-
International Urology and Nephrology Apr 2024The commonly used clinical indicators are not sensitive and comprehensive enough to evaluate the early staging of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study aimed to... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The commonly used clinical indicators are not sensitive and comprehensive enough to evaluate the early staging of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study aimed to evaluate the differences in arterial spin labeling (ASL) and blood oxygenation level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD-MRI) parameter values among patients at various stages of chronic kidney disease and healthy individuals.
METHODS
Electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase were searched from inception to March 29, 2024, to identify relevant studies on ASL and BOLD in CKD. The renal blood flow (RBF) and apparent relaxation rate (R2*) values were obtained from healthy individuals and patients with various stages of CKD. The meta-analysis was conducted using STATA version 12.0. The random-effects model was used to obtain estimates of the effects, and the results were expressed as 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and mean differences (MDs) of continuous variables.
RESULTS
A total of 18 published studies were included in this meta-analysis. The cortical RBF and R2 values and medulla RBF values were considerably distinct between patients with various stages of CKD and healthy controls (MD, - 78.162; 95% CI, - 85.103 to - 71.221; MD, 2.440; 95% CI, 1.843 to 3.037; and MD, - 36.787; 95% CI, - 47.107 to - 26.468, respectively). No obvious difference in medulla R2 values was noted between patients with various stages of CKD and healthy controls (MD, - 1.475; 95% CI, - 4.646 to 1.696).
CONCLUSION
ASL and BOLD may provide complementary and distinct information regarding renal function and could potentially be used together to gain a more comprehensive understanding of renal physiology.
PubMed: 38632173
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-024-04055-z -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023The diversity of clinical trajectories in diabetic kidney disease (DKD) has made blood and biochemical urine markers less precise, while renal puncture, the gold... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The diversity of clinical trajectories in diabetic kidney disease (DKD) has made blood and biochemical urine markers less precise, while renal puncture, the gold standard, is almost impossible in the assessment of diabetic kidney disease, and the value of functional magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of diabetic pathological alterations is increasingly recognized.
METHODS
The literature on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) for the assessment of renal alterations in diabetic kidney disease was searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. The search time limit is from database creation to March 10, 2023. RevMan was used to perform a meta-analysis of the main parameters of fMRIs extracted from DKD patients and healthy volunteers (HV).
RESULTS
24 publications (1550 subjects) were included in this study, using five functional MRIs with seven different parameters. The renal blood flow (RBF) values on Arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging (ASL-MRI) was significantly lower in the DKD group than in the HV group. The [WMD=-99.03, 95% CI (-135.8,-62.27), <0.00001]; Diffusion tensor imaging magnetic resonance imaging (DTI-MRI) showed that the fractional anisotropy (FA) values in the DKD group were significantly lower than that in HV group [WMD=-0.02, 95%CI (-0.03,-0.01), <0.0001]. And there were no statistically significant differences in the relevant parameters in Blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD-MRI) or Intro-voxel incoherent movement magnetic resonance imaging (IVIM-DWI).
DISCUSSION
ASL and DWI can identify the differences between DKD and HV. DTI has a significant advantage in assessing renal cortical changes; IVIM has some value in determining early diabetic kidney disease from the cortex or medulla. We recommend combining multiple fMRI parameters to assess structural or functional changes in the kidney to make the assessment more comprehensive. We did not observe a significant risk of bias in the present study.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk, identifier CRD42023409249.
Topics: Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Diabetic Neuropathies; Diffusion Tensor Imaging; Kidney; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 37484949
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1226830