-
Journal of Wound Care Apr 2024To conduct a systematic review to identify the impact of diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in individuals within the Arab world. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To conduct a systematic review to identify the impact of diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in individuals within the Arab world.
METHOD
A PRISMA-guided systematic search for HRQoL studies in Arab populations was conducted in CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus and EBSCO. Relevant studies were critically appraised using the STROBE statement checklist.
RESULTS
A total of five studies were included. Three studies originated from Saudi Arabia, one from Jordan and one from Tunisia. The studies consistently demonstrated lower (poorer) HRQoL in patients with DFU, and worse HRQoL compared with both patients with diabetes and no DFU, and with healthy subjects.
CONCLUSION
This review confirmed the negative impact of DFU on HRQoL in individuals with diabetes. It also highlights the scarcity of HRQoL studies from the Arab world. However, given that all studies included were conducted between 2013-2019, this could reflect a growing interest in DFU and HRQoL in the Arab world, and could potentially indicate that more studies will follow. In light of this, there is a need for a renewed focus on the completion of a high-quality standardised approach to research in this region.
Topics: Humans; Diabetic Foot; Quality of Life; Arab World; Foot Ulcer; Jordan; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 38573904
DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2024.33.4.253 -
Journal of Wound Care Apr 2024The aims of this study were to ascertain the effectiveness and safety of the off-label use of topical timolol as an adjunct treatment for hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds.... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The aims of this study were to ascertain the effectiveness and safety of the off-label use of topical timolol as an adjunct treatment for hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds. Furthermore, to review and analyse the existing literature regarding the use of topical timolol on wounds of varying aetiologies.
METHOD
A systematic review of literature in the English language published between May 1961-May 2021 on the application of topical timolol for hard-to-heal wounds in adults was performed. Each research study was evaluated by two reviewers independently. Studies eligible for inclusion in the review were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), clinical trials, observational studies of at least 4 weeks' duration, case series and case studies. Search strategies were performed according to PRISMA guidelines and included MeSH terms and keyword searches.
RESULTS
An initial 878 articles were identified from a search of PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and SCOPUS. Of these, 699 were reviewed for eligibility, 19 were read in full-text, and 12 were selected for inclusion in the review. In total, two RCTs and 10 observational studies, including five case studies, were analysed. All studies demonstrated efficacy and safety of topical timolol; however, statistical analysis remained limited by lack of blinding and small sample sizes.
CONCLUSION
This review concludes with all currently available evidence that topical timolol may be considered as an effective and safe adjunct treatment for refractory wounds, primarily venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers. Given the overall safety, low cost and ease of application of topical timolol, this review provides evidence in favour of off-label use and should prompt further, more rigorous studies.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Timolol; Wound Healing; Varicose Ulcer; Diabetic Foot
PubMed: 38573903
DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2024.33.4.243 -
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism Jun 2024
Meta-Analysis
Risk of lower extremity amputation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and peripheral arterial disease receiving sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors versus other medications: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort studies.
Topics: Humans; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Amputation, Surgical; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Observational Studies as Topic; Lower Extremity; Diabetic Foot; Hypoglycemic Agents; Diabetic Angiopathies; Male
PubMed: 38558251
DOI: 10.1111/dom.15571 -
The Medical Journal of Malaysia Mar 2024Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is one of the most prevalent chronic complications of diabetes mellitus (DM) that can significantly result in disability and... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is one of the most prevalent chronic complications of diabetes mellitus (DM) that can significantly result in disability and impaired quality of life. The DPN of the foot has been extensively studied in diabetes care. Nevertheless, the DPN of hand has been the road less taken in research and clinical practice. Thus, a scoping review was conducted to identify all available standardized hand assessments which have been used, developed, or tested in individuals with DM.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This scoping review was reported in alignment with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Studies were identified through searches of five databases: Cochrane, Scopus, ProQuest, MEDLINE, and Web of Science (WoS).
RESULTS
Of the 294 articles initially identified, 20 studies were included and analysed thematically after removing duplicates. The majority of these assessments measure body function and structure such as grip and pinch strength while the rest are measuring the activity and participation domain. Most of the hand assessments were performancebased measurements. It is suggestible to employ both types of assessments to obtain a comprehensive understanding of hand conditions in individuals with DM. While some validated hand assessments were identified, only the Duruöz Hand Index (DHI) has been validated as a reliable tool specifically for evaluating hand function in individuals with DM.
CONCLUSION
There is a need to evaluate the measurement properties of existing instruments for assessing the hand function in individuals with DM, or to develop hand assessments specifically for the DM population. This scoping review was forging a new path, by discovering diabetes care through the utilisation of hand assessments.
Topics: Humans; Quality of Life; Upper Extremity; Diabetes Mellitus; Lower Extremity
PubMed: 38555903
DOI: No ID Found -
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Mar 2024Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) pose a significant challenge in diabetes care, demanding advanced approaches for effective prevention and management. Smart insoles using... (Review)
Review
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) pose a significant challenge in diabetes care, demanding advanced approaches for effective prevention and management. Smart insoles using sensor technology have emerged as promising tools to address the challenges associated with DFU and neuropathy. By recognizing the pivotal role of smart insoles in successful prevention and healthcare management, this scoping review aims to present a comprehensive overview of the existing evidence regarding DFU studies related to smart insoles, offloading sensors, and actuator technologies. This systematic review identified and critically evaluated 11 key studies exploring both sensor technologies and offloading devices in the context of DFU care through searches in CINAHL, MEDLINE, and ScienceDirect databases. Predominantly, smart insoles, mobile applications, and wearable technologies were frequently utilized for interventions and patient monitoring in diabetic foot care. Patients emphasized the importance of these technologies in facilitating care management. The pivotal role of offloading devices is underscored by the majority of the studies exhibiting increased efficient monitoring, prevention, prognosis, healing rate, and patient adherence. The findings indicate that, overall, smart insoles and digital technologies are perceived as acceptable, feasible, and beneficial in meeting the specific needs of DFU patients. By acknowledging the promising outcomes, the present scoping review suggests smart technologies can potentially redefine DFU management by emphasizing accessibility, efficacy, and patient centricity.
Topics: Humans; Diabetic Foot; Wearable Electronic Devices; Shoes; Technology; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 38544271
DOI: 10.3390/s24062009 -
Diabetes/metabolism Research and Reviews Mar 2024It is critical that interventions used to enhance the healing of chronic foot ulcers in diabetes are backed by high-quality evidence and cost-effectiveness. In previous...
BACKGROUND
It is critical that interventions used to enhance the healing of chronic foot ulcers in diabetes are backed by high-quality evidence and cost-effectiveness. In previous years, the systematic review accompanying guidelines published by the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot performed 4-yearly updates of previous searches, including trials of prospective, cross-sectional and case-control design.
AIMS
Due to a need to re-evaluate older studies against newer standards of reporting and assessment of risk of bias, we performed a whole new search from conception, but limiting studies to randomised control trials only.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
For this systematic review, we searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases for published studies on randomised control trials of interventions to enhance healing of diabetes-related foot ulcers. We only included trials comparing interventions to standard of care. Two independent reviewers selected articles for inclusion and assessed relevant outcomes as well as methodological quality.
RESULTS
The literature search identified 22,250 articles, of which 262 were selected for full text review across 10 categories of interventions. Overall, the certainty of evidence for a majority of wound healing interventions was low or very low, with moderate evidence existing for two interventions (sucrose-octasulfate and leucocyte, platelet and fibrin patch) and low quality evidence for a further four (hyperbaric oxygen, topical oxygen, placental derived products and negative pressure wound therapy). The majority of interventions had insufficient evidence.
CONCLUSION
Overall, the evidence to support any other intervention to enhance wound healing is lacking and further high-quality randomised control trials are encouraged.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Diabetic Foot; Cross-Sectional Studies; Prospective Studies; Placenta; Foot Ulcer; Wound Healing; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 38507616
DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3786 -
Heliyon Mar 2024Many clinical management strategies have been proposed to deal with diabetic foot ulcers. However, the occurrence and recurrence of foot ulcers remain the major problems...
Many clinical management strategies have been proposed to deal with diabetic foot ulcers. However, the occurrence and recurrence of foot ulcers remain the major problems for diabetics. This study aims to identify, visualize, and characterize the meta-analyses on diabetic foot ulcer research. Articles published online were retrieved from the Web of Science core collection database using a search query incorporating MeSH terms and topics related to diabetic foot ulcers and meta-analysis. The publications were then analyzed for basic characteristics, including publication year, countries, topics covered, references, and keywords discussed in the articles. Data visualization was performed using CiteSpace. 334 meta-analyses and systematic reviews on diabetic foot ulcers were identified. The number of publications has experienced rapid growth in recent years (nearly 6-fold since 2016). The United States, China, Netherlands, England, and Australia had a strong collaboration in the contribution of publication. 7 primary topics were summarized from the top 100 highly cited publications: #1 Interventions (proportion: 59%), #2 Risk factors and Prevention (22%), #3 Epidemiology analysis (6%), #4 Cost-effectiveness of interventions (5%), #5 Long-term prognosis (3%), #6 Quality of life analysis (3%), and #7 Economic burden analysis (2%). Footwear and offloading interventions, multidisciplinary care, hyperbaric oxygen, platelet-rich plasma, and negative pressure wound therapies are highly regarded in terms of intervention. Diabetic foot osteomyelitis, peripheral diabetic neuropathy, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and infections are the main comorbidities. In recent years, offloading interventions, debridement, telemedicine, long-term prognosis, and economic burden analyses have gradually received attention. Individualized treatment, multidisciplinary collaboration, quality of life considerations, and economic burden analyses are the long-term concerns.
PubMed: 38496839
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27534 -
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology... Mar 2024Diabetes mellitus is associated with morbid complications such as diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) that may lead to amputations or mortality if not managed adequately.
CONTEXT
Diabetes mellitus is associated with morbid complications such as diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) that may lead to amputations or mortality if not managed adequately.
OBJECTIVE
New adjunctive interventions to treat diabetic wounds include topical biologics and growth factors. This study aims to evaluate their efficacy in improving wound healing outcomes and safety.
DATA SOURCES
Comprehensive database searches of MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane performed from inception to December 2022.
STUDY SELECTION
Three independent researchers selected the studies. Randomised-controlled trials that compared the use of a topical biologic growth factor-containing regimen to other biologics or standard of care (SOC) were included.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
This review followed PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias analysis was performed using the Jadad scale. Network meta-analysis was performed. Treatments were grouped into common nodes based on the type of biologic agent.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Primary outcomes of interest were healing rate and time to wound closure. Secondary outcomes included wound infection, serious adverse events, and amputation rate.
RESULTS
Human umbilical cord (HUC) was associated with the highest cure, followed by recombinant human epidermal growth factor (hEGF). A significantly greater reduction in the time to cure DFUs was seen in HUC, hEGF and fibroblast growth factor (FGF). There was a significantly lower risk of adverse events (AEs) when platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was administered.
CONCLUSION
HUC, hEGF and FGF are promising topical biologics with statistically significant primary outcomes compared to SOC, while PRP is effective in reducing ulcer-related AEs. HUC has been found to be the most effective in terms of cure rate and a reduction in time to cure.
PubMed: 38477463
DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgae128 -
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Oct 2023Diabetes is one of the most common causes of neuropathy. Morbidity and mortality increase in patients suffering from diabetic polyneuropathy and are experienced by...
CONTEXT
Diabetes is one of the most common causes of neuropathy. Morbidity and mortality increase in patients suffering from diabetic polyneuropathy and are experienced by approximately 10 to 54% of diabetic patients. Severe pain, loss of sensation, increased risk of ulceration, and even amputation are the complications of diabetic neuropathy. Intradermal injection of botulinum toxin type-A (BTX-A) is a relatively novel method for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy. This method is becoming popular considering its acceptable and long-lasting pain control and minimal systemic side effects.
METHODS
This narrative systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of intradermal BTX-A injection on painful diabetic neuropathy. The queried databases included PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The final search was performed in February 2022, and no time limits were set for the search. All the relevant clinical trials were included. The inclusion criteria and search strategy were set as follows: Type of study: Randomized clinical trial (RCT) or other types of interventional studies; publication date: All published studies until February 22, 2022; sample size: No restrictions; outcomes: Effect on diabetic neuropathy pain; quality: Earning a minimum acceptable score based on critical appraisal; and language: English. The searches and article screening were performed by two independent reviewers to minimize the possibility of bias. In case of disagreement about a study, the comments of an expert (as a third person) were used to resolve the ambiguity.
RESULTS
In a review of 4 RCTs and 1 case-control study on the effectiveness of BTX-A in reducing the pain of diabetic neuropathy, 273 patients were evaluated in total. The lowest and highest number of subjects was 18 and 141. The sex distribution included 43.22% men and 56.77% women, all of whom were 47.8 to 74.8 years old. Three studies were conducted in Iran, Taiwan, and Egypt. The results of this review showed significant improvement in pain reduction, e.g., based on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS). A few studies evaluated sleep and psychosocial complications, and their results indicated a statistically significant improvement in the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) and the physical subscale of the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36).
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this systematic review demonstrated that intradermal injection of BTX-A causes significant and long-term (up to 12 weeks) improvement in diabetic neuropathy pain. The improvement in sleep and mental or physical functions was not consistent, and no conclusive result could be reached.
PubMed: 38476988
DOI: 10.5812/aapm-136260 -
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism Jun 2024To investigate the differences in utility between conventional dressings and hydrogel dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIM
To investigate the differences in utility between conventional dressings and hydrogel dressings for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU).
METHODS
The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP and Wanfang databases were systematically searched up to 21 January 2023. Fixed/random-effect models were used to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the effect size analysis, with heterogeneity determined by I statistics. Subgroup analyses of different classes of hydrogel were also conducted.
RESULTS
A total of 15 randomized controlled trials with 872 patients were eligible for the present analysis. Compared with conventional dressings, hydrogel dressings significantly improved the healing rate (OR 4.09, 95% CI 2.83 to 5.91), shortened the healing time (MD -11.38, 95% CI -13.11 to -9.66), enhanced granulation formation (MD -3.60, 95% CI -4.21 to -3.00) and epithelial formation (MD -2.82, 95% CI -3.19 to -2.46), and reduced the incidence of bacterial infection (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.18).
CONCLUSION
The meta-analysis showed that hydrogel dressings are more effective in treating DFU compared with conventional dressings.
Topics: Diabetic Foot; Humans; Wound Healing; Hydrogels; Bandages; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Female; Male; Bandages, Hydrocolloid; Middle Aged
PubMed: 38465784
DOI: 10.1111/dom.15544