-
Cancer Cell International Aug 2023Unlike improved treatment response in multiple myeloma (MM), the mortality rate in MM is still high. The study's aim is to investigate the potential role of circRNAs as... (Review)
Review
Unlike improved treatment response in multiple myeloma (MM), the mortality rate in MM is still high. The study's aim is to investigate the potential role of circRNAs as a new biomarker for diagnosis, prognosis, and clinicopathological features of MM. We identified studies through Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed and ProQuest databases, and Google Scholar to August 2022. The SEN, SPE, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were combined to investigate the diagnostic performance of circRNAs in MM. Also, HR and RR were used for prognostic and clinicopathological indicators, respectively. 12 studies for prognosis, 9 studies about diagnosis, and 13 studies regarding clinicopathological features. The pooled SEN, SPE, DOR, and AUC were 0.82, 0.76, 14.70, and 0.86, respectively for the diagnostic performance of circRNAs. For the prognostic performance, oncogene circRNAs showed a poor prognosis for the patients (HR = 3.71) and tumor suppressor circRNAs indicated a good prognosis (HR = 0.31). Finally, we discovered that dysregulation of circRNAs is associated with poor clinical outcomes in beta-2-microglobulin (RR = 1.56), Durie-Salmon stage (RR = 1.36), and ISS stage (RR = 1.79). Furthermore, the presence of del(17p) and t(4;14) is associated with circRNA dysregulation (RR = 1.44 and 1.44, respectively). Our meta-analysis demonstrates that the expression analysis of circRNAs is valuable for MM's diagnosis and prognosis determination. Also, dysregulation of circRNAs is associated with poor clinicopathological features and can be used as the applicable biomarkers for evaluating treatment effectiveness.
PubMed: 37633891
DOI: 10.1186/s12935-023-03028-z -
EJHaem Aug 2023Long-term follow-up of multiple myeloma (MM) clinical trials are needed to assess long-term outcomes. We aimed to investigate the length of follow-up of all phase III MM...
Long-term follow-up of multiple myeloma (MM) clinical trials are needed to assess long-term outcomes. We aimed to investigate the length of follow-up of all phase III MM clinical trials. Median follow-up duration of clinical trials of newly diagnosed MM was longer when compared to relapsed/refractory MM clinical trials (42.7 vs. 20.5 months, respectively). The follow-up duration of phase III clinical trials in MM is relatively short when compared to the improved outcomes in the current era. Efforts should be made to facilitate long-term clinical trials follow-up and/or publication of results of updated results.
PubMed: 37601879
DOI: 10.1002/jha2.680 -
Journal of Medical Internet Research Aug 2023The internet is a primary source of health information for patients, supplementing physician care. Google Trends (GT), a popular tool, allows the exploration of public... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The internet is a primary source of health information for patients, supplementing physician care. Google Trends (GT), a popular tool, allows the exploration of public interest in health-related phenomena. Despite the growing volume of GT studies, none have focused explicitly on oncology, creating a need for a systematic review to bridge this gap.
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to systematically characterize studies related to oncology using GT to describe its utilities and biases.
METHODS
We included all studies that used GT to analyze Google searches related to malignancies. We excluded studies written in languages other than English. The search was performed using the PubMed engine on August 1, 2022. We used the following search input: "Google trends" AND ("oncology" OR "cancer" or "malignancy" OR "tumor" OR "lymphoma" OR "multiple myeloma" OR "leukemia"). We analyzed sources of bias that included using search terms instead of topics, lack of confrontation of GT statistics with real-world data, and absence of sensitivity analysis. We performed descriptive statistics.
RESULTS
A total of 85 articles were included. The first study using GT for oncology research was published in 2013, and since then, the number of publications has increased annually. The studies were categorized as follows: 22% (19/85) were related to prophylaxis, 20% (17/85) pertained to awareness events, 11% (9/85) were celebrity-related, 13% (11/85) were related to COVID-19, and 47% (40/85) fell into other categories. The most frequently analyzed cancers were breast (n=28), prostate (n=26), lung (n=18), and colorectal cancers (n=18). We discovered that of the 85 studies, 17 (20%) acknowledged using GT topics instead of search terms, 79 (93%) disclosed all search input details necessary for replicating their results, and 34 (40%) compared GT statistics with real-world data. The most prevalent methods for analyzing the GT data were correlation analysis (55/85, 65%) and peak analysis (43/85, 51%). The authors of only 11% (9/85) of the studies performed a sensitivity analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
The number of studies related to oncology using GT data has increased annually. The studies included in this systematic review demonstrate a variety of concerning topics, search strategies, and statistical methodologies. The most frequently analyzed cancers were breast, prostate, lung, colorectal, skin, and cervical cancers, potentially reflecting their prevalence in the population or public interest. Although most researchers provided reproducible search inputs, only one-fifth used GT topics instead of search terms, and many studies lacked a sensitivity analysis. Scientists using GT for medical research should ensure the quality of studies by providing a transparent search strategy to reproduce results, preferring to use topics over search terms, and performing robust statistical calculations coupled with sensitivity analysis.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Bias; Biomedical Research; COVID-19; Internet; Search Engine; Neoplasms
PubMed: 37540544
DOI: 10.2196/47582 -
British Journal of Haematology Nov 2023Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are at an elevated risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which is further increased for those undergoing anti-myeloma therapy....
Direct oral anticoagulants versus aspirin for primary thromboprophylaxis in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing outpatient therapy: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis.
Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are at an elevated risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which is further increased for those undergoing anti-myeloma therapy. Current guidelines suggest low-dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as an alternative to aspirin for primary thromboprophylaxis in this population, but data comparing these two therapies are limited. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare DOACs with aspirin for primary thromboprophylaxis in individuals undergoing outpatient anti-myeloma therapy. Studies were selected when comparing DOACs versus aspirin for thrombotic and haemorrhagic outcomes. We included 10 randomised controlled trials and observational studies comprising 1026 patients with MM who received primary thromboprophylaxis with DOACs (n = 337) or aspirin (n = 689). DOAC thromboprophylaxis was associated with a significantly lower incidence of VTE compared with aspirin (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.16-0.68; p < 0.001). Major, clinically relevant non-major and minor bleeding event rates did not differ significantly between groups. Overall, our meta-analysis suggests that DOACs may be a preferable option to aspirin for the prevention of MM-related thrombosis. However, these results should be interpreted in the context of heterogeneous baseline population characteristics and potential bias from including observational studies. Further research is needed to evaluate the optimal thromboprophylaxis strategy, particularly in high-risk individuals.
PubMed: 37533165
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.19017 -
Nutrients Jul 2023Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy characterized by the exponential growth of malignant plasma cells. Individuals diagnosed with MM exhibit a deficiency... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy characterized by the exponential growth of malignant plasma cells. Individuals diagnosed with MM exhibit a deficiency in vitamin D and may suffer fatigue, a loss of muscular strength, persistent musculoskeletal aches, and pain. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency in individuals diagnosed with MM.
METHODS
We searched five electronic databases using relevant keywords. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the critical appraisal tool developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. We employed a random-effects model and presented the findings in the form of percentages accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (CI). This protocol has been officially registered in PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42021248710.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis comprised a total of eighteen studies and found that, among patients with MM, the occurrence of serum vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency was 39.4% (95% CI: 25.8 to 52.9, n = 3746) and 34.1% (95% CI: 20.9 to 47.2, n = 3559), respectively. The findings indicate that a greater proportion of newly diagnosed patients exhibited vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency, with rates of 43.0% and 41.6%, respectively, compared to those receiving treatment (rates of 41.6% and 32.3%, respectively). The findings of the sensitivity analyses were consistent, and most of the studies (72.2%) were deemed to be of high quality. The results of Egger's test indicated the absence of publication bias.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients diagnosed with MM have been found to exhibit significantly elevated levels of both vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency. Therefore, it is recommended to consider vitamin D testing as an additional parameter in the current criteria for the clinical evaluation of MM.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Prevalence; Vitamin D Deficiency; Vitamin D; Vitamins; Pain
PubMed: 37513645
DOI: 10.3390/nu15143227 -
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory... Nov 2023Monoclonal gammopathies (MG) are characterized by the proliferation of plasma cells that produce identical abnormal immunoglobulins (intact or some of their subunits)....
Recommendations for the study of monoclonal gammopathies in the clinical laboratory. A consensus of the Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine and the Spanish Society of Hematology and Hemotherapy. Part I: Update on laboratory tests for the study of monoclonal gammopathies.
Monoclonal gammopathies (MG) are characterized by the proliferation of plasma cells that produce identical abnormal immunoglobulins (intact or some of their subunits). This abnormal immunoglobulin component is called monoclonal protein (M-protein), and is considered a biomarker of proliferative activity. The identification, characterization and measurement of M-protein is essential for the management of MG. We conducted a systematic review of the different tests and measurement methods used in the clinical laboratory for the study of M-protein in serum and urine, the biochemistry and hematology tests necessary for clinical evaluation, and studies in bone marrow, peripheral blood and other tissues. This review included literature published between 2009 and 2022. The paper discusses the main methodological characteristics and limitations, as well as the purpose and clinical value of the different tests used in the diagnosis, prognosis, monitoring and assessment of treatment response in MG. Included are methods for the study of M-protein, namely electrophoresis, measurement of immunoglobulin levels, serum free light chains, immunoglobulin heavy chain/light chain pairs, and mass spectrometry, and for the bone marrow examination, morphological analysis, cytogenetics, molecular techniques, and multiparameter flow cytometry.
Topics: Humans; Laboratories, Clinical; Consensus; Paraproteinemias; Immunoglobulin Light Chains; Hematology; Multiple Myeloma
PubMed: 37477188
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0326 -
Blood Advances Oct 2023Bispecific antibodies, a novel immunotherapy with promising efficacy against multiple myeloma, form immune synapses between T-cell surface marker CD3 and malignant cell... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Bispecific antibodies, a novel immunotherapy with promising efficacy against multiple myeloma, form immune synapses between T-cell surface marker CD3 and malignant cell markers, including B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), FcRH5, and G protein-coupled receptor GPRC5D. These bispecific antibodies so effectively deplete plasma cells (and to some extent T-cells) that patients are at increased risk of developing infections. A systematic review and meta-analysis of infections in published studies of patients with myeloma treated with bispecific antibodies was conducted to better characterize the infection risks. A literature search used MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane to identify relevant studies between inception and February 10, 2023, including major conference presentations. Phase 1b-3 clinical trials and observational studies were included. Sixteen clinical trials comprising 1666 patients were included. Median follow-up was 7.6 months and 38% of the cohort had penta-drug refractory disease. Pooled prevalence of all-grade infections was 56%, whereas the prevalence of grade ≥3 infections was 24%. Patients who were treated with BCMA-targeted bispecifics had significantly higher rates of grade ≥3 infections than non-BCMA bispecifics (25% vs 20%). Similarly, patients treated with bispecifics in combination with other agents had significantly higher rate of all-grade infection than those receiving monotherapy (71% vs 52%). In observational studies (n = 293), excluded from the primary analysis to ensure no overlap with patients in clinical trials, several infections classically associated with T-cell depletion were identified. This systematic review identifies BCMA-targeted bispecifics and bispecific combination therapy as having higher infection risk, requiring vigilant infection screening and prophylaxis strategies.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Antibodies, Bispecific; B-Cell Maturation Antigen; Immunotherapy; T-Lymphocytes; CD3 Complex
PubMed: 37467036
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010539 -
Neurological Sciences : Official... Sep 2023Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a demyelinating disease of the central nervous system caused by a reactivation of the human polyomavirus 2 (HPyV-2,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a demyelinating disease of the central nervous system caused by a reactivation of the human polyomavirus 2 (HPyV-2, previously known as JCV) in immunosuppressed individuals. Few cases of PML have been described in multiple myeloma (MM) patients.
METHODS
We described a case of PML in a patient with MM with fatal worsening that occurred during SARS-CoV-2 infection. We also performed a literature review to update the 16 cases series of MM patients with PML already collected until April 2020.
RESULTS
A 79-year-old female patient with refractory IgA lambda MM in Pomalidomide- Cyclophosphamide-Dexamethasone regimen developed gradual lower limbs and left arm paresis along with a decreased consciousness 3.5 years after the MM diagnosis. Symptoms developed shortly after the recognition of hypogammaglobulinemia. After SARS-CoV-2 infection, her neurological status quickly worsened until she deceased. MRI features and JCV-positive PCR on CSF confirmed the PML diagnosis. Our literature review adds sixteen clinical cases of PML in MM published between May 2020 and March 2023 to the 16 cases already collected in the previously published review by Koutsavlis.
DISCUSSION
PML has been increasingly described in MM patients. It remains questionable if the HPyV-2 reactivation is determined by the severity of MM itself, by the effect of drugs or by a combination of both. SARS-CoV-2 infection may have a role in worsening PML in affected patients.
Topics: Humans; Female; Aged; Leukoencephalopathy, Progressive Multifocal; JC Virus; Multiple Myeloma; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 37421487
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-023-06944-0 -
European Journal of Haematology Sep 2023Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) enrolled in randomized control trials (RCTs) discontinue treatment for various reasons; however, no prior study has analyzed reasons...
OBJECTIVES
Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) enrolled in randomized control trials (RCTs) discontinue treatment for various reasons; however, no prior study has analyzed reasons for discontinuation. We performed a systematic review of MM RCTs to investigate reasons for treatment discontinuation, imbalances between trial cohorts, and reporting practices.
METHODS
A comprehensive search for RCTs in MM from 2015 to 2021 identified 45 studies meeting inclusion criteria.
RESULTS
Of 21 236 randomized patients, 10 161 (47.8%) discontinued therapy by primary endpoint ascertainment. Causes of discontinuation included progression (n = 4790; 22.6% of randomized patients); toxicity (n = 2569; 12.1%); patient/physician withdrawal (n = 1200; 5.7%) and death (n = 495; 2.3%). Of randomized patients, 20 914 (98.5%) were included in the RCT analysis. Imbalances of attrition, defined as trials with greater than 5% absolute difference in discontinuation rate for reasons other than death, progression, and toxicity between intervention and control arms, were found in 11 (24.4%) studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Although progression is the most common reason for RCT treatment discontinuation in patients with MM, over 10% discontinued due to toxicity. Furthermore, 24.4% of trials showed substantial imbalances between trial cohorts; raising concern for informative censoring and emphasizes the importance of detailed characterization of withdrawal in MM RCTs.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37382045
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.14032 -
Leukemia Research Aug 2023Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are commonly used for treating newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory (r/r) multiple myeloma (MM). However, concerns have been... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are commonly used for treating newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory (r/r) multiple myeloma (MM). However, concerns have been raised about the occurrence of second primary malignancies (SPMs) in patients receiving anti-CD38 mAbs. Assessing the safety data for rare adverse events like SPMs is challenging because individual clinical trials are typically focused on the primary endpoint. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 2005 and April 2022, including patients with newly diagnosed or r/r MM. Our aim was to compare SPM rate with the use of anti-CD38 mAb-based regimens with other anti-myeloma regimens. After a median follow-up of 35.3 months (range: 8.2-56.2), we found that exposure to anti-CD38 mAbs was associated with an increased risk of developing SPMs compared to the control group (6.8% vs. 5.2%; Peto odds ratio [OR]: 1.53 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.20-1.95]; I= 0%, p-value for heterogeneity= 0.44). This increased risk was primarily driven by non-melanoma cutaneous cancers (92 vs. 47; Peto OR: 1.77 [95% CI: 1.25-2.51]; I = 0%, p-value for heterogeneity = 0.54). However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of solid tumors (including malignant melanoma) (OR: 1.28 [95% CI: 0.85-1.95]) or hematologic SPMs (OR: 1.86; [95% CI: 0.81-4.27]). In conclusion, the use of anti-CD38 mAb-based combination regimens is associated with a higher risk of non-invasive cutaneous SPMs, but not solid tumors or hematologic SPMs. The increased occurrence of non-invasive cutaneous SPMs may be due to enhanced monitoring resulting from longer treatment duration with anti-CD38 mAbs.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Neoplasms, Second Primary; Incidence; Antineoplastic Agents; Antibodies, Monoclonal
PubMed: 37285641
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2023.107324