-
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia E... Aug 2023To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes of women with singleton pregnancies, after spontaneous... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes of women with singleton pregnancies, after spontaneous conception, and with the diagnosis of amniotic sludge before 37 weeks of gestational age.
DATA SOURCES
We conducted a search on the PubMed, Cochrane, Bireme, and Theses databases until June 2022.
SELECTION OF STUDIES
Using the keywords or or , we found 263 articles, 132 of which were duplicates, and 70 were discarded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria.
DATA COLLECTION
The articles retrieved were analyzed by 2 reviewers; 61 were selected for full-text analysis, 18 were included for a qualitative analysis, and 14, for a quantitative analysis.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Among the maternal outcomes analyzed, there was an increased risk of preterm labor (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.45-2.03), premature rupture of ovular membranes (95%CI: 1.99-3.79), and clinical (95%CI: 1.41-6.19) and histological chorioamnionitis (95%CI: 1.75-3.12). Regarding the fetal outcomes, there was a significant increase in the risk of morbidity (95%CI: 1.80-3.17), mortality (95%CI: 1.14-18.57), admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU; 95%CI: 1.17-1.95), and neonatal sepsis (95%CI: 2.29-7.55).
CONCLUSION
The results of the present study indicate that the presence of amniotic sludge is a risk marker for preterm delivery. Despite the heterogeneity of the studies analyzed, even in patients with other risk factors for prematurity, such as short cervix and previous preterm delivery, the presence of amniotic sludge increases the risk of premature labor. Moreover, antibiotic therapy seems to be a treatment for amniotic sludge, and it may prolong pregnancy.
Topics: Pregnancy; Infant, Newborn; Humans; Female; Premature Birth; Sewage; Gestational Age; Risk Factors; Databases, Factual
PubMed: 37683661
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1772189 -
PloS One 2023The benefits of routine gastric suctioning or lavage in neonates remain uncertain, despite the common practice worldwide. To investigate the potential advantages and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The benefits of routine gastric suctioning or lavage in neonates remain uncertain, despite the common practice worldwide. To investigate the potential advantages and harms, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effects of these procedures in healthy or meconium-stained neonates at birth. We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library databases from inception to February 9, 2023. We included only RCTs assessing the outcomes of gastric suction or lavage in neonates at birth. We calculated risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model. The primary outcomes were gastrointestinal symptoms including vomiting, retching, feeding intolerance, and secondary aspiration. The secondary outcomes included time to initiation of breastfeeding and potential adverse procedure-related events. Twelve RCTs with a total of 4,122 neonates were analyzed. All the studies compared neonates who received gastric suction or lavage with those who received usual care. Gastrointestinal symptoms were significantly reduced in neonates receiving gastric suction or gastric lavage compared with the control group (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.89). Gastric lavage was beneficial for infants with meconium-stained amniotic fluid (RR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60-0.84), while gastric suction had no significant benefit in reducing gastrointestinal symptoms in infants without meconium-stained amniotic fluid (RR 0.91; 95% CI, 0.61-1.37). Our findings suggest that gastric suction or lavage may reduce gastrointestinal symptoms in neonates; however, these procedures may only benefit infants born with meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Vigorous newborns without meconium-stained amniotic fluid may not benefit from these procedures. Furthermore, gastric suction may lead to adverse outcomes such as apnea and bradycardia. Registration: This study was registered in the PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews in health and social care (CRD42023247780).
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Infant; Humans; Meconium; Therapeutic Irrigation; Suction; Stomach; Gastric Lavage; Vomiting; Amniotic Fluid
PubMed: 37440527
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288398 -
American Journal of Perinatology May 2024This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials (RCTs and NCTs, respectively) that explored... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials (RCTs and NCTs, respectively) that explored the maternal-neonatal outcomes of cervical osmotic dilators versus dinoprostone in promoting cervical ripening during labor induction.
STUDY DESIGN
Six major databases were screened until August 27, 2022. The quality of included studies was evaluated. The data were summarized as mean difference or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) in a random-effects model.
RESULTS
Overall, 14 studies with 15 arms were analyzed ( = 2,380 patients). Ten and four studies were RCTs and NCTs, respectively. The overall quality for RCTs varied (low risk = 2, unclear risk = 7, and high risk = 1), whereas all NCTs had good quality ( = 4). For the primary endpoints, there was no significant difference between both groups regarding the rate of normal vaginal delivery (RR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.95-1.14, = 0.41) and rate of cesarean delivery (RR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.93-1.17, = 0.51). Additionally, there was no significant difference between both groups regarding the mean change in Bishop score and mean time from intervention to delivery. The rate of uterine hyperstimulation was significantly lower in the cervical osmotic dilator group. For the neonatal outcomes, during cervical ripening, the rate of fetal distress was significantly lower in the cervical osmotic dilator group. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding the mean Apgar scores, rate of meconium-stained amniotic fluid, rate of umbilical cord metabolic acidosis, rate of neonatal infection, and rate of neonatal intensive care unit admission.
CONCLUSION
During labor induction, cervical ripening with cervical osmotic dilators and dinoprostone had comparable maternal-neonatal outcomes. Cervical osmotic dilators had low risk of uterine hyperstimulation compared with dinoprostone. Overall, cervical osmotic dilators might be more preferred over dinoprostone in view of their analogous cervical ripening effects, comparable maternal-neonatal outcomes, and lack of drug-related adverse events.
KEY POINTS
· This is the first analysis of cervical osmotic dilators versus PGE2 for cervical ripening during labor.. · There was no difference between both arms regarding the rates of normal vaginal/cesarean deliveries.. · There was no difference between both arms regarding the rates of neonatal adverse events.. · Cervical osmotic dilators had significant lower risk of uterine hyperstimulation compared with PGE2.. · Cervical osmotic dilators may be superior to PGE2 in view of their similar efficacy and better safety..
Topics: Humans; Labor, Induced; Cervical Ripening; Pregnancy; Female; Dinoprostone; Oxytocics; Cesarean Section; Infant, Newborn; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Cervix Uteri; Delivery, Obstetric
PubMed: 37336231
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770161 -
The Australian & New Zealand Journal of... Oct 2023Ramadan fasting (RF) is mandatory for all healthy Muslims in the ninth month of the Islamic calendar. Although pregnant women are exempt from fasting, many make the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Ramadan fasting (RF) is mandatory for all healthy Muslims in the ninth month of the Islamic calendar. Although pregnant women are exempt from fasting, many make the decision to practise it. Concerns that fasting during pregnancy harms the fetus remain, as there are no firm recommendations regarding its safety.
OBJECTIVES
To provide a systematic review on the effects of RF on fetal health.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We conducted a literature search for peer-reviewed articles through Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) until 31 December 2021.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All case-control and observational cohort studies that reported on fetal outcomes of pregnant women who underwent RF for at least one day during pregnancy are included.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two researchers independently reviewed the eligibility of all studies. A third researcher resolved any conflict between researchers. Findings are extracted from eligible papers and presented as narratives.
MAIN RESULTS
Fourteen articles are included based on eligibility criteria, with a total sample size of 2889. Studies demonstrate negative associations between RF and neonatal weight, amniotic fluid index, preterm birth and growth parameters mainly during the second and third trimesters. However, the evidence is not strongly supported.
CONCLUSION
There is limited data to elucidate the relationship between RF and fetal health, hence the need for more studies to provide a better understanding.
PubMed: 37283305
DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13706 -
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Feb 2024Amniotic Fluid Sludge (AFS) has been theorized to be sonographic evidence of an underlying infection/inflammation and studies have concluded that approximately 10% of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Amniotic Fluid Sludge (AFS) has been theorized to be sonographic evidence of an underlying infection/inflammation and studies have concluded that approximately 10% of the patients who show signs of preterm labor with intact membranes have an underlying intraamniotic infection, mostly subclinical, carrying an increased risk for preterm birth with its subsequent neonatal and maternal complications. The purpose of the present systematic review is to evaluate the impact of antibiotic therapy on preterm birth rates of women diagnosed with AFS.
METHODS
We searched Medline, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL, Google Scholar, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases for relevant articles published until the 30th of September 2022. Observational studies (prospective and retrospective) that evaluated the impact of antibiotics on preterm delivery rates of patients with AFS were considered eligible for inclusion. Statistical meta-analysis was performed with RStudio and we calculated pooled risk ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). To evaluate the information size, we performed trial sequential analysis (TSA) and the methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using RoBINS tools.
RESULTS
Overall, four retrospective cohort studies were included in the present systematic review and 369 women were enrolled. We demonstrated that preterm delivery prior to 34, 32 and 28 weeks of gestational age was comparable among the groups of women that had antibiotics and those that did not (OR: 0.34, 95% CI 0.05, 2.14, 0.40 [0.09, 1.66], 0.35 [0.08, 1.58], respectively) but the statistical heterogenicity of the studies included was high for every gestational period that was examined.
CONCLUSIONS
According to our study, we cannot conclude that the use of antibiotics in women with amniotic fluid sludge benefit the prognostic risk to deliver prematurely. It is quite clear that data from larger sample sizes and more well adjusted and designed studies are needed.
Topics: Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Amniotic Fluid; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Premature Birth; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37097312
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07045-1