-
Eye (London, England) Oct 2023Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) has been thought to be associated with glaucoma, however there are many conflicting studies on this topic. With many new studies having... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) has been thought to be associated with glaucoma, however there are many conflicting studies on this topic. With many new studies having been published since the previous meta-analysis, we believe it is important to clarify this association. Hence, in this study we meta-analyse the recent literature regarding the association between OSA and glaucoma.
METHODS
Pubmed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library were searched from inception till the 28th February 2022 for observational as well as cross-sectional studies examining the association between OSA and glaucoma. Two reviewers selected studies, extracted data, graded the quality of included non-randomized studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The overall quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Random-effects models were used to meta-analyse the maximally covariate- adjusted associations.
RESULTS
48 studies were included in our systematic review, with 46 suitable for meta-analysis. Total study population was 4,566,984 patients. OSA was associated with a higher risk of glaucoma (OR 3.66, 95% CI 1.70 to 7.90, I = 98%, p < 0.01). After adjustment for various important confounders including age, gender and patient comorbidities such as hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases and diabetes, patients with OSA had up to 40% higher odds of glaucoma. Substantial heterogeneity was eliminated through subgroup and sensitivity analyses after consideration of glaucoma subtype, OSA severity and adjustment for confounders.
CONCLUSIONS
In this meta-analysis, OSA was associated with higher risk of glaucoma, as well as more severe ocular findings characteristic of the glaucomatous disease process. We suggest more clinical studies looking into the effects of OSA treatment on the progression of glaucoma to help clinical decision making for patients.
Topics: Humans; Cross-Sectional Studies; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Glaucoma; Cardiovascular Diseases; Data Collection
PubMed: 36977937
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02471-6 -
American Journal of Ophthalmology Nov 2023We synthesized the literature on the association between systemic antihypertensive medications with intraocular pressure (IOP) and glaucoma. Antihypertensive medications... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
We synthesized the literature on the association between systemic antihypertensive medications with intraocular pressure (IOP) and glaucoma. Antihypertensive medications included β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and diuretics.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
Databases were searched for relevant articles until December 5, 2022. Studies were eligible if they examined (1) the association between systemic antihypertensive medications with glaucoma or (2) the association between systemic antihypertensive medications with IOP in those without glaucoma or ocular hypertension. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; registration ID: CRD42022352028).
RESULTS
A total of 11 studies were included in the review and 10 studies in the meta-analysis. The 3 studies on IOP were cross-sectional, whereas the 8 studies on glaucoma were primarily longitudinal. In the meta-analysis, β-blockers were associated with a lower odds of glaucoma (odds ratio: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.75-0.92, 7 studies, n = 219,535) and lower IOP (β: -0.53, 95% CI: -1.05 to -0.02, 3 studies, n = 28,683). Calcium channel blockers were associated with a higher odds of glaucoma (odds ratio: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.03-1.24, 7 studies, n = 219,535) but not with IOP (β: -0.11, 95% CI: -0.25 to 0.03, 2 studies, n = 20,620). There were no consistent associations between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, or diuretics with glaucoma or IOP.
CONCLUSIONS
Systemic antihypertensive medications have heterogeneous effects on glaucoma and IOP. Clinicians should be aware that systemic antihypertensive medications may mask elevated IOP or positively or negatively affect the risk of glaucoma.
PubMed: 36966883
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.03.014 -
Eye (London, England) Oct 2023In most cases, glaucoma patients require long-term medical and/or surgical treatment. Preference studies investigate how different aspects of glaucoma management, such... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
In most cases, glaucoma patients require long-term medical and/or surgical treatment. Preference studies investigate how different aspects of glaucoma management, such as health or process outcomes, are valued and herewith help stakeholders make care more responsive to patients' needs. As, to our knowledge, no overview of these studies is currently available, this study aims to systematically review and critically appraise these studies.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted using keywords for stated-preference studies and glaucoma up to October 2021. Studies were included if they were original research and used a stated-preference methodology to investigate preferences in patients or healthcare professionals for different aspects of glaucoma management. Data were extracted and summarized. Furthermore, a quality appraisal of the included studies was performed using two validated checklists.
RESULTS
The search yielded 1214 articles after removal of duplicates. Of those, 11 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Studies aimed to elicit preferences for glaucoma treatment (27%), glaucoma related health state valuation (36%), and services (36%) from the patient (91%) or ophthalmologists' perspective (9%). Altogether studies included 69 attributes. The majority of attributes were outcome related (62%), followed by process (32%) and cost attributes (6%). Outcome attributes (e.g., effectiveness) were most often of highest importance to the population.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review provides an up-to-date and critical review of stated-preference studies in the field of glaucoma, suggesting that patients have preferences and are willing to trade-off between characteristics, and revealed that outcome attributes are the most influential characteristics of glaucoma management.
Topics: Humans; Glaucoma; Patient Preference
PubMed: 36944711
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02482-3 -
Eye (London, England) Oct 2023We aim to quantify the co-existence of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), glaucoma, or diabetic retinopathy (DR) and cognitive impairment or dementia. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
We aim to quantify the co-existence of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), glaucoma, or diabetic retinopathy (DR) and cognitive impairment or dementia.
METHOD
MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL were searched (to June 2020). Observational studies reporting incidence or prevalence of AMD, glaucoma, or DR in people with cognitive impairment or dementia, and of cognitive impairment or dementia among people with AMD, glaucoma, or DR were included.
RESULTS
Fifty-six studies (57 reports) were included but marked by heterogeneities in the diagnostic criteria or definitions of the diseases, study design, and case mix. Few studies reported on the incidence. Evidence was sparse but consistent in individuals with mild cognitive impairment where 7.7% glaucoma prevalence was observed. Prevalence of AMD and DR among people with cognitive impairment ranged from 3.9% to 9.4% and from 11.4% to 70.1%, respectively. Prevalence of AMD and glaucoma among people with dementia ranged from 1.4 to 53% and from 0.2% to 25.9%, respectively. Prevalence of DR among people with dementia was 11%. Prevalence of cognitive impairment in people with AMD, glaucoma, and DR ranged from 8.4% to 52.4%, 12.3% to 90.2%, and 3.9% to 77.8%, respectively, and prevalence of dementia in people with AMD, glaucoma and DR ranged from 9.9% to 62.6%, 2.5% to 3.3% and was 12.5%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Frequency of comorbid eye disease and cognitive impairment or dementia varied considerably. While more population-based estimations of the co-existence are needed, interdisciplinary collaboration might be helpful in the management of these conditions to meet healthcare needs of an ageing population.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO registration: CRD42020189484.
Topics: Humans; Cognitive Dysfunction; Glaucoma; Aging; Diabetic Retinopathy; Macular Degeneration; Dementia
PubMed: 36922645
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02481-4 -
Graefe's Archive For Clinical and... Sep 2023This study is to quantitatively estimate the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) impact of major age-related eye diseases (AREDs) including cataract, glaucoma,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
This study is to quantitatively estimate the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) impact of major age-related eye diseases (AREDs) including cataract, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and diabetic retinopathy (DR) assessed by the EuroQoL Five-Dimensional Questionnaire (EQ-5D).
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched until October 20, 2022. Studies were included if they reported the EQ-5D health utility score (HUS) or visual analogue scale (VAS) score of both AREDs patients and healthy controls. The mean difference (MD) in HUS or VAS score between cases and controls and its 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were pooled using the random-effects model. We also performed sensitivity analysis using the leaving-one-out method and subgroup analyses by sample size and race. The prevalence in reporting any problems in the five EQ-5D dimensions was summarized and compared between cases and controls using the Chi-square test.
RESULTS
Fifteen articles involving 30,491 participants were included in this review. Pooled estimates indicated reduced HUS in AMD patients (MD = - 0.04, 95%CI - 0.07, - 0.01; P = 0.009), DR patients (MD = - 0.03, 95%CI - 0.05, - 0.01; P = 0.01), and glaucoma patients (MD = - 0.06, 95%CI - 0.10, - 0.01; P = 0.01), compared with the controls. Significantly lower EQ-5D VAS score was also observed in cataract patients (MD = - 11.33, 95%CI - 13.47, - 9.18; P < 0.001) and DR patients (MD = - 6.41, 95%CI - 10.64, - 2.18; P = 0.003). AREDs patients reported usual activities and anxiety/depression problems more frequently than the control group.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings confirmed the HRQOL impairment caused by major AREDs including AMD, cataract, DR, and glaucoma. High-quality studies with large sample sizes are warranted to further verify our results.
Topics: Humans; Quality of Life; Glaucoma; Macular Degeneration; Cataract; Diabetic Retinopathy; Surveys and Questionnaires; Health Status
PubMed: 36917317
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-023-06034-z -
Seminars in Ophthalmology Aug 2023We highlight a case of intracranial hypertension secondary to exogenous testosterone in a female-to-male transgender patient and present a systematic review of similar...
We highlight a case of intracranial hypertension secondary to exogenous testosterone in a female-to-male transgender patient and present a systematic review of similar cases. Our review identified 19 female-to-male transgender individuals with intracranial hypertension. The mean age was 24.2 years and most common presenting symptom was headache (78.9% of patients). The most frequently associated ocular symptoms were transient visual obscurations (42.1%) and blurred vision (21.1%). Onset of symptoms occurred concurrently with exogenous testosterone therapy in 89.5% of the patients. The most common treatments were acetazolamide (89.5%), topiramate (31.6%), and alteration in hormone regimen (21.1%); four cases required surgery. These findings aid clinicians treating intracranial hypertension in patients undergoing gender affirmation therapy in a conscientious, patient-centered manner.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Young Adult; Adult; Testosterone; Transgender Persons; Intracranial Hypertension; Acetazolamide; Vision Disorders
PubMed: 36658742
DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2023.2169578 -
European Journal of Ophthalmology Sep 2023This review focuses on utility of artificial intelligence (AI) in analysis of biofluid markers in glaucoma. We detail the accuracy and validity of AI in the exploration...
PURPOSE
This review focuses on utility of artificial intelligence (AI) in analysis of biofluid markers in glaucoma. We detail the accuracy and validity of AI in the exploration of biomarkers to provide insight into glaucoma pathogenesis.
METHODS
A comprehensive search was conducted across five electronic databases including Embase, Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science. Studies pertaining to biofluid marker analysis using AI or bioinformatics in glaucoma were included. Identified studies were critically appraised and assessed for risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools.
RESULTS
A total of 10,258 studies were screened and 39 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 23 cross-sectional studies (59%), nine prospective cohort studies (23%), six retrospective cohort studies (15%), and one case-control study (3%). Primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) was the most commonly studied subtype (55% of included studies). Twenty-four studies examined disease characteristics, 10 explored treatment decisions, and 5 provided diagnostic clarification. While studies examined at entire metabolomic or proteomic profiles to determine changes in POAG, there was heterogeneity in the data with over 175 unique, differentially expressed biomarkers reported. Discriminant analysis and artificial neural network predictive models displayed strong differentiating ability between glaucoma patients and controls, although these tools were untested in a clinical context.
CONCLUSION
The use of AI models could inform glaucoma diagnosis with high sensitivity and specificity. While insight into differentially expressed biomarkers is valuable in pathogenic exploration, no clear pathogenic mechanism in glaucoma has emerged.
Topics: Humans; Artificial Intelligence; Biomarkers; Case-Control Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Glaucoma; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Prospective Studies; Proteomics; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36426575
DOI: 10.1177/11206721221140948