-
PeerJ 2024The methods previously proposed in the literature to assess patients with rotator cuff related shoulder pain, based on special orthopedic tests to precisely identify the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The methods previously proposed in the literature to assess patients with rotator cuff related shoulder pain, based on special orthopedic tests to precisely identify the structure causing the shoulder symptoms have been recently challenged. This opens the possibility of a different way of physical examination.
OBJECTIVE
To analyze the differences in shoulder range of motion, strength and thoracic kyphosis between rotator cuff related shoulder pain patients and an asymptomatic group.
METHOD
The protocol of the present research was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (PROSPERO) (registration number CRD42021258924). Database search of observational studies was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, WOS and CINHAL until July 2023, which assessed shoulder or neck neuro-musculoskeletal non-invasive physical examination compared to an asymptomatic group. Two investigators assessed eligibility and study quality. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the methodology quality.
RESULTS
Eight studies ( = 604) were selected for the quantitative analysis. Meta-analysis showed statistical differences with large effect for shoulder flexion (I2 = 91.7%, < 0.01, HG = -1.30), external rotation (I2 = 83.2%, < 0.01, HG = -1.16) and internal rotation range of motion (I2 = 0%, < 0.01, HG = -1.32). Regarding to shoulder strength; only internal rotation strength showed statistical differences with small effect (I2 = 42.8%, < 0.05, HG = -0.3).
CONCLUSIONS
There is moderate to strong evidence that patients with rotator cuff related shoulder pain present less shoulder flexion, internal and external rotation range of motion and less internal rotation strength than asymptomatic individuals.
Topics: Humans; Range of Motion, Articular; Shoulder Pain; Rotator Cuff; Muscle Strength; Rotator Cuff Injuries; Shoulder Joint; Kyphosis
PubMed: 38948223
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17604 -
Orthopedic Reviews 2024Osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal (CMC) is considered a common musculoskeletal disorder. The treatment of carpometacarpal osteoarthritis could be either by...
BACKGROUND
Osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal (CMC) is considered a common musculoskeletal disorder. The treatment of carpometacarpal osteoarthritis could be either by conservative or surgical methods. surgical treatment, there are various alternatives, including trapeziectomy and arthroplasty. This study aims to perform a systematic review of the literature to determine the functional outcomes associated with trapeziectomy and arthroplasty in CMC arthritis.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the functional outcomes associated with trapeziectomy and arthroplasty in CMC arthritis patients.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and performed on August 2022 by one independent reviewer (author) using PubMed database, EBSCO Host, EMBASE, and ScienceDirect. The literature search will be based on (PICO) criteria, as mentioned in the following: Patients with any carpometacarpal arthritis; with the intervention of using carpometacarpal arthroplasty as their method of surgery; control with trapeziectomy and primary outcome of functional outcome. Clinical outcomes using patient-reported outcome measures and complications were included. The quality of the included studies was evaluated with Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tools. Quantitative analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.4.
RESULTS
Three studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Both treatments resulted in significant improvements in functional scores. When matching patients according to preoperative function, patients receiving arthroplasty had better postoperative function (Quick DASH: trapeziectomy = 25.1, ARPE = 16.8).
CONCLUSION
This study showed that variable results of clinical outcomes improved after trapezeictomy and arthroplasty in patients with CMC arthritis. Evidence showed that arthroplasty allows for a better improvement in functional outcome.
PubMed: 38947179
DOI: 10.52965/001c.117651 -
Heart & Lung : the Journal of Critical... Jun 2024Progressive exercise intolerance is a hallmark of pulmonary hypertension (pH), severely impacting patients' independence and quality of life (QoL). Accumulating evidence... (Review)
Review
Respiratory, cardiovascular and musculoskeletal mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of pulmonary hypertension: An updated systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies.
BACKGROUND
Progressive exercise intolerance is a hallmark of pulmonary hypertension (pH), severely impacting patients' independence and quality of life (QoL). Accumulating evidence over the last decade shows that combined abnormalities in peripheral reflexes and target organs contribute to disease progression and exercise intolerance.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to review the literature of the last decade on the contribution of the cardiovascular, respiratory, and musculoskeletal systems to pathophysiology and exercise intolerance in pH.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted using specific terms in PubMed, SciELO, and the Cochrane Library databases for original pre-clinical or clinical studies published between 2013 and 2023. Studies followed randomized controlled/non-randomized controlled and pre-post designs.
RESULTS
The systematic review identified 25 articles reporting functional or structural changes in the respiratory, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal systems in pH. Moreover, altered biomarkers in these systems, lower cardiac baroreflex, and heightened peripheral chemoreflex activity seemed to contribute to functional changes associated with poor prognosis and exercise intolerance in pH. Potential therapeutic strategies acutely explored involved manipulating the baroreflex and peripheral chemoreflex, improving cardiovascular autonomic control via cardiac vagal control, and targeting specific pathways such as GPER1, GDF-15, miR-126, and the JMJD1C gene.
CONCLUSION
Information published in the last 10 years advances the notion that pH pathophysiology involves functional and structural changes in the respiratory, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal systems and their integration with peripheral reflexes. These findings suggest potential therapeutic targets, yet unexplored in clinical trials, that could assist in improving exercise tolerance and QoL in patients with pH.
PubMed: 38941771
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.06.001 -
Drugs Jun 2024Although paracetamol (acetaminophen) combined with other analgesics can reduce pain intensity in some pain conditions, its effectiveness in managing low back pain and...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Although paracetamol (acetaminophen) combined with other analgesics can reduce pain intensity in some pain conditions, its effectiveness in managing low back pain and osteoarthritis is unclear. This systematic review investigated whether paracetamol combination therapy is more effective and safer than monotherapy or placebo in low back pain and osteoarthritis.
METHODS
Online database searches were conducted for randomised trials that evaluated paracetamol combined with another analgesic compared to a placebo or the non-paracetamol ingredient in the combination (monotherapy) in low back pain and osteoarthritis. The primary outcome was a change in pain. Secondary outcomes were (serious) adverse events, changes in disability and quality of life. Follow-up was immediate (≤ 2 weeks), short (> 2 weeks but ≤ 3 months), intermediate (> 3 months but < 12 months) or long term (≥ 12 months). A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed using the original Cochrane tool, and quality of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies were included. Pain was reduced with oral paracetamol plus a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) at immediate term in low back pain (paracetamol plus ibuprofen vs ibuprofen [mean difference (MD) - 6.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) -10.4 to -2.0, moderate evidence]) and in osteoarthritis (paracetamol plus aceclofenac vs aceclofenac [MD - 4.7, 95% CI - 8.3 to - 1.2, moderate certainty evidence] and paracetamol plus etodolac vs etodolac [MD - 15.1, 95% CI - 18.5 to - 11.8; moderate certainty evidence]). Paracetamol plus oral tramadol reduced pain compared with placebo at intermediate term for low back pain (MD - 11.7, 95% CI - 19.2 to - 4.3; very low certainty evidence) and osteoarthritis (MD - 6.8, 95% CI - 12.7 to -0.9; moderate certainty evidence). Disability scores improved in half the comparisons. Quality of life was infrequently measured. All paracetamol plus NSAID combinations did not increase the risk of adverse events compared to NSAID monotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS
Low-to-moderate quality evidence supports the oral use of some paracetamol plus NSAID combinations for short-term pain relief with no increased risk of harm for low back pain and osteoarthritis compared to its non-paracetamol monotherapy comparator.
PubMed: 38937394
DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02065-w -
Postgraduate Medical Journal Jun 2024De Quervain's tenosynovitis (DQt) is a prevalent chronic inflammatory musculoskeletal disorder predominantly affecting the radial aspect of the wrist. This study...
BACKGROUND
De Quervain's tenosynovitis (DQt) is a prevalent chronic inflammatory musculoskeletal disorder predominantly affecting the radial aspect of the wrist. This study conducted a comprehensive review of the efficacy of acupuncture in treating De Quervain's tenosynovitis (DQt). Although there is evidence suggesting that acupuncture can alleviate symptoms of DQt-characterized by pain, swelling, and functional impairment-higher-level evidence is still required to further substantiate its efficacy and safety. This study conducted a comprehensive review of the efficacy of acupuncture in treating De Quervain's tenosynovitis (DQt).
METHODS
By systematically searching databases such as PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, Google Scholar, EMbase, PEDro, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), Wanfang Database, and Chongqing VIP China Science, Technology Journal Database (VIP), we retrieved randomized controlled trial (RCT) literature on acupuncture for DQt, with the search period extending to November 1, 2023. After extracting and assessing data from the included literature, we performed Meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4.1 software.
RESULTS
The results encompassed 14 RCT papers, involving 851 patients. The Meta-analysis findings indicated that, when compared to topical analgesics, acupuncture demonstrated a significant increase in treatment effectiveness (RR = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.11, 1.39, P = 0.0002) and a notable reduction in VAS pain scores (MD = -1.06; 95% CI = -1.51, -0.61, P < 0.00001). However, no statistically significant difference was observed in conney wrist joint scores. Furthermore, acupuncture was found to reduce VAS pain scores compared to the waiting list group. In comparison to corticosteroid injections (CSI), acupuncture did not show statistical significance in VAS, effectiveness rate, and conney wrist scores.
CONCLUSION
Acupuncture exhibited a promising trend in alleviating pain associated with DQt and enhancing treatment effectiveness. Nonetheless, due to limitations in the quantity and quality of the included studies, these findings warrant further validation through additional research.
PubMed: 38932434
DOI: 10.1093/postmj/qgae057 -
Life (Basel, Switzerland) Jun 2024Smartphone apps for self-management are valuable tools to help manage low back pain (LBP) patients. The purposes of this systematic review were to (a) summarize the... (Review)
Review
The Efficacy of the Smartphone App for the Self-Management of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Assessment of Their Quality through the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) in Italy.
Smartphone apps for self-management are valuable tools to help manage low back pain (LBP) patients. The purposes of this systematic review were to (a) summarize the available studies on the efficacy of smartphone apps for self-management of LBP and (b) identify free applications available in Italy that offer strategies for LBP self-management and provide a qualitative assessment using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS). According to the Prisma Checklist, six bibliographic databases were searched with the keywords 'low back pain', 'mobile application', 'smartphone', and 'telemedicine'. In total, 852 records were screened, and 16 were included in the systematic review. Of the six RCTs included, four reported a statistically significant decrease in pain in favor of the app group, and two RCTs did not. Only in a non-RCT was there an increase in the disability score. In the application research conducted on mobile stores, we identified and rated 25 applications through MARS. The overall scores ranged from 1.93 to 3.92 for the IOS app and 1.73 to 4.25 for the Play Store app. The findings suggest that few apps meet satisfying quality, content, and functionality criteria for LBP self-management.
PubMed: 38929744
DOI: 10.3390/life14060760 -
BMJ Open Jun 2024To explore if there are differences in the design and/or conduct of studies that have tested the STarTBack treatment approach for the management of low back pain (LBP),... (Review)
Review
Evaluating the STarTBack stratified treatment approach for low back pain: exploring study-level factors potentially explaining differences in results of studies - a literature review.
OBJECTIVE
To explore if there are differences in the design and/or conduct of studies that have tested the STarTBack treatment approach for the management of low back pain (LBP), potentially explaining differences in study results.
DESIGN
A literature review.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE were searched from inception to 26 July 2023.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
We included studies that included (1) participants with LBP and/or leg pain, (2) randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials and interrupted time series designs, (3) used the STarTBack Tool to stratify participants into subgroups and (4) studies provided matched treatments according to participants STarTBack score.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Two review authors independently reviewed the search results and extracted data into the data extraction form. Due to the exploratory nature of this study, results are presented descriptively.
RESULTS
11 studies conducted across 5 countries were included. There were substantial differences in the proportion of participants allocated to the different risk groups; low-risk group (range: 19%-58%), medium risk group (range: 31%-52%) and high-risk group (range: 6%-38%). There were large differences between studies in the implementation of the STarTBack approach. The original STarTBack trial (Hill 2011) had a more explanatory design while in many subsequent studies, the design was more pragmatic/real world. Only the two original studies provided clear evidence that the implementation of the STarTBack tool led to a higher proportion of participants receiving matched treatment. In the other studies, there was no evidence of a difference, or it was unclear. In two studies, a researcher made the decision about which matched treatment participants received based on the STartTback Tool, while in nine studies, this was done by a clinician. Most studies recommended the same matched treatment for each risk group as per the original study except for a small number of studies. Only three studies reported whether the clinician delivering matched treatment followed the recommended treatment as per the tool. There was substantial variability in the training clinicians received.
CONCLUSIONS
Reporting of important study-level factors (eg, differences in study design, whether clinicians were trained and how the tool was used in each study) in how the STarTBack approach was implemented was unclear. There is some suggestion that key factors may include the individual who implemented the STarTBack tool, whether the recommendations of the tool were followed, the amount of training the clinician delivering the matched treatment received, and whether clinicians actually delivered the matched treatment.
Topics: Low Back Pain; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38925707
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081704 -
BMJ Open Jun 2024To assess compliance with statutory requirements to register and report outcomes in interventional trials of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for musculoskeletal...
OBJECTIVE
To assess compliance with statutory requirements to register and report outcomes in interventional trials of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for musculoskeletal disorders and to describe the trials' clinical and design characteristics.
DESIGN
A systematic review of published trials and trials submitted to public registries.
DATA SOURCES
The databases Medline, Cochrane Library and McMaster; six public clinical registries. All searches were done until 31 January 2023.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Trials submitted to registries and completed before January 2021. Prospective interventional trials published in peer-reviewed journals.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
The first author searched for trials that had (1) posted trial results in a public registry, (2) presented results in a peer-reviewed publication and (3) submitted a pretrial protocol to a registry before publication. Other extracted variables included trial design, number of participants, funding source, follow-up duration and cell type.
RESULTS
In total 124 trials were found in registries and literature databases. Knee osteoarthritis was the most common indication. Of the 100 registry trials, 52 trials with in total 2 993 participants had neither posted results in the registry nor published results. Fifty-two of the registry trials submitted a protocol retrospectively. Forty-three of the 67 published trials (64%) had registered a pretrial protocol. Funding source was not associated with compliance with reporting requirements. A discrepancy between primary endpoints in the registry and publication was found in 16 of 25 trials. In 28% of trials, the treatment groups used adjuvant therapies. Only 39% of controlled trials were double-blinded.
CONCLUSIONS
A large proportion of trials failed to comply with statutory requirements for the registration and reporting of results, thereby increasing the risk of bias in outcome assessments. To improve confidence in the role of MSCs for musculoskeletal disorders, registries and medical journals should more rigorously enforce existing requirements for registration and reporting.
Topics: Humans; Registries; Musculoskeletal Diseases; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation; Clinical Trials as Topic; Guideline Adherence; Research Design; Mesenchymal Stem Cells
PubMed: 38925685
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081343 -
Sports (Basel, Switzerland) Jun 2024The treatment of myofascial pain in athletes requires a set of rehabilitation techniques that aim to be effective quickly. In this context, dry needling (DNY) has shown... (Review)
Review
The treatment of myofascial pain in athletes requires a set of rehabilitation techniques that aim to be effective quickly. In this context, dry needling (DNY) has shown interesting results due to its ability to reduce pain in the short term. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the role of DNY in managing myofascial shoulder pain in overhead athletes. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were screened up to March 2024, to identify studies that met the following inclusion criteria: overhead athletes with shoulder pain with a DNY approach for myofascial trigger points (MTrPs), RCT, case-control study, feasibility study as the study design. Exclusion criteria were studies that did not include athletes, studies that did not focus on the treatment of MTrPs with DNY, other reviews, no full-text availability and papers written in a language other than English. Out of 399 articles, 165 were excluded as duplicates. Of the 234 articles screened, only 6 articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 6 studies were included in the systematic review. Initial results showed that DNY improved pain rapidly and in the short term; however, there is still no consensus on the minimum number and the interval between treatments. Major findings reported a rapid potential decrease in perceived pain, shoulder disability and an increase in muscle strength; in this scenario, DNY might be a valid solution in a sports rehabilitation setting.
PubMed: 38921850
DOI: 10.3390/sports12060156 -
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) Jun 2024No previous study has evaluated the effectiveness of routine physical therapy with and without neural mobilization for patients with chronic musculoskeletal neck... (Review)
Review
No previous study has evaluated the effectiveness of routine physical therapy with and without neural mobilization for patients with chronic musculoskeletal neck disorders and cervical radiculopathy. The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of routine physical therapy with and without neural mobilization on pain and mobility in patients with chronic musculoskeletal neck disorders and cervical radiculopathy. A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials involving the use of neural mobilization techniques for the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal neck disorders and cervical radiculopathy was conducted. Methodological quality was assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and PEDro scale. Data were pooled and a meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model with Review Manager 5 software. Seven articles were included in our review. Significant differences were found in mobility but not in pain in favor of using routine physical therapy with neural mobilization for the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal neck disorders and cervical radiculopathy. Our results show that routine physical therapy accompanied by neural mobilization is superior for improving mobility in comparison with routine physical therapy alone in patients with musculoskeletal neck disorders and cervical radiculopathy.
PubMed: 38921339
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12121225