-
Frontiers in Surgery 2024Advancements in surgical techniques have improved outcomes in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. To date there have been no meta-analyses comparing robotic and...
BACKGROUND
Advancements in surgical techniques have improved outcomes in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. To date there have been no meta-analyses comparing robotic and laparoscopic approaches for distal pancreatectomies (DP) in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to explore the oncological outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) and open distal pancreatectomy (ODP).
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted for studies reporting laparoscopic, robotic or open surgery for DP. Frequentist network meta-analysis of oncological outcomes (overall survival, resection margins, tumor recurrence, examined lymph nodes, administration of adjuvant therapy) were performed.
RESULTS
Fifteen studies totalling 9,301 patients were included in the network meta-analysis. 1,946, 605 and 6,750 patients underwent LDP, RDP and ODP respectively. LDP (HR: 0.761, 95% CI: 0.642-0.901, = 0.002) and RDP (HR: 0.757, 95% CI: 0.617-0.928, = 0.008) were associated with overall survival (OS) benefit when compared to ODP. LDP (HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.793-1.27, = 0.968) was not associated with OS benefit when compared to RDP. There were no significant differences between LDP, RDP and ODP for resection margins, tumor recurrence, examined lymph nodes and administration of adjuvant therapy.
CONCLUSION
This study highlights the longer OS in both LDP and RDP when compared to ODP for patients with PDAC.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, PROSPERO (CRD42022336417).
PubMed: 38933652
DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1369169 -
International Journal of Surgery... Jun 2024Pancreatic cancer, specifically pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), continues to pose a significant clinical and scientific challenge. The most significant finding...
BACKGROUND
Pancreatic cancer, specifically pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), continues to pose a significant clinical and scientific challenge. The most significant finding of recent years is that PDAC tumours harbour their specific microbiome, which differs amongst tumour entities and is distinct from healthy tissue. This review aims to evaluate and summarise all PDAC studies that have used the next-generation technique, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing within each bodily compartment. As well as establishing a causal relationship between PDAC and the microbiome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This systematic review was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy was designed, and 1727 studies were analysed.
RESULTS
In total, 38 studies were selected for qualitative analysis and summarised significant PDAC bacterial signatures. Despite the growing amount of data provided, we are not able to state a universal 16S rRNA gene microbial signature that can be used for PDAC screening. This is most certainly due to the heterogeneity of the presentation of results, lack of available datasets and the intrinsic selection bias between studies.
CONCLUSION
Several key studies have begun to shed light on causality and the influence the microbiome constituents and their produced metabolites could play in tumorigenesis and influencing outcomes. The challenge in this field is to shape the available microbial data into targetable signatures. Making sequenced data readily available is critical, coupled with the coordinated standardisation of data and the need for consensus guidelines in studies investigating the microbiome in PDAC.
PubMed: 38874485
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001762 -
Future Oncology (London, England) Jun 2024Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a very aggressive type of cancer, in which targeted therapies have not yet been fully utilized. wild-type pancreatic adenocarcinoma tumors... (Review)
Review
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a very aggressive type of cancer, in which targeted therapies have not yet been fully utilized. wild-type pancreatic adenocarcinoma tumors are associated with different genomic alterations in comparison to mutated pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This systematic review aims to provide a one-stop summary of all these alterations, their proposed targeted treatment and their effect on disease progression. An electronic search strategy was elaborated in the PubMed database between 2020 and January 2024. 21 studies were included, and we found that the most frequent targetable genomic alterations in wild-type pancreatic adenocarcinoma were , , , , amplification, and other HRDs, and gene fusions like , and .
PubMed: 38861291
DOI: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2355078 -
International Journal of Surgery... Jun 2024The study of changes in the microbiome in chronic pancreatitis (CP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) holds significant potential for developing noninvasive...
BACKGROUND
The study of changes in the microbiome in chronic pancreatitis (CP) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) holds significant potential for developing noninvasive diagnostic tools as well as innovative interventions to alter the progression of diseases. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyze in detail the taxonomic and functional characteristics of the gut microbiome in patients with CP and PDAC.
METHODS
Two researchers conducted a systematic search across public databases to gather all published research up to June 2023. Diversity and gut microbiota composition are the main outcomes we focus on.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included 14 studies, involving a total of 1511 individuals in the PDAC (n=285), CP (n=342), and control (n=649) groups. Our results show a significant difference in the composition of gut microbiota between PDAC/CP patients compared to healthy controls (HC), as evidenced by a slight decrease in α-diversity, including Shannon (SMD=-0.33; P=0.002 and SMD=-0.59; P<0.001, respectively) and a statistically significant β-diversity (P<0.05). The pooled results showed that at the phylum level, the proportion of Firmicutes was lower in PDAC and CP patients than in HC patients. At the genus level, more than two studies demonstrated that 4 genera were significantly increased in PDAC patients compared to HC (e.g., Escherichia-Shigella and Veillonella). CP patients had an increase in 4 genera (e.g., Escherichia-Shigella and Klebsiella) and a decrease in 8 genera (e.g., Coprococcus and Bifidobacterium) compared to HC. Functional/metabolomics results from various studies also showed differences between PDAC/CP patients and HC. In addition, this study found no significant differences in gut microbiota between PDAC and CP patients.
CONCLUSIONS
Current evidence suggests changes in gut microbiota is associated with PDAC/CP, commonly reflected by a reduction in beneficial species and an increase in the pathogenic species. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore therapeutic possibilities.
PubMed: 38847785
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001724 -
Gastroenterology May 2024More than half of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) recur within 12 months after curative-intent resection. This systematic review and meta-analysis was...
BACKGROUND & AIMS
More than half of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) recur within 12 months after curative-intent resection. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to identify all reported prognostic factors for early recurrence in resected PDACs.
METHODS
After a systematic literature search, a meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. Separate analyses were performed for adjusted vs unadjusted effect estimates as well as reported odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs). Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool, and evidence was rated according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation recommendations.
RESULTS
After 2,903 abstracts were screened, 65 studies were included. Of these, 28 studies (43.1%) defined early recurrence as evidence of recurrence within 6 months, whereas 34 (52.3%) defined it as evidence of recurrence within 12 months after surgery. Other definitions were uncommon. Analysis of unadjusted ORs and HRs revealed 41 and 5 prognostic factors for early recurrence within 6 months, respectively. When exclusively considering adjusted data, we identified 25 and 10 prognostic factors based on OR and HR, respectively. Using a 12-month definition, we identified 38 (OR) and 15 (HR) prognostic factors from unadjusted data and 38 (OR) and 30 (HR) prognostic factors from adjusted data, respectively. On the basis of frequency counts of adjusted data, preoperative carbohydrate antigen 9-9, N status, nondelivery of adjuvant therapy, grading, and tumor size based on imaging were identified as key prognostic factors for early recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS
Reported prognostic factors of early recurrence vary considerably. Identified key prognostic factors could aid in the development of a risk stratification framework for early recurrence. However, prospective validation is necessary.
PubMed: 38825047
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.05.028 -
Annals of Surgical Oncology May 2024
PubMed: 38819749
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15532-1 -
Cureus Apr 2024Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal cancer often diagnosed at advanced stages, highlighting the urgent need for early detection strategies. This... (Review)
Review
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal cancer often diagnosed at advanced stages, highlighting the urgent need for early detection strategies. This systematic review explores the potential of fecal and urinary biomarkers for early PDAC detection. A comprehensive search identified eight relevant studies investigating various biomarkers, including proteins, metabolites, microbial profiles, DNA mutations, and non-coding RNAs. Promising findings suggest that urinary biomarkers related to metabolic alterations, inflammatory processes, fecal microbiome profiles, and fecal miRNAs hold diagnostic potential even at early stages of PDAC. Combining biomarkers into panels may enhance diagnostic accuracy. Challenges such as validation in larger cohorts, standardization of protocols, and regulatory approval must be addressed for clinical translation. Despite these hurdles, non-invasive urinary and fecal biomarkers represent a promising avenue for improving PDAC outcomes through early detection.
PubMed: 38813271
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59248 -
PloS One 2024Familial Pancreatic Cancer (FPC) presents a notable risk, with 3-10% of pancreatic adenocarcinoma cases having a family history. Studies link FPC to syndromes like HBOC,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Familial Pancreatic Cancer (FPC) presents a notable risk, with 3-10% of pancreatic adenocarcinoma cases having a family history. Studies link FPC to syndromes like HBOC, suggesting BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations play a role. BRCA gene functions in DNA repair impact FPC management, influencing sensitivity to therapies like PARP inhibitors. Identifying mutations not only aids FPC treatment but also reveals broader cancer risks. However, challenges persist in selectively applying genetic testing due to cost constraints. This Systematic Review focuses on BRCA1/BRCA2 significance in FPC, diagnostic criteria, prognostic value, and limitations.
METHOD
Original articles published from 2013 to January 2023 were sourced from databases such as Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, and ScienceDirect. Inclusion criteria comprised observational cohort or diagnostic studies related to the role of BRCA1/2 mutation in correlation to familial pancreatic cancer (FPC), while article reviews, narrative reviews, and non-relevant content were excluded. The assessment of bias used ROBINS-I, and the results were organized using PICOS criteria in a Google spreadsheet table. The systematic review adhered to the PRISMA 2020 checklist.
RESULT
We analyzed 9 diagnostic studies encompassing 1325 families and 4267 patients from Italy, USA, and Poland. Despite the limitation of limited homogenous PICO studies, our findings effectively present evidence. BRCA1/2 demonstrates benefits in detecting first-degree relatives FPC involvement with 2.26-10 times higher risk. These mutation findings also play an important role since with the BRCA1/2 targeted therapy, Poly-ADP Ribose Polymerase inhibitors (PARP) may give better outcomes of FPC treatment. Analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 administration's impact on odds ratio (OR) based on six and five studies respectively. BRCA1 exhibited non-significant effects (OR = 1.26, P = 0.51), while BRCA2 showed significance (OR = 1.68, P = 0.04). No heterogeneity observed, indicating consistent results. Further research on BRCA1 is warranted.
CONCLUSION
Detecting the BRCA1/2 mutation gene offers numerous advantages, particularly in its correlation with FPC. For diagnostic and prognostic purposes, testing is strongly recommended for first-degree relatives, who face a significantly higher risk (2.26-10 times) of being affected. Additionally, FPC patients with identified BRCA1/2 mutations exhibit a more favorable prognosis compared to the non-mutated population. This is attributed to the availability of targeted BRCA1/2 therapy, which maximizes treatment outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Germ-Line Mutation; BRCA2 Protein; BRCA1 Protein; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Carcinoma
PubMed: 38809921
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299276 -
International Journal of Radiation... May 2024For rectal cancer patients, the standard approach of chemotherapy, radiation therapy (RT), and surgery (Trimodality Therapy, TMT) is associated with significant... (Review)
Review
Executive Summary of the American Radium Society® (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for Non-Operative Management (NOM) for Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Guidelines.
PURPOSE
For rectal cancer patients, the standard approach of chemotherapy, radiation therapy (RT), and surgery (Trimodality Therapy, TMT) is associated with significant long-term toxicity and/or colostomy for most patients. Patient options focused on quality-of-life (QOL) have dramatically improved, but there remains limited guidance regarding comparative effectiveness. This systematic review and associated guidelines evaluate how various treatment strategies compare to each other in terms of oncologic outcomes and QOL.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cochrane and PRISMA methodology were used to search for prospective and retrospective trials and meta-analyses of adequate quality within the Ovid Medline database between 1/1/2012-6/15/2023. These studies informed the expert panel, which rated the appropriateness of various treatments in 6 clinical scenarios through a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi).
RESULTS
The search process yielded 197 articles that advised voting. Increasing data show non-operative management (NOM) and primary surgery result in QOL benefits noted over TMT without detriment to oncologic outcomes. For rectal cancer patients for whom TME would result in permanent colostomy or inadequate bowel continence, NOM was strongly recommended as usually appropriate. Restaging with tumor response assessment 8-12 weeks following completion of RT/CRT was deemed a necessary component of NOM. The panel recommended active surveillance in the setting of a near complete or complete response. In the setting of NOM, 54-56 Gy in 27-33 fractions concurrent with chemotherapy and followed by consolidation chemotherapy was recommended. The panel strongly recommends primary surgery as usually appropriate for a T3N0 high rectal tumor for whom LAR and adequate bowel function is possible, with adjuvant chemotherapy considered if N+.
CONCLUSIONS
Recent data supports NOM and primary surgery as important options that should be offered to eligible patients. Considering the complexity of multi-disciplinary management, patients should be discussed in a multi-disciplinary setting and therapy should be tailored to individual patient goals/values.
PubMed: 38797496
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.05.019 -
Journal of Personalized Medicine Apr 2024Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive, heterogeneous, and fatal types of human cancer; therefore, more effective therapeutic drugs are urgently needed. Human... (Review)
Review
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive, heterogeneous, and fatal types of human cancer; therefore, more effective therapeutic drugs are urgently needed. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression and amplification have been identified as a cornerstone in this pathology. The aim of this review is to identify HER2 membrane overexpression in relation to pancreatic cancer pathways that can be used in order to develop a targeted therapy. After searching the keywords, 174 articles were found during a time span of 10 years, between 2013 and 2023, but only twelve scientific papers were qualified for this investigation. The new era of biomolecular research found a significant relationship between HER2 overexpression and pancreatic cancer cells in 25-30% of cases. The variables are dependent on tumor-derived cells, with differences in receptor overexpression between PDAC (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma), BTC (biliary tract cancer), ampullary carcinoma, and PNETs (pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors). HER2 overexpression is frequently encountered in human pancreatic carcinoma cell lines, and the ERBB family is one of the targets in the near future of therapy, with good results in phase I, II, and III studies evaluating downregulation and tumor downstaging, respectively.
PubMed: 38793045
DOI: 10.3390/jpm14050463