-
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral... Jul 2024A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted to define the incidence of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) in patients with oral cavity cancer (OCC) treated with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted to define the incidence of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) in patients with oral cavity cancer (OCC) treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and to identify the risk factors influencing its development.
STUDY DESIGN
Six databases were searched systematically. A meta-analysis was performed to determine overall, spontaneous, and dental extraction-attributed incidences of ORN. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool evaluated evidence certainty.
RESULTS
Out of 11 eligible studies, 6 underwent meta-analysis for the overall aggregated ORN incidence in OCC patients receiving IMRT, resulting in an incidence rate of 8% (95% CI: 6%-11%). Regarding development reasons, 2 studies were assessed, revealing an incidence of 36% (95% CI: 1%-98%) for spontaneous ORN, and 17% (95% CI: 5%-44%) ensued from dental extraction exclusively pre-RT. All rates had very low certainty of evidence. Factors significantly correlated with ORN development included postoperative RT use (78%), employment of therapeutic doses above 50 Gy, and mandibular involvement (80.5%).
CONCLUSION
The findings suggest that IMRT alone is not sufficient to decrease ORN rates in OCC patients, underscoring the importance of precisely identifying the involved risk factors. However, further detailed primary studies will be necessary.
Topics: Humans; Osteoradionecrosis; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated; Incidence; Mouth Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Jaw Diseases
PubMed: 38772792
DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2024.04.008 -
Scientific Reports May 2024Our study aimed to estimate the prevalence of total free flap failure following free flap reconstruction for mandibular osteoradionecrosis (mORN) and assess the impact... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Our study aimed to estimate the prevalence of total free flap failure following free flap reconstruction for mandibular osteoradionecrosis (mORN) and assess the impact of potential moderators on this outcome. A comprehensive systematic literature search was independently conducted by two reviewers using the Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases. Quality assessment of the selected studies was performed, and prevalence estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Outlier and influential analyses were conducted, and meta-regression analyses was employed to investigate the effects of continuous variables on the estimated prevalence. Ultimately, forty-six eligible studies (involving 1292 participants and 1344 free flaps) were included in our meta-analysis. The findings of our study revealed a prevalence of 3.1% (95% CI 1.3-5.4%) for total free flap failure after reconstruction for mORN. No study was identified as critically influential, and meta-regression analysis did not pinpoint any potential sources of heterogeneity. These findings provide valuable insights for researchers and serve as a foundation for future investigations into the management of mandibular osteoradionecrosis and the prevention of free flap failure in this context.
Topics: Humans; Osteoradionecrosis; Free Tissue Flaps; Prevalence; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Mandibular Diseases; Mandibular Reconstruction; Mandible
PubMed: 38750124
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61862-1 -
Microsurgery May 2024Successive osteoseptocutaneous fibula transfers for jaws reconstruction are rare but important options. This study contributes patient-reported and clinical outcomes, as...
BACKGROUND
Successive osteoseptocutaneous fibula transfers for jaws reconstruction are rare but important options. This study contributes patient-reported and clinical outcomes, as well as systematically reviews all existing reports.
METHODS
All sequential fibula transfers performed by the senior author were reviewed from a prospectively managed database, including University of Washington quality of life (UWQoL). Systematic review was conducted in PubMed and Cochrane databases for similar publications.
RESULTS
Eighteen patients (average age 51.5 years) received sequential fibulas (mean 4.7 years between reconstructions). Secondary fibulas more often had benign indications (72.2% vs. 33.3%, p = .04), most commonly osteoradionecrosis (38.9%). At a mean follow-up of 30.5 months, the average interincisal distance increased from 21.8 to 27.6 mm, and 92.3% tolerated an oral diet following the second fibula. Eight patients completed the UW-QoL before and after the second fibula, and three prior to the first fibula. Composite physical function was significantly decreased from 96.7 prefibula reconstruction to 63.3 following the first (p < .001) and 64.2 after the second fibula (p < .001). There were no differences in other domains. The systematic review yielded six articles reporting 56 patients (mean 39 months between fibulas). Secondary fibulas were performed for repeat malignancy (45%) and osteoreadionecrosis (39%), resulting in elevated tube feeding from 20% following the first to 39% following the second, but overall high quality of life in two studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Sequential osteoseptocutaneous fibula reconstructions of jaws are often performed for benign indications such as osteoradionecrosis. Overall function and QoL are comparable with those following the first fibula transfer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Bone Transplantation; Fibula; Free Tissue Flaps; Mandibular Reconstruction; Quality of Life
PubMed: 38747121
DOI: 10.1002/micr.31184 -
Oral Diseases Feb 2024Jaw osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a complication in patients with previous head and neck radiotherapy. Its incidence increases with dental extractions. Hence, this review... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Jaw osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a complication in patients with previous head and neck radiotherapy. Its incidence increases with dental extractions. Hence, this review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adjunctive treatment modalities undertaken at the time of extraction in previous head and neck radiotherapy patients in preventing ORN.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted, where studies with data on ORN incidence after extraction with or without adjunctive interventions were included. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate the pooled prevalence of ORN per intervention and the pooled odds ratio for incidence of ORN between interventions.
RESULTS
In total, 1520 patients in 29 studies were included. Interventions identified were hyperbaric oxygen (HBO), pentoxifylline-tocopherol (PENTO), antibiotics (ABX), platelet-rich fibrin and photobiomodulation. The pooled prevalence of ORN for HBO (4.6%), PENTO (3.4%) and ABX (3.8%) was significantly lower than the Control (17.6%). For studies with direct comparisons between groups, HBO had lower but not significant odds of developing ORN than the Control (OR 0.27) and ABX (OR 0.57).
CONCLUSIONS
HBO, PENTO and ABX may reduce the incidence of ORN compared to no intervention. Given that all three have similar incidences of ORN, ABX may be the most cost-effective and accessible adjunctive modality.
PubMed: 38396363
DOI: 10.1111/odi.14902 -
Clinical Oral Investigations Jan 2024To review the available prospective literature on hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy for periodontal conditions. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To review the available prospective literature on hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy for periodontal conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A comprehensive electronic and manual search was performed to identify clinical studies on adult patients who underwent hyperbaric oxygen therapy for periodontal treatments. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, and Dentistry Oral Sciences Source databases.
RESULTS
Fourteen articles were included in the final literature review, of which five were RCTs and 11 were prospective clinical studies. Four studies discussed HBO as an adjunct to nonsurgical treatment of periodontitis, eight reported on HBO and osteoradionecrosis, and one examined HBO in bisphosphonate-related necrosis of the jaws.
CONCLUSIONS
HBO has shown superior efficacy compared to antibiotics as a prophylactic measure in preventing osteoradionecrosis (ORN) in patients with a history of high mandibular irradiation. Clinicians should consider referring such patients for HBO therapy before and after tooth extractions. However, for the surgical excision of existing ORN lesions, HBO therapy does not yield significant benefits but does not negatively impact outcomes either. Regarding the treatment of periodontitis patients, the variability among studies prevents definitive conclusions. HBO therapy as an adjunct to SRP in periodontitis treatment produces mixed results.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
This study's clinical relevance lies in its exploration of the potential benefits of HBO for periodontal conditions. Also, it provides clinicians with insights into when and how to integrate HBO therapy into their treatment approaches, particularly for patients with a history of irradiation and those undergoing complex dental procedures.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Hyperbaric Oxygenation; Osteoradionecrosis; Prospective Studies; Periodontitis; Periodontal Diseases; Gingival Diseases
PubMed: 38182685
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05410-7 -
Oral Oncology Jan 2024Head and neck cancer ranks as the seventh most common cancer worldwide. Proton therapy is widely used in head and neck cancer. Osteoradionecrosis(ORN) is currently a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Head and neck cancer ranks as the seventh most common cancer worldwide. Proton therapy is widely used in head and neck cancer. Osteoradionecrosis(ORN) is currently a commonly investigated side effect of proton therapy. A meta-analysis is needed to investigate this topic.
MATERIAL/METHODS
Two authors searched three databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library; the search period was from inception to June 2023. The search keyword was set to be ((("osteoradionecrosis") OR ("osteonecrosis")) AND ("proton")).
RESULTS
We initially collected 410 articles, and after article selections, 22 articles remained in our systematic reviews. Due to the overlapping of patient populations, 17 studies were finally included in our meta-analysis. The pooled grade 3 or more ORN rate is 0.01(95 % CI = 0.01-0.03). Subgroup analysis showed that IMPT didn't reduce grade 3 or more ORN compared with 3DCPT (p = 0.15).
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis showed that severe ORN rarely occurred in proton therapy for head and neck cancer patients.
Topics: Humans; Osteoradionecrosis; Proton Therapy; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 38035508
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106649 -
Supportive Care in Cancer : Official... Oct 2023To investigate the survival rate in implants placement in irradiated and non-irradiated bone in patients undergoing head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment. We focused on... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To investigate the survival rate in implants placement in irradiated and non-irradiated bone in patients undergoing head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment. We focused on the consequences of the main complications, such as osteoradionecrosis and peri-implantitis.
METHODS
An electronic search conducted by PRISMA protocol was performed. Full texts were carefully assessed, and data were assimilated into a tabular form for discussion and consensus among the expert panel. The quality assessment and the risk of bias are verified by Joanna Briggs Institute checklist (JBI) and The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) assessment tool.
RESULTS
A total of 452 records were identified in the based on our PICOs strategy and after screening, 19 articles were included in the descriptive analysis of the review. Totaling 473 implants placed in irradiated and non-irradiated bone, and 31.6% of the patients were over 60 years of age. 57.9%) performed implant placement in a period of 12 months or more after the ending of radiotherapy. Only 5 studies had a follow-up period longer than 5 years after implant placement, of which three were used for the meta-analysis. In the meta-analysis of 5-year survival rate, analysis of implants in irradiated bone was assessed; a random effect model was used and a weighted proportion (PP) of 93.13% (95% CI: 87.20-99.06; p < 0.001), and in the 5-year survival rate, analysis of implants in non-irradiated bone was analysed; a fixed effect model was used and a weighted proportion (PP) of 98.52% survival (95% CI: 97.56-99.48, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Survival rates of implants placed in irradiated bone are clinically satisfactory after a follow-up of 5 years, with a fewer percentage than in implants placed in non-irradiated bone after metanalyses performed.
Topics: Humans; Middle Aged; Aged; Bone-Anchored Prosthesis; Head and Neck Neoplasms
PubMed: 37851170
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08088-5 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Aug 2023This is the third update of the original Cochrane Review published in July 2005 and updated previously in 2012 and 2016. Cancer is a significant global health issue.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This is the third update of the original Cochrane Review published in July 2005 and updated previously in 2012 and 2016. Cancer is a significant global health issue. Radiotherapy is a treatment modality for many malignancies, and about 50% of people having radiotherapy will be long-term survivors. Some will experience late radiation tissue injury (LRTI), developing months or years following radiotherapy. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been suggested as a treatment for LRTI based on the ability to improve the blood supply to these tissues. It is postulated that HBOT may result in both healing of tissues and the prevention of complications following surgery and radiotherapy.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the benefits and harms of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) for treating or preventing late radiation tissue injury (LRTI) compared to regimens that excluded HBOT.
SEARCH METHODS
We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 24 January 2022.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of HBOT versus no HBOT on LRTI prevention or healing.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. survival from time of randomisation to death from any cause; 2. complete or substantial resolution of clinical problem; 3. site-specific outcomes; and 4.
ADVERSE EVENTS
Our secondary outcomes were 5. resolution of pain; 6. improvement in quality of life, function, or both; and 7. site-specific outcomes. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence.
MAIN RESULTS
Eighteen studies contributed to this review (1071 participants) with publications ranging from 1985 to 2022. We added four new studies to this updated review and evidence for the treatment of radiation proctitis, radiation cystitis, and the prevention and treatment of osteoradionecrosis (ORN). HBOT may not prevent death at one year (risk ratio (RR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47 to 1.83; I = 0%; 3 RCTs, 166 participants; low-certainty evidence). There is some evidence that HBOT may result in complete resolution or provide significant improvement of LRTI (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.89; I = 64%; 5 RCTs, 468 participants; low-certainty evidence) and HBOT may result in a large reduction in wound dehiscence following head and neck soft tissue surgery (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.94; I = 70%; 2 RCTs, 264 participants; low-certainty evidence). In addition, pain scores in ORN improve slightly after HBOT at 12 months (mean difference (MD) -10.72, 95% CI -18.97 to -2.47; I = 40%; 2 RCTs, 157 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Regarding adverse events, HBOT results in a higher risk of a reduction in visual acuity (RR 4.03, 95% CI 1.65 to 9.84; 5 RCTs, 438 participants; high-certainty evidence). There was a risk of ear barotrauma in people receiving HBOT when no sham pressurisation was used for the control group (RR 9.08, 95% CI 2.21 to 37.26; I = 0%; 4 RCTs, 357 participants; high-certainty evidence), but no such increase when a sham pressurisation was employed (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.52 to 2.21; I = 74%; 2 RCTs, 158 participants; high-certainty evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
These small studies suggest that for people with LRTI affecting tissues of the head, neck, bladder and rectum, HBOT may be associated with improved outcomes (low- to moderate-certainty evidence). HBOT may also result in a reduced risk of wound dehiscence and a modest reduction in pain following head and neck irradiation. However, HBOT is unlikely to influence the risk of death in the short term. HBOT also carries a risk of adverse events, including an increased risk of a reduction in visual acuity (usually temporary) and of ear barotrauma on compression. Hence, the application of HBOT to selected participants may be justified. The small number of studies and participants, and the methodological and reporting inadequacies of some of the primary studies included in this review demand a cautious interpretation. More information is required on the subset of disease severity and tissue type affected that is most likely to benefit from this therapy, the time for which we can expect any benefits to persist and the most appropriate oxygen dose. Further research is required to establish the optimum participant selection and timing of any therapy. An economic evaluation should also be undertaken.
Topics: Humans; Hyperbaric Oxygenation; Radiation Injuries; Neoplasms; Osteoradionecrosis; Disease Progression; Pain; Barotrauma
PubMed: 37585677
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005005.pub5