-
Asian Journal of Surgery Apr 2024
PubMed: 38643053
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.04.036 -
BMJ Open Apr 2024Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains the most common and serious complication after distal pancreatectomy. Many attempts at lowering fistula rates have led to...
Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) compared with conventional pancreatic transection in distal pancreatectomy: study protocol for the randomised controlled CUSA-1 pilot trial.
BACKGROUND
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains the most common and serious complication after distal pancreatectomy. Many attempts at lowering fistula rates have led to unrewarding insignificant results as still up to 30% of the patients suffer from clinically relevant POPF. Therefore, the development of new innovative methods and procedures is still a cornerstone of current surgical research.The cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) device is a well-known ultrasound-based parenchyma transection method, often used in liver and neurosurgery which has not yet been thoroughly investigated in pancreatic surgery, but the first results seem very promising.
METHODS
The CUSA-1 trial is a randomised controlled pilot trial with two parallel study groups. This single-centre trial is assessor and patient blinded. A total of 60 patients with an indication for open distal pancreatectomy will be intraoperatively randomised after informed consent. The patients will be randomly assigned to either the control group with conventional pancreas transection (scalpel or stapler) or the experimental group, with transection using the CUSA device. The primary safety endpoint of this trial will be postoperative complications ≥grade 3 according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The primary endpoint to investigate the effect will be the rate of POPF within 30 days postoperatively according to the ISGPS definition. Further perioperative outcomes, including postpancreatectomy haemorrhage, length of hospital stay and mortality will be analysed as secondary endpoints.
DISCUSSION
Based on the available literature, CUSA may have a beneficial effect on POPF occurrence after distal pancreatectomy. The rationale of the CUSA-1 pilot trial is to investigate the safety and feasibility of the CUSA device in elective open distal pancreatectomy compared with conventional dissection methods and gather the first data on the effect on POPF occurrence. This data will lay the groundwork for a future confirmatory multicentre randomised controlled trial.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION
The CUSA-1 trial protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Heidelberg (No. S-098/2022). Results will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal and summaries will be provided in lay language to study participants and their relatives.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
DRKS00027474.
Topics: Humans; Pancreatectomy; Ultrasonics; Pilot Projects; Pancreas; Pancreatic Fistula; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Multicenter Studies as Topic
PubMed: 38637127
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082024 -
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Apr 2024Pancreatoduodenectomies are complex surgical procedures with a considerable morbidity and mortality even in high-volume centers. However, postoperative morbidity and...
BACKGROUND
Pancreatoduodenectomies are complex surgical procedures with a considerable morbidity and mortality even in high-volume centers. However, postoperative morbidity and long-term oncological outcome are not only affected by the surgical procedure itself, but also by the underlying disease. The aim of our study is an analysis of pancreatoduodenectomies for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and ampullary carcinoma (CAMP) concerning postoperative complications and long-term outcome in a tertiary hospital in Germany.
METHODS
The perioperative and oncological outcome of 109 pancreatic head resections performed for carcinoma of the ampulla vateri was compared to the outcome of 518 pancreatic head resections for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma over a 20 year-period from January 2002 until December 2021. All operative procedures were performed at the University Hospital Freiburg, Germany. Patient data was analyzed retrospectively, using a prospectively maintained SPSS database. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for differences in surgical and reconstruction technique. Primary outcome of our study was long-term overall survival, secondary outcomes were postoperative complications and 30-day postoperative mortality. Postoperative complications like pancreatic fistula (POPF), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) and delayed gastric emptying (DGE) were graded following current international definitions. Survival was estimated using Kaplan Meier curves and log-rank tests. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Operation time was significantly longer in PDAC patients (432 vs. 391 min, p < 0.001). The rate of portal vein resections was significantly higher in PDAC patients (p < 0.001). In CAMP patients, a pancreatogastrostomy as reconstruction technique was performed more frequently compared to PDAC patients (48.6% vs. 29.9%, p < 0.001) and there was a trend towards more laparoscopic surgeries in CAMP patients (p = 0.051). After propensity score matching, we found no difference in DGE B/C and PPH B/C (p = 0.389; p = 0.517), but a significantly higher rate of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) in patients with pancreatoduodenectomies due to ampullary carcinoma (30.7% vs. 16.8%, p < 0.001). Long-term survival was significantly better in CAMP patients (42 vs. 24 months, p = 0.003).
CONCLUSION
Patients with pancreatoduodenectomies due to ampullary carcinomas showed a better long-term oncological survival, by reason of the better prognosis of this tumor entity. However, these patients often needed a more elaborated postoperative treatment due to the higher rate of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula in this group.
Topics: Humans; Pancreatic Fistula; Retrospective Studies; Prognosis; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 38632147
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03319-7 -
Case Reports in Gastroenterology 2024Portal annular pancreas (PAP) is a congenital anomaly resulting from aberrant fusion of the ventral and dorsal pancreatic buds around the portal vein (PV). PAP was...
INTRODUCTION
Portal annular pancreas (PAP) is a congenital anomaly resulting from aberrant fusion of the ventral and dorsal pancreatic buds around the portal vein (PV). PAP was classified into three types by Joseph et al., based on the location of the main pancreatic duct around the PV. The presence of PAP is important for the surgical procedure because it is associated with the postoperative pancreatic fistula. There are no standardized surgical procedures of resection and reconstruction for PAP.
CASE PRESENTATION
We report 2 cases of subtotal stomach-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with PAP. One case of PAP was discovered coincidentally intraoperatively, and the other case was diagnosed before surgery. The first case was an 84-year-old male patient who underwent surgery for distal bile duct cancer. PAP was noticed intraoperatively when the uncinate process of the pancreas was detached from behind the PV. The second case was an 84-year-old female patient who also underwent surgery for distal bile duct cancer. We recognized PAP from preoperative computed tomography images. In both cases, the ductal anatomy was consistent with type IIIA PAP, and the dorsal pancreas was resected using a stapling device. During the postoperative period, there was no clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula.
CONCLUSION
PAP is rarely encountered intraoperatively; however, it is important to recognize it before surgery and take it into consideration when deciding upon the procedures for resection and reconstruction.
PubMed: 38628808
DOI: 10.1159/000538370 -
Medicine Apr 2024Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is an alternative to open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) for treatment of periampullary cancer in selected patients. However,...
Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is an alternative to open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) for treatment of periampullary cancer in selected patients. However, this is a difficult procedure with a high complication rate. We conducted a prospective cohort study of 85 patients with suspected periampullary cancer who underwent LPD from February 2017 to January 2022 at University Medical Center at Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Among these, 15 patients were excluded from the data analysis because of benign disease confirmed by postoperative pathological examination. Among 70 patients, the mean age was 58.9 ± 8.9 years old and 51.4% were female. The conversion rate to open surgery was 7.1% (n = 5). Among those underwent LPD, the mean operating time and estimated blood loss were 509 ± 94 minutes and 267 ± 102 mL, respectively. The median length of hospital stay was 8 days, interquartile range (IQR) 7-12 days. The percentage of cumulative morbidity, pancreatic fistula and major complication was 35.4%, 12.3%, and 13.8%, respectively. The median of comprehensive complication index (CCI) was 26.2 (IQR 20.9-29.6). Three patients required reoperation due to severe pancreatic fistula (n = 2) and necrotizing pancreatitis (n = 1). There was no death after ninety-day. The average number of harvested lymph nodes was 16.6 ± 5.1. The percentage of R0 resection was 100%. With properly selected patients, LPD can be a feasible, safe and effective approach with acceptable short-term outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Female; Middle Aged; Aged; Male; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Vietnam; Feasibility Studies; Pancreatic Fistula; Prospective Studies; Duodenal Neoplasms; Laparoscopy
PubMed: 38608081
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037769 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Mar 2024Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a frequent complication after pancreatectomy, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Optimizing prediction models for... (Review)
Review
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a frequent complication after pancreatectomy, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Optimizing prediction models for POPF has emerged as a critical focus in surgical research. Although over sixty models following pancreaticoduodenectomy, predominantly reliant on a variety of clinical, surgical, and radiological parameters, have been documented, their predictive accuracy remains suboptimal in external validation and across diverse populations. As models after distal pancreatectomy continue to be progressively reported, their external validation is eagerly anticipated. Conversely, POPF prediction after central pancreatectomy is in its nascent stage, warranting urgent need for further development and validation. The potential of machine learning and big data analytics offers promising prospects for enhancing the accuracy of prediction models by incorporating an extensive array of variables and optimizing algorithm performance. Moreover, there is potential for the development of personalized prediction models based on patient- or pancreas-specific factors and postoperative serum or drain fluid biomarkers to improve accuracy in identifying individuals at risk of POPF. In the future, prospective multicenter studies and the integration of novel imaging technologies, such as artificial intelligence-based radiomics, may further refine predictive models. Addressing these issues is anticipated to revolutionize risk stratification, clinical decision-making, and postoperative management in patients undergoing pancreatectomy.
Topics: Humans; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Fistula; Prospective Studies; Artificial Intelligence; Risk Factors; Pancreas; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 38596504
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i10.1329 -
JPMA. the Journal of the Pakistan... Mar 2024Pancreaticoureteric Fistula (PUF) is a very rare complication secondary to penetrating abdominal trauma involving the ureter and pancreatic parenchyma. Pancreatic...
Pancreaticoureteric Fistula (PUF) is a very rare complication secondary to penetrating abdominal trauma involving the ureter and pancreatic parenchyma. Pancreatic injuries carry h igh morbidity due to the involvem ent of surrounding structures and are d ifficult to diagnose due to thei r retroperitoneal location. A case of a patient is reported at Civil Hospital, Hyderabad who presented with a history of firearm injury and missed pancreatic duct involvement on initial exploration that eventually led to the development of Pan creaticoureteric Fistula. He was managed v ia p erc ut aneous nep hrostomy ( PCN ) for the right ureteric injury and pancreatic duct (PD) stenting was done for distal main pancreatic duct injury (MPD).
Topics: Male; Humans; Firearms; Wounds, Gunshot; Pancreas; Pancreatic Ducts; Pancreatic Diseases; Fistula; Abdominal Injuries
PubMed: 38591304
DOI: 10.47391/JPMA.9936 -
Annals of Surgical Treatment and... Apr 2024When performing laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP), sometimes, anatomically challenging patients are encountered, where the pancreatic tail is...
PURPOSE
When performing laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP), sometimes, anatomically challenging patients are encountered, where the pancreatic tail is deep in the splenic hilum. The purpose of this study was to discuss the experience with the surgical technique of leaving the deep pancreatic tail of the splenic hilum in these patients.
METHODS
Eleven patients who underwent LSPDP with remnant pancreatic tails between November 2019 and August 2021 at Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, Korea were included in the study. Their short-term postoperative outcomes were analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTS
The mean operative time was 168.6 ± 26.0 minutes, the estimated blood loss was 172.7 ± 95.8 mL, and the postoperative length of stay was 6.1 ± 1.0 days. All 11 lesions were in the body or tail of the pancreas and included 2 intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, 6 neuroendocrine tumors, 2 cystic neoplasms, and 1 patient with chronic pancreatitis. In 10 of the 11 patients, only the pancreatic tail was left inside the distal portion of the splenic hilum of the branching splenic vessel, and there was a collection of intraabdominal fluid, which was naturally resolved. One patient with a remnant pancreatic tail above the hilar vessels was readmitted due to a postoperative pancreatic fistula with fever and underwent internal drainage.
CONCLUSION
In spleen preservation, leaving a small pancreatic tail inside the splenic hilum is feasible and more beneficial to the patient than performing splenectomy in anatomically challenging patients.
PubMed: 38586554
DOI: 10.4174/astr.2024.106.4.211 -
Journal of Surgical Case Reports Apr 2024A 76-year-old man underwent distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) after preoperative chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer with celiac artery invasion....
A 76-year-old man underwent distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) after preoperative chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer with celiac artery invasion. Although postoperative pancreatic leakage and ischemia-induced bile fistula developed, the patient's condition remained stable with good drainage. On postoperative Day 47, a pseudoaneurysm developed at the junction of the gastroduodenal artery and proper hepatic artery. However, cannulation of the guidewire was difficult, and relaparotomy pseudoaneurysm repair was performed. On postoperative Day 56, a pseudoaneurysm reappeared at the same site, and relaparotomy was performed again. On postoperative Day 61, CT confirmed the disappearance of the pseudoaneurysm and preservation of the right and left hepatic arteries. The patient was discharged 107 days postoperatively. Interventional radiology (IVR) remains the best technique to achieve hemostasis for pseudoaneurysms. However, this case demonstrates that even when hemostasis by IVR is difficult, relaparotomy pseudoaneurysm repair after DP-CAR may be useful after some postoperative.
PubMed: 38585177
DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjae204 -
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery :... Apr 2024Postoperative serum hyperamylasemia (POH) is a part of the new, increasingly highlighted, definition for postpancreatectomy pancreatitis (PPAP). This study aimed to...
PURPOSE
Postoperative serum hyperamylasemia (POH) is a part of the new, increasingly highlighted, definition for postpancreatectomy pancreatitis (PPAP). This study aimed to analyze whether the biochemical changes of PPAP are differently associated with postoperative complications after distal pancreatectomy (DP) compared with pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). The textbook outcome (TO) was used as a summary measure to capture real-world data.
METHODS
The data were retrospectively extracted from a prospective clinical database. Patients with POH, defined as levels above our institution's upper limit of normal on postoperative day 1, after DP and the corresponding propensity score-matched cohort after PD were evaluated on postoperative complications by using logistic regression analyses.
RESULTS
We analyzed 723 patients who underwent PD and DP over a period of 9 years. After propensity score matching, 384 patients (192 patients in each group) remained. POH was observed in 78 (41.1%) and 74 (39.4%) after PD and DP correspondingly. There was a significant increase of postoperative complications in the PD group: Clavien-Dindo classification system ≥3 (P < .01 vs P = .71), clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (P < .001 vs P = .2), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (P < .001 vs P = .11), and length of hospital stay (P < .001 vs P = .69) if POH occurred compared with in the DP group. TO was significantly unlikely in cases with POH after PD compared with DP (P > .001 vs P = .41). Furthermore, POH was found to be an independent predictor for missing TO after PD (odds ratio [OR], 0.29; 95% CI, 0.14-0.60; P < .001), whereas this was not observed in patients after DP (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.21-1.33; P = .18).
CONCLUSION
As a part of the definition for PPAP, POH is a predictive indicator associated with postoperative complications after PD but not after DP.
Topics: Humans; Pancreatectomy; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Hyperamylasemia; Propensity Score; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Pancreatic Fistula; Postoperative Complications; Pancreatitis; Propylamines
PubMed: 38583895
DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.02.012