-
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics : MCP Jun 2024Targeted protein degradation is the selective removal of a protein of interest through hijacking intracellular protein cleanup machinery. This rapidly growing field...
Targeted protein degradation is the selective removal of a protein of interest through hijacking intracellular protein cleanup machinery. This rapidly growing field currently relies heavily on the use of the E3 ligase Cereblon (CRBN) to target proteins for degradation, including the immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide which work through a molecular glue mechanism of action with CRBN. While CRBN recruitment can result in degradation of a specific protein of interest (e.g. efficacy), degradation of other proteins (called CRBN neosubstrates) also occurs. Degradation of one or more of these CRBN neosubstrates is believed to play an important role in thalidomide-related developmental toxicity observed in rabbits and primates. We identified a set of 25 proteins of interest associated with CRBN-related protein homeostasis and/or embryo/fetal development. We developed a targeted assay for these proteins combining peptide immunoaffinity enrichment and high-resolution mass spectrometry and successfully applied this assay to rabbit embryo samples from pregnant rabbits dosed with three IMiDs. We confirmed previously reported in vivo decreases in neosubstrates like SALL4, as well as provided evidence of neosubstrate changes for proteins only examined in vitro previously. While there were many proteins that were similarly decreased by all three IMiDs, no compound had the exact same neosubstrate degradation profile as another. We compared our data to previous literature reports of IMiD induced degradation and known developmental biology associations. Based on our observations, we recommend monitoring at least a major subset of these neosubstrates in a developmental test system to improve CRBN-binding compound-specific risk assessment. A strength of our assay is that it is configurable, and the target list can be readily adapted to focus on only a subset of proteins of interest or expanded to incorporate new findings as additional information about CRBN biology is discovered.
PubMed: 38866076
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2024.100797 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2024To identify the optimal dose of selinexor in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (SPd).
OBJECTIVE
To identify the optimal dose of selinexor in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (SPd).
METHODS
An analysis of efficacy and safety of 2 once-weekly selinexor regimens (60 mg and 40 mg) with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (SPd-60 and SPd-40, respectively) given to patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the STOMP (NCT02343042) and XPORT-MM-028 (NCT04414475) trials.
RESULTS
Twenty-eight patients (60.7% males, median age 67.5 years) and 20 patients (35.0% males, median age 65.5 years) were analyzed in the SPd-40 and SPd-60 cohorts, respectively. Overall response rate was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI] 30.6-69.4%) and 65% (95% CI 40.8-84.6%), respectively. Very good partial response or better was reported in 28.6% (95% CI 13.2-48.7%) and 30.0% (95% CI 11.9-54.3%) of patients, respectively. Among 27 responders in both cohorts, the 12-month sustained response rate was 83.3% (95% CI 64.7-100.0%) for SPd-40 and 28.1% (95% CI 8.9-88.8%) for SPd-60. Median progression-free survival was 18.4 months (95% CI 6.5 months, not evaluable [NE]) and 9.5 months (95% CI 7.6 months-NE) for SPd-40 and SPd-60, respectively. Twenty-four-month survival rates were 64.2% (95% CI 47.7-86.3%) for SPd-40 and 51.1% (95% CI 29.9-87.5%) for SPd-60. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included neutropenia (all grades: SPd-40 64.3% versus SPd-60 75.0%), anemia (46.4% versus 65.0%), thrombocytopenia (42.9% versus 45.0%), fatigue (46.4% versus 75.0%), nausea (32.1% versus 70.0%) and diarrhea (28.6% versus 35.0%).
CONCLUSION
The all-oral combination of SPd exhibited preliminary signs of efficacy and was generally tolerable in patients with RRMM. The overall risk-benefit profile favored the SPd-40 regimen.
PubMed: 38826786
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1352281 -
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy : CII May 2024Isatuximab, an anti-CD38 antibody, has been widely used in treatments for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Despite its high efficacy, not all...
BACKGROUND
Isatuximab, an anti-CD38 antibody, has been widely used in treatments for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Despite its high efficacy, not all patients achieve a lasting therapeutic response with isatuximab.
OBJECTIVE
We tried to identify biomarkers to predict the effectiveness of isatuximab by focusing on the host's immune status before treatment.
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 134 relapsed/refractory MM patients in the Kansai Myeloma Forum database who had received only a first isatuximab treatment.
RESULTS
Among the 134 patients, an isatuximab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Isa-PD) regimen, isatuximab, carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Isa-KD) regimen and isatuximab and/or dexamethasone (Isa-D) regimen were used in 112, 15 and 7 patients, respectively. The median age at treatment, number of prior treatment regimens, and progression-free survival (PFS) were 71, 6, and 6.54 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the PFS under the Isa-PD regimen was longer in patients with higher lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR ≥ 4), fewer prior treatment regimens (< 6), and no use of prior daratumumab treatment. The OS under the Isa-PD regimen was longer in patients with higher white blood cell counts (WBC counts ≥ 3000/μL) and higher LMR. The PFS under the Isa-D regimen was longer in patients with fewer prior treatment regimens in univariate analysis, but no parameters were correlated with PFS/OS under the Isa-KD regimen.
CONCLUSION
We found that the patients with higher LMR (≥ 4) could obtain longer PFS and OS under the Isa-PD regimen. Other cohort studies of isatuximab treatment might be necessary to substantiate our results.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Female; Male; Thalidomide; Aged; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Lymphocytes; Monocytes; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Adult; Aged, 80 and over; Prognosis
PubMed: 38758239
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-024-03711-8 -
Cancers Apr 2024FAM46C is a well-established tumour suppressor with a role that is not completely defined or universally accepted. Although FAM46C expression is down-modulated in... (Review)
Review
FAM46C is a well-established tumour suppressor with a role that is not completely defined or universally accepted. Although FAM46C expression is down-modulated in several tumours, significant mutations in the gene are only found in multiple myeloma (MM). Consequently, its tumour suppressor activity has primarily been studied in the MM context. However, emerging evidence suggests that FAM46C is involved also in other cancer types, namely colorectal, prostate and gastric cancer and squamous cell and hepatocellular carcinoma, where FAM46C expression was found to be significantly reduced in tumoural versus non-tumoural tissues and where FAM46C was shown to possess anti-proliferative properties. Accordingly, FAM46C was recently proposed to function as a pan-cancer prognostic marker, bringing FAM46C under the spotlight and attracting growing interest from the scientific community in the pathways modulated by FAM46C and in its mechanistic activity. Here, we will provide the first comprehensive review regarding FAM46C by covering (1) the intracellular pathways regulated by FAM46C, namely the MAPK/ERK, PI3K/AKT, β-catenin and TGF-β/SMAD pathways; (2) the models regarding its mode of action, specifically the poly(A) polymerase, intracellular trafficking modulator and inhibitor of centriole duplication models, focusing on connections and interdependencies; (3) the regulation of FAM46C expression in different environments by interferons, IL-4, TLR engagement or transcriptional modulators; and, lastly, (4) how FAM46C expression levels associate with increased/decreased tumour cell sensitivity to anticancer agents, such as bortezomib, dexamethasone, lenalidomide, pomalidomide, doxorubicin, melphalan, SK1-I, docetaxel and norcantharidin.
PubMed: 38730656
DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091706 -
Cancer Medicine May 2024Comparative investigations evaluating the efficacy of pomalidomide-based (Pom-based) versus daratumumab-based (Dara-based) therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory...
BACKGROUND
Comparative investigations evaluating the efficacy of pomalidomide-based (Pom-based) versus daratumumab-based (Dara-based) therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) remain scarce, both in randomized controlled trials and real-world studies.
METHODS
This retrospective cohort study included 140 RRMM patients treated with Pom-based or Dara-based or a combination of pomalidomide and daratumumab (DPd) regimens in a Chinese tertiary hospital between December 2018 and July 2023.
RESULTS
The overall response rates (ORR) for Pom-based (n = 48), Dara-based (n = 68), and DPd (n = 24) groups were 57.8%, 84.6%, and 75.0%, respectively (p = 0.007). At data cutoff on August 1, 2023, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.7 months (95% CI: 5.0-6.5) for the Pom-based group, 10.5 months (5.2-15.8) for the Dara-based group, and 6.7 months (4.0-9.3) for the DPd group (p = 0.056). Multivariate analysis identified treatment regimens (Dara-based vs. Pom-based, DPd vs. Pom-based) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) as independent prognostic factors for PFS. In the subgroups of patients aged >65 years, with ECOG PS ≥2, lines of therapy ≥2, extramedullary disease or double-refractory disease (refractory to both lenalidomide and proteasome inhibitors), the superiority of Dara-based regimens over Pom-based regimens was not evident. A higher incidence of infections was observed in patients receiving Dara-based and DPd regimens (Pom-based 39.6% vs. Dara-based 64.7% vs. DPd 70.8%, p = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS
In real-world settings, Pom-based, Dara-based, and DPd therapies exhibited favorable efficacy in patients with RRMM. Dara-based therapy yielded superior clinical response and PFS compared to Pom-based therapy.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Thalidomide; Male; Female; Retrospective Studies; Middle Aged; Aged; China; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Progression-Free Survival; Aged, 80 and over; Treatment Outcome; Adult; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
PubMed: 38698679
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7232 -
Oncology Letters Jun 2024Despite the emergence of monoclonal antibodies, the prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) with extramedullary disease remains poor. The present report...
Despite the emergence of monoclonal antibodies, the prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) with extramedullary disease remains poor. The present report describes a rare case of daratumumab-refractory MM that was successfully treated with elotuzumab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone. A 66-year-old male patient diagnosed with MM was treated with bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone, followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Thereafter, the patient was treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone as maintenance therapy. This was changed to daratumumab, bortezomib and dexamethasone when new paraskeletal lesions were identified, resulting in marked tumor shrinkage. After 15 months, an increase in serum monoclonal protein levels, development of a skeletal lesion in the right second rib and extramedullary disease of the right thoracic mediastinal lymph nodes were noted. Treatment with elotuzumab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone (EPd) resulted in expeditious symptomatic improvement and regression of the lesions. Notably, during daratumumab, bortezomib and dexamethasone treatment, lymphocyte counts gradually increased to a level at which elotuzumab was sufficiently effective. EPd might be a promising strategy for the treatment of patients with relapsed extramedullary MM while on daratumumab treatment.
PubMed: 38638843
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2024.14381 -
Blood Advances Apr 2024
Jian Y, Chang L, Shi M-X, et al. Pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients with renal impairment. Blood Adv. 2023;7(24):7581-7584.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Bortezomib; Thalidomide; Renal Insufficiency; Dexamethasone
PubMed: 38619856
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013036 -
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia Jul 2024The increasing use of lenalidomide (Len) in first-line (1L) therapy of multiple myeloma (MM) has led to a significant proportion of patients becoming Len-refractory...
Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma After Exposure to Lenalidomide in First Line of Therapy: A Single Center Database Review in Greece.
BACKGROUND
The increasing use of lenalidomide (Len) in first-line (1L) therapy of multiple myeloma (MM) has led to a significant proportion of patients becoming Len-refractory following 1L treatment. However, there are limited real-world data on treatment strategies and outcomes of patients who become Len-refractory following 1L therapy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
This real-world retrospective cohort study analyzed Len-refractory and non-Len-refractory patients who received 1L Len and initiated second-line (2L) therapy at a Greek MM center. The Len-exposed cohort (n = 249) included 55.4% Len-refractory patients after 1L.
RESULTS
Compared to non-Len-refractory patients, Len-refractory patients more frequently had high-risk cytogenetics and Revised-International Staging System-3 disease stage at diagnosis, and had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) following 1L therapy. Len-refractory versus non-Len-refractory patients more frequently received triplets (59% vs. 40%), anti-CD38 agents (20% vs. 9%) and pomalidomide (22% vs. 13%). The overall response rate was 53% for Len-refractory patients and 64% for non-Len-refractory patients in 2L therapy; median PFS was 10.7 vs. 18.3 months, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was shorter for Len-refractory patients vs non-Len-refractory patients (23.8 vs. 53.6 months). Len refractoriness was an independent prognostic factor for both PFS and OS in Len-exposed patients.
CONCLUSION
In this real-world Len-exposed cohort, Len-refractory patients receiving 1L Len experienced poorer survival outcomes than non-Len-refractory patients, highlighting the unmet need in this patient population which has driven the development of novel therapies.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Lenalidomide; Male; Female; Aged; Greece; Retrospective Studies; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Aged, 80 and over; Databases, Factual
PubMed: 38616479
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2024.03.003 -
BioRxiv : the Preprint Server For... Mar 2024Immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMiDs) including thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide, can be used to induce degradation of a protein of interest that is fused to a...
Immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMiDs) including thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide, can be used to induce degradation of a protein of interest that is fused to a short zinc finger (ZF) degron motif. These IMiDs, however, also induce degradation of endogenous neosubstrates, including IKZF1 and IKZF3. To improve degradation selectivity, we took a bump-and-hole approach to design and screen bumped IMiD analogs against 8380 ZF mutants. This yielded a bumped IMiD analog that induces efficient degradation of a mutant ZF degron, while not affecting other cellular proteins, including IKZF1 and IKZF3. In proof-of-concept studies, this system was applied to induce efficient degradation of TRIM28, a disease-relevant protein with no known small molecule binders. We anticipate that this system will make a valuable addition to the current arsenal of degron systems for use in target validation.
PubMed: 38559242
DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.15.585309 -
Cureus Feb 2024Lenalidomide and Pomalidomide are chiral immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and have antiangiogenic and anti-immunomodulatory activity. Each enantiomer may have distinct...
Computational Analysis of Lenalidomide and Pomalidomide Enantiomers' Binding Interactions With Prostaglandin (PG)-Protein: Implications for Inflammatory Activity in Cancer.
BACKGROUND
Lenalidomide and Pomalidomide are chiral immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and have antiangiogenic and anti-immunomodulatory activity. Each enantiomer may have distinct binding and biological activity. This study aimed to explore the in-silico binding of both enantiomers of Lenalidomide and Pomalidomide with Prostaglandin and its potential impact on persisting inflammatory activity in cancer. This can further provide insight into the transport of pro-inflammatory mediators and their potential implications for the inflammatory microenvironment within tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Molecular docking studies were performed to explore the binding potential of both enantiomers of Lenalidomide and Pomalidomide with Pg protein. The crystal structure of Pg-protein (PDB ID: 1IW7) was obtained from the Protein Data Bank.
RESULTS
The binding energies for (-)-Lenalidomide and (+)-Lenalidomide were -6.7 and -7.2 kcal/mol, respectively, while the binding energies for (-)-Pomalidomide and (+)-Pomalidomide were -7.8 and -8.1 kcal/mol, respectively. The binding mode analysis revealed that all four compounds formed hydrogen bonds with key amino acid residues of Pg-protein. The hydrogen bond distances for (-)-Lenalidomide, (+)-Lenalidomide, (-)-Pomalidomide, and (+)-Pomalidomide were 2.1 Å, 2.0 Å, 2.2 Å, and 2.1 Å, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The present study suggests that both enantiomers of Lenalidomide and Pomalidomide have a high affinity for Pg-protein and can effectively target the Pg-protein pathway to persist inflammatory activity in cancer. By targeting inflammation-mediated processes, these drugs may offer a novel strategy to combat tumor progression.
PubMed: 38558718
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.55294