-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2024Acute and chronic postoperative pain are important healthcare problems, which can be treated with a combination of opioids and regional anaesthesia. The erector spinae... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Acute and chronic postoperative pain are important healthcare problems, which can be treated with a combination of opioids and regional anaesthesia. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a new regional anaesthesia technique, which might be able to reduce opioid consumption and related side effects.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the analgesic effects and side effect profile of ESPB against no block, placebo block or other regional anaesthetic techniques.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science on 4 January 2021 and updated the search on 3 January 2022.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating adults undergoing surgery with general anaesthesia were included. We included ESPB in comparison with no block, placebo blocks or other regional anaesthesia techniques irrespective of language, publication year, publication status or technique of regional anaesthesia used (ultrasound, landmarks or peripheral nerve stimulator). Quasi-RCTs, cluster-RCTs, cross-over trials and studies investigating co-interventions in either arm were excluded.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed all trials for inclusion and exclusion criteria, and risk of bias (RoB), and extracted data. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and we used GRADE to rate the certainty of evidence for the primary outcomes. The primary outcomes were postoperative pain at rest at 24 hours and block-related adverse events. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain at rest (2, 48 hours) and during activity (2, 24 and 48 hours after surgery), chronic pain after three and six months, as well as cumulative oral morphine requirements at 2, 24 and 48 hours after surgery and rates of opioid-related side effects.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified 69 RCTs in the first search and included these in the systematic review. We included 64 RCTs (3973 participants) in the meta-analysis. The outcome postoperative pain was reported in 38 out of 64 studies; block-related adverse events were reported in 40 out of 64 studies. We assessed RoB as low in 44 (56%), some concerns in 24 (31%) and high in 10 (13%) of the study results. Overall, 57 studies reported one or both primary outcomes. Only one study reported results on chronic pain after surgery. In the updated literature search on 3 January 2022 we found 37 new studies and categorised these as awaiting classification. ESPB compared to no block There is probably a slight but not clinically relevant reduction in pain intensity at rest 24 hours after surgery in patients treated with ESPB compared to no block (visual analogue scale (VAS), 0 to 10 points) (mean difference (MD) -0.77 points, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.08 to -0.46; 17 trials, 958 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There may be no difference in block-related adverse events between the groups treated with ESPB and those receiving no block (no events in 18 trials reported, 1045 participants, low-certainty evidence). ESPB compared to placebo block ESPB probably has no effect on postoperative pain intensity at rest 24 hours after surgery compared to placebo block (MD -0.14 points, 95% CI -0.29 to 0.00; 8 trials, 499 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There may be no difference in block-related adverse events between ESPB and placebo blocks (no events in 10 trials reported; 592 participants; low-certainty evidence). ESPB compared to other regional anaesthetic techniques Paravertebral block (PVB) ESPB may not have any additional effect on postoperative pain intensity at rest 24 hours after surgery compared to PVB (MD 0.23 points, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.52; 7 trials, 478 participants; low-certainty evidence). There is probably no difference in block-related adverse events (risk ratio (RR) 0.27, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.95; 7 trials, 522 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) ESPB may not have any additional effect on postoperative pain intensity at rest 24 hours after surgery compared to TAPB (MD -0.16 points, 95% CI -0.46 to 0.14; 3 trials, 160 participants; low-certainty evidence). There may be no difference in block-related adverse events (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.21 to 4.83; 4 trials, 202 participants; low-certainty evidence). Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) The effect on postoperative pain could not be assessed because no studies reported this outcome. There may be no difference in block-related adverse events (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.06 to 15.59; 2 trials, 110 participants; low-certainty evidence). Pectoralis plane block (PECSB) ESPB may not have any additional effect on postoperative pain intensity at rest 24 hours after surgery compared to PECSB (MD 0.24 points, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.58; 2 trials, 98 participants; low-certainty evidence). The effect on block-related adverse events could not be assessed. Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) Only one study reported on each of the primary outcomes. Intercostal nerve block (ICNB) ESPB may not have any additional effect on postoperative pain intensity at rest 24 hours after surgery compared to ICNB, but this is uncertain (MD -0.33 points, 95% CI -3.02 to 2.35; 2 trials, 131 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There may be no difference in block-related adverse events, but this is uncertain (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.28; 3 trials, 181 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Epidural analgesia (EA) We are uncertain whether ESPB has an effect on postoperative pain intensity at rest 24 hours after surgery compared to EA (MD 1.20 points, 95% CI -2.52 to 4.93; 2 trials, 81 participants; very low-certainty evidence). A risk ratio for block-related adverse events was not estimable because only one study reported this outcome.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
ESPB in addition to standard care probably does not improve postoperative pain intensity 24 hours after surgery compared to no block. The number of block-related adverse events following ESPB was low. Further research is required to study the possibility of extending the duration of analgesia. We identified 37 new studies in the updated search and there are three ongoing studies, suggesting possible changes to the effect estimates and the certainty of the evidence in the future.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Analgesics, Opioid; Chronic Pain; Pain, Postoperative; Analgesia, Epidural; Nerve Block; Anesthetics; Benzamidines
PubMed: 38345071
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013763.pub3 -
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular... Apr 2024To evaluate the benefit of single-shot erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on pain at postoperative hours 4 and 12, duration of mechanical ventilation, hospital length of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the benefit of single-shot erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on pain at postoperative hours 4 and 12, duration of mechanical ventilation, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, cumulative postoperative opioid usage, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after cardiac surgery via sternotomy DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective clinical trials.
SETTING
Studies were identified through the search of PubMed and EMBASE on July 19, 2023.
PARTICIPANTS
Adults and children undergoing cardiac surgery via sternotomy.
INTERVENTIONS
Single-shot ESPB versus standard-of-care analgesia.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
A systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 studies (N = 695 patients). The single-shot ESPB arm exhibited statistically significant reductions in pain score at postoperative hour 4 (standardized mean difference [SMD] -2.95, 95% CI -5.86 to -0.04, p = 0.0466), duration of mechanical ventilation (SMD -1.23, 95% CI -2.21 to -0.24, p = 0.0145), cumulative postoperative opioid usage (SMD -1.48, 95% CI -2.46 to -0.49, p = 0.0033), and PONV incidence (risk ratio 0.4358, 95% CI 0.2105-0.9021, p = 0.0252). The single-shot ESPB arm did not exhibit a statistically significant reduction in pain score at postoperative hour 12, length of hospital stay, and length of ICU stay.
CONCLUSIONS
Single-shot ESPB improves near-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery via sternotomy. More randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Sternotomy; Analgesics, Opioid; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Prospective Studies; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Pain; Nerve Block; Pain, Postoperative
PubMed: 38341301
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.12.014 -
American Journal of Surgery Jun 2024Despite the life-saving nature of colorectal surgeries, patients often experience intra and post-operative problems, especially pain and discomfort. This meta-analysis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Despite the life-saving nature of colorectal surgeries, patients often experience intra and post-operative problems, especially pain and discomfort. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of erector spinae plane block (ESP block) in postoperative pain management for patients undergoing colorectal surgeries. A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and Cochrane Library databases from inception until December 2023. Eight studies were deemed appropriate for inclusion. The pooled analysis demonstrated a significant decrease with the ESP block compared to the control group in postoperative opioid consumption [MD = -15.96 mg; 95 % CI (-28.74 to -3.18); p = 0.014, I = 87 %], intraoperative opioid consumption [MD = -35.51 mg; 95 % CI (-62.63 to -8.40); p = 0.010, I = 87 %], pain scores [MD = -0.94; 95 % CI (-1.27 to -0.60); p < 0.000001, I = 86 %], with a significantly shorter duration of hospital stay [MD = -1.25 days; 95 % CI (-2.02 to -0.48); p = 0.002, I = 23 %]. This meta-analysis support the use of erector spinae plane block (ESP) for postoperative pain management in colorectal surgeries. ESP shows significant reductions in opioid consumption, pain scores and hospital stay.
Topics: Humans; Pain, Postoperative; Nerve Block; Analgesics, Opioid; Paraspinal Muscles; Pain Management; Rectum
PubMed: 38336575
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.01.032 -
European Spine Journal : Official... Apr 2024This systematic review aimed to report the current evidence in the literature about the efficacy of interventional treatments in the management of low back pain (LBP)... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
This systematic review aimed to report the current evidence in the literature about the efficacy of interventional treatments in the management of low back pain (LBP) due to sacroiliac joint dysfunction.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and CENTRAL bibliographic databases were searched. The search was performed from October to December 2021, and articles from the inception of the database to December 2021 were searched.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies were included for qualitative synthesis. Five studies used the traditional radiofrequency approach (tRF), five studies used cooled radiofrequency approach (cRF), one study used botulinum toxin (BT), two studies used steroid injection, triamcinolone (TA) and local anesthetics injections, and one study used pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) denervation. Two studies used sham as a comparator.
CONCLUSIONS
Cooled radiofrequency seems to be the most effective treatment in improving pain and functionality, while intra-articular injections are helpful only as diagnostic tools. However, due to the lack of high-quality studies, it was not possible to draw significant conclusions.
Topics: Humans; Low Back Pain; Sacroiliac Joint; Treatment Outcome; Joint Diseases; Triamcinolone
PubMed: 38329572
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08130-y -
Pain Physician Feb 2024Chronic axial spinal pain is one of the major causes of disability. Literature shows that spending on low back and neck pain and musculoskeletal disorders continues to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Chronic axial spinal pain is one of the major causes of disability. Literature shows that spending on low back and neck pain and musculoskeletal disorders continues to escalate, not only with disability, but also with increasing costs, accounting for the highest amount of various disease categories. Based on the current literature utilizing controlled diagnostic blocks, facet joints, nerve root dura, and sacroiliac joints have been shown as potential sources of spinal pain. Therapeutic facet joint interventional modalities of axial spinal pain include radiofrequency neurotomy, therapeutic facet joint nerve blocks, and therapeutic intraarticular injections.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness of facet joint nerve blocks as a therapeutic modality in managing chronic axial spinal pain of facet joint origin.
STUDY DESIGN
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist.
METHODS
The available literature on facet joint nerve blocks in axial spinal pain was reviewed. The quality assessment criteria utilized were the Cochrane review criteria to assess risk of bias, the Interventional Pain Management Techniques - Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment (IPM-QRB) for randomized therapeutic trials, and the Interventional Pain Management Techniques - Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment for Nonrandomized Studies (IPM-QRBNR) for nonrandomized studies. The evidence was graded according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment criteria. The level of evidence was based on best evidence synthesis with modified grading of qualitative evidence from Level I to Level V. A comprehensive literature search of multiple databases from 1966 to July 2023, including manual searches of the bibliography of known review articles was performed. Quality assessment of the included studies and best evidence synthesis were incorporated into qualitative and quantitative evidence synthesis.
OUTCOME MEASURES
The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients with significant relief and functional improvement of greater than 50% of at least 3 months. Duration of relief was categorized as short-term (less than 6 months) and long-term (greater than 6 months).
RESULTS
This assessment identified 8 high-quality and one moderate quality RCTs and 8 high quality and 4 moderate quality non-randomized studies with application of spinal facet joint nerve blocks as therapeutic modalities. However, based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) assessment, only 3 of the 21 studies showed high levels of evidence and clinical applicability, with 11 studies showing moderate levels of GRADE evidence and clinical applicability.
LIMITATIONS
Despite the availability of multiple studies, the paucity of literature is considered as the major drawback. Based on Grading of Recommendations, Assessment Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) assessment, only 3 of the 21 studies showed high levels of evidence and clinical applicability.
CONCLUSION
Based on the present systematic review and meta-analysis with 9 RCTs and 12 non-randomized studies, the evidence is Level II with moderate to strong recommendation for therapeutic facet joint nerve blocks in managing spinal facet joint pain.
Topics: Humans; Pain Management; Zygapophyseal Joint; Chronic Pain; Spine; Nerve Block
PubMed: 38324785
DOI: No ID Found -
Global Spine Journal Feb 2024Systematic review of the literature and subsequent meta-analysis for the development of a new guideline. (Review)
Review
Radiofrequency Denervation of the Spine and the Sacroiliac Joint: A Systematic Review based on the Grades of Recommendations, Assesment, Development, and Evaluation Approach Resulting in a German National Guideline.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review of the literature and subsequent meta-analysis for the development of a new guideline.
OBJECTIVES
This manuscript summarizes the recommendations from a new clinical guideline published by the German Spine Society. It covers the current evidence on recommendations regarding the indication, test blocks and use of radiofrequency denervation. The guidelines aim is to improve patient care and efficiency of the procedure.
METHODS
A multidisciplinary working group formulated recommendations based on the Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach and the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument.
RESULTS
20 clinical questions were defined for guideline development, with 87.5% consensus achieved by committee members for one recommendation and 100% consensus for all other topics. Specific questions that were addressed included clinical history, examination and imaging, conservative treatment before injections, diagnostic blocks, the injected medications, the cut-off value in pain-reduction for a diagnostic block as well as the number of blocks, image guidance, the cannula trajectories, the lesion size, stimulation, repeat radiofrequency denervation, sedation, cessation or continuation of anticoagulants, the influence of metal hardware, and ways to mitigate complications.
CONCLUSION
Radiofrequency (RF) denervation of the spine and the SI joint may provide benefit to well-selected individuals. The recommendations of this guideline are based on very low to moderate quality of evidence as well as professional consensus. The guideline working groups recommend that research efforts in relation to all aspects of management of facet joint pain and SI joint pain should be intensified.
PubMed: 38321700
DOI: 10.1177/21925682241230922 -
World Neurosurgery Apr 2024Lumbar facet syndrome is a cause of pain. The diagnosis iconfirmation is achieved through a selective block. Although this procedure is standardized under fluoroscopic...
OBJECTIVE
Lumbar facet syndrome is a cause of pain. The diagnosis iconfirmation is achieved through a selective block. Although this procedure is standardized under fluoroscopic or computed tomography (CT) guidance, the current use of ultrasound may provide an alternative to its implementation.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted. "ultrasound-guided lumbar" and "lumbar facet joint."
RESULTS
Twenty articles were included. Five randomized clinical trials, 4 observational studies, 2 clinical trials, 1 retrospective study, 2 metanalysis and 5 cadaveric studies, and 1 feasibility study. The studies demonstrated a improvement in pain with ultrasound. However, no significant differences in these outcomes were found when comparing ultrasound with fluoroscopy or CT. It was also observed that the procedural time was longer with ultrasound. Finally, success rates in correctly locating the injection site ranged from 88% to 100% when confirmed with fluoroscopy or CT.
CONCLUSIONS
Although the use of ultrasound for regional anesthesia is on the rise, there are no results that can replace those found with fluoroscopy or CT for performing the dorsal and medial branch block of the spinal root in the treatment of lumbar facet syndrome.
Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Nerve Block; Lumbar Vertebrae; Low Back Pain; Ultrasonography; Arthralgia; Zygapophyseal Joint
PubMed: 38296041
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.01.121 -
Canadian Journal of Diabetes Jun 2024Current medications for diabetic neuropathy (DN) recommended by the American Diabetes Association and American Academy of Neurology do not address the pathologic process... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Ranking Alpha Lipoic Acid and Gamma Linolenic Acid in Terms of Efficacy and Safety in the Management of Adults With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVES
Current medications for diabetic neuropathy (DN) recommended by the American Diabetes Association and American Academy of Neurology do not address the pathologic process of denervation among patients with DN, because ancillary treatments, such as reactive oxygen scavengers, may be needed. The purpose of this work was to summarize the available evidence about the efficacy and safety of alpha lipoic acid (ALA) and gamma linolenic acid (GLA) in the management of DN.
METHODS
Using the search terms [(alpha lipoic acid or ALA or thioctic acid or thioctacid) or (gamma linolenic acid or GLA)] AND [(diabetes or diabetes mellitus) AND (polyneuropathy or neuropathy or sensorimotor polyneuropathy or radiculopathy)], 11 studies were included in this review and combined meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Eight of the 11 articles (73%) reported significant benefit of ALA vs placebo. In the meta-analysis, the Total Symptom Score (TSS) for ALA 600 mg/day (ALA600) was 1.05 points lower (standard mean difference [SMD] -1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.07 to -0.04, p=0.04, I=98.18%) compared with control at the end of the study. In the network meta-analysis, ALA600 (SMD -1.68, 95% CI -2.8 to -0.6) and GLA (SMD -2.39, 95% CI -4.3 to -0.5) had significantly lower TSSs compared with placebo. Moreover, GLA had the highest probability of being the best (52.7%) for improving DN symptoms. In all studies, most adverse events include gastrointestinal disturbances. In terms of tolerability, no differences were detected between ALA and control groups.
CONCLUSION
ALA and GLA appear to be safe and efficacious biofactors for improvement of DN symptoms.
Topics: Humans; Thioctic Acid; Diabetic Neuropathies; gamma-Linolenic Acid; Network Meta-Analysis; Adult; Treatment Outcome; Antioxidants
PubMed: 38295879
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2024.01.007 -
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Jan 2024Radiofrequency (RF) ablation is a prevalent treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), targeting triggers within the pulmonary vein (PV) for elimination. This study... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Radiofrequency (RF) ablation is a prevalent treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), targeting triggers within the pulmonary vein (PV) for elimination. This study evaluated heart rate variability (HRV) parameter changes at three intervals post-RF ablation: short-term (immediately to 1 month), medium-term (1 to 6 months), and long-term (6 months to 1 year). We compared two ablation techniques: circumferential PV isolation (CPVI) and segmental PV isolation (SPVI).
METHODS
A thorough search of databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane, in 2022 yielded 835 pertinent studies. After inclusion criteria were applied, 22 studies were analyzed.
RESULTS
Results showed a marked decline in HRV parameters post-AF ablation, with LF/HF as an exception. These reductions persisted in short- and long-term evaluations up to a year post-procedure. Subgroup analysis revealed significant HRV declines, with distinct LF/HF values post-SPVI.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis suggests the potential of decreased HRV as an indicator of autonomic denervation, necessitating further exploration to optimize therapeutic strategies and enhance patient outcomes.
PubMed: 38289454
DOI: 10.1007/s10557-024-07549-1 -
Minerva Anestesiologica May 2024Postoperative cognitive impairment is common in surgical patients, including postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Several studies... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Postoperative cognitive impairment is common in surgical patients, including postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Several studies investigating the association between peripheral nerve block and the risk of cognitive impairment after thoracic surgery showed conflicting results. Therefore, we conducted the current systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effects of peripheral nerve block on postoperative cognitive impairment in thoracic surgical patients.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
Eligible randomized controlled trials were retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Embase databases. The primary outcomes were the incidence of postoperative delirium or cognitive dysfunction and the MMSE scores. Furthermore, VAS scores, levels of TNF-α and IL-6, as well as the duration of hospitalization were analyzed as secondary outcomes.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Ten articles including 1279 participants were selected for this meta-analysis. The results showed that peripheral nerve block could lessen the incidence of postoperative delirium or cognitive dysfunction (OR=0.39, 95% CI [0.27 to 0.56]), the scores of VAS (MD=-1.35 [95% CI: -2.30 to -0.40]), the values of TNF-α (SMD=-1.13 [95% CI: -1.49 to -0.76]) and IL-6 (SMD=-1.65 [95% CI: -1.87 to -1.42]), as well as the length of hospitalization (MD=-0.70 [95% CI: -0.96 to -0.43]). In addition, peripheral nerve block was linked to a significant increase in MMSE scores (MD=2.16 [95% CI: 1.40 to 2.91]).
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis revealed positive effects of peripheral nerve block on improving postoperative cognitive impairment in patients following thoracic surgery.
Topics: Humans; Nerve Block; Thoracic Surgical Procedures; Postoperative Complications; Cognitive Dysfunction; Postoperative Cognitive Complications
PubMed: 38289296
DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.23.17669-3