-
Scientific Reports Apr 2024This study aimed to evaluate the impact of shear stress on surgery-related sacral pressure injury (PI) after laparoscopic colorectal surgery performed in the lithotomy...
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of shear stress on surgery-related sacral pressure injury (PI) after laparoscopic colorectal surgery performed in the lithotomy position. We included 37 patients who underwent this procedure between November 2021 and October 2022. The primary outcome was average horizontal shear stress caused by the rotation of the operating table during the operation, and the secondary outcome was interface pressure over time. Sensors were used to measure shear stress and interface pressure in the sacral region. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of PI. PI had an incidence of 32.4%, and the primary outcome, average horizontal shear stress, was significantly higher in the PI group than in the no-PI group. The interface pressure increased over time in both groups. At 120 min, the interface pressure was two times higher in the PI group than in the no-PI group (PI group, 221.5 mmHg; no-PI group, 86.0 mmHg; p < 0.01). This study suggested that shear stress resulting from rotation of the operating table in the sacral region by laparoscopic colorectal surgery performed in the lithotomy position is the cause of PI. These results should contribute to the prevention of PI.
Topics: Humans; Laparoscopy; Female; Male; Aged; Middle Aged; Pressure Ulcer; Stress, Mechanical; Rotation; Pressure; Colorectal Surgery; Sacrum; Operating Tables
PubMed: 38679609
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60424-9 -
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Apr 2024Reducing high mechanical stress is imperative to heal diabetes-related foot ulcers. We explored the association of cumulative plantar tissue stress (CPTS) and plantar...
Reducing high mechanical stress is imperative to heal diabetes-related foot ulcers. We explored the association of cumulative plantar tissue stress (CPTS) and plantar foot ulcer healing, and the feasibility of measuring CPTS, in two prospective cohort studies (Australia (AU) and The Netherlands (NL)). Both studies used multiple sensors to measure factors to determine CPTS: plantar pressures, weight-bearing activities, and adherence to offloading treatments, with thermal stress response also measured to estimate shear stress in the AU-study. The primary outcome was ulcer healing at 12 weeks. Twenty-five participants were recruited: 13 in the AU-study and 12 in the NL-study. CPTS data were complete for five participants (38%) at baseline and one (8%) during follow-up in the AU-study, and one (8%) at baseline and zero (0%) during follow-up in the NL-study. Reasons for low completion at baseline were technical issues (AU-study: 31%, NL-study: 50%), non-adherent participants (15% and 8%) or combinations (15% and 33%); and at follow-up refusal of participants (62% and 25%). These underpowered findings showed that CPTS was non-significantly lower in people who healed compared with non-healed people (457 [117; 727], 679 [312; 1327] MPa·s/day). Current feasibility of CPTS seems low, given technical challenges and non-adherence, which may reflect the burden of treating diabetes-related foot ulcers.
Topics: Humans; Diabetic Foot; Female; Middle Aged; Male; Prospective Studies; Biomechanical Phenomena; Stress, Mechanical; Aged; Feasibility Studies; Foot; Wound Healing; Pressure
PubMed: 38676030
DOI: 10.3390/s24082411 -
BMC Veterinary Research Apr 2024Melting corneal ulcers are a serious condition that affects a great number of animals and people around the world and it is characterised by a progressive weakening of...
BACKGROUND
Melting corneal ulcers are a serious condition that affects a great number of animals and people around the world and it is characterised by a progressive weakening of the tissue leading to possible severe ophthalmic complications, such as visual impairment or blindness. This disease is routinely treated with medical therapy and keratoplasty, and recently also with alternative regenerative therapies, such as cross-linking, amniotic membrane transplant, and laser. Plasma medicine is another recent example of regenerative treatment that showed promising results in reducing the microbial load of corneal tissue together with maintaining its cellular vitality. Since the effect of helium plasma application on corneal mechanical viscoelasticity has not yet been investigated, the aim of this study is first to evaluate it on ex vivo porcine corneas for different exposition times and then to compare the results with previous data on cross-linking treatment.
RESULTS
94 ex vivo porcine corneas divided into 16 populations (healthy or injured, fresh or cultured and treated or not with plasma or cross-linking) were analysed. For each population, a biomechanical analysis was performed by uniaxial stress-relaxation tests, and a statistical analysis was carried out considering the characteristic mechanical parameters. In terms of equilibrium normalised stress, no statistically significant difference resulted when the healthy corneas were compared with lesioned plasma-treated ones, independently of treatment time, contrary to what was obtained about the cross-linking treated corneas which exhibited more intense relaxation phenomena.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, the influence of the Helium plasma treatment was observed on the viscoelasticity of porcine corneas ex vivo, by restoring in lesioned tissue a degree of relaxation similar to the one of the native tissue, even after only 2 min of application. Therefore, the obtained results suggest that plasma treatment is a promising new regenerative ophthalmic therapy for melting corneal ulcers, laying the groundwork for further studies to correlate the mechanical findings with corneal histology and ultrastructural anatomy after plasma treatment.
Topics: Animals; Swine; Cornea; Plasma Gases; Helium; Biomechanical Phenomena; Alkalies; Atmospheric Pressure; Corneal Ulcer
PubMed: 38659026
DOI: 10.1186/s12917-024-03980-6 -
GMS Interdisciplinary Plastic and... 2024The clinical appearance of acral melanoma is diverse and can cause diagnostic difficulties in individual cases.
BACKGROUND
The clinical appearance of acral melanoma is diverse and can cause diagnostic difficulties in individual cases.
CASE DESCRIPTION
We present a clinical case of an 83-year-old patient with a melanoma in the heel area that was initially interpreted as a pressure ulcer, resulting in delayed and more complicated treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
Melanomas should be included in the differential diagnosis even in "typical" pressure ulcer areas. Against the background of increasingly poor healthcare in rural areas, an increase in such cases can be expected.
PubMed: 38654893
DOI: 10.3205/iprs000185 -
International Wound Journal Apr 2024Negative pressure injury is one of the auxiliary methods of treating diabetes foot ulcers. It has been shown to be superior to conventional techniques in randomized... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Negative pressure injury is one of the auxiliary methods of treating diabetes foot ulcers. It has been shown to be superior to conventional techniques in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Nevertheless, the results of observational research are still scarce. A systematic review of RCTs and observations was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness and security of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) treatment for diabetes foot ulcers. Three English e-databases have been found for NPWT research. The meta-analyses of the comparative studies provided point estimates of results. Intermediate results were given as median and binary values were given in the form of odds ratios (OR). Seventeen trials, 13 RCTs and four randomized, controlled trials were found in the survey. Of these, 831 were treated with NPWT, 834 were treated with standard therapy. A total of 14 studies have been conducted to investigate the influence of NPWT on the healing of diabetic foot ulcers(DFU). In the study, NPWT was shown to speed up the healing of the wound in DFU patients(OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.72, 3.85 p < 0.0001). A subgroup analysis showed that NPWT was associated with an acceleration of the wound healing rate in 10 RCT trials (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.58, 3.89 p < 0.001). In the four nRCT trials, NPWT was also shown to speed up the healing of the wound(OR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.03, 8.42 p = 0.04). In 11 studies, the influence of NPWT on amputations of diabetes mellitus (DM) foot ulcers was investigated. The results showed that NPWT was associated with a reduction in amputations (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.37, 0.74 p = 0.0002).In a subgroup of RCT trials, nine RCT trials showed a reduction in amputations(OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43, 0.87 p = 0.007). In both nRCT trials, NPWT also showed a reduction in amputations (OR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.00, 0.24 p = 0.001). Generally speaking, NPWT can help to heal the wound and lower the risk of amputations in people with diabetes. The subgroup analysis showed similar results for the RCT and non-RCT trials. NPWT can be used to treat diabetes foot ulcers caused by diabetes.
Topics: Humans; Diabetic Foot; Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Wound Healing
PubMed: 38651532
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14886 -
Improving Healing: The Putative Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy for Ulcer in Parkinson's Disease.Cureus Mar 2024The progressive nature of Parkinson's disease and its associated motor and non-motor symptoms can lead to various complications when patients experience immobilization,...
The progressive nature of Parkinson's disease and its associated motor and non-motor symptoms can lead to various complications when patients experience immobilization, exacerbating existing motor impairments and potentially giving rise to secondary health issues. The variability, progression, and management of tremors in PD can be challenging. Due to low bone mass density, patients with Parkinson's disease are susceptible to vitamin D deficiency. The lack of movement can worsen muscle rigidity and stiffness, leading to contractures and a decreased range of motion in joints. Additionally, immobility may contribute to cardiovascular deconditioning, orthostatic hypotension, and an increased risk of pressure ulcers due to prolonged pressure on specific areas of the body. In this case report, we hereby report a case of Parkinson's disease further complicated by sinus discharge from the ulcer. This case report describes the putative effects of low-level laser therapy on discharging sinus from the wound secondary to a diabetic ulcer in idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Achieving an ideal level of functional independence and preventing problems associated with extended immobility are essential goals of structured physical therapy postoperative care. This may assist the patient in returning to their pre-injury position more quickly. Our patient underwent several interventions for wound healing, including proprioception training, tremor management, improving dynamic trunk balance, and pain control measures. Clinical outcome measures like the Barthel Index, lower extremity functional scale, and Visual-Analog Scale were used to assess the progress of the patient. Managing these interconnected conditions requires a multi-disciplinary approach.
PubMed: 38650813
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.56756 -
International Wound Journal Apr 2024A meta-analysis was conducted comprehensively to investigate the impact of evidence-based nursing (EBN) interventions on pressure injury (PI) in the intensive care unit... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
A meta-analysis was conducted comprehensively to investigate the impact of evidence-based nursing (EBN) interventions on pressure injury (PI) in the intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Computer searches were performed, from databases inception to November 2023, in Wanfang, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the application of EBN interventions in ICU patients. Two independent researchers conducted screenings of the literature, extracted data, and carried out quality evaluations. Stata 17.0 software was employed for data analysis. Overall, 25 RCTs, involving 2494 ICU patients, were included. It was found that compared to conventional care methods, the implementation of EBN interventions in ICU patients markedly decreased the occurrence of PI (odds ratio [OR]: 0.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.30, p < 0.001), delayed the onset time of pressure ulcers (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -1.61, 95% CI: -2.00 to -1.22, p < 0.001), and also improved nursing satisfaction (OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.14-1.23, p < 0.001). Our findings suggest the implementation of EBN interventions in the care of PI in ICU patients is highly valuable, can reduce the occurrence of PI, can delay the time of appearance, and is associated with relatively higher nursing satisfaction, making it worthy of promotion.
Topics: Pressure Ulcer; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Evidence-Based Nursing; Female; Male; Middle Aged; Adult; Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38650426
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14834 -
International Journal of Nursing Studies Jul 2024Numerous interventions for pressure injury prevention have been developed, including care bundles. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Numerous interventions for pressure injury prevention have been developed, including care bundles.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review the effectiveness of pressure injury prevention care bundles on pressure injury prevalence, incidence, and hospital-acquired pressure injury rate in hospitalised patients.
DATA SOURCES
The Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (via PubMed), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, EMBASE, Scopus, the Cochrane Library and two registries were searched (from 2009 to September 2023).
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies with a comparison group published in English after 2008 were included. Studies reporting on the frequency of pressure injuries where the number of patients was not the numerator or denominator, or where the denominator was not reported, and single subgroups of hospitalised patients were excluded. Educational programmes targeting healthcare professionals and bundles targeting specific types of pressure injuries were excluded.
PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS
Bundles with ≥3 components directed towards patients and implemented in ≥2 hospital services were included.
STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS
Screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessments were undertaken independently by two researchers. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted. The certainty of the body of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation.
RESULTS
Nine studies (seven non-randomised with historical controls; two randomised) conducted in eight countries were included. There were four to eight bundle components; most were core, and only a few were discretionary. Various strategies were used prior to (six studies), during (five studies) and after (two studies) implementation to embed the bundles. The pooled risk ratio for pressure injury prevalence (five non-randomised studies) was 0.55 (95 % confidence intervals 0.29-1.03), and for hospital-acquired pressure injury rate (five non-randomised studies) it was 0.31 (95 % confidence intervals 0.12-0.83). All non-randomised studies were at high risk of bias, with very low certainty of evidence. In the two randomised studies, the care bundles had non-significant effects on hospital-acquired pressure injury incidence density, but data could not be pooled.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS
Whilst some studies showed decreases in pressure injuries, this evidence was very low certainty. The potential benefits of adding emerging evidence-based components to bundles should be considered. Future effectiveness studies should include contemporaneous controls and the development of a comprehensive, theory and evidence-informed implementation plan.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER
PROSPERO CRD42023423058.
TWEETABLE ABSTRACT
Pressure injury prevention care bundles decrease hospital-acquired pressure injuries, but the certainty of this evidence is very low.
Topics: Pressure Ulcer; Humans; Patient Care Bundles; Hospitalization
PubMed: 38642429
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104768 -
Journal of Tissue Viability Apr 2024The aim of this integrative review was to explore the effect of care bundles in the prevention of Medical Device Related Pressure Ulcers (MDRPU). An MDRPU is a wound... (Review)
Review
The aim of this integrative review was to explore the effect of care bundles in the prevention of Medical Device Related Pressure Ulcers (MDRPU). An MDRPU is a wound that occurs on the skin or mucosal membranes because of pressure or pressure in combination with shear. Like other types of pressure ulcers, they will have negative consequences for patients and healthcare organisations alike. Many MDRPU's are preventable. A literature search was undertaken from computerised databases using key search terms, Pressure Ulcer* Pressure Injur* and Medical Device*. Databases included CINAHL; Medline and SocIndex. A total of seven studies were found that met the criteria for inclusion in this review. When compared to the widely recognised and trusted international guidelines there was variation found between the individual interventions selected within each study for inclusion within the bundle. Skin assessment and device repositioning were the most frequently included interventions in the bundles, followed by use of prophylactic dressings, appropriate device selection and fitting. The least common intervention was monitoring the tension of the device and/or its securements. All studies reported a reduction in the number of MDRPU's when care bundles were used in clinical practice. However, there is variation in bundle designs and study methodologies employed. This review has demonstrated the potential benefit of care bundles in reducing MDRPU. However, due to heterogeneity in the study methods employed and the interventions within the care bundles, further, more robust research is required to establish which interventions show the most clinical and patient benefit.
PubMed: 38641481
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2024.04.003 -
Applied Nursing Research : ANR Apr 2024It is known that heel offloading devices are widely used in clinical practice for the prevention of heel pressure ulcers, even though there is a lack of robust, good...
BACKGROUND
It is known that heel offloading devices are widely used in clinical practice for the prevention of heel pressure ulcers, even though there is a lack of robust, good quality evidence to inform their use.
OBJECTIVE
To explore how and why heel offloading devices are used (or not used) and reasoning behind their use in population at high risk of developing heel pressure ulcers.
METHODS
An ethnographic study was conducted as part of a realist evaluation in three orthopaedic wards in a large English hospital. Twelve observations took place, with 49 h and 35 min of patient care observed. A total of 32 patients were observed and 19 members of the nursing team were interviewed and in-depth interviews with the three ward managers were conducted.
RESULTS
Although the focus of the study was on offloading devices, constant low pressure heel specific devices were also observed in use for pressure ulcer prevention, whilst offloading devices were perceived to be for higher risk patients or those already with a heel pressure ulcer. Nursing staff viewed leadership from the ward manager and the influence of the Tissue Viability Nurse Specialists as key mechanisms for the proactive use of devices.
CONCLUSIONS
This study informs trial design as it has identified that a controlled clinical trial of both types of heel specific devices is required to inform evidence-based practice. Involving the ward managers and Tissue Viability Nurse Specialists during set up phase for clinical equipoise could improve recruitment. Tweetable abstract How, for whom, and in what circumstances do devices work to prevent heel pressure ulcers? Observations of clinical practice.
Topics: Humans; Heel; Pressure Ulcer
PubMed: 38641382
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2024.151785