-
Journal of Infection and Public Health May 2024Colistin is a viable option for multidrug resistant gram-negative bacteria emerged from inappropriate antibiotic use. Nonetheless, suboptimal colistin concentrations and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Clinical outcomes of colistin methanesulfonate sodium in correlation with pharmacokinetic parameters in critically ill patients with multi-drug resistant bacteria-mediated infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Colistin is a viable option for multidrug resistant gram-negative bacteria emerged from inappropriate antibiotic use. Nonetheless, suboptimal colistin concentrations and nephrotoxicity risks hinder its clinical use. Thus, the aim of this study is to investigate clinical outcomes in correlation with pharmacokinetic differences and infection types in critically ill patients on intravenous colistin methanesulfornate sodium (CMS).
METHODS
A systematic literature search of Embase, Google Scholars, and PubMed was performed to identify clinical trials evaluating pharmacokinetic parameters along with clinical outcomes of CMS treatment from inception to July 2023. The pooled analyses of clinical impact of CMS on nephrotoxicity, mortality, clinical cure, and colistin concentration at steady state (C) were performed. This study was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD 42023456120).
RESULTS
Total of 695 critically ill patients from 17 studies were included. The mortality was substantially lower in clinically cured patients (OR 0.05; 95% CI 0.02 - 0.14), whereas the mortality rate was statistically insignificant between nephrotoxic and non-nephrotoxic patients. Inter-patient variability of pharmacokinetic parameters of CMS and colistin was observed in critically ill patients. The standard mean differences of C were statistically insignificant between clinically cure and clinically failure groups (standard mean difference (SMD) -0.25; 95% CI -0.69 - 0.19) and between nephrotoxic and non-nephrotoxic groups (SMD 0.67; 95% CI -0.27-1.61). The clinical cure rate is substantially lower in pneumonia patients (OR 0.09; 95% CI 0.01 - 0.56), and pharmacokinetic parameters pertaining to microbiological cure were different among strains.
CONCLUSION
The mortality rate was substantially lower in clinically cured patients with CMS. However, no significant differences in C of colistin were examined to determine the impact of pharmacokinetic differences on clinical outcomes including mortality rate and nephrotoxicity risk. Nevertheless, the clinical cure rate is substantially lower in patients with respiratory infection than patients with urinary tract infection.
Topics: Humans; Colistin; Critical Illness; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; Bacteria; Mesylates; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections
PubMed: 38554590
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2024.03.021 -
Scientific Reports Jan 2024We aimed to summarize the cancer risk among patients with indication of group I pharmaceuticals as stated in monographs presented by the International Agency for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
We aimed to summarize the cancer risk among patients with indication of group I pharmaceuticals as stated in monographs presented by the International Agency for Research on Cancer working groups. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed database. Pharmaceuticals with few studies on cancer risk were identified in systematic reviews; those with two or more studies were subjected to meta-analysis. For the meta-analysis, a random-effects model was used to calculate the summary relative risks (SRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Heterogeneity across studies was presented using the Higgins I square value from Cochran's Q test. Among the 12 group I pharmaceuticals selected, three involved a single study [etoposide, thiotepa, and mustargen + oncovin + procarbazine + prednisone (MOPP)], seven had two or more studies [busulfan, cyclosporine, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, methoxsalen + ultraviolet (UV) radiation therapy, melphalan, and chlorambucil], and two did not have any studies [etoposide + bleomycin + cisplatin and treosulfan]. Cyclosporine and azathioprine reported increased skin cancer risk (SRR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.07-1.62; SRR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.25-1.93) compared to non-use. Cyclophosphamide increased bladder and hematologic cancer risk (SRR = 2.87, 95% CI 1.32-6.23; SRR = 2.43, 95% CI 1.65-3.58). Busulfan increased hematologic cancer risk (SRR = 6.71, 95% CI 2.49-18.08); melphalan was associated with hematologic cancer (SRR = 4.43, 95% CI 1.30-15.15). In the systematic review, methoxsalen + UV and MOPP were associated with an increased risk of skin and lung cancer, respectively. Our results can enhance persistent surveillance of group I pharmaceutical use, establish novel clinical strategies for patients with indications, and provide evidence for re-categorizing current group I pharmaceuticals into other groups.
Topics: Humans; Etoposide; Methoxsalen; Azathioprine; Melphalan; Busulfan; Neoplasms; Hematologic Neoplasms; Cyclophosphamide; Cyclosporins; Pharmaceutical Preparations
PubMed: 38172159
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-50602-6 -
Journal of Pediatric Hematology/oncology Oct 2023It is unclear whether there is a difference in outcomes with treosulfan or busulfan-based conditioning in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
It is unclear whether there is a difference in outcomes with treosulfan or busulfan-based conditioning in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We reviewed the evidence on this topic through a systematic review and meta-analysis, the comparison between treosulfan and busulfan-based conditioning in pediatric patients undergoing HSCT for instance. Six studies were included. Meta-analysis showed that there was no difference in the incidence of acute graft versus host disease (odds ratio [OR]: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.57, 1.61), grade II to IV acute graft versus host disease (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.83, 1.72), chronic GVHD (OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.70, 2.00), and veno-occlusive disease (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.22, 3.85) between treosulfan and busulfan groups. Pooled analysis indicated marginally better survival with treosulfan-based conditioning (OR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.00, 2.44), however, these results were unstable on sensitivity analysis. A meta-analysis found no difference in transplant-related mortality (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.34, 1.42) between the two groups. Retrospective data from a heterogenous population indicates that there is no difference in the rate of GVHD after treosulfan versus busulfan-based conditioning for pediatric HSCT. A marginal improvement in survival was noted with treosulfan but the results remained unstable. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to provide better evidence.
Topics: Humans; Child; Busulfan; Retrospective Studies; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Graft vs Host Disease; Transplantation Conditioning
PubMed: 37526377
DOI: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000002735