-
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2024This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Allisartan Isoproxil in the management of hypertension.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Allisartan Isoproxil in the management of hypertension.
METHODS
A comprehensive search was conducted across both English and Chinese databases, including the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese Journal Full Text Database (CNKI), Wanfang Digital Periodical Full Text Database, and VIP Chinese Periodical Database (VIP), up to March 24, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating alisartan axetil for hypertension management were selected. Literature quality was assessed, and data were extracted for meta-analysis using Stata 15.1 software. The quality of evidence for outcome indicators was evaluated using the GRADE system level.
RESULTS
Six RCTs involving 767 participants were included. Meta-analysis revealed that, compared to placebo, the Allisartan Isoproxil group exhibited a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) [WMD = -8.08, 95% CI (-11.81, 4.10), = 0.000] and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) [SMD = -0.69, 95% CI (-1.17, 0.20), = 0.006]. However, the reduction in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was not statistically significant [WMD = -5.48, 95% CI (-11.07, 0.10), = 0.054]. Additionally, compared to calcium channel blockers (CCB) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), Allisartan Isoproxil did not significantly affect SBP [WMD = 0.20, 95% CI (-3.71, 4.10), = 0.921] or DBP [WMD = 0.16, 95% CI (-2.11, 2.43), = 0.891]. Allisartan Isoproxil demonstrated superior effects in increasing nitric oxide (NO) levels and decreasing endothelin (ET) levels compared to control groups [WMD = 9.56, 95% CI (6.42, 12.71), = 0.000], [WMD = -7.42, 95% CI (-11.13, -3.71), = 0.000], and showed a higher effective control rate of blood pressure [RR = 1.26, 95% CI (1.13, 1.41), = 0.000]. Subgroup analysis did not reveal significant differences. Regarding safety, there were no statistically significant differences in adverse events between the Allisartan Isoproxil group and the control groups [RR = 0.99, 95% CI (0.74, 1.32), = 0.928], and no fatal adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSION
Allisartan Isoproxil is effective in reducing SBP and baPWV, increasing NO, decreasing ET, and achieving a higher control rate of blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension. These benefits are achieved with minimal adverse reactions.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023467869, identifier PROSPERO CRD42023467869.
PubMed: 38903964
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1355014 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2024The impact of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs) on the outcome of hypertensive cancer patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICIs) therapy remains...
BACKGROUND
The impact of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs) on the outcome of hypertensive cancer patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICIs) therapy remains ambiguous. This investigation sought to elucidate the consequences of RASIs use on the prognosis for this specific patient group within the context of ICIs treatment, aspiring to provide a clearer basis for rational, evidence-driven choices in the clinical prescription of these medications.
METHODS
A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for original studies published up to 6 August 2023. Studies published in English reporting hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS) were included. All statistical analyses were executed utilizing R software (version 4.2.2).
RESULTS
A total of 13 studies, encompassing approximately 12,595 patients, satisfied the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses demonstrated a statistically significant association between the use of RASIs and a favorable outcome in OS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.88) and PFS (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.96) among cancer patients receiving ICIs treatment.
CONCLUSION
This investigation provides compelling evidence supporting the beneficial prognostic impact of RASIs on cancer patients receiving ICIs. RASIs present a viable option as antihypertensive agents for cancer patients with hypertension undergoing ICIs treatment. Further exploration and validation through prospective studies are necessary to establish definitive guidelines for the use of RASIs in managing hypertensive cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy with ICIs.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023454886.
PubMed: 38895628
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1378577 -
Shock (Augusta, Ga.) Jun 2024While non-norepinephrine vasopressors are increasingly used as a rescue therapy in cases of norepinephrine-refractory shock, data on their efficacy are limited. This...
BACKGROUND
While non-norepinephrine vasopressors are increasingly used as a rescue therapy in cases of norepinephrine-refractory shock, data on their efficacy are limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesize existing literature on the efficacy of Angiotensin II (ATII) in distributive shock.
METHODS
We pre-registered our meta-analysis with PROSPERO (CRD42023456136). We searched PubMed, Scopus, and gray literature for studies presenting outcomes on ATII use in distributive shock. The primary outcome of the meta-analysis was all-cause mortality. We used a random effects model to calculate pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS
By incorporating data from 1555 patients included in 10 studies, we found that however all-cause mortality was similar among patients receiving ATII and controls (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.16, p = 0.81), the reduction in norepinephrine or norepinephrine-equivalent dose at 3 h after treatment initiation was greater among patients receiving ATII (MD -0.06, 95% CI -0.11 to -0.02, p = 0.008), while there were no higher rates of adverse events reported among ATII patients.
CONCLUSIONS
While ATII did not reduce mortality among distributive shock patients, it allowed for significant adjunctive vasopressor reduction at 3 h without an increase in reported adverse events, deeming it a viable alternative for the increasingly adopted multimodal vasopressor for minimizing catecholamine exposure and its adverse events.
PubMed: 38888542
DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002384 -
Internal Medicine Journal Jun 2024Cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is a complication of selected cancer therapy agents associated with decline in left ventricular ejection fraction... (Review)
Review
Prevention of anthracycline-t and trastuzumabinduced decline in left ventricular ejection fraction with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blocker: a narrative systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
Cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) is a complication of selected cancer therapy agents associated with decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have established benefits in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, but their efficacy for preventing CTRCD remains controversial. This narrative systematic review assessed the efficacy and safety of ACEI/ARB in the prevention of cancer therapy LVEF decline. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane from January 1980 to June 2022. Studies of interest were randomised controlled trials of patients with normal LVEF and active malignancy receiving cancer therapy, randomised to receive either an ACEI or ARB compared with a control group. The outcome was the change in LVEF from baseline to the end of the follow-up period. Death, clinical heart failure and adverse drug reactions were recorded. A total of 3731 search records were screened and 12 studies were included, comprising a total of 1645 participants. Nine studies assessed the prevention of anthracycline-induced LVEF decline, of which five showed a beneficial effect (1%-14% higher LVEF in treated groups), whereas four studies showed no effect. Three studies assessed the prevention of trastuzumab-induced LVEF decline, of which one showed a beneficial effect (4% higher LVEF) in a subset of participants. There are mixed data regarding the efficacy of ACEI/ARB in preventing the LVEF decline in patients undergoing anthracycline or trastuzumab therapy, with evidence suggesting no clinically meaningful benefit observed in recent studies.
PubMed: 38874281
DOI: 10.1111/imj.16437 -
Renal Failure Dec 2024This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in abnormal renal function (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m) patients combined with heart... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIMS
This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in abnormal renal function (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m) patients combined with heart failure based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies.
METHODS
The Embase, PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies from inception to December 2023. Dichotomous variables were described as event counts with the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) values. Continuous variables were expressed as mean standard deviation (SD) with 95% CIs.
RESULTS
A total of 6 RCTs and 8 observational studies were included, involving 17335 eGFR below 60 ml/min/1.73m patients combined with heart failure. In terms of efficacy, we analyzed the incidence of cardiovascular events and found that sacubitril/valsartan significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3-5 patients with heart failure (OR: 0.65, 95%CI: 0.54-0.78). Moreover, sacubitril/valsartan prevented the serum creatinine elevation (OR: 0.81, 95%CI: 0.68-0.95), the eGFR decline (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.73-0.95) and the development of end-stage renal disease in this population (OR:0.73, 95%CI:0.60-0.89). As for safety outcomes, we did not find that the rate of hyperkalemia (OR:1.31, 95%CI:0.79-2.17) and hypotension (OR:1.57, 95%CI:0.94-2.62) were increased in sacubitril/valsartan group among CKD stages 3-5 patients with heart failure.
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis proves that sacubitril/valsartan has a favorable effect on cardiac function without obvious risk of adverse events in abnormal renal function patients combined with heart failure, indicating that sacubitril/valsartan has the potential to become perspective treatment for these patients.
Topics: Valsartan; Humans; Biphenyl Compounds; Aminobutyrates; Drug Combinations; Heart Failure; Tetrazoles; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Creatinine
PubMed: 38869007
DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2349135 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2024Sacubitril-valsartan has been widely reported for reducing the risk of cardiovascular death and improving left ventricular remodeling in patients with heart failure...
Effect of sacubitril-valsartan on left ventricular remodeling in patients with acute myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Sacubitril-valsartan has been widely reported for reducing the risk of cardiovascular death and improving left ventricular remodeling in patients with heart failure (HF). However, the effect of sacubitril-valsartan in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to investigate whether sacubitril-valsartan could reverse left ventricular remodeling and reduce cardiovascular adverse events in AMI patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Two researchers independently retrieved the relevant literature from PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and the Wanfang database. The retrieval time was limited from inception to 1 June 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting the inclusion criteria were included and analyzed.
RESULTS
In total, 21 RCTs involving 2442 AMI patients who underwent PPCI for revascularization were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that compared with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), sacubitril-valsartan treatment in AMI patients after PPCI significantly reduced left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) (weighted mean difference (WMD) -3.11, 95%CI: -4.05∼-2.16, < 0.001), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) (WMD -7.76, 95%CI: -12.24∼-3.27, = 0.001), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) (WMD -6.80, 95%CI: -9.45∼-4.15, < 0.001) and left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD) (WMD -2.53, 95%CI: -5.30-0.24, < 0.001). Subgroup analysis according to the dose of sacubitril-valsartan yielded a similar result. Meanwhile, PPCI patients using sacubitril-valsartan therapy showed lower risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (OR = 0.36, 95%CI: 0.28-0.46, < 0.001), myocardial reinfarction (OR = 0.54, 95%CI: 0.30-0.98, = 0.041) and HF (OR = 0.35, 95%CI: 0.26-0.47, < 0.001) without increasing the risk of renal insufficiency, hyperkalemia, or symptomatic hypotension. At the same time, the change of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (WMD 3.91, 95%CI: 3.41-4.41, < 0.001), 6 min walk test (6MWT) (WMD 43.56, 95%CI: 29.37-57.76, < 0.001) and NT-proBNP level (WMD -130.27, 95%CI: -159.14∼-101.40, < 0.001) were statistically significant.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, our meta-analysis indicates that compared with ACEI/ARB, sacubitril-valsartan may be superior to reverse left ventricular remodeling, improve cardiac function, and effectively reduce the risk of MACE, myocardial reinfarction, and HF in AMI patients after PPCI during follow-up without increasing the risk of adverse reactions including renal insufficiency, hyperkalemia, and symptomatic hypotension.
PubMed: 38863978
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1366035 -
Renal Failure Dec 2024To determine the efficacy and safety of Astragalus combined with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers in treating stage III diabetic nephropathy (DN) by... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Efficacy of astragalus combined with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers in the treatment of stage III diabetic nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the efficacy and safety of Astragalus combined with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers in treating stage III diabetic nephropathy (DN) by meta-analysis.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wiley, and Web of Science databases were searched for articles published between August 2007 and August 2022. Clinical studies on Astragalus combined with RAAS blockers for the treatment of stage III DN were included. Meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.1 and Stata 14.3 software.
RESULTS
A total of 32 papers were included in this meta-analysis, containing 2462 patients from randomized controlled trials, with 1244 receiving the combination treatment and 1218 solely receiving RAAS blockers. Astragalus combined with RAAS blockers yielded a significantly higher total effective rate (TER) (mean difference [MD] 3.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.59-5.09) and significantly reduced urinary protein excretion rate (UPER), serum creatinine (Scr), blood urine nitrogen (BUN) and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbAlc) levels. In subgroup analysis, combining astragalus and angiotensin receptor blocker significantly lowered fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 24 h urinary protein (24hUTP) levels, compared with the combined astragalus and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor treatment. Meanwhile, the latter significantly decreased the urinary microprotein (β-MG). Importantly, the sensitivity analysis confirmed the study's stability, and publication bias was not detected for UPER, BUN, HbAlc, FPG, or β-MG. However, the TER, SCr, and 24hUTP results suggested possible publication bias.
CONCLUSIONS
The astragalus-RAAS blocker combination treatment is safe and improves outcomes; however, rigorous randomized, large-scale, multi-center, double-blind trials are needed to evaluate its efficacy and safety in stage III DN.
Topics: Humans; Diabetic Nephropathies; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Renin-Angiotensin System; Drug Therapy, Combination; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Astragalus Plant; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Treatment Outcome; Creatinine; Glycated Hemoglobin; Proteinuria
PubMed: 38836372
DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2359033 -
Annals of Medicine Dec 2024Nocturnal blood pressure (BP) is correlated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and is an important predictor of cardiovascular death in hypertensive... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Nocturnal blood pressure (BP) is correlated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and is an important predictor of cardiovascular death in hypertensive patients.
OBJECTIVE
Nocturnal BP control is of great importance for cardiovascular risk reduction. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for nocturnal BP reduction in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.
METHODS
PICOS design structure was used to formulate the data extraction. All statistical calculations and analyses were performed with R.
RESULTS
Seventy-seven studies with 13,314 participants were included. The overall analysis indicated that nocturnal BP drop varied considerably among different ARBs. Allisartan (13.04 [95% CI (-18.41, -7.68)] mmHg), olmesartan (11.67 [95% CI (-14.12, -9.21)] mmHg), telmisartan (11.11 [95% CI (-12.12, -10.11)] mmHg) were associated with greater reduction in nocturnal systolic BP. In the aspect of the nocturnal-diurnal BP drop ratio, only allisartan was greater than 1. While, the variation tendency of last 4-6 h ambulatory BP was basically consistent with nocturnal BP. Additionally, allisartan showed improvement effect in the proportion of patients with dipping BP pattern.
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrates that for patients with mild to moderate hypertension, allisartan, olmesartan and telmisartan have more advantages in nocturnal BP reduction among the ARBs, while allisartan can reduce nighttime BP more than daytime BP and improve the dipping pattern.
Topics: Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory; Circadian Rhythm; Hypertension; Imidazoles; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38830046
DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2362880 -
Chinese Medical Journal May 2024Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), β-blockers (BBs), and...
BACKGROUND
Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), β-blockers (BBs), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are the cornerstones in treating heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) are included in HFrEF treatment guidelines. However, the effect of SGLT-2i and the five drugs on HFrEF have not yet been systematically evaluated.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception dates to September 23, 2022. Additional trials from previous relevant reviews and references were also included. The primary outcomes were changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter/dimension (LVEDD), left ventricular end-systolic diameter/dimension (LVESD), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVI), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI). Secondary outcomes were New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, 6-min walking distance (6MWD), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level, and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) level. The effect sizes were presented as the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
We included 68 RCTs involving 16,425 patients. Compared with placebo, ARNI + BB + MRA + SGLT-2i was the most effective combination to improve LVEF (15.63%, 95% CI: 9.91% to 21.68%). ARNI + BB + MRA + SGLT-2i (5.83%, 95% CI: 0.53% to 11.14%) and ARNI + BB + MRA (3.83%, 95% CI: 0.72% to 6.90%) were superior to the traditional golden triangle "ACEI + BB + MRA" in improving LVEF. ACEI + BB + MRA + SGLT-2i was better than ACEI + BB + MRA (-8.05 mL/m2, 95% CI: -14.88 to -1.23 mL/m2) and ACEI + BB + SGLT-2i (-18.94 mL/m2, 95% CI: -36.97 to -0.61 mL/m2) in improving LVEDVI. ACEI + BB + MRA + SGLT-2i (-3254.21 pg/mL, 95% CI: -6242.19 to -560.47 pg/mL) was superior to ARB + BB + MRA in reducing NT-proBNP.
CONCLUSIONS
Adding SGLT-2i to ARNI/ACEI + BB + MRA is beneficial for reversing cardiac remodeling. The new quadruple drug "ARNI + BB + MRA + SGLT-2i" is superior to the golden triangle "ACEI + BB + MRA" in improving LVEF.
REGISTRATION
PROSPERO; No. CRD42022354792.
PubMed: 38811344
DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003118 -
JAMA Jun 2024Concerns have arisen that renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers are less effective in Black patients than non-Black patients with heart failure and reduced ejection... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Concerns have arisen that renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers are less effective in Black patients than non-Black patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether the effects of RAS blockers on cardiovascular outcomes differ between Black patients and non-Black patients with HFrEF.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE and Embase databases through December 31, 2023.
STUDY SELECTION
Randomized trials investigating the effect of RAS blockers on cardiovascular outcomes in adults with HFrEF that enrolled Black and non-Black patients.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Individual-participant data were extracted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Independent Personal Data (PRISMA-IPD) reporting guidelines. Effects were estimated using a mixed-effects model using a 1-stage approach.
MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE
The primary outcome was first hospitalization for HF or cardiovascular death.
RESULTS
The primary analysis, based on the 3 placebo-controlled RAS inhibitor monotherapy trials, included 8825 patients (9.9% Black). Rates of death and hospitalization for HF were substantially higher in Black than non-Black patients. The hazard ratio (HR) for RAS blockade vs placebo for the primary composite was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.69-1.03) in Black patients and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.67-0.79) in non-Black patients (P for interaction = .14). The HR for first HF hospitalization was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.70-1.13) in Black patients and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.56-0.69) in non-Black patients (P for interaction = .006). Conversely, the corresponding HRs for cardiovascular death were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.65-1.07) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.93), respectively (P for interaction = .99). For total hospitalizations for HF and cardiovascular deaths, the corresponding rate ratios were 0.82 (95% CI, 0.66-1.02) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66-0.80), respectively (P for interaction = .27). The supportive analyses including the 2 trials adding an angiotensin receptor blocker to background angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor treatment (n = 16 383) gave consistent findings.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
The mortality benefit from RAS blockade was similar in Black and non-Black patients. Despite the smaller relative risk reduction in hospitalization for HF with RAS blockade in Black patients, the absolute benefit in Black patients was comparable with non-Black patients because of the greater incidence of this outcome in Black patients.
Topics: Heart Failure; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Hospitalization; Renin-Angiotensin System; Stroke Volume; Black or African American
PubMed: 38809561
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.6774