-
PloS One 2024This review aimed to chart the landscape of literature concerning the precise applications of traditional medicine in managing specific oral diseases and, in doing so,...
BACKGROUND
This review aimed to chart the landscape of literature concerning the precise applications of traditional medicine in managing specific oral diseases and, in doing so, to pinpoint knowledge gaps surrounding the use of traditional medicine for oral disease management in the African context.
METHODS
A systematic search of the literature was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL. The search was conducted from the inception of the database till September 2023. A search of related citations and references was also carried out. Only English language publications were included. A summary of studies that met the inclusion criteria was conducted.
RESULTS
Of the 584 records identified, 11 were duplicates and 12 studies, published between 2006 and 2021, met the inclusion criteria. The studies were published from eight countries located in the five sub-regions on the continent. All the studies were either experimental designs or ethnobotanical surveys and they all utilized plant-based remedies. The five experimental studies aimed to assess the impact of whole plants or plant extracts on the three microorganisms responsible for dental caries and seven responsible for periodontal diseases. The number of plant species identified by the seven ethnobotanical surveys ranged from 29 to 62 while the number of plan families ranged from 15 to 29. The remedies were either topical applied, use as mouth rinses, gargled, or chewed. The systemic routes of administration identified were inhalation and drinking. The remedies were used for the treatment of hard such as dental caries and tooth sensitivity, to soft tissue lesions such as mouth ulcers, gingival bleeding, and mouth thrush. Other oral disorders managed include halitosis, jaw fracture, and oral cancer.
CONCLUSIONS
Given the increasing prevalence of oral diseases within the region, the shortage of oral healthcare professionals and limited access to financial resources, it becomes imperative to support the generation of empirical evidence to enhance the provision of traditional medicine for oral healthcare in Africa.
Topics: Humans; Africa; Dental Caries; Ethnobotany; Medicine, African Traditional; Medicine, Traditional; Mouth Diseases; Oral Health; Periodontal Diseases; Phytotherapy
PubMed: 38805486
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297570 -
The British Journal of Oral &... May 2024This review examines the prevailing modalities for fractures of the anterior mandible, which represent a significant proportion of the maxillofacial injuries commonly...
This review examines the prevailing modalities for fractures of the anterior mandible, which represent a significant proportion of the maxillofacial injuries commonly treated by oral and maxillofacial surgeons. The article traces the historical shift from conservative techniques to the dominant management strategies of open reduction and fixation. Encompassing a range of studies, the review, in accordance with PRISMA 2020 recommendations, meticulously examines various fixation methods, assessing their efficacy in achieving stability of fracture, early healing, and mobilisation. The comparison of these methods highlights their unique advantages and limitations, and demonstrates the need for more nuanced and precise approaches. The review emphasises evidence-based methodology in the management of anterior mandibular fractures (AMF), highlighting the benefits offered by innovative techniques such as 3D miniplates. It also acknowledges the advantages provided by older fixation devices such as lag screws. The importance of postoperative outcomes and the need for tailored treatment strategies are recognised, considering the complex nature of these fractures.
Topics: Humans; Bone Plates; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Mandibular Fractures
PubMed: 38604919
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2024.02.006 -
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral... Apr 2024Mandible fractures are the second most common fractures of the facial skeleton because of the prominent position of the lower jaw. The purpose of this study was to...
PURPOSE
Mandible fractures are the second most common fractures of the facial skeleton because of the prominent position of the lower jaw. The purpose of this study was to calculate the prevalence of mandibular fractures based on their causes and locations.
MATERIALS AND METHOD
A systematic search of 3 electronic databases from January 2010 and January 2020 was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. There were 359 articles identified for screening against selection criteria. The search identified 39 articles to be included in our analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 20,135 patients with 31,468 mandible fractures in this review. There was a 76% male predominance. The third decade was the most common age group (21-30). Motor vehicle accidents (39.89%) were the leading cause of mandible fractures, followed by falls (27.72%) and violence (25.35%). Condylar fractures are the most common cause of MVA and fall (33.11%, 50% respectively). Mandible body fractures are the second most common type of MVA injury (17.06%). When it came to violence, the angle of the mandible was the most common site (31.73%).
CONCLUSIONS
The prevalence of mandible fractures was higher in male patients in the current study, particularly in the second and third decades of life. Road traffic accidents were the most common cause, and the condylar process of the mandible was the most frequently affected region. Demographic data such as age, gender, and mechanism of injury can help surgeons predict and identify specific areas of mandibular fracture.
PubMed: 38601229
DOI: 10.1007/s12663-022-01750-1 -
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive &... May 2024Currently, there are several methods of achieving maxillomandibular fixation (MMF), each with its unique operative considerations and subsequent patient outcomes and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Currently, there are several methods of achieving maxillomandibular fixation (MMF), each with its unique operative considerations and subsequent patient outcomes and complications. In this study, we reviewed the literature to evaluate and compare all MMF methods.
METHODS
A systematic review of all MMF types was conducted and post-operative outcome data were analyzed and compared among the different types. Conventional Erich arch bars were compared to hybrid arch bars, MMF screws, and eyelet interdental wiring. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to determine the mean differences, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with a statistical significance of P < 0.05.
RESULTS
Among the 4234 articles identified, 24 were included, and 17 were meta-analyzed. Time to achieve MMF (-43.38 min; 95% CI, -58.20 to -28.56; P < 0.001), total operative time (-30.33 min; 95% CI, -61.05 to 0.39; P = 0.05), incidence of wire puncture injuries and glove perforations (0.11; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.30; P < 0.001), and incidence of poor oral hygiene (0.08; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.28; P < 0.001) were lower for alternative MMF interventions compared to those of the conventional Erich arch bars.
CONCLUSIONS
Alternative MMF methods required shorter operative time to achieve MMF and demonstrated other increased efficiencies of practice such as shorter total operative time and decreased glove perforations, when compared to conventional Erich arch bars. If a patient is a candidate for MMF, the presented alternative MMF techniques should be considered depending on the clinical context and availability of institutional resources.
Topics: Humans; Postoperative Complications; Jaw Fixation Techniques; Mandibular Fractures; Treatment Outcome; Operative Time
PubMed: 38520780
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.02.075 -
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial... Apr 2024This study investigates whether the intraoral approach to mandibular open reduction and internal fixation, through exposure to the oral cavity's microbiome, results in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
This study investigates whether the intraoral approach to mandibular open reduction and internal fixation, through exposure to the oral cavity's microbiome, results in higher infection rates compared to the extraoral approach, thus addressing a critical public health concern, potentially offering an opportunity to reduce health-care costs, and aiming to guide effective clinical practice.
METHODS
In this systematic review with meta-analyses, a review of the literature was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using Embase and PubMed for articles published between 1989 and 2023. Inclusion criteria targeted studies on open reduction and internal fixation mandibular fractures comparing intraoral and extraoral approaches and reporting infection rates. Exclusion criteria eliminated non-English articles, case reports, and studies with insufficient approach-specific data. The primary outcome was the postoperative infection rate, with surgical approach as the predictor. Covariates such as age, sex, diabetes, and smoking status were included when reported. Data were analyzed using R software, employing random-effects models due to anticipated heterogeneity (I statistics).
RESULTS
From 61 studies, 11 provided direct comparisons involving 1,317 patients-937 intraoral and 380 extraoral. Infection rates were 5.9% for intraoral and 10% for extraoral approaches. Pooled relative risk was 0.94 [95% confidence interval, 0.63, 1.39], suggesting no significant risk difference. Prevalence of infections was estimated at 9% for intraoral and 6.1% for extraoral procedures, with significant heterogeneity (I = 84% for intraoral and 56% for extraoral).
CONCLUSION
Our meta-analysis found no significant difference in infection rates between the two approaches. There is opportunity to expand on reporting complication rates comparing the various approaches to mandibular fixation. Until these data are presented, surgeon preference may dictate the operative approach to expose the mandible for reduction and fixation.
Topics: Humans; Mandibular Fractures; Mandible; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Open Fracture Reduction; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 38336352
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2024.01.011 -
The British Journal of Oral &... Feb 2024This study aims to review surgical treatment in paediatric condylar fractures and describe different types of techniques performed, along with the results obtained from... (Review)
Review
This study aims to review surgical treatment in paediatric condylar fractures and describe different types of techniques performed, along with the results obtained from them. A retrospective review was conducted from records of paediatric patients (from one to 17 years old) who sustained fractures of the mandibular condyle and underwent surgical treatment from 2003 to 2023. The number of patients, age, location, and type of fracture, clinical and imaging examinations, treatment methods, intraoperative/postoperative complications, removal of osteosynthesis material, follow up and outcomes were recorded and analysed. A total of 68 patients with 79 fractures were identified. The most common fracture pattern was condylar neck fracture (61.1%). Of the 68 patients who underwent surgical treatment, one had a complication of minimal temporal paraesthesia and another patient had near-complete resorption of the condyle. A total of 55 patients (81%) reported normal dental occlusion, mouth opening (>35 mm), lateral excursions (7-8 mm), TMJ function, no pain, no deviation of the midline or the jaw, and no ankylosis. Thirteen patients (19%) developed an unsatisfactory result, nine patients (13%) had a jaw deviation on mouth opening, four patients (6%) had mandibular retrusion, and seven patients (10%) had signs of TMJ dysfunction. A total of 59 patients (87%) reported bone completely healed with no signs of bone abnormality; seven patients (10%) had shortening of the condylar neck and/or ramus. Surgical treatment can lead to good or excellent results for severely dislocated and displaced condylar fractures in children and can reduce the unsatisfactory results resulting from closed treatment.
Topics: Humans; Child; Infant; Child, Preschool; Adolescent; Mandibular Condyle; Tooth Ankylosis; Fractures, Bone; Intraoperative Complications; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 38155068
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2023.10.015 -
Clinical Oral Investigations Dec 2023The need for prevention and management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) has increased with the growing number of patients using antiresorptive... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
The need for prevention and management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) has increased with the growing number of patients using antiresorptive agents. The scope of this systematic review (SR) was to determine whether the withdrawal of antiresorptive agents is necessary for tooth extractions in patients receiving each of the antiresorptive medications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The searches were performed using the MEDLINE databases. We selected SRs, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective non-randomized clinical (observational) studies, and case reports/case series in this order of preference.
RESULTS
We included one SR, one RCT, five observational studies, and three case reports. Meta-analyses were not conducted because the RCT had an extremely small sample size and the observational studies had different definitions of intervention and comparison that could not be integrated across studies. In this SR, no studies showed a benefit (i.e., a reduction in the incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw) of short-term withdrawal of antiresorptive agents for tooth extraction. Additionally, no studies examined the harm (i.e., an increase in femoral and vertebral fractures and skeletal-related events during bone metastasis) of withdrawal for tooth extraction.
CONCLUSIONS
We were unable to determine whether withdrawal before and after tooth extraction is necessary with a high certainty of evidence. Future systematic reviews including RCTs with larger samples are expected to provide such evidence.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
This systematic review provides evidence-based information for multidisciplinary collaborations related to patients receiving antiresorptive agents.
Topics: Humans; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Dental Care; Tooth Extraction; Femur; Osteonecrosis
PubMed: 38150155
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05462-9 -
F1000Research 2023Our study aims to estimate the prevalence of Frey syndrome following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for mandibular fractures. Two reviewers independently... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Our study aims to estimate the prevalence of Frey syndrome following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for mandibular fractures. Two reviewers independently conducted a systematic literature search in the Medline and Scopus databases. The pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was estimated, and quality assessment, outlier analysis, and influential analysis were performed. In total, fifteen eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis. One study was identified as critically influential. The overall prevalence of Frey syndrome following extraoral surgical treatment for mandibular fractures was estimated as 0.01% (95%CI 0%-0.7%) with moderate heterogeneity observed between studies. In the meta-regression analysis with continuous variables, no statistically significant association was observed. Despite the relatively low prevalence, the impact of Frey syndrome on affected individuals should not be underestimated. Additional research will provide a more comprehensive understanding of the underlying factors contributing to Frey syndrome, leading to improved preventive measures and treatment strategies. A better grasp of the prevalence and associated risk factors will aid in the development of guidelines to minimize the occurrence of this syndrome.
Topics: Humans; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Mandibular Fractures; Sweating, Gustatory; Prevalence; Risk Factors
PubMed: 38106653
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.140994.2 -
The British Journal of Oral &... Dec 2023The choices for managing a condylar head fracture (CHF) of the mandible are either open surgical or closed functional treatments (CFT) and the decision depends on... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The choices for managing a condylar head fracture (CHF) of the mandible are either open surgical or closed functional treatments (CFT) and the decision depends on various factors. The purpose of this systematic review was to ascertain from the available literature whether the open method or CFT yields better outcomes in managing CHF. We have systematically reviewed published articles according to the PRISMA statement. The search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, and the Cochrane Library database for comparative studies about both open and closed treatments from inception until April 2023. The outcomes of interest were mouth opening (MO), protrusion, laterotrusion, postoperative pain, and malocclusion. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The review comprised of 326 cases, among which 177 were managed by open methods and 149 were treated by CFT. The incidence of postoperative malocclusion and pain were significantly less in the open group. MO was better in the open treatment group although this was not statistically significant. Protrusion and laterotrusion occurred slightly more in CFT, although these were also statistically not significant. Overall, meta-analysis favoured open methods of managing CHF. Although enough evidence exists for the use of open methods for selected condylar head fractures, CFT still demonstrated favourable outcomes in undisplaced fractures. The selection of a particular treatment method should be individualised on the basis of each particular case considering the risk/benefits. Further high quality randomised trials are needed to establish a therapeutic guideline.
Topics: Humans; Mandibular Condyle; Mandibular Fractures; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Treatment Outcome; Malocclusion
PubMed: 37996317
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2023.10.010 -
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral... Nov 2023Surgical innovation led to an endoscopic-assisted intraoral approach for managing condyle fractures. The purpose of this systematic review is to purview the role of the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Surgical innovation led to an endoscopic-assisted intraoral approach for managing condyle fractures. The purpose of this systematic review is to purview the role of the endoscope and determine the range of information, summarizing the evidence for the benefit of surgeons on an endoscopic-assisted intraoral approach.
STUDY DESIGN
A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases for studies mentioning the endoscopic intraoral approach for managing mandibular condylar fractures. Outcomes include the role of the endoscope, challenges, adjunct armamentarium, duration, and complications associated with the transoral and transbuccal approach for screw fixation. The meta-analysis was conducted with prevalence estimates and standardized means using STATA.
RESULTS
Thirty-nine studies were included. A 30° angulated, 4-mm-thick endoscope was the most commonly used endoscope. Two mini plates were most commonly used for fixation. Facial nerve weakness was higher in the transbuccal approach (1.24%) than in the transoral approach (0.8%). Pooled analysis (6 studies) showed that the duration of the surgical procedure was less in the transoral approach compared with the transbuccal approach for screw fixation. The bailout was 1.49%.
CONCLUSIONS
The endoscopic-assisted intraoral approach is reliable for condylar fracture management. The transoral and transbuccal approaches can be used for screw fixation with comparable outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Mandibular Condyle; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Endoscopy; Mandibular Fractures; Bone Screws; Treatment Outcome; Bone Plates
PubMed: 37635009
DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2023.04.013