-
South Asian Journal of Cancer Jan 2024Ranjith K.The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of a proposed bevacizumab biosimilar (DRL_BZ) with the...
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of a Bevacizumab Biosimilar, in Combination with Chemotherapies, in Nonresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study.
Ranjith K.The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of a proposed bevacizumab biosimilar (DRL_BZ) with the innovator Avastin (reference medicinal product [RMP]) in patients with nonresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) over a period of 9 months and advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over 6 months. The study was planned as a randomized, double-blind trial. In part A, a total of 117 mCRC patients were intended to receive 5 mg/kg of bevacizumab every 2 weeks along with mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy for a maximum of 18 cycles. In part B, 60 NSCLC patients were to receive 15 mg/kg of bevacizumab every 3 weeks along with pemetrexed and carboplatin for the initial four cycles, followed by pemetrexed for another four cycles. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival rate at 6 months (PFS6) in both subparts. The anticipated sample size was 106 evaluable mCRC patients to achieve 85% statistical power for concluding noninferiority with a margin of half the difference (18.8%) between DRL_BZ and Avastin, along with a pilot study involving 60 evaluable NSCLC patients. Safety comparison included assessing adverse events (AEs), infusion reactions, and lab abnormalities. Immunogenicity comparison involved the incidence of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Pharmacokinetic comparison was planned after the first and fourth dosing cycles of treatment in 24 NSCLC patients. The PFS6 for mCRC patients treated with DRL_BZ and RMP was 57.8% and 50% respectively, with a difference in efficacy of 7.8 (-8.7, 23.7). The PFS9 was 31.1% and 22.9%, with a difference of 8.2% (-6.9%, 22.9%). The objective response rate (ORR) for DRL_BZ and RMP was 28.8% and 22.4%, while the disease control rate (DCR) was 44.2% and 37.9% respectively. For NSCLC patients, the PFS6 was 44% and 45%, showing a difference of -1.0 (-4.2, 22.1). The ORR was 41.4% and 48.1%, and the DCR was 62.1% and 63%. The frequency, type, and severity of AEs were similar in both indications. Blood levels during the first and fourth dosing cycles exhibited comparable values. All NSCLC patients tested negative for ADA, while no mCRC patients on DRL_BZ tested positive for ADA. Low incidences of ADA (8%) and NAbs (4.0%) were reported in patients on RMP. Overall, the efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetic parameters of DRL_BZ and RMP were found to be comparable. Clinical Trial Registration For BZ-01-002: CTRI/2016/01/006481.
PubMed: 38721097
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1774403 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2024Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) characterized by poor prognosis and short survival. A variety of therapeutic...
Double-dose osimertinib combined with intrathecal injection of pemetrexed improves the efficacy of EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer and leptomeningeal metastasis: case report and literature review.
Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) characterized by poor prognosis and short survival. A variety of therapeutic approaches have been sought to improve the efficacy of LM. Here we present a clinical case and conduct a literature review to investigate the effectiveness and safety of double-dose osimertinib combined with a pemetrexed intrathecal injection. This is an older man who underwent thoracoscopic pneumonectomy and was diagnosed with stage IIA lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR21 L858R mutation. He experienced thoracic vertebral metastases 33 months postoperatively and received first-line treatment with gefitinib combined with radiotherapy for vertebral metastases. However, the patient developed a grade 3 rash with unacceptable toxicity and his CEA levels were significantly increased 22 months later, leading to a targeted treatment adjustment to 80 mg of osimertinib orally once daily. Four months later, the patient developed LM and osimertinib dosage was increased to 160 mg once daily; however, neurological symptoms did not improve, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tumor cells remained detected. Accordingly, the patient received an intrathecal injection of pemetrexed (dose 30 mg) every 2-3 months, 2-3 times per course (4-6 days each time), and continued to receive a double dose of osimertinib. After three courses of intrathecal chemotherapy, CSF tumor cells were eliminated, and neurological symptoms significantly improved. During the treatment, he experienced a one-degree rash, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue. This patient has been alive and well with disease control for 28 months since the diagnosis of meningeal metastases. Combining double-dose osimertinib and an intrathecal injection of pemetrexed demonstrated therapeutic efficacy and manageable adverse effects in this patient with advanced NSCLC with EGFR-mutant and LM.
PubMed: 38711856
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1377451 -
JAMA Network Open May 2024Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) are commonly used to assess therapeutic response in clinical trials but not in routine care; thus, RECIST-based end... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
IMPORTANCE
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) are commonly used to assess therapeutic response in clinical trials but not in routine care; thus, RECIST-based end points are difficult to include in observational studies. Clinician-anchored approaches for measuring clinical response have been validated but not widely compared with clinical trial data, limiting their use as evidence for clinical decision-making.
OBJECTIVE
To compare response- and progression-based end points in clinical trial and observational cohorts of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This retrospective cohort study used patient-level data from the IMpower132 trial (conducted April 7, 2016, to May 31, 2017) and a nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-derived deidentified database (data collected January 1, 2011, to March 31, 2022). Patients in the observational cohort were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the IMpower132 trial. All patients in the observational cohort had stage IV NSCLC.
EXPOSURE
All patients were randomized to or received first-line carboplatin or cisplatin plus pemetrexed.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
End points included response rates, duration of response, and progression-free survival, compared between the trial and observational cohorts before and after weighting. Response rates for the observational cohort were derived from the EHR.
RESULTS
A total of 769 patients met inclusion criteria, 494 in the observational cohort (median [IQR] age, 67 [60-74] years; 228 [46.2%] female; 45 [9.1%] Black or African American; 352 [71.3%] White; 53 [10.7%] American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, or multiracial) and 275 in the trial cohort (median [IQR] age, 63 [56-68] years; 90 [32.7%] female; 4 [1.5%] Black or African American; 194 [70.5%] White; 65 [23.6%] American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, or multiracial). All 3 end points were comparable between the study cohorts. Trial patients had a higher number of response assessments compared with patients in the weighted observational cohort. The EHR-derived response rate was numerically higher than the objective response rate after weighting (100.3 of 249.3 [40.2%] vs 105 of 275 [38.2%]) due to higher rates of observed partial response than RECIST-based partial response. Among patients with at least 1 response assessment, the EHR-derived response rate remained higher than the objective response rate (100.3 of 193.4 [51.9%] vs 105 of 256 [41.0%]) due to a higher proportion of patients in the observational cohort with no response assessment.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this study, response- and progression-based end points were similar between clinical trial and weighted observational cohorts, which increases confidence in the reliability of observational end points and can inform their interpretation in relation to trial end points. Additionally, the difference observed in response rates (including vs excluding patients with no response assessment) highlights the importance of future research adopting this 2-way approach when evaluating the relationship of EHR-derived and objective response rates.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Female; Male; Lung Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Aged; Retrospective Studies; Carboplatin; Disease Progression; Cisplatin; Pemetrexed; Cohort Studies; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Progression-Free Survival
PubMed: 38700864
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.9286 -
Investigational New Drugs Jun 2024Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy is commonly used in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A growing body of evidence indicates that incorporating...
BACKGROUND
Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy is commonly used in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A growing body of evidence indicates that incorporating antiangiogenic agents into platinum-based chemotherapy may enhance the survival outcomes for NSCLC patients. However, the optimal administration protocol for intravenous recombinant human endostatin (rh-endostatin), an antiangiogenic agent, remains uncertain at present.
AIM
This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of 5-d continuous intravenous infusion of rh-endostatin in combination with chemotherapy for patients with advanced NSCLC. The predictive biomarkers for this treatment regimen were further probed.
METHODS
This prospective, single-arm multicenter study enrolled a total of 48 patients with advanced NSCLC who were histologically or cytologically confirmed but had not received any prior treatment from January 2021 to December 2022. Prior to the chemotherapy, these patients received a continuous intravenous infusion of rh-endostatin (210 mg) over a period of 120 h, using an infusion pump. The chemotherapy regimen included a combination of platinum with either pemetrexed or paclitaxel, given in 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint of the study was median progression-free survival (mPFS), and the secondary endpoints included median overall survival (mOS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and assessment of adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS
The mPFS was 6.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.8-9.1 m) while the mOS was 12.3 months (95% CI: 7.6-18.5 m). The ORR and DCR was 52.1% and 75.0%, respectively. Leukopenia (52.1%), anemia (33.3%), and thrombocytopenia (20.8%) were the most common adverse effects and these toxicities were deemed acceptable and manageable. In addition, a correlation was noted between elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels and decreased PFS and OS.
CONCLUSIONS
The incorporation of a 5-day continuous intravenous infusion of rh-endostatin into platinum-based doublet chemotherapy has demonstrated both safety and efficacy in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Furthermore, the baseline serum levels of CEA may potentially function as a predictor for the efficacy of rh-endostatin when combined with chemotherapy in NSCLC patients.
CLINICALTRIALS
GOV: NCT05574998.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Endostatins; Female; Male; Lung Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aged; Infusions, Intravenous; Recombinant Proteins; Prospective Studies; Paclitaxel; Pemetrexed; Adult; Progression-Free Survival
PubMed: 38700579
DOI: 10.1007/s10637-024-01439-x -
Frontiers in Oncology 2024Front-line therapy with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is the standard of care for treating patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with the common sensitizing...
BACKGROUND
Front-line therapy with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is the standard of care for treating patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with the common sensitizing exon 19 deletion and exon 21 L858R point mutations. However, EGFR TKI resistance inevitably develops. The optimal subsequent therapy remains to be identified, although platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens are often administered. Our objectives were to describe baseline characteristics, survival, and subsequent treatment patterns for patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation who received a platinum-based combination regimen after front-line EGFR TKI therapy.
METHODS
This retrospective study used a nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database to select adult patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC, evidence of exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation, and ECOG performance status of 0-2 who initiated platinum-containing chemotherapy, with or without concomitant immunotherapy, from 1-January-2011 to 30-June-2020 following receipt of any EGFR TKI as first-line therapy or, alternatively, a first- or second-generation EGFR TKI (erlotinib, afatinib, gefitinib, dacomitinib) as first-line therapy followed by the third-generation EGFR TKI osimertinib as second-line therapy. Data cut-off was 30-June-2022. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) after initiation of pemetrexed-platinum (n=119) or any platinum-based combination regimen (platinum cohort; n=311).
RESULTS
The two cohorts included two-thirds women (65%-66%) and 57%-58% nonsmokers; median ages were 66 and 65 years in pemetrexed-platinum and platinum cohorts, respectively. Median OS was 10.3 months (95% CI, 8.1-13.9) from pemetrexed-platinum initiation and 12.4 months (95% CI, 10.2-15.2) from platinum initiation; 12-month survival rates were 48% and 51%, respectively; 260 patients (84%) had died by the end of the study.
CONCLUSION
The suboptimal survival outcomes recorded in this study demonstrate the unmet need to identify more effective subsequent treatment regimens for patients with -mutated advanced nonsquamous NSCLC after EGFR TKI resistance develops.
PubMed: 38699642
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1285280 -
In Vivo (Athens, Greece) 2024Immune checkpoint inhibitors can induce immune-related adverse events in various organs, thus careful observation is required.
BACKGROUND/AIM
Immune checkpoint inhibitors can induce immune-related adverse events in various organs, thus careful observation is required.
CASE REPORT
A 69-year-old man was diagnosed with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and treated with combined therapy of carboplatin plus pemetrexed plus pembrolizumab. After two cycles of treatment, anemia was noted. Myelosuppression due to cytotoxic anticancer agents was suspected and the cytotoxic agents were discontinued, followed by three courses of pembrolizumab monotherapy. However, the anemia persisted, requiring red blood cell transfusions. A bone marrow biopsy revealed erythroblast hypoplasia and chromosomal abnormalities, resulting in a diagnosis of pure red cell aplasia. These adverse events were considered immune-related because of the treatment history with an immune checkpoint inhibitor, and 60 mg/day (1 mg/kg/day) of prednisolone was initiated. Anemia improved, and it did not recur during the tapering of prednisolone.
CONCLUSION
Immune-related pure red cell aplasia should be considered for patients presenting anemia during treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Topics: Humans; Red-Cell Aplasia, Pure; Male; Aged; Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Lung Neoplasms; Chromosome Aberrations; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
PubMed: 38688637
DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13599 -
Chemistry of Materials : a Publication... Apr 2024The development of nanoparticle (NP)-based drug carriers has presented an exciting opportunity to address challenges in oncology. Among the 100,000 available...
Enhancing Drug Delivery Efficacy Through Bilayer Coating of Zirconium-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks: Sustained Release and Improved Chemical Stability and Cellular Uptake for Cancer Therapy.
The development of nanoparticle (NP)-based drug carriers has presented an exciting opportunity to address challenges in oncology. Among the 100,000 available possibilities, zirconium-based metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as promising candidates in biomedical applications. Zr-MOFs can be easily synthesized as small-size NPs compatible with intravenous injection, whereas the ease of decorating their external surfaces with functional groups allows for targeted treatment. Despite these benefits, Zr-MOFs suffer degradation and aggregation in real, in vivo conditions, whereas the loaded drugs will suffer the burst effect-i.e., the fast release of drugs in less than 48 h. To tackle these issues, we developed a simple but effective bilayer coating strategy in a generic, two-step process. In this work, bilayer-coated MOF NU-901 remained well dispersed in biologically relevant fluids such as buffers and cell growth media. Additionally, the coating enhances the long-term stability of drug-loaded MOFs in water by simultaneously preventing sustained leakage of the drug and aggregation of the MOF particles. We evaluated our materials for the encapsulation and transport of pemetrexed, the standard-of-care chemotherapy in mesothelioma. The bilayer coating allowed for a slowed release of pemetrexed over 7 days, superior to the typical 48 h release found in bare MOFs. This slow release and the related performance were studied in vitro using both A549 lung cancer and 3T mesothelioma cells. Using high-resolution microscopy, we found the successful uptake of bilayer-coated MOFs by the cells with an accumulation in the lysosomes. The pemetrex-loaded NU-901 was indeed cytotoxic to 3T and A549 cancer cells. Finally, we demonstrated the general approach by extending the coating strategy using two additional lipids and four surfactants. This research highlights how a simple yet effective bilayer coating provides new insights into the design of promising MOF-based drug delivery systems.
PubMed: 38681089
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c02954 -
Cancer Research Communications Jun 2024Chemotherapy can potentially enhance the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors by promoting immune priming. The phase Ib/II JAVELIN Chemotherapy Medley trial...
PURPOSE
Chemotherapy can potentially enhance the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors by promoting immune priming. The phase Ib/II JAVELIN Chemotherapy Medley trial (NCT03317496) evaluated first-line avelumab + concurrent chemotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Avelumab 800 or 1,200 mg was administered continuously every 3 weeks with standard doses of cisplatin + gemcitabine in patients with urothelial carcinoma, or carboplatin + pemetrexed in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC. Dual primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT; phase Ib) and confirmed objective response (phase Ib/II).
RESULTS
In phase Ib, urothelial carcinoma and NSCLC cohorts received avelumab 800 mg (n = 13 and n = 6, respectively) or 1,200 mg (n = 6 each) + chemotherapy. In evaluable patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with avelumab 800 or 1,200 mg + chemotherapy, DLT occurred in 1/12 (8.3%) and 1/6 (16.7%), respectively; no DLT occurred in the NSCLC cohort. In phase II, 35 additional patients with urothelial carcinoma received avelumab 1,200 mg + chemotherapy. Across all treated patients, safety profiles were similar irrespective of avelumab dose. Objective response rates (95% confidence internal) with avelumab 800 or 1,200 mg + chemotherapy, respectively, across phase Ib/II, were 53.8% (25.1-80.8) and 39.0% (24.2-55.5) in urothelial carcinoma, and 50.0% (11.8-88.2) and 33.3% (4.3-77.7) in NSCLC.
CONCLUSIONS
Preliminary efficacy and safety findings with avelumab + chemotherapy in urothelial carcinoma and NSCLC were consistent with previous studies of similar combination regimens. Conclusions about clinical activity are limited by small patient numbers.
SIGNIFICANCE
This phase Ib/II trial evaluated avelumab (immune checkpoint inhibitor) administered concurrently with standard first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma or advanced nonsquamous NSCLC without actionable mutations. Efficacy and safety appeared consistent with previous studies of similar combinations, although patient numbers were small.
Topics: Humans; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Female; Middle Aged; Male; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Carboplatin; Gemcitabine; Deoxycytidine; Cisplatin; Pemetrexed; Adult; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell; Aged, 80 and over; Urologic Neoplasms
PubMed: 38669053
DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-23-0459 -
Current Oncology (Toronto, Ont.) Apr 2024Maintenance chemotherapy is a standard treatment in patients with non-progressive advance staged IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer after induction therapy....
Maintenance chemotherapy is a standard treatment in patients with non-progressive advance staged IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer after induction therapy. Here, we report the case of a 53-year-old man undergoing a maintenance monotherapy with pemetrexed who presented prolonged pancytopenia despite filgrastim injections. A bone marrow aspiration revealed a macrophage activation syndrome with amastigotes. A Polymerase Chest Reaction testing confirmed the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis. Treatment with liposomal amphotericin B was started. Oncologists should bear in mind that visceral leishmaniasis in endemic areas can potentially induce severe and prolonged pancytopenia in immunosuppressed patients, during chemotherapy in particular.
Topics: Humans; Pancytopenia; Leishmaniasis, Visceral; Male; Middle Aged; Lung Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Diagnosis, Differential; Pemetrexed; Antineoplastic Agents; Antiprotozoal Agents; Amphotericin B
PubMed: 38668071
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31040168 -
Respirology Case Reports Apr 2024Oncogene-negative, PDL1-negative metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presents significant treatment challenges due to its complexity and resistance to...
Oncogene-negative, PDL1-negative metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presents significant treatment challenges due to its complexity and resistance to conventional therapies. The case report presented addresses a 55-year-old male patient with oncogene-negative, PDL1-negative stage IV lung adenocarcinoma, showcasing an exceptional complete metabolic response to a multimodality treatment combining double immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) and chemotherapy, followed by salvage stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The patient underwent a treatment regimen incorporating two cycles of carboplatin, pemetrexed, nivolumab, and ipilimumab followed by nivolumab, and ipilimumab maintenance. After a partial response, SBRT was applied to persistent lesions, achieving a complete metabolic response. This case highlights the potential of combining dual ICI with chemotherapy and SBRT in treating oncogene-negative, PDL1-negative NSCLC underscoring the importance of multimodality treatment strategies.
PubMed: 38660343
DOI: 10.1002/rcr2.1362