-
Nutrition Reviews Jun 2024Oral health and food oral-processing issues emerge with functional decline in the older adult population, potentially increasing the risk of malnutrition. Impairment of...
CONTEXT
Oral health and food oral-processing issues emerge with functional decline in the older adult population, potentially increasing the risk of malnutrition. Impairment of oral health is associated with poorer nutrition status; however, the relationship between oral factors and the intake of each nutrient remains poorly understood.
OBJECTIVE
The associations between different oral factors and nutrient intakes among community-dwelling older adults were investigated.
DATA SOURCES
A literature search from 5 databases (Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Ovid [MEDLINE and Embase], and CINAHL) was completed on February 1, 2022. The search was limited to peer-reviewed articles published between the years 2012 and 2022.
DATA EXTRACTION
Six cross-sectional studies were included in the meta-analysis. Two authors independently completed the data extraction and summarized the study characteristics, factors adjusted for in the statistical analysis, the outcome, and summary statistics of the results.
DATA ANALYSIS
Meta-analyses showed evidence of a significant association between compromised oral factors (namely, denture status, chewing ability, and the number of teeth) with lower energy (weighted mean difference [WMD], -107 kcal d-1 (95% CI, -132 to -81), protein (WMD, -5.2 g d-1; 95% CI, -6.6 to -3.8), fat (WMD, -4.6 g d-1; 95% CI, -6.7 to -2.6), carbohydrate (WMD, -8.8 g d-1; 95% CI, -13.9 to -3.7), and vitamin C intakes (WMD, -12.9 mg d-1; 95% CI, -16.6 to -9.2) in older adults.
CONCLUSION
Oral health can be an indicator of compromised daily energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate, and vitamin C intakes in older adults. However, the small sample size of the studies included in this review and the heterogeneity among macronutrient studies should be considered. Because of the lack of studies covering all aspects of food oral processing (eg, salivary flow rate, tongue pressure), the associations between oral processing and nutrient intake were not thoroughly explored.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022308823.
PubMed: 38916939
DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae080 -
Nutrition Reviews Jun 2024Current evidence on the effect of a low-fat (LF) diet on depression scores has been inconsistent.
CONTEXT
Current evidence on the effect of a low-fat (LF) diet on depression scores has been inconsistent.
OBJECTIVE
To explore the effect of an LF diet on depression scores of adults by systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
DATA SOURCES
The PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases were searched from inception to June 7, 2023, to identify trials investigating the effect of an LF diet (fat intake ≤30% of energy intake) on the depression score.
DATA EXTRACTION
Random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate pooled summary effects of an LF diet on the depression score (as Hedges g).
DATA ANALYSIS
Finding from 10 trials with 50 846 participants indicated no significant change in depression score following LF diets in comparison with usual diet (Hedges g = -0.11; 95% CI, -0.25 to 0.03; P = 0.12; I2 = 70.7% [for I2, 95% CI, 44%, 85%]). However, a significant improvement was observed in both usual diet and LF diets when the content of protein was 15-20% of calorie intake (LF, normal protein diet: n = 5, Hedges g = -0.21, 95% CI, -0.24 to -0.01, P = 0.04, I2 = 0%; usual, normal protein diet: n = 3, Hedges g = -0.28, 95% CI, -0.51 to -0.05, P = 0.01, I2 = 0%). Sensitivity analysis also found the depression score improved following LF diet intervention in participants without baseline depression.
CONCLUSION
This study revealed that LF diet may have small beneficial effect on depression score in the studies enrolled mentally healthy participants. Moreover, achieving to adequate dietary protein is likely to be a better intervention than manipulating dietary fat to improve depression scores. However, it is not clear whether this effect will last in the long term. Conducting more studies may change the results due to the low-certainty of evidence.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
CRD42023420978 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO).
PubMed: 38899499
DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae069 -
Nutrients May 2024Gut microbiome-modulating agents (MMAs), including probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics, and synbiotics, are shown to ameliorate type 1 diabetes (T1D) by restoring the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Gut microbiome-modulating agents (MMAs), including probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics, and synbiotics, are shown to ameliorate type 1 diabetes (T1D) by restoring the microbiome from dysbiosis. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the impact of MMAs on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and biomarkers associated with (T1D). A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, National Knowledge Infrastructure, WeiPu, and WanFang Data up to 30 November 2023. Ten randomized controlled trials ( = 630) were included, with study quality evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Random-effect models with standardized mean differences (SMDs) were utilized. MMA supplementation was associated with improvements in HbA1c (SMD = -0.52, 95% CI [-0.83, -0.20]), daily insulin usage (SMD = -0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) [-0.76, -0.07]), and fasting C-peptide (SMD = 0.99, 95% CI [0.17, 1.81]) but had no effects on FBG, CRP, TNF-α, IL-10, LDL, HDL, and the Shannon index. Subgroup analysis of HbA1c indicated that a long-term intervention (>3 months) might exert a more substantial effect. These findings suggest an association between MMAs and glycemic control in T1D. Further large-scale clinical trials are necessary to confirm these findings with investigations on inflammation and gut microbiota composition while adjusting confounding factors such as diet, physical activity, and the dose and form of MMA intervention.
Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Humans; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Glycated Hemoglobin; Probiotics; Prebiotics; Biomarkers; Synbiotics; Dietary Supplements; Female; Dysbiosis; Adult; Male
PubMed: 38892608
DOI: 10.3390/nu16111675 -
Cureus May 2024Gastrointestinal permeability refers to the movement of substances across the gut wall. This is mediated by endotoxemia (bacterial products entering the systemic... (Review)
Review
Gastrointestinal permeability refers to the movement of substances across the gut wall. This is mediated by endotoxemia (bacterial products entering the systemic circulation), and is associated with metabolic disease. The effect of bariatric surgery on permeability remains uncertain; the associated dietary, metabolic and weight changes are suggested to influence, or trigger, altered permeability. The primary aim of this study is to synthesize evidence and analyze the effect of bariatric surgery on permeability. A systematic review was performed, searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus until February 2023, using MESH terms "intestinal permeability", "bariatric", for studies reporting in vivo assessment of permeability. Three cohort studies and two case series were identified (n=96). Data was heterogeneous; methodology and controls preclude meta-analysis. Gastroduodenal permeability reduced post-sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Two studies showed an increase in small intestinal permeability after biliopancreatic diversion. Two studies revealed a decrease in post-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. One study identified increased colonic permeability six months post-SG. Evidence regarding permeability change after bariatric surgery is conflicting, notably for the small intestine. Impaired colonic permeability post-SG raises concerns regarding colonic protein fermentation and harmful dietary sequelae. There are multiple interacting variables confounding gastrointestinal permeability change; procedure type, altered microbiota and metabolic response to surgery. Further understanding of this important aspect of obesity is required, both before and after bariatric surgery.
PubMed: 38883053
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60480 -
Progress in Neuro-psychopharmacology &... Jun 2024The various pharmacological interventions, ranging from mood stabilizers and antipsychotics to antidepressants, reflect the diff/iculty of treating depressive/manic... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The various pharmacological interventions, ranging from mood stabilizers and antipsychotics to antidepressants, reflect the diff/iculty of treating depressive/manic symptomatology of bipolar disorder (BD). Among a broad range of mechanisms implicated, immune dysregulation may contribute to the increased inflammation that influences the course of BD. Inflammatory, neurotrophic and oxidative stress factors may be identified as promising peripheral biomarkers in brain functioning, perhaps serving as predictors of an effective response to treatment for BD. The present systematic review aimed to examine the evidence supporting the pharmacotherapeutic value of inflammatory and neurotrophic biomarkers in BD.
METHODS
PubMed, PsychINFO, Scopus and Web of Science were searched from inception to May 2024 by two independent reviewers. A total of 40 studies with 3371 patients with diagnosis and intervention of BD were selected.
RESULTS
Inconsistencies in the effects of pharmacological treatments on the connection between the expected anti-inflammatory response and symptomatologic improvement were identified. Mood stabilizers (lithium), antipsychotics (quetiapine), antidepressants (ketamine) or their combination were described to increase both pro-inflammatory (TNFα, IL-6) and anti-inflammatory (IL-4, IL-8) factors. Other medications, such as memantine and dextromethorphan, autoimmune (infliximab) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (aspirin, celecoxib) drugs, antidiabetics (pioglitazone), and even dietary supplementation (omega-3), or their combination, clearly decrease inflammatory factors (TNFα, IL-6, IL-1β, C-reactive protein) and/or increase the neurotrophic factor BDNF in BD patients.
CONCLUSION
Inflammation in BD requires further investigation to understand the underlying immunologic mechanism, to identify predictors of treatment response, and to make informed decisions about the use and development of more effective pharmacological interventions for BD.
PubMed: 38879067
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111056 -
Nutrition Reviews May 2024The COVID-19 pandemic has had a global impact on food security and nutrition, both in the short and long term. The influence on school-age children, adolescents, and...
CONTEXT
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a global impact on food security and nutrition, both in the short and long term. The influence on school-age children, adolescents, and young adults may be particularly significant and long-lasting.
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on dietary habits among school-age children, adolescents, and young adults worldwide.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched from inception to October 5, 2023.
DATA EXTRACTION
We included observational studies published in English that reported dietary quality scores and dietary intake quantities during and before the COVID-19 pandemic among school-age children, adolescents, and young adults. We included a total of 22 cohort studies and 20 cross-sectional studies of high or moderate quality.
DATA ANALYSIS
We conducted a meta-analysis, expressing dietary quality scores and dietary intake quantities as standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For studies with low heterogeneity, we used a fixed-effects model; otherwise, we applied a random-effects model. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was employed by 2 reviewers independently to evaluate methodological quality. The analysis indicated that, overall, juice intake increased (SMD = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.20), while alcohol consumption reduced during the COVID-19 pandemic (SMD = -0.28, 95% CI: -0.47 to -0.08). However, the age-stratified results varied. Among school-age children, intake of fruit, dairy products, sugar, and juice increased. Adolescents showed an increase in meal frequency and vegetable intake. Young adults showed reduced carbohydrate and alcohol intakes, while protein and dairy product intakes increased, based on limited included studies.
CONCLUSION
Dietary changes in school-age children from before to during the pandemic were mixed, while dietary behavior changes in adolescents and young adults tended to be more positive. Considering the lasting effects of negative dietary behaviors, attention should be given to addressing the increased sugar and juice intakes. It is also crucial that caregivers and researchers monitor whether positive dietary behaviors will rebound after returning to normal study and life.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023420923.
PubMed: 38820346
DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae050 -
PeerJ 2024The optimal range of protein dosage and effect of high-dose protein on critically ill patients remain controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare higher and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
The optimal range of protein dosage and effect of high-dose protein on critically ill patients remain controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare higher and lower doses of protein supplementation for nutritional support in critically ill patients.
METHODS
We searched the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials that compared higher (≥1.2 g/kg per day) lower (<1.2 g/kg per day) doses of protein supplementation among critically ill adult patients. This search spanned from the inception of relevant databases to November 20, 2023. Our primary endpoint of interest was overall mortality, while secondary endpoints included length of stay in the intensive care unit, length of hospital stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and incidence of acute kidney injury.
RESULTS
Seventeen studies including 2,965 critically ill patients were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled analyses showed no significant difference in overall mortality (RR 1.03, 95%CI [0.92-1.15], = 0.65, I = 0%), length of intensive care unit stay (MD 0.19, 95%CI [-0.67 to 1.04], = 0.66, I = 25%), length of hospital stay (MD 0.73, 95%CI [-1.59 to 3.04], = 0.54, I = 27%), duration of mechanical ventilation (MD -0.14, 95%CI [-0.83 to 0.54], = 0.68, I = 8%), and incidence of acute kidney injury (RR 1.11, 95%CI [0.87-1.41], = 0.38, I = 0%) between critically ill patients receiving higher or lower doses of protein supplementation.
CONCLUSIONS
For critically ill patients, the protein supplementation dose had no significant effect on clinical outcomes, including overall mortality, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and incidence of acute kidney injury.
Topics: Humans; Critical Illness; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Length of Stay; Respiration, Artificial; Acute Kidney Injury; Intensive Care Units; Dietary Proteins; Dietary Supplements; Nutritional Support; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
PubMed: 38799065
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17433 -
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN Jun 2024The current meta-analysis aimed to examine the heritability and familial resemblance of dietary intakes, including energy and macronutrients in both twin and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND/AIMS
The current meta-analysis aimed to examine the heritability and familial resemblance of dietary intakes, including energy and macronutrients in both twin and family-based studies.
METHODS
The online literature databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched comprehensively until 2023 to identify the relevant studies. The heritability index in family studies was h and the heritability indices for twin studies were h, A, and E. Three weighted methods were used to calculate the mean and SE of heritability dietary intakes.
RESULTS
Eighteen papers including 8 studies on familial population and 12 for twin population studies were included in the present meta-analysis. The heritability of dietary intakes in twin studies (range of pooled estimated h, A and E was 30-55%, 14-42%, and 52-79%, respectively) was higher than family studies (range of pooled estimated h = 16-39%). In family studies, the highest and lowest heritability for various nutrients was observed for the fat (%Kcal) (h range:36-38%) and carbohydrate in g (h range:16-18%), respectively. In twin studies, based on mean h, the highest and lowest heritability for various nutrients was reported for the fat (%Kcal) (h range:49-55%) and protein intake in g (h range:30-35%), respectively. Also, based on the mean of A, the highest and lowest heritability was observed for carbohydrates (% Kcal) (A range:42-42%), and protein (% Kcal) (A range:14-16%), respectively. Furthermore, in twin studies, the highest and lowest mean of E was shown for saturated fats (E range:74-79%) and energy intake (E range:52-57%), respectively.
CONCLUSION
Our analysis indicated that both environmental factors and genetics have noticeable contributions in determining the heritability of dietary intakes. Also, we observed higher heritability in twins compared to family studies.
Topics: Humans; Nutrients; Energy Intake; Diet; Twins; Family; Twin Studies as Topic; Dietary Fats
PubMed: 38777476
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.03.016 -
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN Jun 2024International guidelines recommend a target protein intake of ≥1.2 g/kg/day to all critically ill patients for optimal outcomes. There are however various conflicting... (Review)
Review
International guidelines recommend a target protein intake of ≥1.2 g/kg/day to all critically ill patients for optimal outcomes. There are however various conflicting data related to this recommendation. The primary objective of this review was to compare a protein intake group (≥1.2 g/kg/day) with a lower protein intake group (<1.2 g/kg/day) in critically ill adult patients on mortality, length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay. Secondly, the effect of protein intake on length of mechanical ventilation, adverse nutrition-related events and muscle mass and strength parameters were investigated. Sixteen randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adult patients admitted to an intensive or high care unit and receiving nutrition support in the form of enteral- and/or parenteral nutrition were selected against prespecified eligibility criteria. Two independent reviewers extracted relevant data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Review Manager 5.4.1 was used to analyse data and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) was used to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. The higher protein group, when compared to the lower protein group, probably results in little to no difference in mortality (risk ratio [RR] 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89 to 1.14; moderate-certainty evidence); with a probable slight increase in length of ICU stay (mean difference [MD] 0.33; 95% CI -0.57 to 1.23; moderate-certainty) and length of hospital stay (MD 1.72; 95% CI -0.58 to 4.01; moderate-certainty evidence), on average. For secondary outcomes, it was found that the higher protein group probably does not reduce the length of mechanical ventilation (MD 0.08; 95% CI -0.38 to 0.53; moderate-certainty evidence). Higher protein group probably reduces the occurrence of diarrhoea and high gastric residual volume and may reduce the occurrence of constipation. It may also increase nitrogen balance (MD 3.66; 95% CI 1.81 to 5.51; low-certainty evidence). Importantly, there does not seem to be harm associated with the higher protein group, though it should be mentioned that for many of the adverse events in this study, the certainty of evidence was low or very low.
Topics: Humans; Critical Illness; Intensive Care Units; Dietary Proteins; Length of Stay; Respiration, Artificial; Adult; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Enteral Nutrition; Critical Care; Parenteral Nutrition; Hospital Mortality
PubMed: 38777455
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.04.003 -
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN Jun 2024Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy in developed countries. Therefore, omega-3 fatty acids (O3FAs) have been suggested as a beneficial... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy in developed countries. Therefore, omega-3 fatty acids (O3FAs) have been suggested as a beneficial complementary treatment due to their ability to regulate inflammatory responses and improve nutrition levels.This study aimed to evaluate the effects of O3FAs as a complementary treatment for inflammation, nutrition levels, post-operative infectious complications, and enhancement of recovery in CRC patients.
METHODS
The literature search was carried out through three databases. The outcomes of interest were assessed by measuring pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) and CRP levels, serum albumin levels for nutrition assessment, post-operative infectious complications, and length of stay for recovery evaluation. Quality appraisal and meta-analysis were performed using RoB 2.0 and RevMan 5.4, respectively.
RESULTS
The result showed that O3FAs significantly reduced IL-6, CRP, and TNF-α, but did not affect IL-1β. Furthermore, the variable slightly increased serum albumin levels and the supplementation led to a decrease in post-operative infectious complications and shortened hospital stays.
CONCLUSION
O3FAs as a complementary treatment provided advantages for CRC patients, Further clinical trials and experiments should also be made emphasizing the impact and clinical implementation of O3FA in the nutritional status of CRC patients.
Topics: Humans; Fatty Acids, Omega-3; Colorectal Neoplasms; Nutritional Status; Dietary Supplements; C-Reactive Protein; Complementary Therapies; Inflammation; Postoperative Complications; Cytokines
PubMed: 38777451
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.04.002