-
Monaldi Archives For Chest Disease =... Apr 2024Persistent air leaks in patients with pneumothorax can lead to significant morbidity. If a patient with persistent air leak is medically unfit for thoracic surgery,...
Persistent air leaks in patients with pneumothorax can lead to significant morbidity. If a patient with persistent air leak is medically unfit for thoracic surgery, medical pleurodesis via chest tube or thoracoscopy is either an option. Thoracoscopy offers the advantage of visualizing the site of the air leak and enabling direct instillation of the pleurodesis agent or glue at that location. Autologous blood patch instillation via chest tube has been reported to be a cheap and very effective technique for the management of persistent air leaks. However, thoracoscopic blood patch instillation has not been reported in the literature. We report two cases of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax in which patients had persistent air leaks for more than seven days and were subjected to thoracoscopy to locate the site of the leak. In the same sitting, 50 mL of autologous blood patch was instilled directly at the leak site. Post-procedure, the air leak subsided in both patients, and the chest tube was removed with complete lung expansion. We also conducted a systematic review of the use of medical thoracoscopic interventions for treating persistent air leaks.
PubMed: 38656320
DOI: 10.4081/monaldi.2024.2994 -
The Surgeon : Journal of the Royal... Dec 2023Thoracic surgeons are now adopting a new method of using a mesh covering to reduce recurrence in surgical pleurodesis for pneumothorax. We aimed to review the literature... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Thoracic surgeons are now adopting a new method of using a mesh covering to reduce recurrence in surgical pleurodesis for pneumothorax. We aimed to review the literature and compare the outcomes of using mesh covering as an additional procedure during surgical pleurodesis.
METHODS
A comprehensive search was performed from inception to October 2022 on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Scopus. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies (OCSs) comparing the use of mesh coverage, and different materials were included. Data were extracted to compare recurrence and other outcomes using a random effect model.
RESULTS
23 studies consisting of 2 RCTs and 21 OCSs totalling 5092 patients were included. Patients with a mesh had a significantly lower recurrence (OR = 0.22, 95% CI 0.12-0.42, p < 0.0001) and a shorter duration of chest tube drainage (SMD = -0.74 days, 95% CI -0.28 to -1.20, p < 0.0001) but no significant difference in the length of operation. The use of polyglycolic acid (PGA) and vicryl mesh was associated with a significantly shorter duration of chest tube drainage [(PGA, SMD = 0.83 days, 95% CI 0.14-1.52, p < 0.0001), (vicryl, SMD = 1.06 days, 95% CI 0.71-2.82, p = 0.0005)]. They also had a shorter post-operative length of stay than oxidized regenerative cellulose (ORC) but this was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION
The use of a mesh material reduced the incidence of post-operative air leaks in the short term and the recurrence rate in the long term. Some mesh materials such as PGA and vicryl performed better than other materials.
Topics: Humans; Pneumothorax; Surgical Mesh; Polyglactin 910; Pleurodesis; Drainage; Recurrence; Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted
PubMed: 37714802
DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2023.08.002 -
Archivos de Bronconeumologia Sep 2023To compare the efficacy and safety of indwelling pleural catheters (IPC) in relation with the timing of systemic cancer therapy (SCT) (i.e., before, during, or after...
INTRODUCTION
To compare the efficacy and safety of indwelling pleural catheters (IPC) in relation with the timing of systemic cancer therapy (SCT) (i.e., before, during, or after SCT) in patients with malignant pleural effusion (MPE).
METHODS
Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT), quasi-controlled trials, prospective and retrospective cohorts, and case series of over 20 patients, in which the timing of IPC insertion in relation to that of SCT was provided. Medline (via PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to January 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROB) tool for RCTs and the ROB in non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) for non-randomized designs.
RESULTS
Ten studies (n=2907 patients; 3066 IPCs) were included. Using SCT while the IPC was in situ decreased overall mortality, increased survival time, and improved quality-adjusted survival. Timing of SCT had no effect on the risk of IPC-related infections (2.85% overall), even in immunocompromised patients with moderate or severe neutropenia (relative risk 0.98 [95%CI: 0.93-1.03] for patients treated with the combination of IPC and SCT). The inconsistency of the results or the lack of analysis of all outcome measures in relation to the SCT/IPC timing precluded drawing solid conclusions about time to IPC removal or need of re-interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on observational evidence, the efficacy and safety of IPC for MPE does not seem to vary depending on the IPC insertion timing (before, during, or after SCT). The data most likely support early IPC insertion.
Topics: Humans; Pleural Effusion, Malignant; Catheters, Indwelling; Retrospective Studies; Pleurodesis; Catheter-Related Infections
PubMed: 37429748
DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2023.06.007