-
Cureus Sep 2023The prevalence of cannabis use disorders has become a noteworthy global public health issue. Understanding the neurobiological factors associated with cannabis use... (Review)
Review
The prevalence of cannabis use disorders has become a noteworthy global public health issue. Understanding the neurobiological factors associated with cannabis use disorder (CUD) is crucial for creating effective interventions. One such factor, the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), has been linked to the onset and persistence of addictive behaviors. This systematic review aims to summarize the existing literature on BDNF levels in individuals with CUD to provide a comprehensive overview of the current evidence. A systematic search was conducted using electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus) for relevant studies. The search approach yielded a total of 785 articles, with 559 located in the PubMed database and 226 in Scopus. Studies reporting BDNF levels in individuals with CUD compared to healthy controls were included in this study. Ultimately, eight articles were included in this systematic review. The primary emphasis of these studies was on individuals who were cannabis users or had a dependency on cannabis. There is considerable variation in the estimated effect size among included studies due to heterogeneity; hence, a random effect model was used for meta-analysis. The findings of our study suggest that the effect size of BDNF levels was 0.25 with 95% CI (-0.55; 1.05) in cannabis users, which was not statistically significant (p-value=0.54). Therefore, it is important to interpret the results with caution, and additional research is warranted to investigate the potential factors contributing to this heterogeneity.
PubMed: 37900486
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45960 -
International Journal of Environmental... Jul 2023Regular cannabis use during adolescence can lead to cognitive, psychological, and social consequences, causing significant distress. Although psychological interventions... (Review)
Review
Regular cannabis use during adolescence can lead to cognitive, psychological, and social consequences, causing significant distress. Although psychological interventions are the mainstay type of treatment for cannabis use disorder, the results remain mixed among youths. The objective of this review is twofold: to identify the existing psychological interventions for cannabis use among youths, and to assess the evidence regarding the effectiveness of those interventions. Randomized controlled trials focused exclusively on cannabis use among adolescents and young adults were included. Three databases-Embase, PsycInfo, and PubMed-were searched to identify relevant peer-reviewed manuscripts published before February 2022 in English and French. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. Twenty-five randomized controlled trials were included. Fourteen studies reported a significant outcome related to cannabis use. These were mainly non-intensive, online interventions that aimed to improve the patients' relationships and emotion regulation. This review highlights the need to conduct additional randomized control trials that target cannabis use disorder specifically among adolescents. These randomized control trials should also aim to reduce the risk of bias related to psychiatric comorbidities as well as detection and attrition problems.
Topics: Humans; Adolescent; Young Adult; Cannabis; Psychosocial Intervention; Marijuana Abuse; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37510578
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20146346 -
Academic Emergency Medicine : Official... May 2024Adults with cannabis hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) are increasingly presenting to the emergency department (ED), and this systematic review will evaluate the direct... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Adults with cannabis hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) are increasingly presenting to the emergency department (ED), and this systematic review will evaluate the direct evidence on the effectiveness of capsaicin and dopamine antagonists in its clinical management.
METHODS
A bibliographic search was conducted to address the following population-intervention-control-outcome (PICO) question: (P) adults >18 years old with a diagnosis of acute CHS presenting to the ED; (I) dopamine antagonists (e.g., haloperidol, droperidol) and topical capsaicin; (C) usual care or no active comparator; and (O) symptoms improvement/resolution in ED, ED length of stay, admission rate, ED recidivism, need for rescue medication, and adverse events. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA reporting recommendations.
RESULTS
From 53 potentially relevant articles, seven articles were included: five observational studies and two randomized controlled trials, including a total of 492 patients. Five of these studies evaluated the efficacy of capsaicin cream (n = 386), and two examined dopamine antagonists (haloperidol, droperidol; n = 106). There was mixed evidence for the efficacy of capsaicin for reducing nausea and emesis. Both studies evaluating dopamine antagonists detected clinical benefit to usual care or no active comparator.
CONCLUSIONS
There is limited direct evidence on the efficacy of dopamine antagonists or capsaicin for treating CHS in the ED. Current evidence is mixed for capsaicin and potentially beneficial for dopamine antagonists. Because of the small number of studies, small number of participants, lack of standardization of treatment administration, and risk of bias of the included studies, methodologically rigorous trials on both types of intervention are needed to directly inform ED management of CHS.
Topics: Humans; Vomiting; Emergency Service, Hospital; Capsaicin; Dopamine Antagonists; Administration, Topical; Adult; Antiemetics; Syndrome; Female; Male; Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome
PubMed: 37391387
DOI: 10.1111/acem.14770 -
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Mar 2024Cannabis legalization policies are rapidly changing in the United States. While there are concerns that recreational legalization will negatively affect young people,... (Review)
Review
Cannabis legalization policies are rapidly changing in the United States. While there are concerns that recreational legalization will negatively affect young people, previous reviews have not provided clear indication of such effects. The purpose of this rapid systematic review was to examine whether recreational legalization was associated with increases in prevalence of cannabis use and use disorder among adolescents and young adults. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, PsycInfo, Web of Science, Dissertations & Theses Global, the Trip Database, and OpenGrey were searched from date of inception through Marcy 17, 2022 to retrieve all relevant records. English language and human subject filters were applied. Two reviewers screened abstracts and titles, assessed full text articles, and coded the final included articles. Studies including primarily 10- to 19-year-olds were classified as adolescent, and those between 18 and 26 years as young adult. Our search identified 33 research reports (22 with adolescent samples; 14 young adult). For adolescents, ten studies reported no change in use prevalence associated with legalization, six reported a decrease, and seven reported an increase. Among young adults, most studies (8) showed an increase in at least one prevalence measure, four showed no change, and one showed a decrease. Only two adolescent and one young adult study examined cannabis use disorder, both adolescent studies showed an increase, and the young adult showed no change. The majority of studies had risk of bias. Recreational legalization may be associated with increases in prevalence of cannabis use in young adults while results for adolescents are mixed. Policymakers and practitioners should consider appropriate prevention and treatment options for young people.Trial Registration: PROSPERO #CRD42021276984.
Topics: Young Adult; Humans; United States; Adolescent; Cannabis; Legislation, Drug; Substance-Related Disorders; Marijuana Abuse
PubMed: 35508822
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-022-01994-9