-
Journal of Robotic Surgery Jun 2024A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to investigate the efficacy of the AirSeal Valveless Trocar Needle Insufflation System in robot-assisted partial... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study Review
A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to investigate the efficacy of the AirSeal Valveless Trocar Needle Insufflation System in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). The study compared the differences in perioperative outcomes between the AirSeal insufflation group (AIS) and the conventional insufflation group (CIS). A systematic search of databases such as PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of science was performed to identify studies reporting perioperative outcomes between the AirSeal insufflation group (AIS) and the conventional insufflation group (CIS) in RAPN. The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024524335). The primary outcome was to compare the incidence of subcutaneous emphysema (SCE) and postoperative pain scores between the two approaches. The review included four studies with 379 patients, 194 in the AIS group and 185 in the CIS group. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar in all outcomes. SCE was significantly lower in the AIS group than in the CIS group [(OR) 0.30 (0.16, 0.54), p < 0.001]. Postoperative 12-h pain scores were also significantly lower in the AIS group compared to the CIS group [(WMD) - 0.93 (- 1.67, - 1.09), p = 0.014]. Both groups showed a significant reduction in length of hospitalization [(WMD) - 0.12 (- 0.84, 0.60), p = 0.746], thermal ischemia time [(WMD) 4.72 (- 5.71, 15.15), p = 0.375], amount of lost hemoglobin [(WMD) - 0.19 (- 0.53, 0.15), p = 0.284], pneumothorax [(OR) 0.13 (0.02,1.10), p = 0.062], mediastinal emphysema [(OR) 0.55 (0.20, 1.46), p = 0.230], and 4-h pain score [(WMD) - 0.25 (- 1.16, 0.65), p = 0.584]; no significant differences were observed. The incidence of subcutaneous emphysema SCE and 12-h pain scores were significantly lower in the AIS group compared to the CIS group. The AirSeal system demonstrated similar efficacy and a higher safety profile than the conventional insufflation system in robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy; however, due to the lack of a randomized study on the topic, further data are needed.
Topics: Robotic Surgical Procedures; Humans; Nephrectomy; Insufflation; Pain, Postoperative; Subcutaneous Emphysema; Treatment Outcome; Postoperative Complications; Kidney Neoplasms
PubMed: 38922386
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02023-4 -
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Sep 2023This case report presents an iatrogenic induced mediastinal emphysema after restorative treatment of the lower left second molar, aimed to highlight the potential...
This case report presents an iatrogenic induced mediastinal emphysema after restorative treatment of the lower left second molar, aimed to highlight the potential life-threatening consequences, and providing diagnostics and treatment concepts of complicated dental induced emphysema based on literature review. A 74-year-old female patient was admitted to the emergency department due to a fall on her shoulder. Additional finding was a significant swelling of the face and neck. In the computer tomography of the head, neck, and thorax, a humerus fracture and pronounced soft tissue emphysema from the infraorbital region to the mediastinum was detected. The patient reported that she had been treated by her dentist 4 days earlier. The treatment had to be discontinued after beginning of a pronounced swelling. Other reasons for the emphysema could be excluded out on an interdisciplinary teamwork. The patient was monitored as an inpatient for 5 days and received intravenous antibiotic therapy. This case report shows the rare complication of pronounced mediastinal emphysema after root canal treatment. Emphysema should always be a differential diagnosis of soft tissue swelling and, in case of doubt, a general medical presentation should be made.
Topics: Humans; Female; Aged; Mediastinal Emphysema; Face; Molar; Tooth Extraction; Subcutaneous Emphysema
PubMed: 35680758
DOI: 10.1007/s10006-022-01088-5