-
PloS One 2023Arthroscopically assisted reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) allows for the assessment of joint congruity following anatomic reduction, identification of occult... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Arthroscopically assisted reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) allows for the assessment of joint congruity following anatomic reduction, identification of occult intra-articular lesions, and treatment of traumatic intra-articular pathologies. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide evidence on whether ARIF is an alternative treatment protocol for ankle fractures.
METHODS
The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched independently by two investigators from the inception dates to October 9, 2022, for comparative studies. The risk-of-bias tool of the Cochrane Collaboration for Randomized Controlled Trials and the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) were used for assessing the methodological quality. Outcomes were evaluated in terms of the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale, post-operative complications, arthroscopic findings, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, and operation time. Cochrane Review Manager Software 5.4 was used to perform the statistical analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 10 trials involving 755 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results revealed that ARIF for ankle fractures was superior regarding functional outcomes and VAS scores when compared with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). No significant difference was noted in the post-operative complication rate and the operation time between the ARIF and ORIF groups. A high incidence of chondral or osteochondral lesions (OCLs), ligamentous injuries, and loose bodies with ankle fractures was found by ankle arthroscopy.
CONCLUSIONS
ARIF for ankle fractures might be beneficial to offer superior functional outcomes and VAS score than ORIF. Orthopedic surgeons should take a high incidence of OCLs and ligamentous injuries into consideration for the treatment of acute ankle fractures. We believe that with the increase in surgical experience, the occurrence of post-operative complications and the extension of operation time will no longer be a potential concern for surgeons.
Topics: Humans; Ankle Fractures; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Ankle Joint; Arthroscopy; Foot; Postoperative Complications; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37540648
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289554 -
Foot and Ankle Surgery : Official... Dec 2023This systematic review evaluates postoperative complications and functional outcomes of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) for distal tibial pilon fractures.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This systematic review evaluates postoperative complications and functional outcomes of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) for distal tibial pilon fractures. This paper aims to fill a key literature gap, as no previous reviews have specifically addressed MIPO for tibial pilon fractures or fractures other than those involving the humeral shaft.
METHODS
This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic literature search was done using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from 2000 to 2022. Inclusion criteria were MIPO treatment in skeletally mature patients, while exclusion criteria were non-English papers, conference abstracts, papers with multiple treatment modalities that didn't analyze MIPO outcomes separately, skeletally immature patients, case reports, and cohorts smaller than five patients. Unpublished papers were also searched using Clinical Trials. Data extraction included general study information, injury specification, outcome measures, and complications. Finally, a risk of bias assessment (RoB) was performed.
RESULTS
A total of 1732 studies were identified, of which 23 were included in this review, with 673 patients and 678 fractures analyzed. The mean follow-up ranged from 6 to 62.53 months, with most studies representing intermediate to long-term follow-up. Primary outcome measures showed that 87.33% achieved 'excellent to good' results, 8.67% achieved 'fair' results, and 4% achieved 'poor' results. Stratified by fracture type, 76.47%, 80.05%, and 76.92% of AO/OTA type A, B, and C fractures, respectively, achieved 'excellent to good' results. 35.06% of cases reported complications (236 in total). These included one case of deep infection (0.148%), 28 superficial wound infections (4.16%), 4 nonunion cases (0.59%), and 22 malunion instances (3.27%). RoB assessment showed that 52.17% had a moderate overall risk of bias, 39.13% had a serious overall risk of bias, and 8.7% had a critical overall risk of bias.
CONCLUSION
MIPO technique for pilon fractures showed good functional outcomes and reliability, with low complication rates and should be considered in cases where proper indirect reduction is possible. However, while the evidence is promising, further high-quality studies with larger sample sizes, longer-term follow-up, and comparison to other techniques are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this technique.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
IV.
Topics: Humans; Reproducibility of Results; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Tibial Fractures; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Tibia; Ankle Fractures; Bone Plates; Treatment Outcome; Fracture Healing
PubMed: 37532663
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2023.07.013 -
Foot & Ankle Specialist Jul 2023Fibula stress fractures are moderately common injuries among athletes and military recruits. Most of the available data for treatment come from case reports with a... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Fibula stress fractures are moderately common injuries among athletes and military recruits. Most of the available data for treatment come from case reports with a limited number of large studies. This systematic review aims to evaluate and present the current literature on fibula stress fractures to help set evidence-based goals and establish realistic expectations for return to activity and sport in injured patients.
METHODS
Systematic literature search using 3 databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocol and the Cochrane Handbook guidelines were followed. The terms "fibula stress fracture" or "fibular stress fracture" were searched. Date range for inclusion was 2010-2022. Pediatric, non-English, lack of full text available, and studies lacking differentiating fibula stress fracture versus other types of fractures in their data were excluded.
RESULTS
A total of 3 studies with 10 987 subjects were included. Among 521 stress fractures in all 3 studies, there were 45 (8.6% of all fractures) cases involving the fibula. All fibular stress fractures healed successfully with nonoperative measures and non-weight-bearing precautions, on average, by 7 weeks and patients resumed activity, on average, by 9 weeks. Among the 3 studies, there were no reported cases of nonunion or delayed union.
CONCLUSION
This review found that fibula stress fractures have a relatively moderate incidence among stress fracture injuries with a frequency up to 8.6%. Despite this high number, there is sufficient healing in fibula stress fractures when managed nonoperatively with activity modification in a weight-bearing foot to allow for resumption of baseline activities, on average, by 9 weeks. This review can be used to help set evidence-based goals and establish realistic expectations for return to activity and sport in patients who suffer from fibula stress fractures.
LEVELS OF EVIDENCE
Level II.
PubMed: 37491891
DOI: 10.1177/19386400231184124 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma Nov 2023To determine the diagnostic accuracy of various stress tests for deltoid ligament and syndesmosis injury in patients with ankle fracture. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
To determine the diagnostic accuracy of various stress tests for deltoid ligament and syndesmosis injury in patients with ankle fracture.
DATA SOURCES
A systemic literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies published from January 1990 to August 2022.
STUDY SELECTION
Studies that evaluated external rotation or gravity stress tests or hook or tap tests for the diagnosis of deltoid ligament or syndesmosis injury were included.
DATA EXTRACTION
Authors, publication years, study design, index tests, reference standards, demographic features of participants, reliability, and the numbers of true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative subjects were extracted from 14 included studies. Article quality was assessed through the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool.
DATA SYNTHESIS
The pooled sensitivity and specificity of each index test for each structure were calculated with a random-effects model using the extracted data of true-positive, true-negative, false-positive, and false-negative outcomes in all relevant studies. The overall diagnostic performance of the different index tests for different structures was determined with the estimation of the area under the curve using the summary receiver operating characteristics curve.
CONCLUSIONS
The gravity stress test and the tap test exhibited high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing deltoid ligament injury. The hook test has relatively high accuracy in diagnosing syndesmosis injury. Further studies with large sample sizes are warranted to confirm the results of this review.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Topics: Humans; Ankle Fractures; Exercise Test; Reproducibility of Results; Ankle Injuries; Ligaments; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 37448133
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002651 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Jul 2023Calcaneal fractures are a common orthopedic disease, account for approximately 2% of all bone fractures, and represent 60% of fractures of tarsal bones. Tranexamic acid... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Calcaneal fractures are a common orthopedic disease, account for approximately 2% of all bone fractures, and represent 60% of fractures of tarsal bones. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a synthetic antifibrinolytic drug that competitively blocks the lysine-binding sites of plasminogen, plasmin, and tissue plasminogen activator, delaying fibrinolysis and blood clot degradation. However, the effect of TXA on patients with calcaneal surgery remains controversial. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of TXA in calcaneal fractures surgeries.
METHODS
The electronic literature databases of Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane library were searched in December 2022. The data on blood loss, the stay in the hospital, the duration of surgery, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet count, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and wound complication were extracted. The Stata 22.0 software was used for the meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Four randomized controlled studies met our inclusion criteria. This meta-analysis showed that TXA significantly reduced postoperative blood loss during the first 24 h (p < 0.001), improved the level of hemoglobin (p < 0.001) and hematocrit (p = 0.03), and reduced the risk of wound complications (p = 0.04). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding total and intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, duration of surgery, platelet count, activated partial thromboplastin time, and prothrombin time.
CONCLUSION
TXA significantly reduced blood loss during the first 24 h postoperatively, improved the level of hemoglobin and hematocrit, and reduced the risk of wound complications. Given the evidence, TXA can be used in patients with calcaneal fractures and had the potential benefit of blood reduction.
PROTOCOL REGISTRATION
The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (registration No. CRD42023391211).
Topics: Humans; Tranexamic Acid; Tissue Plasminogen Activator; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Calcaneus; Tarsal Bones; Ankle Injuries
PubMed: 37438798
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03924-0 -
Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland) Sep 2023Over the past 30 years, several studies have compared early weight-bearing versus late weight-bearing following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures;... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Over the past 30 years, several studies have compared early weight-bearing versus late weight-bearing following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures; however, no review strictly including patients with ankle fractures and complete syndesmotic disruption has been performed.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this systematic review was to compare early versus late weight-bearing following surgery for ankle fracture with syndesmotic injury regarding clinical and patient-reported outcomes.
METHODS
A comprehensive search strategy was applied to the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and PubMed databases from their inception to the 17th of January 2022. The articles were screened independently by two blinded reviewers. Data were extracted by one author, then cross-checked and approved by the other.
RESULTS
No comparative studies were found; therefore, studies describing either early or late weight-bearing were included. It was thus not possible to perform a meta-analysis. 11 studies and 751 patients were included. An early partial weight-bearing protocol was used in three studies (253 patients) and late in eight studies (498 patients). Functional outcomes suggested that there were no clear differences between early partial weight-bearing and late weight-bearing. The reoperation rate was 9-31% in the early group and 0-11% in the late. Similar results were seen for loss of syndesmotic reduction, malreduction, infection, and fixation failure.
CONCLUSION
Pros and cons were reported for early partial weight-bearing and late weight-bearing, but the evidence was very limited as our results were based on noncomparative studies. In the future, high-quality comparative studies focusing on functional outcomes within 6 months postoperatively are needed.
LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE
1.
Topics: Humans; Ankle Fractures; Treatment Outcome; Bone Screws; Ankle Injuries; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Weight-Bearing; Rupture
PubMed: 37352790
DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2023.101967 -
Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ Aug 2023Ankle injuries are one of the most common presentations in the ED. Although fractures can be ruled out using the Ottawa Ankle Rules, the specificity is low, which means...
BACKGROUND
Ankle injuries are one of the most common presentations in the ED. Although fractures can be ruled out using the Ottawa Ankle Rules, the specificity is low, which means many patients may still receive unnecessary radiographs. Even once fractures are ruled out, assessment of ankle stability is recommended to rule out ruptures, but the anterior drawer test has only moderate sensitivity and low specificity and should be performed only after swelling has receded. Ultrasound could be a reliable, cheap and radiation free alternative to diagnose fractures and ligamentous injuries. The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosing ankle injuries.
METHODS
Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched up to 15 February 2022 to include studies of patients of 16 years or older presenting to the ED with acute ankle or foot injury, who underwent ultrasound and had diagnostic accuracy as outcome. No restrictions were applied for date and language. Risk of bias and quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach were assessed.
RESULTS
Thirteen studies evaluating 1455 patients with bony injuries were included. In 10 studies, the reported sensitivity for fracture was >90%, but varied among studies between 76% (95% CI 63% to 86%) and 100% (95% CI 29% to 100%). In nine studies, the reported specificity was at least 91%, but varied between 85% (95% CI 74% to 92%) and 100% (95% CI 88% to 100%).Six studies including 337 patients examined the use of ultrasound for ligamentous injuries and found a sensitivity and specificity >94% and 100%. Overall quality of evidence for both bony and ligamentous injuries was low and very low.
CONCLUSION
Ultrasound has the potential to be a reliable method for diagnosing foot and ankle injuries, however, higher grade evidence is needed.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42020215258.
Topics: Humans; Emergency Service, Hospital; Ultrasonography; Ankle Injuries; Fractures, Bone; Emergency Medical Services; Sensitivity and Specificity; Foot Injuries
PubMed: 37173124
DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2022-212516 -
Foot & Ankle International Aug 2023The best treatment strategy for fractures to the posterior malleolus (PM) is still intensively debated. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the...
BACKGROUND
The best treatment strategy for fractures to the posterior malleolus (PM) is still intensively debated. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the patient-rated outcome following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for fractures of the PM to either closed reduction using AP screws (CRIF) or no treatment in bi- or trimalleolar ankle fractures.
METHODS
Systematic literature research (MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL, Scopus, Central and EMBASE) according to the PICOS and PRISMA guidelines. Eligible were studies comparing the outcome following ORIF to any other treatment strategy for fractures to the posterior malleolus in isolated bi- or trimalleolar ankle fractures.
RESULTS
Twelve studies were eligible for a qualitative analysis and 6 for a quantitative analysis. Overall, a considerable heterogeneity among the studies was observed. The most commonly used outcome score was the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score (AOFAS). The final follow-up ranged from 12 to 160 months. Four studies compared ORIF to CRIF of the PM. The quantitative analysis revealed significantly better AOFAS scores for ORIF (90.9 vs 83.4 points; < .001; = 0%). Three studies compared ORIF to untreated PM fragment. The quantitative analysis again revealed superior AOFAS scores for ORIF (92.0 vs 82.5 points; < .001; = 99%). A similar trend was observed for the Ankle Fracture Scoring System and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Foot and Ankle Questionnaire scores as well as the quality of reduction.
CONCLUSION
Despite a considerable heterogeneity, the data available point to a superior outcome following ORIF for fractures to the PM when compared to CRIF or no treatment.
Topics: Humans; Ankle Fractures; Treatment Outcome; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Open Fracture Reduction; Ankle Joint; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37125766
DOI: 10.1177/10711007231165771 -
European Journal of Trauma and... Feb 2024The systematic review aims to establish the value of using 3D printing-assisted pre-operative planning, compared to conventional planning, for the operative management... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The systematic review aims to establish the value of using 3D printing-assisted pre-operative planning, compared to conventional planning, for the operative management of foot and ankle fractures.
METHODS
The systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Two authors performed searches on three electronic databases. Studies were included if they conformed to pre-established eligibility criteria. Primary outcome measures included intraoperative blood loss, operation duration, and fluoroscopy time. The American orthopaedic foot and ankle score (AOFAS) was used as a secondary outcome. Quality assessment was completed using the Cochrane RoB2 form and a meta-analysis was performed to assess heterogeneity.
RESULTS
Five studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were eventually included in the review. A meta-analysis established that using 3D printed models for pre-operative planning resulted in a significant reduction in operation duration (mean difference [MD] = - 23.52 min, 95% CI [- 39.31, - 7.74], p = 0.003), intraoperative blood loss (MD = - 30.59 mL, 95% CI [- 46.31, - 14.87], p = 0.0001), and number of times fluoroscopy was used (MD = - 3.20 times, 95% CI [- 4.69, - 1.72], p < 0.0001). Using 3D printed models also significantly increased AOFAS score results (MD = 2.24, 95% CI [0.69, 3.78], p = 0.005), demonstrating improved ankle health.
CONCLUSION
The systematic review provides promising evidence that 3D printing-assisted surgery significantly improves treatment for foot and ankle fractures in terms of operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, number of times fluoroscopy was used intraoperatively, and improved overall ankle health as measured by the AOFAS score.
Topics: Humans; Ankle Fractures; Ankle; Blood Loss, Surgical; Fracture Fixation; Treatment Outcome; Printing, Three-Dimensional; Fracture Fixation, Internal
PubMed: 36418394
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-02176-7 -
European Journal of Trauma and... Oct 2023There is currently no consensus on nonoperative management in adult patients after a stable type B ankle fracture. The aim of this review is to compare a removable... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
There is currently no consensus on nonoperative management in adult patients after a stable type B ankle fracture. The aim of this review is to compare a removable orthosis versus a cast regarding safety and functional outcome in the NOM of stable type B ankle fractures.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using randomized clinical trials and observational studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed with the methodological index for non-randomized studies instrument. Nonoperative management was compared using the number of complications and functional outcome measured using the Olerud and Molander Score (OMAS) or the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Ankle Score.
RESULTS
Five studies were included. Two were randomized clinical trials, and three were observational studies, including a total of 516 patients. A meta-analysis showed statistically significant higher odds of developing complications in the cast group [odds ratio (OR), 4.67 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-14.35)]. Functional outcome in OMAS did not vary significantly at 6 weeks, mean difference (MD) - 6.64 (95% CI - 13.72 to + 0.45), and at 12 weeks, MD - 6.91 (95% CI - 18.73 to + 4.91). The mean difference of functional outcome in OMAS at 26 weeks or longer was significantly better in the removable orthosis group; MD - 2.63 (95% CI - 5.01 to - 0.25).
CONCLUSION
Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that a removable orthosis is a safe alternative type of NOM, as complication numbers are significantly lower in the orthosis group. In addition, no statistically significant differences were found in terms of functional outcome between a removable orthosis and a cast at 6 and 12 weeks. The 6-week and the 26-week OMAS results show that in patients with stable type B ankle fractures, a removable orthosis is non-inferior to a cast in terms of functional outcome.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Ankle Fractures; Ankle; Orthotic Devices; Braces; Ankle Injuries; Treatment Outcome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36383226
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-02169-6