-
American Journal of Physical Medicine &... Jul 2024To evaluate the effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programs and other rehabilitation interventions in adults with asthma.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programs and other rehabilitation interventions in adults with asthma.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
RESULTS
MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature and CENTRAL were searched from inception to 31 May 2023. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022331440. Thirty-six randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were analysed, and only 26 were pooled in the meta-analysis due to the heterogeneity of comparisons and outcomes across the studies. Pulmonary rehabilitation, compared with education associated with breathing exercises, may result in little to no difference in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (mean difference 0.01 score, 95% confidence interval -0.48 to 0.50, 163 participants, three studies, low certainty).
CONCLUSION
Our findings show that pulmonary rehabilitation, compared with education associated with breathing exercises, may result in little to no difference in the impact of asthma on health-related quality of life. Overall, the certainty of evidence was low or very low preventing any firm conclusion on the effects of single or combined rehabilitation interventions.
PubMed: 38958276
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002552 -
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery Jul 2024Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common valvular heart disease worldwide, and current guidelines for TR treatment are relatively conservative, as well as with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common valvular heart disease worldwide, and current guidelines for TR treatment are relatively conservative, as well as with detrimental outcomes. Restoration of sinus rhythm was reported to improve the TR severity in those TR patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, relevant research was limited. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of restoration of sinus rhythm in TR patients with AF.
METHODS
In this study, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched for study enrollment until July 2023. This study was designed under the guidance of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. These studies containing the patient's baseline characteristics, surgical procedure, and at least one of the clinical outcomes were included. The primary endpoint was TR grade during follow-up after restoration of sinus rhythm.
RESULTS
Out of 1074 records, 6 were enrolled. Restoration of sinus rhythm is associated with a reduction of TR severity (TR grade, odds ratio 0.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01 to 1.28, P = 0.08, I = 83%; TR area, mean difference (MD) -2.19 cm, 95% CI: -4.17 to -0.21 cm, P = 0.03, I = 96%). Additionally, remolding of right heart with a significant reduction of tricuspid valve annulus diameter (MD -0.36 cm, 95%CI: -0.47 to -0.26 cm, P < 0.00001, I = 29%) and right atrium volume index (MD -11.10 mL/m, 95%CI: -16.81 to -5.39 mL/m, P = 0.0001, I = 79%) was observed during follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, rhythm-control therapy could reduce TR severity in AF patients with TR and is associated with right heart remodeling.
Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency; Heart Rate
PubMed: 38956670
DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-02891-9 -
BMC Anesthesiology Jul 2024As a new type of intravenous anesthetic, ciprofol has the advantages of fast onset of action, fast recovery and high clearance rate. This study aimed to investigate the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ciprofol and propofol in sedating patients in the operating room and outside the operating room: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
BACKGROUND
As a new type of intravenous anesthetic, ciprofol has the advantages of fast onset of action, fast recovery and high clearance rate. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of ciprofol versus traditional propofol for anesthesia and sedation in and out of the operating room.
METHODS
We searched the literature in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from January 2021 to December 2023. All clinical studies comparing the sedative effects of propofol and ciprofol, both inside and outside the operating room, were included in our trial. The main outcome measures were induction time and incidence of injection-site pain. Data are merged using risk ratio and standardized mean difference with 95% confidence interval. Subgroup analysis, meta-regression, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were performed. The study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023447747).
RESULTS
A total of 15 randomized, controlled trials involving 2002 patients were included in this study. Compared with propofol, ciprofol has a longer induction time in the operating room but a shorter induction time in non-operating room settings. Ciprofol can effectively reduce the risk of injection-site pain and respiratory depression both inside and outside the operating room. In addition, the risk of drug-related hypotension induced with ciprofol in the operating room is lower, but the awakening time is also longer. Meta-regression analysis showed that neither age nor BMI were potential sources of heterogeneity. Funnel plot, egger and begg tests showed no significant publication bias. Sensitivity analyzes indicate that our results are robust and reliable.
CONCLUSION
Ciprofol has absolute advantages in reducing the risk of injection-site pain and respiratory depression, both in and outside operating room. Intraoperative use of ciprofol reduces the risk of drug-related hypotension and may also reduce the risk of intraoperative physical movements. However, ciprofol may have longer induction and awakening time than propofol.
Topics: Propofol; Humans; Operating Rooms; Anesthetics, Intravenous; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38956515
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02609-3 -
Critical Care Medicine Jul 2024In sepsis treatment, antibiotics are crucial, but overuse risks development of antibiotic resistance. Recent guidelines recommended the use of procalcitonin to guide...
Benefits and Harms of Procalcitonin- or C-Reactive Protein-Guided Antimicrobial Discontinuation in Critically Ill Adults With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
OBJECTIVES
In sepsis treatment, antibiotics are crucial, but overuse risks development of antibiotic resistance. Recent guidelines recommended the use of procalcitonin to guide antibiotic cessation, but solid evidence is insufficient. Recently, concerns were raised that this strategy would increase recurrence. Additionally, optimal protocol or difference from the commonly used C-reactive protein (CRP) are uncertain. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of procalcitonin- or CRP-guided antibiotic cessation strategies with standard of care in sepsis.
DATA SOURCES
A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Igaku Chuo Zasshi, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform.
STUDY SELECTION
Randomized controlled trials involving adults with sepsis in intensive care.
DATA EXTRACTION
A systematic review with network meta-analyses was performed. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessments, Developments, and Evaluation method was used to assess certainty.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Eighteen studies involving 5023 participants were included. Procalcitonin-guided and CRP-guided strategies shortened antibiotic treatment (-1.89 days [95% CI, -2.30 to -1.47], -2.56 days [95% CI, -4.21 to -0.91]) with low- to moderate-certainty evidence. In procalcitonin-guided strategies, this benefit was consistent even in subsets with shorter baseline antimicrobial duration (7-10 d) or in Sepsis-3, and more pronounced in procalcitonin cutoff of "0.5 μg/L and 80% reduction." No benefit was observed when monitoring frequency was less than half of the initial 10 days. Procalcitonin-guided strategies lowered mortality (-27 per 1000 participants [95% CI, -45 to -7]) and this was pronounced in Sepsis-3, but CRP-guided strategies led to no difference in mortality. Recurrence did not increase significantly with either strategy (very low to low certainty).
CONCLUSIONS
In sepsis, procalcitonin- or CRP-guided antibiotic discontinuation strategies may be beneficial and safe. In particular, the usefulness of procalcitonin guidance for current Sepsis-3, where antimicrobials are used for more than 7 days, was supported. Well-designed studies are needed focusing on monitoring protocol and recurrence.
PubMed: 38949476
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006366 -
Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver... Jun 2024Mammoplasty, a common cosmetic procedure involving breast augmentation and reduction surgeries, has gained global popularity. Recently, attention has shifted towards...
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Mammoplasty, a common cosmetic procedure involving breast augmentation and reduction surgeries, has gained global popularity. Recently, attention has shifted towards understanding the prevalence and significance of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms following mammoplasty. This systematic review aims to consolidate existing literature to provide a comprehensive overview of the type and frequency of GI problems associated with various mammoplasty procedures.
METHODS
A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus databases was conducted until January 22, 2024, identifying observational and interventional studies examining GI symptoms post-mammoplasty. Inclusion criteria covered human studies, while exclusion criteria ensured specificity. Two independent investigators performed screening, and data extraction included study characteristics, surgical procedures, anesthesia methods, and interventions.
RESULTS
Nineteen studies, involving 2,487 subjects, were included in the review. Breast reconstruction emerged as the most studied procedure, followed by breast reduction, augmentation, mastectomy, and breast cancer surgery. Predominant GI symptoms included nausea and vomiting, with varying rates across mammoplasty types. Anesthesia modality influenced symptomatology, with general, local, and combined anesthesia associated with GI disturbances. Antiemetics, notably ondansetron and droperidol, showed variable efficacy. Non-pharmacological approaches, such as preoperative hypnosis, were explored for symptom management.
CONCLUSIONS
Our systematic review reveals insights into GI symptoms post-mammoplasty, emphasizing the common occurrence of symptoms such as nausea and vomiting, alongside less frequent manifestations such as constipation, dry mouth, retching, abdominal pain, and tightness. Variations in symptom prevalence were noted across diverse mammoplasty surgeries, anesthesia methods, and the use of antiemetics, underscoring the complex nature of post-mammoplasty GI disturbances.
Topics: Humans; Mammaplasty; Female; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Adult; Prevalence
PubMed: 38944853
DOI: 10.15403/jgld-5598 -
World Journal of Surgery Jun 2024
PubMed: 38944810
DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12268 -
British Journal of Hospital Medicine... Jun 2024Poorly controlled pain is common after emergency laparotomy. It causes distress, hinders rehabilitation, and predisposes to complications: prolonged hospitalisation,... (Review)
Review
Poorly controlled pain is common after emergency laparotomy. It causes distress, hinders rehabilitation, and predisposes to complications: prolonged hospitalisation, persistent pain, and reduced quality of life. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the relative efficacies of pre-emptive analgesia for emergency laparotomy to inform practice. We performed a search of MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science and SCOPUS for comparator studies of preoperative/intraoperative interventions to control/reduce postoperative pain in adults undergoing emergency laparotomy (EL) for general surgical pathologies. Exclusion criteria: surgery including non-abdominal sites; postoperative sedation and/or intubation; non-formal assessment of pain; non-English manuscripts. All manuscripts were screened by two investigators. We identified 2389 papers. Following handsearching and removal of duplicates, 1147 were screened. None were eligible for inclusion, with many looking at elective and/or laparoscopic surgeries. Our findings indicate there is no evidence base for pre-emptive analgesic strategies in emergency laparotomy. This contrasts substantially with elective cohorts. Potential reasons include variation in practice, management of physiological derangement taking priority, and perceived contraindications to neuraxial techniques. We urge a review of contemporary practice, with analysis of clinical data, to generate expert consensus.
Topics: Humans; Laparotomy; Pain, Postoperative; Analgesia; Pain Management; Emergencies; Analgesics; Analgesics, Opioid
PubMed: 38941975
DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2023.0409 -
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience :... Jun 2024Traditionally, patients undergoing craniotomy were subject to extended hospital stays for intensive monitoring and management of potential complications. However, with... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Traditionally, patients undergoing craniotomy were subject to extended hospital stays for intensive monitoring and management of potential complications. However, with the evolution of surgical methods, anesthesia, and postoperative protocols, the feasibility and interest in same-day discharge (SDD) are growing. This study aimed to evaluate whether same-day discharge is a safe and feasible approach in craniotomy through a meta-analysis of the available literature.
METHODS
Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases from inception to December 2023. Eligible studies comprised reports in English with a minimum of 4 patients who underwent craniotomies and were discharged with same-day discharge, whether single-arm or comparative with normal discharge. Single proportion analysis with 95 % confidence interval (CI) was used to pool the studies and Odds Ratio (OR) with 95 % CI was used to measure effects in comparative analysis. A random-effects model was adopted. Endpoints included success and failure of pre-planned same-day discharge, and postoperative complications throughout the hospital stay (until discharge), these complications were further categorized into major and minor complications. Also, need for reoperation, readmission within 24 h, readmission after 24 h, and mortality.
RESULTS
Seven observational studies were included. Five studies were included in the single-arm analysis, comprising data from 715 patients. Four studies comprising 731 patients were included in the comparative analysis, of whom 233 were discharged on SDD, and 498 were discharged normally. The analysis revealed a success rate of 88 % (95 % CI, 83 %-94 %), readmission to the hospital within the initial 24 h rate of 2 % (95 % CI, 1 %-2 %), readmission after 24 h rate of 1 % (95 % CI, 0 %-2 %;), total postoperative complications until discharge rate of 2 % (95 % CI, 1 %-4 %), major complications rate of 0 % (95 % CI, 0 %-0 %), minor complications rate of 2 % (95 % CI, 1 %-4 %), and mortality rate of 0 % (95 % CI, 0 %-0 %). Comparative analysis for complications and mortality showed no difference between both approaches.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review and meta-analysis identified that same-day discharge in craniotomy for selected patients, as well as for tumor resection craniotomies, is highly feasible and safe, with a high success rate, low failure, and reoperation rates. Moreover, for selected patients, no evidence of harm in same-day discharge was identified when compared with normal discharge. Consequently, same-day discharge may be considered a viable option, provided appropriate selection criteria are employed.
PubMed: 38941918
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.06.013 -
Medicine Jun 2024Healthy eating and weight control are recommended for cancer survivors; however, dietary interventions are not routinely offered to them. This study aimed to assess the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Healthy eating and weight control are recommended for cancer survivors; however, dietary interventions are not routinely offered to them. This study aimed to assess the effects of dietary interventions on survival, nutritional status, morbidity, dietary changes, health-related quality of life (QOL), and clinical measures in cancer survivors.
METHODS
Searches were conducted from October 1, 2018 to November 21, 2011 in the Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Emcare, and DARE electronic databases. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved individuals diagnosed with cancer, excluding conference abstracts, case studies, other reviews, and meta-analyses, and screened the articles.
RESULTS
Eight studies were included in this meta-analysis. We observed significant improvements in QOL and clinical data in 3 of 6 studies and in one study, respectively, significant weight loss on anthropometry in 2 of 5 studies, and dietary improvement in 4 of 5 studies of adult cancer survivors. However, we did not observe any benefits of dietary intervention for cancer survivors with undernutrition.
DISCUSSION
Dietary interventions for adult cancer survivors might contribute to improving their nutritional status; however, further clarification requires a study that standardizes the intervention method. Furthermore, RCTs are required to determine the effects on cancer survivors with undernutrition.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Cancer Survivors; Neoplasms; Nutritional Status; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38941414
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038675 -
Journal of Clinical Nursing Jun 2024
PubMed: 38937902
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.17306