-
Current Osteoporosis Reports Apr 2024Recently, the American Diabetes Association updated the 2024 guidelines for Standards of Care in Diabetes and recommend that a T-score of - 2.0 in patients with diabetes... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Recently, the American Diabetes Association updated the 2024 guidelines for Standards of Care in Diabetes and recommend that a T-score of - 2.0 in patients with diabetes should be interpreted as equivalent to - 2.5 in people without diabetes. We aimed to evaluate the most recent findings concerning the bone mineral density (BMD)-derived T-score and risk of fractures related to osteoporosis in subjects with diabetes.
RECENT FINDINGS
The dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan is the golden standard for evaluating BMD. The BMD-derived T-score is central to fracture prediction and signifies both diagnosis and treatment for osteoporosis. However, the increased fracture risk in diabetes is not sufficiently explained by the T-score, complicating the identification and management of fracture risk in these patients. Recent findings agree that subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have a higher T-score and higher fracture risk compared with subjects without diabetes. However, the actual number of studies evaluating the direct association of higher fracture risk at higher T-score levels is scant. Some studies support the adjustment based on the 0.5 BMD T-score difference between subjects with T2D and subjects without diabetes. However, further data from longitudinal studies is warranted to validate if the T-score treatment threshold necessitates modification to prevent fractures in subjects with diabetes.
Topics: Humans; Bone Density; Osteoporosis; Absorptiometry, Photon; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Osteoporotic Fractures; Risk Factors
PubMed: 38509440
DOI: 10.1007/s11914-024-00867-1 -
Clinical Radiology Mar 2024To identify similarities and differences between visual (VA) and automated assessment (AA) of systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) at chest...
AIM
To identify similarities and differences between visual (VA) and automated assessment (AA) of systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) at chest computed tomography (CT) in terms of clinical applicability.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Medline, Embase, and Web of Science were searched to identify all studies investigating VA and AA for SSc-ILD assessment, from inception to 31 July 2022. Exclusion criteria were manuscripts not in English, absence of full-text, reviews, diseases other than ILD in SSc, CT not analysed with both VA and AA, VA and AA not adopted for the same purpose or not compared, overlap syndromes, SSc-ILD data not extractable, and studies with <10 patients.
RESULTS
Ten full-text studies (804 patients) were included. The most adopted VAs were the Warrick or Goh score (four studies each), while densitometry (eight studies) or lung texture analysis (LTA, two studies) were utilised as AAs. The main field of investigation was the correlation with baseline pulmonary function tests (PFT, six studies). Warrick VA showed lower correlations compared to densitometry, while Goh VA demonstrated more heterogeneous results. Compared to LTA, Goh VA obtained lower correlations with lung volumes but similar or stronger coefficients with alveolar diffusibility.
CONCLUSIONS
VA and AA may show heterogeneous results comparing their correlations with PFT, probably depending on the specific analysis adopted for each method. More data are needed on VA versus LTA. Comparisons between VA and AA regarding correlation with PFT follow-up and as prognostic elements, or for disease monitoring, are lacking. AAs in progressive fibrosis diagnosis remain to be tested.
Topics: Humans; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Lung; Scleroderma, Systemic; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Connective Tissue Diseases
PubMed: 38143228
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2023.11.022 -
International Breastfeeding Journal Dec 2023During the breastfeeding period, important transient changes in calcium homeostasis are verified in the maternal skeleton, to meet the demand for calcium for breastmilk... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
During the breastfeeding period, important transient changes in calcium homeostasis are verified in the maternal skeleton, to meet the demand for calcium for breastmilk production. The literature is inconclusive regarding the causes and percentages of involvement of bone densitometry resulting from exclusive breastfeeding (4 to 6 months).
METHODS
This article aims to systematically review the literature, to determine the occurrence, intensity, and factors involved in alterations in maternal bone mineral density (BMD), during a period of 4 to 6 months of exclusive breastfeeding. The search descriptors "woman", "breastfeeding", "human milk", and "bone mineral density" were used in the electronic databases of the Virtual Health Library, Scielo (Scientific Electronic Library Online), CAPES Periodicals Portal, LILACS, Embase, PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science in June 2023. Inclusion criteria for breastfeedingmothers were; aged to 40 years, primigravida, exclusively breastfeeding, with BMD assessments using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), with values expressed at baseline and from 4 to 6 months postpartum. The Jadad scale, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine - levels of evidence were adopted to assess the quality of the studies. For the meta-analytical study, statistical calculations were performed.
RESULTS
Initially, 381 articles were found using the search strategy and 26 were read in full. After risk of bias analysis, 16 articles remained in the systematic review and four were included in the meta-analysis. The studies showed a reduction in bone mass in the lumbar spine in the first months postpartum (4 - 6 months), when compared with a longer period of breastfeeding (12-18 months). The breastfeeding group presented a greater impact in the meta-analysis than the control group (non-breastfeeding, pregnant, or immediate postpartum), with a reduction in BMD in the lumbar spine of -0.18 g/cm (-0.36, -0.01 g/cm); 95% Confidence Interval, on a scale from 0 to 10.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results demonstrated a transitory reduction in bone densitometry of the lumbar spine during exclusive breastfeeding for 4 to 6 months, which was gradually restored later in the postpartum period. More prospective studies are needed to better understand the topic.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO platform (nº CRD42021279199), November 12th, 2021.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Aged; Bone Density; Breast Feeding; Calcium; Lumbar Vertebrae; Postpartum Period
PubMed: 38111005
DOI: 10.1186/s13006-023-00607-8 -
Bone Feb 2024To determine the effects of high velocity resistance training (HVRT) on bone mineral density (BMD) in older adults. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To determine the effects of high velocity resistance training (HVRT) on bone mineral density (BMD) in older adults.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted using five databases. Records were screened by two independent reviewers.
INCLUSION CRITERIA
adults ≥50 years old, HVRT defined as rapid concentric and slow eccentric phase against an external load, control group and/or other intervention group, BMD measured using dual X-ray absorptiometry, and ≥6 months.
RESULTS
25 studies met the inclusion criteria. 12 were original intervention studies (8 RCTs) with n = 1203 people. 13 papers were follow up studies of these original interventions. Heterogeneity of studies meant no meta-analysis was performed. Moderate evidence suggests a small statistically significant effect of HVRT on BMD in older adults at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck ranging from 0.9 % to 5.4 %. BMD measurements significantly decreased post-intervention in follow-up studies where the interventions had ceased. Dose-response of HVRT was shown to positively impact BMD when ≥2 sessions per week are completed.
CONCLUSIONS
HVRT plays a role in increasing BMD of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip. Doses of higher intensity exercise performed ≥2 sessions per week will yield the most skeletal benefits, and if exercise is stopped for >6 months, benefits achieved may be lost.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Middle Aged; Bone Density; Resistance Training; Absorptiometry, Photon; Femur Neck; Lumbar Vertebrae
PubMed: 38070720
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2023.116986 -
Journal of Clinical Densitometry : the... 2024No meta-analysis has holistically analysed and summarized the effect of prolactin excess due to prolactinomas on bone mineral metabolism. We undertook this meta-analysis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
No meta-analysis has holistically analysed and summarized the effect of prolactin excess due to prolactinomas on bone mineral metabolism. We undertook this meta-analysis to address this knowledge-gap.
METHODS
Electronic databases were searched for studies having patients with hyperprolactinemia due to prolactinoma and the other being a matched control group. The primary outcome was to evaluate the differences in BMD Z-scores at different sites. The secondary outcomes of this study were to evaluate the alterations in bone mineral density, bone mineral content and the occurrence of fragility fractures.
RESULTS
Data from 4 studies involving 437 individuals was analysed to find out the impact of prolactinoma on bone mineral metabolism. Individuals with prolactinoma had significantly lower Z scores at the lumbar spine [MD -1.08 (95 % CI: -1.57 - -0.59); P < 0.0001; I = 54 % (moderate heterogeneity)] but not at the femur neck [MD -1.31 (95 % CI: -3.07 - 0.45); P = 0.15; I = 98 % (high heterogeneity)] as compared to controls. Trabecular thickness of the radius [MD -0.01 (95 % CI: -0.02 - -0.00); P = 0.0006], tibia [MD -0.01 (95 % CI: -0.02 - -0.00); P=0.03] and cortical thickness of the radius [MD -0.01 (95 % CI: -0.19 - -0.00); P = 0.04] was significantly lower in patients with prolactinoma as compared to controls. The occurrence of fractures was significantly higher in patients with prolactinoma as compared to controls [OR 3.21 (95 % CI: 1.64 - 6.26); P = 0.0006] Conclusion: Bone mass is adversely affected in patients with hyperprolactinemia due to prolactinoma with predominant effects on the trabecular bone.
Topics: Humans; Prolactinoma; Bone Density; Hyperprolactinemia; Absorptiometry, Photon; Cancellous Bone; Fractures, Bone; Radius; Femur Neck; Pituitary Neoplasms; Minerals
PubMed: 38064881
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101453 -
Journal of Clinical Densitometry : the... 2024Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard method for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) which is most strongly associated with fracture risk. BMD is... (Review)
Review
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard method for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) which is most strongly associated with fracture risk. BMD is therefore the basis for the World Health Organization's densitometric definition of osteoporosis. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) promotes best densitometry practices and its official positions reflect critical review of current evidence by domain experts. This document reports new official positions regarding follow-up DXA examinations based on a systematic review of literature published through December 2022. Adoption of official positions requires consensus agreement from an expert panel following a modified RAND protocol. Unless explicitly altered by the new position statements, prior ISCD official positions remain in force. This update reflects increased consideration of the clinical context prompting repeat examination. Follow-up DXA should be performed with pre-defined objectives when the results would have an impact on patient management. Testing intervals should be individualized according to the patient's age, sex, fracture risk and treatment history. Incident fractures and therapeutic approach are key considerations. Appropriately ordered and interpreted follow-up DXA examinations support diagnostic and therapeutic decision making, thereby contributing to excellent clinical care. Future research should address the complementary roles of clinical findings, imaging and laboratory testing to guide management.
Topics: Humans; Bone Density; Follow-Up Studies; Societies, Medical; Osteoporosis; Absorptiometry, Photon; Fractures, Bone
PubMed: 38007875
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101440 -
Bone Feb 2024There is a controversy over the influence of psychostimulant medications on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) among children with... (Review)
Review
There is a controversy over the influence of psychostimulant medications on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) among children with attention-deficit-hyperactivity-disorder (ADHD). The aim of the present systematic review was to assess the influence of psychostimulant medications on BMD and BMC among children with ADHD. A comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library, was conducted to identify relevant studies published up until July 2023. Clinical studies that addressed the focused question "Do psychostimulant medications affect bone mineral density and content in children with ADHD?" were included. Letters to the Editor, studies on animal-models, ex-vivo and in-vitro studies, commentaries and reviews were excluded. The primary outcome measures were changes in BMD and BMC. Study quality was assessed using the risk of bias for non-randomized studies-exposure tool. Five non-randomized clinical studies were included. The number of participants ranged from 18 to 6489 with mean ages ranging from 7.3 to 13.75 years. The study durations ranged between five and seven years. In all studies osseous evaluation was done using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The bone locations examined included total body, lumbar-spine, femur, femoral-neck, femoral body, and pelvis. Two studies reported that psychostimulant medications reduce BMC and BMD. In one study, bone turnover, serum leptin and fat levels were reduced in children using psychostimulant medications but no unusual reduction recorded among controls. In general, 80 % of the studies concluded that psychostimulant medications compromise BMC and BMD. Power analysis was done in one study. One study had a low RoB and the remaining demonstrated some concerns. Given the methodological concerns observed in the included studies, arriving at a definitive conclusion regarding the effects of psychostimulant medications on BMC, BMD, and bone turnover in children with ADHD is challenging. However, it is important to acknowledge that an association between psychostimulant medications and these bone-related parameters cannot be disregarded.
Topics: Child; Animals; Humans; Adolescent; Bone Density; Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity; Absorptiometry, Photon; Femur Neck; Lumbar Vertebrae
PubMed: 38006907
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2023.116982 -
Osteoporosis International : a Journal... Mar 2024This review aims to evaluate the accuracy of various mandibular radiomorphometric indices in comparison with DEXA BMD measurements in the diagnosis of osteopenia and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This review aims to evaluate the accuracy of various mandibular radiomorphometric indices in comparison with DEXA BMD measurements in the diagnosis of osteopenia and osteoporosis based on a meta-analysis of the sensitivity and specificity of the indices. PRISMA statement was followed. The materials for analysis were collected in August 2023 by searching three databases: PubMed Central, Web of Science, and Scopus. The selection of studies consisted of three selection stages, and 64 articles were finally obtained. Quality assessment was performed with the QUADAS-2 tool, and the general methodological quality of retrieved studies was low. Statistical analysis was performed based on 2 × 2 tables and estimated sensitivity and specificity were obtained using SROC curves. The most used indices were MCI, MCW and PMI. The best results in detecting reduced BMD obtained for MCW ≤ 3 mm, estimated sensitivity and specificity were 0.712 (95% CI, 0.477-0.870) and 0.804 (95% CI, 0.589-0.921), respectively. The most prone to the risk of bias is the MCI due to the examiner's subjectivism. Radiomorphometric indices of the mandible can be useful as a screening tool to identify patients with low BMD, but should not be used as a diagnostic method. Further research needs to focus on analysing the ability of the indices to detect osteoporosis and also in combination the indices with clinical parameters.
Topics: Humans; Bone Density; Absorptiometry, Photon; Radiography, Panoramic; Osteoporosis; Mandible
PubMed: 37870561
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-023-06949-7 -
Osteoporosis International : a Journal... Jan 2024We included 39 studies in our meta-analysis, finding that patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) exhibit decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and an elevated risk of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
UNLABELLED
We included 39 studies in our meta-analysis, finding that patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) exhibit decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and an elevated risk of fractures. Additionally, we analyzed the risk factors associated with fractures in these patients.
INTRODUCTION
AS is a chronic inflammatory disease primarily affecting the spine and sacroiliac joints, with reduced BMD, osteoporosis, and fractures being common complications. This study aims to systematically consolidate and conduct a meta-analysis of existing research to comprehensively understand decreased bone mineral density, osteoporosis, and fracture risks at various anatomical sites in AS patients. The objective is to provide reliable information for the management of AS patients and to inform clinical decision making.
METHODS
We conducted a thorough search in various databases including Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. These studies focused on the risk of and risk factors for decreased BMD, osteopenia, osteoporosis, and fractures at different sites among AS patients such as the lumbar spine and femoral neck. The quality of eligible studies was evaluated. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the reliability of our analysis results and understand the effects of individual studies on the heterogeneity across studies.
RESULTS
A total of 39 studies were included. Our meta-analysis results revealed significant differences between AS patients and healthy controls. AS patients had significantly lower BMDs at the femoral neck, hip, lumbar vertebra 2 (L2), lumbar vertebra 3 (L3), and lumbar vertebra 4 (L4), but higher BMDs at 1/3 distal radius and ultra distal radius. Risk factors for fractures among AS patients included old age, long course of disease, and low BMD at the lumbar spine. In contrast, factors such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score, gender, and body mass index (BMI) were not risk factors for fractures in AS patients.
CONCLUSION
Our study highlights that BMD at the femoral neck is more effective for evaluating AS patients compared with the BMD at the lumbar spine. Additionally, the risk of osteoporosis and fractures in AS patients is higher in younger patients and those at the early stage of this disease.
Topics: Humans; Absorptiometry, Photon; Bone Density; Lumbar Vertebrae; Osteoporosis; Reproducibility of Results; Risk Factors; Spinal Fractures; Spondylitis, Ankylosing
PubMed: 37814094
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-023-06925-1 -
Best Practice & Research. Clinical... Dec 2023Preserving bone health is an important goal of care of patients with acromegaly and growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Both disorders are associated with compromised bone... (Review)
Review
Preserving bone health is an important goal of care of patients with acromegaly and growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Both disorders are associated with compromised bone health and an increased risk of fracture. However, parameters of bone health that are routinely used to predict fractures in other populations, such as aBMD measured by DXA, are unreliable for this in acromegaly and GHD. Additional methodologies need to be employed to assess bone health in these patients. This review summarizes available data on the effects of acromegaly and GHD on parameters of bone health such as aBMD, volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and microarchitecture assessed by HRpQCT and other techniques, trabecular bone score (TBS) and fracture assessment. More research is needed to identify reliable predictors of fracture risk and to determine how best to screen for and treat those patients at risk so that bone health is optimized in these patients.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Bone Density; Absorptiometry, Photon; Acromegaly; Bone and Bones; Fractures, Bone; Hypopituitarism; Growth Hormone
PubMed: 37798201
DOI: 10.1016/j.beem.2023.101824