-
Research in Social & Administrative... Mar 2024Access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) among racial/ethnic minorities is a growing concern. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) among racial/ethnic minorities is a growing concern.
OBJECTIVES
Inequalities in receiving MOUD among gender and racial/ethnic groups were examined in this systematic review.
METHODS
Studies were retrieved by searching various databases and reference lists of reviews and selected full texts. Adjusted Odds Ratios (AORs) comparing MOUDs among racial/ethnic minorities to Whites were extracted or estimated from their findings. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 17.
RESULTS
After screening 2438 records, 19 studies were included in this review in two categories. The first category consists of 11 studies comparing receiving MOUD between different races/ethnicities and genders at the individual level. The meta-analysis regarding AORs comparing Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Native Americans/Alaska-Natives, Hawaiians, and mixed-race patients with Whites were 0.56 (95 % CI: 0.45-0.68), 0.72 (95 % CI: 0.55-0.94), 0.85 (95 % CI: 0.72-0.99), 0.88 (95%CI: 0.73-1.04), 0.27 (95 % CI: 0.03-2.18), and 0.97 (95 % CI: 0.81-1.16), respectively. The AOR of receiving MOUD for all minorities compared to Whites was 0.70 (95 % CI: 0.61-0.80). Overall AOR comparing MOUD for females to males was 0.95 (95 % CI: 0.87-1.04). The second category of articles compared buprenorphine and methadone treatment among ethnic/racial minorities and Whites.
CONCLUSIONS
Compared to Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians have limited access to MOUD. The findings suggest that methadone is the predominant medication for racial/ethnic minorities, while Whites and high-income communities receive buprenorphine more. It is crucial to re-design policies to bridge the gap in access to MOUD.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Buprenorphine; Ethnicity; Methadone; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Racial Groups; Healthcare Disparities
PubMed: 38101952
DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.12.001 -
The Clinical Journal of Pain Mar 2024Our purpose was to explore the effect of remifentanil on acute and chronic postsurgical pain after cardiac surgery. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
Our purpose was to explore the effect of remifentanil on acute and chronic postsurgical pain after cardiac surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Randomized controlled trials were retrieved from electronic databases, such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Internet databases, Scopus, and Web of Science. A systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were performed. Basic information and outcomes were extracted from the included studies. The primary outcome was chronic postsurgical pain. Secondary outcomes were scores of postsurgical pain and morphine consumption within 24 hours after cardiac surgery. Risk of bias (ROB) assessment was based on the Cochrane ROB tool version 2. The overall quality of the evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system.
RESULTS
Seven studies consisting of 658 patients were enrolled in the meta-analysis. A single study had a high ROB and 2 studies had a moderate ROB. The incidence of chronic postsurgical pain (4 studies [415 patients]; risk ratio: 1.02 [95% CI: 0.53 to 1.95]; P = 0.95; I2 = 59%; TSA-adjusted CI: 0.78 to 1.20) and the postsurgical pain score (2 studies [196 patients]; mean difference: 0.09 [95% CI: -0.36 to 0.55]; P = 0.69; I2 = 0%; TSA-adjusted CI: -0.36 to 0.55) were not statistically different between the 2 groups. However, morphine consumption (6 studies [569 patients]; mean difference: 6.94 [95% CI: 3.65 to 10.22]; P < 0.01; I2 = 0%; TSA-adjusted CI: 0.00 to 0.49) was higher in the remifentanil group than in the control group.
CONCLUSION
There was not enough evidence to prove that remifentanil can increase the incidence of chronic postsurgical pain after cardiac surgery, but interestingly, the results tended to support a trend toward increased complications in the intervention group. However, there was moderate certainty evidence that the use of remifentanil increases the consumption of morphine for analgesia, and more direct comparison trials are needed to inform clinical decision-making with greater confidence.
Topics: Humans; Remifentanil; Pain, Postoperative; Analgesia; Morphine; Cardiac Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 38053431
DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001183 -
Clinical Toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.) Sep 2023The opioid epidemic in the United States continues to result in an increasing number of deaths and is increasingly dominated by fentanyl and fentanyl analogs. As a... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The opioid epidemic in the United States continues to result in an increasing number of deaths and is increasingly dominated by fentanyl and fentanyl analogs. As a result, first responders are likely to come into contact with fentanyl-containing substances daily. Concerns persist regarding occupational exposure resulting in intoxication. We performed a systematic review to describe occupational illnesses from fentanyl and its analogs.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of the literature following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to assess the danger of occupational exposure to fentanyl. The PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health databases were queried to identify occupational fentanyl exposures. Studies included were single case reports, case series, observational studies, controlled studies, and abstracts from scientific presentations. We reviewed articles meeting the eligibility criteria and abstracted outcome data. Outcomes included study design, number of study subjects and study demographics, description of exposure, personal protective equipment used, duration of symptoms, illness developed, medical evaluation performed, treatment provided, hospitalizations, deaths, drug testing performed, and any situation review performed to prevent illness, analytical confirmation of the identity of culprit agent, and concentrations of drug in serum/blood.
RESULTS
Our search yielded 454 citations after deduplication. After abstract and text review, 12 unique reports met the inclusion criteria. All identified studies were observational studies. Ten of the 12 were Health Hazard Evaluation reports from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; two reports describe the same exposure case. There were no reported instances of comprehensive drug testing using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry or gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in exposed first responders. Among first responders possibly exposed to fentanyl or fentanyl analogs, none were admitted to the hospital, and only three first responders received naloxone. The three officers who received naloxone lacked recommended personal protective equipment and had subjective improvement of symptoms following naloxone. There were no instances of severe respiratory depression requiring assisted ventilation or hospital admission. Among forensic laboratory technicians, only one instance of detectable concentrations of fentanyl in urine was reported, and there were no instances of symptomatic cases.
CONCLUSIONS
Among published reports of 27 first responders with symptoms after possible ambient fentanyl exposure, symptoms, recorded physical findings, and vital signs were inconsistent with acute opioid toxicity. Breaches in the recommended use of personal protective equipment appeared common. Only three persons received naloxone, although none had plausible effects of fentanyl. No suspected exposure to fentanyl led to hospitalization or death. Based on these low-quality data, there were no plausible opioid effects from ambient exposure to suspected fentanyl.
Topics: United States; Humans; Fentanyl; Analgesics, Opioid; Chromatography, Liquid; Databases, Factual; Naloxone
PubMed: 37988114
DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2023.2259087 -
The Clinical Journal of Pain Feb 2024Our study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of serratus anterior plane block (SAB) with the paravertebral block (PVB) and intercostal block (ICB) for patients... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Our study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of serratus anterior plane block (SAB) with the paravertebral block (PVB) and intercostal block (ICB) for patients undergoing surgical procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A literature search was performed on the databases of ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Embase from inception to October 24, 2021. Only randomized controlled trials comparing SAB with either PVB or ICB and reporting pain outcomes were included.
RESULTS
A total of 16 randomized controlled trials were included. Thirteen compared SAB with PVB and 3 with ICB. Comparing SAB with PVB, we noted no difference in 24-hour morphine consumption between the groups (mean difference: 1.37; 95% CI: -0.33, 3.08; I2 = 96%; P = 0.11). However, the exclusion of 1 study indicated significantly increased analgesic consumption with the SAB. No difference was found in pain scores between SAB and PVB at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours. Meta-analysis failed to demonstrate any statistically significant difference in time to the first analgesic request between the two groups (mean difference: -0.79; 95% CI: -0.17, 1.75; I2 = 94%; P = 0.11). We also noted no statistically significant difference in the incidence of nausea/vomiting with SAB or PVB (odds ratio: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.41, 1.51; I2 = 0%; P = 0.47).
CONCLUSIONS
Evidence on the analgesic efficacy of the SAB versus the PVB is conflicting. Twenty-four-hour total analgesic consumption may be higher with the SAB as compared with PVB but with no difference in pain scores and time to the first analgesic request. Data on the comparison of the SAB with the ICB is insufficient to draw strong conclusions.
Topics: Humans; Pain Management; Nerve Block; Analgesics; Morphine; Pain, Postoperative
PubMed: 37982705
DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001175 -
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management Mar 2024Ketamine is a well-characterized anesthetic agent, and subanesthetic ketamine possesses analgesic effects in both acute and chronic pain. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
CONTEXT
Ketamine is a well-characterized anesthetic agent, and subanesthetic ketamine possesses analgesic effects in both acute and chronic pain.
OBJECTIVES
A systematic review was performed to ascertain the efficacy and safety of ketamine in treating pain for cancer patients.
METHODS
Eight databases were searched from the inception to March 20th, 2023 to obtain randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ketamine for treating pain in cancer patients. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies; then, meta-analysis was performed by using Revman 5.3 software and Stata 14.0 software.
RESULTS
Thirty-five studies were included, involving 2279 patients with cancer pain. The results of meta-analysis showed that ketamine could significantly reduce pain intensity. Subgroup analysis revealed that, when compared with control group, ketamine decreased markedly visual analogue scale (VAS) scores in two days after the end of treatment with ketamine, and ketamine administrated by patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) was effective. Meanwhile, ketamine could significantly reduce the number of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) compressions within 24 hours and morphine dosage. Ketamine could not decrease Ramsay sedation score. Additionally, the adverse events significantly decreased in the ketamine group, including nausea and vomiting, constipation, pruritus, lethargy, uroschesis, hallucination, and respiratory depression. In addition, compared with the control group, ketamine could reduce Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) score and relieve depressive symptoms.
CONCLUSION
Ketamine may be used as an effective therapy to relieve cancer pain. However, more rigorously designed RCTs with larger sample sizes are required to verify the above conclusions.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Ketamine; Cancer Pain; Analgesics, Opioid; Morphine; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Pain; Pain, Postoperative; Neoplasms
PubMed: 37972720
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.11.004 -
Pain Practice : the Official Journal of... Mar 2024Assessment of the efficacy and safety of perioperative intravenous ketamine in reducing incidence and severity of chronic postsurgical pain. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
STUDY OBJECTIVE
Assessment of the efficacy and safety of perioperative intravenous ketamine in reducing incidence and severity of chronic postsurgical pain.
STUDY DESIGN
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
DATA SOURCES
The following data sources were systematically searched: MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and EMBASE (till 02/2021).
PATIENTS
Adult patients undergoing any surgery.
INTERVENTIONS
Perioperative use of intravenous ketamine as an additive analgesic drug compared to placebo, no active control treatment, and other additive drugs.
MEASUREMENTS
Primary outcomes were number of patients with chronic postsurgical pain after 6 months and ketamine related adverse effects. Secondary outcomes were chronic postsurgical pain incidence after 3 and 12 months, chronic postsurgical neuropathic pain incidence, chronic postsurgical moderate to severe pain incidence, intensity of chronic postsurgical pain at rest, and during movement, oral morphine consumption after 3, 6, and 12 months and incidence of opioid-related adverse effects.
MAIN RESULTS
Thirty-six RCTs were included with a total of 3572 patients. Ketamine compared to placebo may result in no difference in the number of patients with chronic postsurgical pain after 6 months (risk ratio (RR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-1.05; I = 34%; 16 studies; low-certainty evidence). Ketamine may reduce the incidence of chronic postsurgical neuropathic pain after 3 months in comparison to placebo (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.99, I = 31%, seven trials, low-certainty evidence). Ketamine compared to placebo may increase the risk for postoperative nystagmus (RR 9.04, 95% CI 1.15-70.90, I 30%, two trials, low-certainty evidence) and postoperative visual disturbances (RR 2.29, 95% CI 1.05-4.99, I 10%, seven trials, low-certainty evidence).
CONCLUSIONS
There is low-certainty evidence that perioperative ketamine has no effect on chronic postsurgical pain in adult patients. Low-certainty evidence suggests that ketamine compared to placebo may reduce incidence of chronic postsurgical neuropathic pain after 3 months. Questions like ideal dosing, treatment duration and more patient-related outcome measures remain unanswered, which warrants further studies.
PROTOCOL REGISTRATION
Prospero CRD42021223625, 07.01.2021.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Ketamine; Analgesics; Pain, Postoperative; Morphine; Neuralgia
PubMed: 37971167
DOI: 10.1111/papr.13314 -
JAMA Nov 2023Alcohol use disorder affects more than 28.3 million people in the United States and is associated with increased rates of morbidity and mortality. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Alcohol use disorder affects more than 28.3 million people in the United States and is associated with increased rates of morbidity and mortality.
OBJECTIVE
To compare efficacy and comparative efficacy of therapies for alcohol use disorder.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the Cochrane Central Trials Registry, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and EMBASE were searched from November 2012 to September 9, 2022 Literature was subsequently systematically monitored to identify relevant articles up to August 14, 2023, and the PubMed search was updated on August 14, 2023.
STUDY SELECTION
For efficacy outcomes, randomized clinical trials of at least 12 weeks' duration were included. For adverse effects, randomized clinical trials and prospective cohort studies that compared drug therapies and reported health outcomes or harms were included.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Two reviewers evaluated each study, assessed risk of bias, and graded strength of evidence. Meta-analyses used random-effects models. Numbers needed to treat were calculated for medications with at least moderate strength of evidence for benefit.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was alcohol consumption. Secondary outcomes were motor vehicle crashes, injuries, quality of life, function, mortality, and harms.
RESULTS
Data from 118 clinical trials and 20 976 participants were included. The numbers needed to treat to prevent 1 person from returning to any drinking were 11 (95% CI, 1-32) for acamprosate and 18 (95% CI, 4-32) for oral naltrexone at a dose of 50 mg/d. Compared with placebo, oral naltrexone (50 mg/d) was associated with lower rates of return to heavy drinking, with a number needed to treat of 11 (95% CI, 5-41). Injectable naltrexone was associated with fewer drinking days over the 30-day treatment period (weighted mean difference, -4.99 days; 95% CI, -9.49 to -0.49 days) Adverse effects included higher gastrointestinal distress for acamprosate (diarrhea: risk ratio, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.27-1.97) and naltrexone (nausea: risk ratio, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.51-1.98; vomiting: risk ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.23-1.91) compared with placebo.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In conjunction with psychosocial interventions, these findings support the use of oral naltrexone at 50 mg/d and acamprosate as first-line pharmacotherapies for alcohol use disorder.
Topics: Humans; Acamprosate; Alcohol Drinking; Alcoholism; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Naltrexone; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; United States; Alcohol Deterrents; Psychosocial Intervention
PubMed: 37934220
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.19761 -
Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry 2024Opiorphin has been reported to show a stronger analgesic effect than morphine without causing side effects brought about by morphine-like drugs. Functional opiorphin...
BACKGROUND
Opiorphin has been reported to show a stronger analgesic effect than morphine without causing side effects brought about by morphine-like drugs. Functional opiorphin analogs have been created to enhance its metabolic stability and preserve its potent analgesic effect.
OBJECTIVE
We conducted a systematic review to summarize all opiorphin analogs and identify those with the strongest metabolic stability and antinociceptive effect.
METHODS
From a total of 122 articles, 11 made it to the quantitative synthesis phase. The included articles were categorized into the type of modifications used to improve the metabolic stability of the peptide, metabolism and toxicity profile, drug absorption and cytotoxicity, anti-nociceptive effect, the opiorphin analogs' administration in animals or humans, and the type of the test used to test the antinociceptive effect.
RESULTS
The substitution of natural amino acid with a non-natural amino acid, side-chain modifications, or D-aminoacid substitution were the most used type of peptide modification to create opiorphin analogs. STR-324 and PEGylated liposomes loaded with opiorphin showed the best metabolism and toxicity performance. [C]-[(CH)]-QRF-[S-O-(CH)]-R showed high stability in human plasma and stronger inhibitory potency. YQRFSR and PEGylated liposomes loaded with opiorphin showed a stronger antinociceptive effect than the parent opiorphin or morphine, with an analgesic effect of PEGylated liposomes lasting more than 50%. Intravenous administration was the preferred method of opiorphin analog administration, and different tests were used to test the antinociceptive effect.
CONCLUSION
This paper presents the first systematic review discussing opiorphin and opiorphin analogs and identifies the most promising candidates for future research.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Liposomes; Oligopeptides; Analgesics; Amino Acids; Morphine Derivatives; Polyethylene Glycols; Salivary Proteins and Peptides
PubMed: 37933217
DOI: 10.2174/0115680266260621231102195044 -
Minerva Anestesiologica 2024Ketamine is reported as a potent opioid alternative that provides significant reduction in pain with no severe adverse events. However, some studies didn't find its use... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Ketamine is reported as a potent opioid alternative that provides significant reduction in pain with no severe adverse events. However, some studies didn't find its use satisfactory and reported less reduction in pain score with ketamine. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of ketamine versus morphine for the treatment of acute pain in emergency situations.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
The PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PROSPERO registry platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov websites were queried in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines in order to locate relevant studies. According to the predefined PICOS criteria, articles were included and event data pertaining to changes in Visual Analog Scale or Numeric Rating Scale pain scales were extracted. Using RevMan and MedCalc, a meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effects of ketamine and morphine for the treatment of acute pain.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Twelve studies met the criteria for inclusion in this meta-analysis. Ketamine was found to be more effective than morphine at reducing pain scores, with an odds ratio of 0.60 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.76). Similarly, no severe adverse events related to ketamine were reported in any study, and it has a low-risk ratio of 0.78 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.87). Egger's Test P values (0.3052) and Begg's Test P values (0.3869) indicate a low risk of bias, and the Bland-Altman plot demonstrates a high degree of concordance.
CONCLUSIONS
Ketamine is a potent and effective alternative to morphine for the management of acute pain, and it reduces pain score significantly with minimal side effects.
Topics: Humans; Morphine; Ketamine; Acute Pain; Analgesics, Opioid; Pain Management
PubMed: 37930103
DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.23.17561-4 -
European Journal of Clinical... Apr 2024Considering the conflicting effects of bupropion on parameters related to metabolic syndrome including glucose metabolism and lipid profile, in this meta-analysis study,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Changes in lipid profile and glucose metabolism following administration of bupropion alone or in combination with naltrexone: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis.
BACKGROUND
Considering the conflicting effects of bupropion on parameters related to metabolic syndrome including glucose metabolism and lipid profile, in this meta-analysis study, we investigated the effects of this drug alone or in combination with naltrexone on glucose metabolism and lipid profile.
METHODS
Scopus, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science and Embase databases were searched using standard keywords to identify all controlled trials investigating effects of bupropion alone and combined with naltrexone on the glucose and lipid profile. Pooled weighted mean difference and 95% confidence intervals were achieved by random-effects model.
RESULTS
Twelve studies with 5152 participants' were included in this article. The pooled findings showed that bupropion alone or in combination with naltrexone would significantly reduce glucose (weighted mean difference (WMD): -2.25 mg/dL, 95% confidence interval (CI): -4.10, -0.40), insulin (WMD: -4.06 μU/mL, 95% CI: -6.09, -2.03), homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (WMD: -0.58, 95% CI: -0.98, -0.19), triglyceride (TG) (WMD: -11.78 mg/dL, 95% CI: -14.48 to -9.08) and increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (WMD: 2.68 mg/dL, 95% CI: 2.13 to 3.24). A Greater reduction in glucose levels was observed with duration >26 weeks. Dose of bupropion intake ≤360 mg and intervention for more than 26 weeks decreased insulin level significantly. With regard to lipid profile, reduction of triglycerides is more significant with dose of bupropion greater than 360 mg and a shorter intervention length equal to 26 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS
The addition of combination therapies such as bupropion and naltrexone to lifestyle modification can significantly improve glucose metabolism and some lipid parameters.
Topics: Humans; Bupropion; Dietary Supplements; Glucose; Insulin; Naltrexone; Triglycerides
PubMed: 37929909
DOI: 10.1111/eci.14122