-
Fertility and Sterility Jan 2024To investigate whether Azoospermia Factor c (AZFc) microdeletions affect Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) outcomes. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To investigate whether Azoospermia Factor c (AZFc) microdeletions affect Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) outcomes.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
SETTING
Not applicable.
PATIENTS
Infertile men with and without AZFc microdeletions.
INTERVENTION(S)
Electronic databases were searched for case-control studies reporting sperm retrieval rates and outcomes of ART in infertile men with and without AZFc microdeletions from inception to April 2023. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Summary effect sizes (odds ratio [OR] with 95% confidence interval [CI]) were calculated for both categories of infertile men.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
The primary outcome was successful sperm retrieval and the secondary outcomes were outcomes of ART.
RESULTS
Case-control studies reporting sperm retrieval rates and ART outcomes in men with AZFa and AZFb deletions were unavailable. On the basis of the data from 3,807 men, sperm retrieval rates were found to be higher in men with AZFc microdeletions compared to their non-deleted counterparts [OR = 1.82, 95% CI 0.97, 3.41], but the difference was not statistically significant. A significantly lower fertilization rate (OR = 0.61, 95% CI [0.50, 0.74]), clinical pregnancy rate (OR = 0.61, 95% CI [0.42, 0.89]), and live birth rate (OR = 0.54, 95% CI [0.40, 0.72]) were observed in men with AZFc deletions compared with men without deletions. There was no statistically significant difference in rates of embryo cleavage, blastocyst formation, good-quality embryos, implantation, and miscarriage between the two groups. On correcting for female factors, the fertilization rate (OR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.71, 0.82]), cleavage rate (OR = 0.54, 95% CI [0.41, 0.72]), clinical pregnancy rate (OR = 0.39, 95% CI [0.30, 0.52]), and live birth rate (OR = 0.48, 95% CI [0.35, 0.65]) were significantly lower in men with AZFc deletions compared with controls.
CONCLUSIONS
Presence of AZFc microdeletions adversely affects outcomes of ART in infertile men. Further in-depth studies delineating the role of the AZF genes in embryonic development are necessary to understand the full-impact of this finding.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42022311738.
Topics: Pregnancy; Humans; Male; Female; Azoospermia; Oligospermia; Retrospective Studies; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes, Human, Y; Semen; Infertility, Male; Sertoli Cell-Only Syndrome
PubMed: 37923163
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.10.029 -
The World Journal of Men's Health Jul 2024The () gene is a paternally expressed imprinted gene that appears to play a role in embryo survival. The latest meta-analysis on methylation pattern in spermatozoa of...
PURPOSE
The () gene is a paternally expressed imprinted gene that appears to play a role in embryo survival. The latest meta-analysis on methylation pattern in spermatozoa of infertile patients found higher methylation in spermatozoa from infertile patients than fertile controls. To provide an updated and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis on the gene methylation pattern in patients with abnormal sperm parameters compared to men with normal parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023397056) and performed following the MOOSE guidelines for Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). Only original articles evaluating gene methylation in spermatozoa from patients with infertility or abnormalities in one or more sperm parameters compared to fertile or normozoospermic men were included.
RESULTS
Of 354 abstracts evaluated for eligibility, only 6 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis, involving a total of 301 patients and 163 controls. Our analysis showed significantly higher levels of gene methylation in patients compared with controls (standard mean difference [SMD] 2.150, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.377, 3.922; p=0.017), although there was significant heterogeneity between studies (Q-value=239.90, p<0.001; I²=97.91%). No significant evidence of publication bias was found, although one study was sensitive enough to skew the results, leading to a loss of significance (SMD 1.543, 95% CI -0.300, 3.387; p=0.101). In meta-regression analysis, we found that the results were independent of both ages (p=0.6519) and sperm concentration (p=0.2360).
CONCLUSIONS
Sperm DNA methylation may be associated with epigenetic risk in assisted reproductive techniques (ART). The gene could be included in the genetic panel of prospective studies aimed at identifying the most representative and cost-effective genes to be analyzed in couples undergoing ART.
PubMed: 37853535
DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.230094 -
Urologia Nov 2023Most genitourinary tract cancers have a negative impact on male fertility. Although testicular cancers have the worst impact, other tumors such as prostate, bladder, and... (Review)
Review
Most genitourinary tract cancers have a negative impact on male fertility. Although testicular cancers have the worst impact, other tumors such as prostate, bladder, and penis are diagnosed early and treated in relatively younger patients in which couple fertility can be an important concern. The purpose of this review is to highlight both the pathogenetic mechanisms of damage to male fertility in the context of the main urological cancers and the methods of preserving male fertility in an oncological setting, in light of the most recent scientific evidence. A systematic review of available literature was carried out on the main scientific search engines, such as PubMed, Clinicaltrials.Gov, and Google scholar. Three hundred twenty-five relevant articles on this subject were identified, 98 of which were selected being the most relevant to the purpose of this review. There is a strong evidence in literature that all of the genitourinary oncological therapies have a deep negative impact on male fertility: orchiectomy, partial orchiectomy, retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RPLND), radical cystectomy, prostatectomy, penectomy, as well as radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hormonal androgen suppression. Preservation of fertility is possible and includes cryopreservation, hormonal manipulation with GnRH analogs before chemotherapy, androgen replacement. Germ cell auto transplantation is an intriguing strategy with future perspectives. Careful evaluation of male fertility must be a key point before treating genitourinary tumors, taking into account patients' age and couples' perspectives. Informed consent should provide adequate information to the patient about the current state of his fertility and about the balance between risks and benefits in oncological terms. Standard approaches to genitourinary tumors should include a multidisciplinary team with urologists, oncologists, radiotherapists, psycho-sexologists, andrologists, gynecologists, and reproductive endocrinologists.
Topics: Humans; Male; Fertility Preservation; Androgens; Infertility, Male; Testicular Neoplasms; Urologic Neoplasms
PubMed: 37491831
DOI: 10.1177/03915603221146147 -
Andrology Jan 2024There has been no systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze and summarize the predictive factors of successful sperm extraction in salvage microdissection... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Predictors of successful salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) after failed initial TESE in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
There has been no systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze and summarize the predictive factors of successful sperm extraction in salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction.
OBJECTIVES
We aimed to investigate the factors predicting the result of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia who failed the initial microdissection testicular sperm extraction or conventional testicular sperm extraction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for literature that described the characteristics of patients with non-obstructive azoospermia who underwent salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction after failing the initial microdissection testicular sperm extraction or conventional testicular sperm extraction published prior to June 2022.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included four retrospective studies with 332 patients with non-obstructive azoospermia who underwent a failed initial microdissection testicular sperm extraction and three retrospective studies with 177 non-obstructive azoospermia patients who underwent a failed conventional testicular sperm extraction. The results were as follows: among non-obstructive azoospermia patients whose first surgery was microdissection testicular sperm extraction, younger patients (standard mean difference: -0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.55 to -0.01) and those with smaller bilateral testicular volume (standard mean difference: -0.55, 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.15), lower levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (standard mean difference: -0.86, 95% CI: -1.18 to -0.54) and luteinizing hormone (standard mean difference: -0.68, 95% CI: -1.16 to -0.19), and whose testicular histological type was hypospermatogenesis (odds ratio: 3.52, 95% CI: 1.30-9.53) were more likely to retrieve spermatozoa successfully, while patients with Sertoli-cell-only syndrome (odds ratio: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.24-0.73) were more likely to fail again in salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Additionally, in patients who underwent salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction after a failed initial conventional testicular sperm extraction, those with testicular histological type of hypospermatogenesis (odds ratio: 30.35, 95% CI: 8.27-111.34) were more likely to be successful, while those with maturation arrest (odds ratio: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.18-0.83) rarely benefited.
CONCLUSION
We found that age, testicular volume, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, hypospermatogenesis, Sertoli-cell-only syndrome, and maturation arrest were valuable predictors of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction, which will assist andrologists in clinical decision-making and minimize unnecessary injury to patients.
Topics: Humans; Male; Azoospermia; Oligospermia; Retrospective Studies; Microdissection; Sperm Retrieval; Semen; Testis; Spermatozoa; Sertoli Cell-Only Syndrome; Follicle Stimulating Hormone; Luteinizing Hormone; Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human
PubMed: 37172416
DOI: 10.1111/andr.13448