-
Journal of Psychiatric Research Jun 2024Variability in hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes such as 2C19 and 2D6 may influence side-effect and efficacy outcomes for antipsychotics. Aripiprazole and... (Review)
Review
Variability in hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes such as 2C19 and 2D6 may influence side-effect and efficacy outcomes for antipsychotics. Aripiprazole and risperidone are two commonly prescribed antipsychotics, metabolized primarily through CYP2D6. Here, we aimed to provide an overview of the effect of CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 on side-effects of aripiprazole and risperidone, and expand on existing literature by critically examining methodological issues associated with pharmacogenetic studies. A PRISMA compliant search of six electronic databases (Pubmed, PsychInfo, Embase, Central, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) identified pharmacogenetic studies on aripiprazole and risperidone. 2007 publications were first identified, of which 34 were included. Quality of literature was estimated using Newcastle-Ottowa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) and revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The average NOS score was 5.8 (range: 3-8) for risperidone literature and 5 for aripiprazole (range: 4-6). All RCTs on aripiprazole were rated as high risk of bias, and four out of six for risperidone literature. Study populations ranged from healthy volunteers to inpatient individuals in psychiatric units and included adult and pediatric samples. All n = 34 studies examined CYP2D6. Only one study genotyped for CYP2C19 and found a positive association with neurological side-effects of risperidone. Most studies did not report any relationship between CYP2D6 and any side-effect outcome. Heterogeneity between and within studies limited the ability to synthesize data and draw definitive conclusions. Studies lacked statistical power due to small sample size, selective genotyping methods, and study design. Large-scale randomized trials with multiple measurements, providing robust evidence on this topic, are suggested.
Topics: Humans; Aripiprazole; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6; Risperidone; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Antipsychotic Agents
PubMed: 38631139
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.04.001 -
Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism &... May 2024Antiseizure medication (ASM) add-on to clozapine may be efficient to target clozapine-resistant mood or psychotic symptoms or clozapine-related adverse drug reactions...
INTRODUCTION
Antiseizure medication (ASM) add-on to clozapine may be efficient to target clozapine-resistant mood or psychotic symptoms or clozapine-related adverse drug reactions (ADR) such as seizures. We aimed to synthesize the information relevant for clinical practice on the risks and benefits of clozapine-ASM co-prescription.
AREAS COVERED
Articles were identified with MEDLINE, Web of Sciences and PsycINFO search from inception through October 2023. The review was restricted to ASM with mood-stabilizing properties or with potential efficacy for resistant psychotic symptoms (valproate (VPA), lamotrigine, topiramate, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine).
EXPERT OPINION
VPA add-on to clozapine is associated with a high risk of serious ADR (myocarditis, neutropenia, pneumonia) mostly explained by complex time-dependent drug-drug interactions. The initial inhibitory effects on clozapine metabolism require slow titration to avoid immuno-allergic reactions. After the titration period, VPA has mainly inductive effects on clozapine metabolism that are more marked in smokers requiring therapeutic drug monitoring. Lamotrigine and topiramate add-on may be recommended as the first-line treatment for clozapine-related seizures, but there is limited evidence regarding the efficacy of this strategy for clozapine-resistant psychotic symptoms. Carbamazepine should not be co-prescribed with clozapine because of its potential for agranulocytosis and for inducing clozapine metabolism.
Topics: Humans; Anticonvulsants; Antipsychotic Agents; Clozapine; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Psychotic Disorders; Seizures
PubMed: 38613254
DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2024.2343020 -
Schizophrenia Research May 2024
Topics: Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia; Antipsychotic Agents; Piperazines; Drug Therapy, Combination
PubMed: 38569394
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2024.03.038 -
Health Technology Assessment... Mar 2024The indication for this assessment is the use of the KardiaMobile six-lead electrocardiogram device for the assessment of QT interval-based cardiac risk in service users...
BACKGROUND
The indication for this assessment is the use of the KardiaMobile six-lead electrocardiogram device for the assessment of QT interval-based cardiac risk in service users prior to the initiation of, or for the monitoring of, antipsychotic medications, which are associated with an established risk of QT interval prolongation.
OBJECTIVES
To provide an early value assessment of whether KardiaMobile six-lead has the potential to provide an effective and safe alternative to 12-lead electrocardiogram for initial assessment and monitoring of QT interval-based cardiac risk in people taking antipsychotic medications.
REVIEW METHODS
Twenty-seven databases were searched to April/May 2022. Review methods followed published guidelines. Where appropriate, study quality was assessed using appropriate risk of bias tools. Results were summarised by research question; accuracy/technical performance; clinical effects (on cardiac and psychiatric outcomes); service user acceptability/satisfaction; costs of KardiaMobile six-lead.
RESULTS
We did not identify any studies which provided information about the diagnostic accuracy of KardiaMobile six-lead, for the detection of corrected QT-interval prolongation, in any population. All studies which reported information about agreement between QT interval measurements (corrected and/or uncorrected) with KardiaMobile six-lead versus 12-lead electrocardiogram were conducted in non-psychiatric populations, used cardiologists and/or multiple readers to interpret electrocardiograms. Where reported or calculable, the mean difference in corrected QT interval between devices (12-lead electrocardiogram vs. KardiaMobile six-lead) was generally small (≤ 10 ms) and corrected QT interval measured using KardiaMobile six-lead was consistently lower than that measured using 12-lead electrocardiogram. All information about the use of KardiaMobile six-lead, in the context of QT interval-based cardiac risk assessment for service users who require antipsychotic medication, was taken from retrospective surveys of staff and service users who had chosen to use KardiaMobile six-lead during pilots, described in two unpublished project reports. It is important to note that both these project reports relate to pilot studies which were not intended to be used in wider evaluations of KardiaMobile six-lead for use in the NHS. Both reports included survey results which indicated that the use of KardiaMobile six-lead may be associated with reductions in the time taken to complete an electrocardiogram and costs, relative to 12-lead electrocardiogram, and that KardiaMobile six-lead was preferred over 12-lead electrocardiogram by almost all responding staff and service users.
LIMITATIONS
There was a lack of published evidence about the efficacy of KardiaMobile six-lead for initial assessment and monitoring of QT interval-based cardiac risk in people taking antipsychotic medications.
CONCLUSIONS
There is insufficient evidence to support a full diagnostic assessment evaluating the clinical and cost effectiveness of KardiaMobile six-lead, in the context of QT interval-based cardiac risk assessment for service users who require antipsychotic medication. The evidence to inform the aims of this early value assessment (i.e. to assess whether the device has the potential to be clinically effective and cost-effective) was also limited. This report includes a comprehensive list of research recommendations, both to reduce the uncertainty around this early value assessment and to provide the additional data needed to inform a full diagnostic assessment, including cost-effectiveness modelling.
STUDY REGISTRATION
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42022336695.
FUNDING
This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Evidence Synthesis programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR135520) and is published in full in ; Vol. 28, No. 19. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Topics: Humans; Antipsychotic Agents; Retrospective Studies; Electrocardiography; Cognition; National Health Programs; Cost-Benefit Analysis
PubMed: 38551306
DOI: 10.3310/TFHU0078 -
Neurology Apr 2024To undertake a systematic review of the available literature to examine the relationship between prenatal antiseizure medication (ASM) exposure and adverse postnatal...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
To undertake a systematic review of the available literature to examine the relationship between prenatal antiseizure medication (ASM) exposure and adverse postnatal neurodevelopmental outcomes, focusing on social, emotional, behavioral, and adaptive domains of human function, and the frequency of neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders in ASM-exposed offspring.
METHODS
Electronic searches of MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and EMBASE were conducted and limited to studies published between 1990 and 2023 in English. Studies were eligible if they prospectively or retrospectively reported neurodevelopmental outcomes of ASM-exposed offspring. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to conduct methodologic quality assessments of included studies, and a narrative synthesis integrated the review findings.
RESULTS
Forty-three studies were included. Valproate has been consistently associated with a 2- to 4-fold increased risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), 2- to 5-fold increased risk of intellectual disability (ID), and poor adaptive functioning. Growing evidence indicates that topiramate is associated with a 2-fold increased risk of ASD and 3- to 4-fold increased risk of ID. The risks of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes for valproate and topiramate seem to be dose dependent. Phenobarbital has been suggested to be associated with deleterious neurodevelopmental effects, but data are limited. Levetiracetam has recently been linked with an increased risk of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and anxiety disorders in a single study. Carbamazepine has been associated with variable neurodevelopmental outcomes. Lamotrigine seems to be "safe" in terms of postnatal neurodevelopment. Data for oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, and clonazepam are limited but seem to have little-to-no risk of adverse outcomes. Evidence for the remaining ASMs, including gabapentin, pregabalin, lacosamide, zonisamide, clobazam, perampanel, ethosuximide, or brivaracetam, is lacking. Several methodologic limitations impeded data synthesis, including heterogeneity in outcome measures and small samples of monotherapy exposures.
DISCUSSION
The findings of this review support the conclusion that valproate and topiramate use during pregnancy is associated with a significantly increased risk of neurodevelopmental effects on the fetus. Apart from lamotrigine, which seems to be free of adverse neurodevelopmental effects, data for the other ASMs are mixed or inadequate to draw definite conclusions. Further research into the neurodevelopmental effects of prenatal exposure to ASMs, including most newer agents, is much needed.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Valproic Acid; Lamotrigine; Topiramate; Autism Spectrum Disorder; Retrospective Studies; Anticonvulsants
PubMed: 38531021
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209175 -
Pharmacogenetics and Genomics Jul 2024This umbrella review was conducted to summarize the association between HLA*1502 allele with antiepileptic induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
This umbrella review was conducted to summarize the association between HLA*1502 allele with antiepileptic induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN).
METHODS
Pubmed, Scopus and EMBASE were searched for eligible reviews in May 2023. Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts and assessed full-text reviews for eligibility. The quality of meta-analyses and case-control studies was appraised with Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, respectively. Narrative summaries of each antiepileptic drug were analyzed. Preestablished protocol was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews Registry(ID: CRD42023403957).
RESULTS
Included studies are systematic reviews, meta-analyses and case-control studies evaluating the association of HLA-B*1502 allele with the following antiepileptics. Seven meta-analyses for carbamazepine, three meta-analyses for lamotrigine (LTG), three case-control studies for oxcarbazepine, nine case-control studies for phenytoin and four case-control studies for phenobarbitone were included. The findings of this umbrella review suggest that there is a strong association between HLA-B-1502 with SJS/TEN for carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine and a milder association for lamotrigine and phenytoin.
CONCLUSION
In summary, although HLA-B*1502 is less likely to be associated with phenytoin or lamotrigine-induced SJS/TEN compared to carbamazepine-induced SJS/TEN, it is a significant risk factor that if carefully screened, could potentially reduce the development of SJS/TEN. In view of potential morbidity and mortality, HLA-B*1502 testing may be beneficial in patients who are initiating lamotrigine/phenytoin therapy. However, further studies are required to examine the association of other alleles with the development of SJS/TEN and to explore the possibility of genome-wide association studies before initiation of treatment.
Topics: Stevens-Johnson Syndrome; Humans; Anticonvulsants; HLA-B15 Antigen; Carbamazepine; Lamotrigine; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Alleles
PubMed: 38527170
DOI: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000531 -
Schizophrenia Bulletin Apr 2024People with first-episode psychosis (FEP) in low- and lower-middle-income countries (LMIC) experience delays in receiving treatment, resulting in poorer outcomes and...
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS
People with first-episode psychosis (FEP) in low- and lower-middle-income countries (LMIC) experience delays in receiving treatment, resulting in poorer outcomes and higher mortality. There is robust evidence for effective and cost-effective early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services for FEP, but the evidence for EIP in LMIC has not been reviewed. We aim to review the evidence on early intervention for the management of FEP in LMIC.
STUDY DESIGN
We searched 4 electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) to identify studies describing EIP services and interventions to treat FEP in LMIC published from 1980 onward. The bibliography of relevant articles was hand-searched. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed.
STUDY RESULTS
The search strategy produced 5074 records; we included 18 studies with 2294 participants from 6 LMIC countries. Thirteen studies (1553 participants) described different approaches for EIP. Pharmacological intervention studies (n = 4; 433 participants) found a high prevalence of metabolic syndrome among FEP receiving antipsychotics (P ≤ .005). One study found a better quality of life in patients using injectables compared to oral antipsychotics (P = .023). Among the non-pharmacological interventions (n = 3; 308 participants), SMS reminders improved treatment engagement (OR = 1.80, CI = 1.02-3.19). The methodological quality of studies evidence was relatively low.
CONCLUSIONS
The limited evidence showed that EIP can be provided in LMIC with adaptations for cultural factors and limited resources. Adaptations included collaboration with traditional healers, involving nonspecialist healthcare professionals, using mobile technology, considering the optimum use of long-acting antipsychotics, and monitoring antipsychotic side effects.
Topics: Humans; Psychotic Disorders; Developing Countries; Early Medical Intervention; Antipsychotic Agents
PubMed: 38525604
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbae025 -
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy Mar 2024We systematically reviewed extant studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of xanomeline and xanomeline-trospium (KarXT) for treatment of adults with...
INTRODUCTION
We systematically reviewed extant studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of xanomeline and xanomeline-trospium (KarXT) for treatment of adults with schizophrenia.
METHODS
In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, articles were systematically searched for in databases and clinical trial registries.
RESULTS
A total of 4 preclinical trials and 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this review. A 4-week RCT observed a difference of 24.0 points (SD 21.0) in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score between xanomeline and placebo groups ( = 0.039). A 5-week RCT observed PANSS total score changes from baseline to week 5, including -17.4 and -5.9 points in KarXT and placebo groups, respectively (LSMD -11.6 points; 95% CI -16.1 to -7.1; < 0.001; d = 0.75). Another 5-week RCT observed PANSS total score changes from baseline to week 5, including -21.2 (SE 1.7) and -11.6 (SE 1.6) points in KarXT and placebo groups, respectively (LSMD -9.6; 95% CI -13.9 to -5.2; < 0.0001; d = 0.61). Side effects include constipation, nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia, and dry mouth.
CONCLUSION
KarXT offers an innovative non-D2 blocking approach, representing a promising treatment avenue for schizophrenia.
Topics: Adult; Animals; Humans; Antipsychotic Agents; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Schizophrenia
PubMed: 38515004
DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2024.2334424 -
Asian Journal of Psychiatry May 2024Cariprazine is an orally active dopamine D3-preferring D3/D2 receptor and serotonin 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist, being considered as a treatment for refractory MDD.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Role of adjunctive cariprazine for treatment-resistant depression in patients with major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
INTRODUCTION
Cariprazine is an orally active dopamine D3-preferring D3/D2 receptor and serotonin 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist, being considered as a treatment for refractory MDD. Therefore, we aim to perform the first meta-analysis of current literature, to collate changes in depression from baseline and assess tolerability of adjunctive cariprazine in MDD populace.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.Gov, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception till 1st September 2023. RCTs of adult patients with refractory MDD under adjunctive cariprazine vs. placebo were included. Primary outcomes included improvement in MADRS, CGI-S, and HAM-D 17 scores. Secondary outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events. The statistical analysis was performed using generic inverse variance with random-effects model. The overall risk ratios (RR) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of five RCTs were analysed, enrolling 2013 participants (cariprazine: 959 participants, Placebo: 1054). Supplementation of ADT with cariprazine demonstrated a significant improvement in MADRAS, CGI-S and HAMD-17 scores from baseline (LSMD: -1.88, 95% CI [-2.94, -0.83], p=0.0005), (LSMD: -0.18, 95% CI [-0.29, -0.07], p=0.002), and (LSMD: -0.96, 95% CI [-1.70, -0.21], p=0.01) respectively. Treatment with adjunctive cariprazine therapy demonstrated significantly increased incidence of akathisia, nausea, dizziness, fatigue, restlessness, somnolence, and tremors when compared with placebo.
CONCLUSION
Our meta-analysis provides evidence supporting the efficacy of adjunctive cariprazine in patients with refractory MDD. However, it is essential to consider the safety profile of cariprazine, particularly the increased risk of adverse events. The vigilant monitoring and management of these side effects should be integrated into clinical practice to minimize discontinuation rates and optimize patient outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Depressive Disorder, Major; Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant; Piperazines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Antidepressive Agents; Outcome Assessment, Health Care
PubMed: 38513509
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104005 -
Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) 2024The antiemetic effectiveness of olanzapine, as a prophylactic off-label antiemetic drug, for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) is unknown. In this systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The antiemetic effectiveness of olanzapine, as a prophylactic off-label antiemetic drug, for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) is unknown. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the authors evaluate the efficacy and side effects of olanzapine as a prophylactic antiemetic in adult patients who undergo general anesthesia and assess adverse effects.
METHODS
A systematic search was done on electronic bibliographic databases in July 2023. Randomized controlled trials of olanzapine as a prophylactic antiemetic for PONV in adults who underwent general anesthesia were included. The authors excluded non-RCTs and retracted studies. The authors set no date of publication or language limits. The outcomes were the incidence of PONV within 24 h postoperatively and the safety of olanzapine. The risk of bias was assessed according to the tool suggested by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
RESULTS
Meta-analysis included 446 adult patients. Olanzapine reduced on average 38 % the incidence of PONV. The estimated risk ratio (95 % CI) of olanzapine versus control was 0.62 (0.42-0.90), p = 0.010, I = 67 %. In the subgroup meta-analysis, doses of olanzapine (10 mg) reduced on average 49 % of the incidence of PONV (RR = 0.51 [0.34-0.77], p = 0.001, I = 31 %).
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review with meta-analysis indicated that olanzapine as a prophylactic antiemetic alone or combined with other antiemetic agents reduced the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. However, this conclusion must be presented with some degree of uncertainty due to the small number of studies included. There was a lack of any evidence to draw conclusions on side effects.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Antiemetics; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Olanzapine; Anesthesia, General
PubMed: 38513297
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100345