI: 10.19102/icrm.2024.15043 -
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS May 2024Triptans are anti-migraine drugs with a potential central site of action. However, it is not known to what extent triptans cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The aim...
BACKGROUND
Triptans are anti-migraine drugs with a potential central site of action. However, it is not known to what extent triptans cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The aim of this study was therefore to determine if triptans pass the brain capillary endothelium and investigate the possible underlying mechanisms with focus on the involvement of the putative proton-coupled organic cation (H/OC) antiporter. Additionally, we evaluated whether triptans interacted with the efflux transporter, P-glycoprotein (P-gp).
METHODS
We investigated the cellular uptake characteristics of the prototypical H/OC antiporter substrates, pyrilamine and oxycodone, and seven different triptans in the human brain microvascular endothelial cell line, hCMEC/D3. Triptan interactions with P-gp were studied using the IPEC-J2 MDR1 cell line. Lastly, in vivo neuropharmacokinetic assessment of the unbound brain-to-plasma disposition of eletriptan was conducted in wild type and mdr1a/1b knockout mice.
RESULTS
We demonstrated that most triptans were able to inhibit uptake of the H/OC antiporter substrate, pyrilamine, with eletriptan emerging as the strongest inhibitor. Eletriptan, almotriptan, and sumatriptan exhibited a pH-dependent uptake into hCMEC/D3 cells. Eletriptan demonstrated saturable uptake kinetics with an apparent K of 89 ± 38 µM and a J of 2.2 ± 0.7 nmol·min·mg protein (n = 3). Bidirectional transport experiments across IPEC-J2 MDR1 monolayers showed that eletriptan is transported by P-gp, thus indicating that eletriptan is both a substrate of the H/OC antiporter and P-gp. This was further confirmed in vivo, where the unbound brain-to-unbound plasma concentration ratio (K) was 0.04 in wild type mice while the ratio rose to 1.32 in mdr1a/1b knockout mice.
CONCLUSIONS
We have demonstrated that the triptan family of compounds possesses affinity for the H/OC antiporter proposing that the putative H/OC antiporter plays a role in the BBB transport of triptans, particularly eletriptan. Our in vivo studies indicate that eletriptan is subjected to simultaneous brain uptake and efflux, possibly facilitated by the putative H/OC antiporter and P-gp, respectively. Our findings offer novel insights into the potential central site of action involved in migraine treatment with triptans and highlight the significance of potential transporter related drug-drug interactions.
Topics: Tryptamines; Animals; Endothelial Cells; Humans; Mice, Knockout; Blood-Brain Barrier; Brain; Cell Line; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Biological Transport; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Male; Antiporters; Pyrilamine; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B; Pyrrolidines
PubMed: 38711118
DOI: 10.1186/s12987-024-00544-6 -
Psychopharmacology Jul 2024Medications are urgently needed to treat symptoms of drug withdrawal and mitigate dysphoria and psychiatric comorbidities that drive opioid abuse and relapse. ITI-333 is...
RATIONALE
Medications are urgently needed to treat symptoms of drug withdrawal and mitigate dysphoria and psychiatric comorbidities that drive opioid abuse and relapse. ITI-333 is a novel molecule in development for treatment of substance use disorders, psychiatric comorbidities, and pain.
OBJECTIVE
Characterize the preclinical profile of ITI-333 using pharmacological, behavioral, and physiological assays.
METHODS
Cell-based assays were used to measure receptor binding and intrinsic efficacy of ITI-333; animal models were employed to assess effects on opioid reinstatement, precipitated oxycodone withdrawal, and drug abuse liability.
RESULTS
In vitro, ITI-333 is a potent 5-HT receptor antagonist (K = 8 nM) and a biased, partial agonist at μ-opioid (MOP) receptors (K = 11 nM; lacking β-arrestin agonism) with lesser antagonist activity at adrenergic α (K = 28 nM) and dopamine D (K = 50 nM) receptors. In vivo, ITI-333 blocks 5-HT receptor-mediated head twitch and MOP receptor-mediated effects on motor hyperactivity in mice. ITI-333 alone is a naloxone-sensitive analgesic (mice) which suppresses somatic signs of naloxone-precipitated oxycodone withdrawal (mice) and heroin cue-induced reinstatement responding without apparent tolerance or physical dependence after chronic dosing (rats). ITI-333 did not acutely impair gastrointestinal or pulmonary function (rats) and was not intravenously self-administered by heroin-maintained rats or rhesus monkeys.
CONCLUSIONS
ITI-333 acts as a potent 5-HT receptor antagonist, as well a biased MOP receptor partial agonist with low intrinsic efficacy. ITI-333 mitigates opioid withdrawal/reinstatement, supporting its potential utility as a treatment for OUD.
Topics: Animals; Mice; Male; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome; Rats; Humans; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Serotonin 5-HT2 Receptor Antagonists; Substance-Related Disorders; Opioid-Related Disorders; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Oxycodone; Analgesics, Opioid; Self Administration; Cricetulus; CHO Cells
PubMed: 38710856
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-024-06578-w -
Scandinavian Journal of Pain Jan 2024Multimodal pain management is one component in enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. Here we evaluate the efficacy of tramadol-paracetamol in acute postoperative... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVES
Multimodal pain management is one component in enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. Here we evaluate the efficacy of tramadol-paracetamol in acute postoperative pain and pain outcome at 12 months after spine surgery in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
METHODS
We randomized 120 patients undergoing spine surgery to receive, for add-on pain management, two tramadol-paracetamol 37.5 mg/325 mg ( = 61) or placebo tablets ( = 59) twice a day for 5 postoperative days. In the hospital, multimodal pain management consisted of dexketoprofen and oxycodone. After discharge, patients were prescribed ibuprofen 200 mg, maximum 1,200 mg/day. Pain, analgesic use, and satisfaction with pain medication were followed up with the Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire before surgery and at 1 and 52 weeks after surgery. The primary outcome was patients' satisfaction with pain medication 1 week after surgery.
RESULTS
At 1 week after surgery, patients' satisfaction with pain medication was similarly high in the two groups, 75% [interquartile range, 30%] in the placebo group and 70% [40%] in the tramadol-paracetamol group ( = 0.949) on a scale: 0% = not satisfied, 100% = totally satisfied. At 1 week, ibuprofen dose was lower in the placebo group 200 mg [1,000] compared to the tramadol-paracetamol group, 800 mg [1,600] ( = 0.016). There was no difference in the need for rescue oxycodone. Patients in the tramadol-paracetamol group had more adverse events associated with analgesics during the first postoperative week (relative risk = 1.8, 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.6).
CONCLUSION
Add-on pain treatment with tramadol-paracetamol did not enhance patients' satisfaction with early pain management after back surgery.
Topics: Humans; Pain, Postoperative; Tramadol; Double-Blind Method; Acetaminophen; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Patient Satisfaction; Oxycodone; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Adult; Spine; Treatment Outcome; Ibuprofen; Pain Measurement; Aged
PubMed: 38708610
DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2023-0105 -
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy =... Jun 2024Opioid receptor agonists are often used when cancer patients undergo surgery or analgesic treatment. As analgesics in clinical care, opioids can provide intraoperative... (Review)
Review
Opioid receptor agonists are often used when cancer patients undergo surgery or analgesic treatment. As analgesics in clinical care, opioids can provide intraoperative or to chronic cancer pain relief. Immune function plays an important role in anti-cancer therapy, with cellular immunity, comprised principally of T-lymphocytes and natural killer cells, representing the primary anti-cancer immune response. However, it remains unclear whether immune function is further affected with the use of opioids in already immunocompromised cancer patients. This article provides a review of the effects of commonly used clinical opioids, including morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl and tramadol, on immune function in cancer patients. It provides a summary of current evidence regarding the immunomodulatory effects of opioids in the cancer setting and mechanisms underlying these interactions.
Topics: Humans; Analgesics, Opioid; Neoplasms; Cancer Pain; Animals; T-Lymphocytes; Immune System
PubMed: 38701564
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116665