-
European Journal of Human Genetics :... Feb 2024The Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) aims to facilitate PGx implementation by developing evidence-based pharmacogenetics guidelines to optimize...
The Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) aims to facilitate PGx implementation by developing evidence-based pharmacogenetics guidelines to optimize pharmacotherapy. This guideline describes the gene-drug interaction of ABCG2 with allopurinol, HLA-B with allopurinol, MTHFR with folic acid, and MTHFR with methotrexate, relevant for the treatment of gout, cancer, and rheumatoid arthritis. A systematic review was performed based on which pharmacotherapeutic recommendations were developed. Allopurinol is less effective in patients with the ABCG2 p.(Gln141Lys) variant. In HLA-B*58:01 carriers, the risk of severe cutaneous adverse events associated with allopurinol is strongly increased. The DPWG recommends using a higher allopurinol dose in patients with the ABCG2 p.(Gln141Lys) variant. For HLA-B*58:01 positive patients the DPWG recommends choosing an alternative (for instance febuxostat). The DPWG indicates that another option would be to precede treatment with allopurinol tolerance induction. Genotyping of ABCG2 in patients starting on allopurinol was judged to be 'potentially beneficial' for drug effectiveness, meaning genotyping can be considered on an individual patient basis. Genotyping for HLA-B*58:01 in patients starting on allopurinol was judged to be 'beneficial' for drug safety, meaning it is advised to consider genotyping the patient before (or directly after) drug therapy has been initiated. For MTHFR-folic acid there is evidence for a gene-drug interaction, but there is insufficient evidence for a clinical effect that makes therapy adjustment useful. Finally, for MTHFR-methotrexate there is insufficient evidence for a gene-drug interaction.
Topics: Humans; Allopurinol; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2; Drug Interactions; Folic Acid; Gout Suppressants; HLA-B Antigens; Methotrexate; Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2); Neoplasm Proteins; Pharmacogenetics
PubMed: 36056234
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01180-0 -
Clinical Gastroenterology and... Aug 2023Studies evaluating reproductive outcomes among male patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are limited. We evaluated use of IBD medications and association with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Studies evaluating reproductive outcomes among male patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are limited. We evaluated use of IBD medications and association with semen parameters, a proxy of male fertility, and adverse pregnancy outcomes (early pregnancy loss [EPL], preterm birth [PB], congenital malformations [CM]).
METHODS
We searched Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science (PROSPERO CRD42020197098) from inception to April 2022 for studies reporting semen parameters and adverse pregnancy outcomes among male patients exposed to biologics, thiopurine, or methotrexate. Standardized mean difference, prevalence, and odds ratios (ORs) of outcomes were pooled and analyzed using a random effects model.
RESULTS
Ten studies reporting semen parameters (268 patients with IBD) and 16 studies reporting adverse pregnancy outcomes (over 25,000 patients with IBD) were included. Biologic, thiopurine, or methotrexate use were not associated with decreased sperm count, motility, or abnormal morphology compared with nonexposed patients. The prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes with paternal biologic (5%), thiopurine (6%), or methotrexate (6%) exposure was comparable to nonexposed patients (5%). Biologic use was not associated with risk of EPL (OR, 1.26; I = 0%; P = .12), PB (OR, 1.10; I = 0%; P = .17), or CM (OR, 1.03; I = 0%; P = .69). Thiopurine use was not associated with risk of EPL (OR, 1.31; I = 19%; P = .17), PB (OR, 1.05; I = 0%; P = .20), or CM (OR, 1.07; I = 7%; P = .34). Methotrexate use was not associated with risk of PB (OR, 1.06; I = 0%; P = .62) or CM (OR, 1.03; I = 0%; P = .81).
CONCLUSIONS
Biologic, thiopurine, or methotrexate use among male patients with IBD are not associated with impairments in fertility or with increased odds of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Male; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Methotrexate; Premature Birth; Semen; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Abortion, Spontaneous; Fertility
PubMed: 35870769
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.008 -
Arthritis Care & Research Aug 2023Whereas in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis much evidence exists on the effects of current pharmacologic treatment on clinical outcomes, little is known about the...
OBJECTIVE
Whereas in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis much evidence exists on the effects of current pharmacologic treatment on clinical outcomes, little is known about the effects on patient-reported outcomes. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effects of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on the patient-relevant domains of pain, fatigue, activity limitation, overall emotional and physical health impact, and work/school/housework ability and productivity.
METHODS
A literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials wherein registered DMARDs were compared with placebo or methotrexate and reported the effects on patient-reported outcomes included in the International Consortium of Health Outcomes Measurement standard set for inflammatory arthritis. Random effects meta-analyses using the standardized mean differences of change scores as the effect measure were performed for the domains of pain, fatigue, and activity limitation, comparing DMARDs with placebo and methotrexate. The other 2 domains were presented narratively.
RESULTS
Across the 5 domains, 69 records belonging to 52 studies were identified. All meta-analyses showed a decrease of burden when DMARDs were compared with placebo (standardized mean differences [95% confidence interval] in pain -0.80 [-0.99, -0.61], fatigue -0.48 [-0.64, -0.32], and activity limitation -0.56 [- 0.63, -0.49]) and when compared with methotrexate (-0.55 [-0.70, -0.41), -0.44 [-0.55, -0.33], and - 0.37 [-0.44, -0.30], respectively).
CONCLUSION
DMARDs decrease the burden in all the domains that are relevant to patients. Effect sizes may be influenced by DMARD type. Therefore, in the decision for rheumatoid arthritis treatment, patient-reported outcomes should be taken into account.
Topics: Humans; Antirheumatic Agents; Methotrexate; Arthritis, Rheumatoid
PubMed: 35657611
DOI: 10.1002/acr.24965