-
Journal of the Korean Association of... Jun 2024Dentoalveolar (DA) trauma, which can involve tooth, alveolar bone, and surrounding soft tissues, is a significant dentofacial emergency. In emergency settings,...
Dentoalveolar (DA) trauma, which can involve tooth, alveolar bone, and surrounding soft tissues, is a significant dentofacial emergency. In emergency settings, physicians might lack comprehensive knowledge of timely procedures, causing delays for specialist referral. This systematic review assesses the literature on isolated DA fractures, emphasizing intervention timing and splinting techniques and duration in both children and adults. This systematic review adhered to PRISMA guidelines and involved a thorough search across PubMed, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, and the Cochrane Library from January 1980 to December 2022. Inclusion and exclusion criteria guided study selection, with data extraction and analysis centered on demographics, etiology, injury site, diagnostics, treatment timelines, and outcomes in pediatric (2-12 years) and adult (>12 years) populations. This review analyzed 26 studies, categorized by age into pediatrics (2-12 years) and adults (>12 years). Falls were a common etiology, primarily affecting the anterior maxilla. Immediate management involved replantation, repositioning, and splinting within 24 hours (pediatric) or 48 hours (adult). Composite resin-bonded splints were common. Endodontic treatment was done within a timeframe of 3 days to 12 weeks for children and 2-12 weeks for adults. Tailored management based on patient age, tooth development stage, time elapsed, and resource availability is essential.
PubMed: 38940648
DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2024.50.3.123 -
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma... Jun 2024The ideal surgical management for tibial eminence avulsion fractures remains controversial with varying approach, methods of fixation and post-operative regimes reported...
PURPOSE
The ideal surgical management for tibial eminence avulsion fractures remains controversial with varying approach, methods of fixation and post-operative regimes reported throughout literature. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare between the different approaches, methods of fixation and post-operative regimes for tibial eminence fractures.
METHODS
The systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. A search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE and CINAHL databases. The keywords used were "anterior cruciate ligament", "tibial spine" or "tibial eminence" and "fracture" or "avulsion". All original human studies that reported the surgical outcomes of tibial eminence fractures were included. Individual patient data meta-analysis was performed.
RESULTS
48 studies with 1367 patients were included. Arthroscopic fixation resulted in significantly greater stability in terms of anterior drawer test (p = 0.018) and Lachman's test (p = 0.042), as compared to open fixation, though there was no significant difference for pivot shift test. There was no significant difference identified in functional scores and activity, including Lysholm score, IKDC subjective score, Tegner score and return to sports. Suture fixation had significantly increased stability compared to screw fixation, in terms of anterior drawer test (p = 0.001) and Lachman's test (p = 0.001), though no significant difference was identified for pivot shift test. Significantly better subjective scores and return to activity were also noted for suture fixation, in terms of Lysholm score (p = 0.008), IKDC subjective score (p = 0.001) and Tegner score (p = 0.001), though no significant difference was identified for return to sports.
CONCLUSION
Arthroscopic and suture fixation had significantly superior outcomes when compared to open and screw fixation. Arthroscopic fixation resulted in significantly improved stability of the knee as compared to open fixation, though no significant difference was identified in terms of functional knee scores and return to activity. Suture fixation resulted in significantly improved stability of the knee and functional knee screws as compared to screw fixation.
PubMed: 38896276
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05318-1 -
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery... Apr 2024Both open and arthroscopic surgical techniques have been used for PCL avulsion fractures. The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Both open and arthroscopic surgical techniques have been used for PCL avulsion fractures. The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the different management strategies proposed for PCL avulsion fractures in children.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was performed utilizing Medline, Scopus, and EMBASE databases from 1977 to the present. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Data were selected and extracted by two independent reviewers. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies reporting injuries in pediatric patients with PCL avulsion injuries. Exclusion criteria were combined PCL and ACL injuries and ligamentous injuries requiring reconstruction. A subgroup analysis was performed between open reduction and arthroscopic surgeries.
FINDINGS/RESULTS
Twenty-six studies were included in this systematic review. Patient sex was reported in 39 patients with a higher number of males (32/39). The age range was 7-18 years old. In the open group, 30/31 patients had clinical improvement or returned to pre-injury activity level with two complications. Lysholm scores ranged from 66 to 99. In the arthroscopic group, 11/12 patients experienced clinical improvement or returned to normal activity levels with only one complication. Lysholm scores ranged from 90 to 100 with a mean of 95. In the non-operative group, 3/3 recovered with evidence of fracture healing, full or near full knee range of motion. One Lysholm score was reported 14 months after injury and was 100/100.
CONCLUSIONS
Open reduction and arthroscopic surgeries are effective and safe treatment options for pediatric PCL avulsion fractures-97% of open reduction and 92% of arthroscopic patients significantly improved symptoms. The complication rates for the open and arthroscopic groups were 11 and 9%, respectively. All three non-operative made full or near full recovery of pre-injury knee status.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV
Systematic review of Level-II-IV studies. Prospero Registration No CRD42021290899.
PubMed: 38653925
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-03920-y -
Children (Basel, Switzerland) Mar 2024Tibial spine avulsion fractures (TSAFs) account for approximately 14% of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. This study aims to systematically review the current... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Tibial spine avulsion fractures (TSAFs) account for approximately 14% of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. This study aims to systematically review the current evidence for the operative management of paediatric TSAFs.
METHODS
A search was carried out across four databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Studies discussing the outcomes of the surgical management of paediatric TSAFs since 2000 were included.
RESULTS
Of 38 studies included for review, 13 studies reported outcomes of TSAF patients undergoing screw fixation only, and 12 studies used suture fixation only. In total, 976 patients underwent arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (ARIF), and 203 patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The risk of arthrofibrosis with the use of ARIF ( = 0.45) and screws ( = 0.74) for TSAF repair was not significant. There was a significantly increased risk of knee instability ( < 0.0001), reoperation ( = 0.01), and post-operative pain ( = 0.007) with screw fixation compared to sutures.
CONCLUSIONS
While the overall benefits of sutures over screws and ARIF over ORIF are unclear, there is clear preference for ARIF and suture fixation for TSAF repair in practice. We recommend large-scale comparative studies to delineate long-term outcomes for various TSAF fixation techniques.
PubMed: 38539382
DOI: 10.3390/children11030345 -
Hand (New York, N.Y.) Feb 2024Sudden, forced hyperextension injuries to the proximal interphalangeal joint leading to volar plate avulsion fractures are common hand injuries in children. Suboptimal...
BACKGROUND
Sudden, forced hyperextension injuries to the proximal interphalangeal joint leading to volar plate avulsion fractures are common hand injuries in children. Suboptimal management of these fractures can lead to the development of long-term complications such as stiffness and flexion contracture.
METHODS
MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were systematically searched, and additional studies were found through reference of articles up to June 15, 2023. Identified articles were assessed using predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria.
RESULTS
Twenty-five articles were included, involving 268 patients with ages from 3 to 17 years. Fractures with less than 30% joint involvement, classified as Eaton type I or II, or designated as "Stable" in the Keifhaber-Stern classification, were treated through nonsurgical means. Surgical interventions, encompassing open reduction and internal fixation, were reserved for fractures with more than 30% joint involvement and/or meeting criteria such as Eaton type IIIa or IIIb and Keifhaber-Stern "Tenuous" or "Unstable." Positive outcomes were seen in 99.5% of patients receiving nonsurgical treatment, compared with 85.7% in the surgical cohort.
CONCLUSIONS
The literature demonstrated positive outcomes for fractures presenting with less than 30% joint involvement that were managed nonsurgically. In fractures with more than 30% joint involvement, surgical interventions yielded positive results. To further substantiate these findings, larger prospective studies with uniform measures are needed to validate the results of this study.
PubMed: 38380839
DOI: 10.1177/15589447241231308 -
Journal of Orthopaedics Mar 2024Patella fractures in the pediatric age group often have a dilemma in their ease of diagnosis and treatment required. Indications for conservative management or surgical... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Patella fractures in the pediatric age group often have a dilemma in their ease of diagnosis and treatment required. Indications for conservative management or surgical intervention in the pediatric population during growth phase are not clearly defined. The current systematic review aims to provide a consensus on the morphological types, treatment options, indications, the outcomes expected and complications and their management.
METHODS
The review was conducted as per the PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were (a).Articles published in English, (b) Age <18 years, (c) Patellar fractures including osteochondral fractures. Exclusion criteria includes articles with incomplete data, case reports, biomechanical studies, case series with sample size <2, biomechanical studies, reviews, letter to the editor, or editorials and Non-English language.
RESULTS
The review search yielded a total of 18 articles. A total of 288 patients with patellar fractures were included in the review. The average age ranged from 9.6 years to 16 years. The follow-up period ranged from 3 months to 20 years In total, 49 individuals underwent immobilization with cast or brace application, 4 with spica cast application and 48 with cylindrical cast in extension. Overall, 83 patients in 13 studies underwent surgical fixation most of which underwent wiring.
CONCLUSION
Pediatric patella fracture/dislocations or Osteochondral fractures (OCF) although being a rare event, may be associated with a child with knee injury and swelling. Conservative management in terms of casting and immobilization may be an alternative but surgical intervention should be the primary mode of treatment in such cases.
PubMed: 38090603
DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.11.049 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Mar 2024Terrible triad injury is a complex injury of the elbow, involving elbow dislocation with associated fracture of the radial head, avulsion or tear of the lateral ulnar... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Terrible triad injury is a complex injury of the elbow, involving elbow dislocation with associated fracture of the radial head, avulsion or tear of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament, and fracture of the coronoid. These injuries are commonly managed surgically with fixation or replacement of the radial head and repair of the collateral ligaments with or without fixation of the coronoid. Postoperative mobilization is a significant factor that may affect patient outcomes; however, the optimal postoperative mobilization protocol is unclear. This study aimed to systematically review the available literature regarding postoperative rehabilitation of terrible triad injuries to aid clinical decision making.
METHODS
We systematically reviewed the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The inclusion criteria were studies with populations aged ≥16 years with terrible triad injury in which operative treatment was performed, a clear postoperative mobilization protocol was defined, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was reported. Secondary outcomes were pain, instability, and range of motion (ROM). Postoperative mobilization was classified as either "early," defined as active ROM commencement before or up to 14 days, or "late," defined as active ROM commencement after 14 days.
RESULTS
A total of 119 articles were identified from the initial search, of which 11 (301 patients) were included in the final review. The most common protocols (6 studies) favored early mobilization, whereas 5 studies undertook late mobilization. Meta-regression analysis including mobilization as a covariate showed an estimated mean difference in the pooled mean MEPS between early and late mobilization of 6.1 (95% confidence interval, 0.2-12) with a higher pooled mean MEPS for early mobilization (MEPS, 91.2) than for late mobilization (MEPS, 85; P = .041). Rates of instability reported ranged from 4.5% to 19% (8%-11.5% for early mobilization and 4.5%-19% for late mobilization).
CONCLUSION
Our findings suggest that early postoperative mobilization may confer a benefit in terms of functional outcomes following surgical management of terrible triad injuries without appearing to confer an increased instability risk. Further research in the form of randomized controlled trials between early and late mobilization is advised to provide a higher level of evidence.
Topics: Humans; Radius Fractures; Elbow Injuries; Treatment Outcome; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Joint Dislocations; Elbow Joint; Range of Motion, Articular; Retrospective Studies; Ulna Fractures
PubMed: 38036253
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.10.012 -
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Sep 2023There is no consensus regarding the management of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fractures and the expected outcomes after treatment. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
There is no consensus regarding the management of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fractures and the expected outcomes after treatment.
PURPOSE
To systematically review clinical outcomes and complications after management of tibial-sided avulsion fractures of the PCL.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
A literature search of Scopus, PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials was performed in accordance with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Included were studies with evidence levels 1 to 4 that reported clinical outcomes after treatment of PCL tibial-sided avulsion fractures in humans. The quality of the included studies was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. A meta-analysis was performed for patient-reported outcome measures using random-effects modeling with 95% CIs.
RESULTS
A total of 58 studies published between 1999 and 2022 were identified. The mean MINORS score was 9.90 ± 4.12, indicating overall low-quality evidence with high risk of bias. The studies comprised 1440 patients (mean age, 32.59 ± 5.69 years; 75.2% males) with a mean follow-up of 26.9 ± 19.6 months (range, 5.3-126 months). Most patients were treated with open surgery (63.6%), followed by arthroscopic surgery (29.7%) and nonoperative treatment (6.7%). All patients reported significant posttreatment improvement in both subjective and objective outcomes ( < .05 for all). Arthroscopic surgery was associated with lower postoperative posterior tibial translation compared with open surgery (range, 0.6-3.2 vs 1.7-3.1 mm), greater preoperative to postoperative improvement in Lysholm score (54.6 vs 48.8; < .0001), higher postoperative Tegner score (6.64 ± 1.03 vs 6.14 ± 2.29; = .0448), and a higher rate of return to sport (100% vs 89.5%; = .009). Nonoperative management was associated with a significantly lower fracture union rate (87% vs 99.1%; < .0001) and greater postoperative side-to-side posterior translation (4.9 ± 4.3 mm) when compared with operative management.
CONCLUSION
Although nonoperative and surgical management of PCL tibial avulsion fractures resulted in high rates of fracture union and improvement in functional outcome scores and a low incidence of complications, nonoperative treatment yielded a high side-to-side posterior displacement (>4 mm) with a lower rate of fracture union compared to surgical treatment.
PubMed: 37724253
DOI: 10.1177/23259671231188383 -
Children (Basel, Switzerland) Aug 2023Tibial eminence fractures (TEF) of Meyers-McKeever type II-III-IV usually require surgical management. No consensus in the literature has been achieved regarding the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Tibial eminence fractures (TEF) of Meyers-McKeever type II-III-IV usually require surgical management. No consensus in the literature has been achieved regarding the best treatment option. The aims of the present systematic review were (1) to analyze the current literature and describe the outcomes of surgical treatment for TEF; and (2) to compare the outcomes of different surgical options using arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) with sutures or screws and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).
METHODS
A search was carried out with Pubmed, Medline, and Cochrane. Key terms were used "tibial" AND "eminence" or "spine" or "intercondylar" AND "paediatric" or "children" AND "fracture" or "avulsion" AND "treatment". Twelve articles met the inclusion criteria. Demographic data, clinical outcomes, and complication rates were evaluated for each study. Means/standard deviation and sum/percentage were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Chi-square or t-student tests were applied. A -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
ORIF showed superior clinical outcomes (Tegner ( < 0.05) and Lysholm ( < 0.001) scores) relative to ARIF and a lower incidence of arthrofibrosis ( < 0.05) and implant removal ( < 0.01). The Tegner, IKDC, and Lysholm scores showed statistically significant superior results following arthroscopic sutures compared to arthroscopic screws ( < 0.001). The incidence of arthrofibrosis was higher after arthroscopic sutures ( < 0.05), the implant removal was higher after screw fixation ( < 0.001) Conclusions: Better clinical results with low complication rates were achieved with ORIF surgery rather than ARIF; arthroscopic suture fixation resulted in higher clinical results compared to arthroscopic screw fixation and reduced the incidence of postoperative complications.
PubMed: 37628378
DOI: 10.3390/children10081379 -
Evidence-based Dentistry Sep 2023Systematic review.
DESIGN
Systematic review.
REVIEW QUESTION
Does splinting of traumatised primary teeth improve clinical outcomes?
CASE SELECTION
Clinical studies published after 2003 reporting trauma (luxation, root fracture or alveolar fracture) to primary teeth, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months, were eligible for inclusion. Case reports were excluded, but case series were included. Studies reporting the outcome of splinting following avulsion injuries were excluded, as current guidance does not recommend re-implantation of teeth for these injuries.
DATA ANALYSIS
Two researchers independently assessed the risk of bias in the included studies, with a third researcher resolving any disagreements. The same two independent researchers conducted a quality assessment of the included studies.
RESULTS
Three retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria. Only one of these studies had a control group. High success rates were reported for the management of teeth with root fractures. A benefit for splinting teeth with lateral luxation was not identified. No alveolar fractures were included.
CONCLUSIONS
This review suggests that the outcome of the management of root fractures in primary teeth may benefit from flexible splinting. However, the evidence base is low.
Topics: Humans; Splints; Retrospective Studies; Tooth Root; Incisor; Tooth, Deciduous
PubMed: 37433924
DOI: 10.1038/s41432-023-00914-3