-
PloS One 2024To evaluate the efficacy of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique in full-thickness macular holes (MHs) with a size of ≤400 μm compared to the ILM... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To evaluate the efficacy of inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique in full-thickness macular holes (MHs) with a size of ≤400 μm compared to the ILM peeling technique.
METHODS
Related literatures that compared inverted ILM flap and ILM peeling in MHs ≤ 400 μm were reviewed by searching electronic databases including Pubmed, EMbase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library up to April 2023. The primary outcome measure was hole closure rate, and the secondary outcome measures were the mean postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), retinal sensitivity, and outer status of the retinal layers, including the external limiting membrane and ellipsoid zone. The quality of the articles was assessed according to the revised version of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials or the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. In the case of heterogeneity, a sensitivity analysis was conducted, and publication bias was visually evaluated using a funnel plot.
RESULTS
This review included six studies with 610 eyes for the primary outcome and 385 eyes for the secondary outcomes, which were two randomized control trials and four retrospective studies. Pooled data revealed that the overall MH closure rate was 99.4% in the inverted ILM flap group and 96.2% in the ILM peeling group, without significant difference between the two groups (odds ratio = 3.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.82~18.69; P = 0.09). The inverted ILM flap technique did not have a favorable effect on the BCVA, retinal sensitivity, or recovery of the outer retinal layers. These results were consistent with those of the subgroup analysis of the different follow-up periods. No significant publication bias was observed.
CONCLUSION
In eyes with MHs of ≤400 μm, both techniques demonstrated excellent surgical outcomes without significant differences. Therefore, surgical techniques can be selected according to surgeon preferences.
Topics: Retinal Perforations; Humans; Surgical Flaps; Visual Acuity; Vitrectomy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38683767
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302481 -
International Ophthalmology Mar 2024It is commonly accepted that phacoemulsification surgery is a risk factor for the development of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) and may accelerate the process. This...
PURPOSE
It is commonly accepted that phacoemulsification surgery is a risk factor for the development of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) and may accelerate the process. This is an important consideration particularly in cases involving young patients who pre-operatively have no PVD, given the increased risk of retinal tears and detachments.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies reporting incidence of PVD post-uncomplicated phacoemulsification surgery. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement was used for search strategy. Of 3071 titles, 7 studies met the inclusion criteria; The outcomes measured were PVD occurrence by (1) time, (2) type, (3) age, (4) gender and (5) axial length, with all statistical analysis performed using Review Manager.
RESULTS
A total of 2034 eyes were included for analysis with a mean follow-up time of 28.3 months. 33.3% of patients developed a PVD, either partial or complete, with rates increasing in a time dependent manner. No significant difference was noted in sub-group analysis by age, gender or axial length.
CONCLUSIONS
The results from our systematic review show that uncomplicated phacoemulsification accelerates the physiological process of PVD development. Pre-operative evaluation of the vitreoretinal interface should be performed with careful post-operative follow-up advised in those without a pre-existing PVD.
Topics: Humans; Vitreous Detachment; Phacoemulsification; Prospective Studies; Vitreous Body; Retinal Perforations; Retinal Detachment
PubMed: 38512501
DOI: 10.1007/s10792-024-03091-z -
Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) Mar 2024To compare the efficacy and safety of pars plana vitrectomy with and without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for macular hole (MH). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To compare the efficacy and safety of pars plana vitrectomy with and without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling for macular hole (MH).
METHODS
A systematic literature search on Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was performed from January 2000 to 2023. The primary outcome was the final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Secondary outcomes included MH closure rates and the need for repeat surgery. The authors performed a random-effects meta-analysis on Review Manager 5.4.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies on 880 eyes were included. Pars plana vitrectomy with and without ILM peel achieved a similar final BCVA ( P = 0.66). However, pars plana vitrectomy without ILM peeling achieved a significantly better final BCVA in eyes with closed MHs (WMD = 0.05 logMAR, 95% CI, 0.01-0.10, P = 0.02). Pars plana vitrectomy with ILM peeling achieved a significantly higher primary MH closure rate (RR = 1.21, 95% CI, 1.04-1.42, P = 0.02) and lower incidence of MH reoperation (RR = 0.19, 95% CI, 0.11-0.33, P < 0.001). The final MH closure rate ( P = 0.12) and incidence of MH recurrence ( P = 0.25) were similar between groups.
CONCLUSION
Pars plana vitrectomy with and without ILM peel achieved a similar final BCVA. However, pars plana vitrectomy without ILM peeling achieved a better final BCVA in eyes with closed MHs. ILM peeling achieved a greater primary MH closure rate and reduced need for reoperation.
Topics: Humans; Vitrectomy; Retinal Perforations; Retina; Reoperation; Visual Acuity; Basement Membrane; Retrospective Studies; Epiretinal Membrane
PubMed: 38166007
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000004033 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2023Macular holes cause severe impairment of sight. With the aim of improving the outcome of surgery for macular holes, particularly larger macular holes (those measuring... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Macular holes cause severe impairment of sight. With the aim of improving the outcome of surgery for macular holes, particularly larger macular holes (those measuring over 400 μm), a variable period of face-down positioning may be advised. This review is an update of a Cochrane Review published in 2011.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effect of postoperative face-down positioning on the outcome of surgery for macular hole.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2022, Issue 5), which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, the ISRCTN registry, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. There were no date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 25 May 2022.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which postoperative face-down positioning was compared to no face-down positioning following surgery for macular holes. The primary outcome of interest was closure of the macular hole. Other outcomes of interest included visual outcomes, quality of life outcomes, and the occurrence of adverse events. Pairs of review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and evaluated the certainty of evidence using GRADE.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We analysed dichotomous data as risk ratios (RRs), and continuous data as mean differences (MDs), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The unit of analysis was eyes.
MAIN RESULTS
We included eight studies allocating a total of 709 eyes (699 participants). There was heterogeneity in study design, including the control group treatment (from no positioning to strict maintenance of other 'face-forward' postures) and surgical procedures (with or without inner limiting membrane peeling, with or without cataract surgery). There were also different durations of positioning, with two studies using 3 days, two studies using 5 days, and three studies using 10 days of face-down positioning. Whilst the overall risk of bias was low, all included studies were judged to be at high or unclear risk of bias due to absence of assessment of adherence to the 'prescribed' intervention of face-down positioning or posturing. The primary outcome of successful anatomical hole closure at one to six months following surgery was reported in 95 of every 100 eyes of participants advised to position face-down for at least three days after surgery, and in 85 of every 100 eyes of participants not advised to position face-down (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.12, 709 eyes, 8 studies, I² = 44%). Amongst the 327 eyes of participants with macular holes of at least 400 μm, hole closure was noted in 94 of every 100 eyes of participants advised to position face-down, and in 84 of every 100 eyes of participants not advised to position face-down (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.26, 5 studies, I² = 62%). Amongst the 129 eyes of participants with macular holes of less than 400 μm, hole closure was noted in 100 of every 100 eyes of participants advised to position face-down, and in 96 of every 100 eyes of participants not advised to position face-down (RR 1.03, CI 0.97 to 1.11, 4 studies, I² = 0%). The certainty of the evidence was low, downgraded for imprecision (CIs including no effect) and study design limitations (with different durations of face-down posturing used in the absence of a dose-response gradient, and limitations in measuring the exposure). Meta-analysis of visual acuity data was challenging given the use of different definitions of postoperative visual outcome across studies. Three studies reported findings by gain in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters (MD 2.04, 95% CI -0.01 to 4.09, very low-certainty evidence). Meta-analyses of quality of life data were not possible because of inconsistency in outcome metrics across studies. One study reported no difference between groups in quality of life, as reported on a validated quality of life metric scale (the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire - 25 (NEI VFQ-25), between face-down positioning for five days and non-face-down positioning (median NEI VFQ-25 score was 89 (interquartile range (IQR) 76 to 94) in the face-down group versus 87 (IQR 73 to 93) in the non-face-down group (adjusted mean difference on a logistic scale 0.02, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.07, P = 0.41)). Two studies reported increased ease of positioning and less pain in non-face-down positioning groups on non-validated 0-to-10-point visual analogue scores. On an ease-of-positioning score running from 0 (very difficult) to 10 (very easy), there were consistent reports of the discomfort associated with face-down positioning: the median participant-reported ease-of-positioning score was 6 (IQR 4 to 8) in those undergoing 5 days of face-down positioning versus 9 (IQR 7 to 10) in the comparator group (P = 0.01). On a pain score with 0 being pain-free and 10 being in severe pain, mean pain score was 6.52 ± 2.48 in the face-down positioning group versus 2.53 ± 2.6 in the non-face-down positioning group. The adverse event of postoperative nerve compression occurred in less than 1 in every 100 (3 per 1000) participants advised to position face-down, and 0 in every 100 participants not advised to position face-down (699 participants, 8 studies, moderate-certainty evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We identified eight RCTs evaluating face-down positioning following surgery for macular hole. The included studies were not all directly comparable due to differences in the surgical techniques used and the durations of postoperative positioning advised. Low-certainty evidence suggests that face-down positioning may have little or no effect on macular hole closure after surgery. Face-down positioning is a low-risk intervention, with serious adverse events affecting fewer than 1 in 300 people. We suggest that any future trials focus on patients with larger macular holes, with interventions and outcome measures used in previous trials (i.e. with inner limiting membrane peeling, positioning durations of three to five days, and validated quality of life metrics) to allow future meta-analyses to determine any effect with greater precision and confidence.
Topics: Humans; Cataract Extraction; Diabetic Retinopathy; Pain; Retinal Perforations
PubMed: 37987517
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008228.pub3 -
Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) Nov 2023To summarize the current evidence regarding the therapeutic effect of using autologous platelet concentrate (APC) in vitrectomy for macular hole (MH). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To summarize the current evidence regarding the therapeutic effect of using autologous platelet concentrate (APC) in vitrectomy for macular hole (MH).
METHODS
The PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched according to the PROSPERO protocol (CRD42022366202). Controlled trials comparing whether APC was used in the vitrectomy of MH were included. The primary outcome was the closure rate of MH and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity, and the secondary outcome was the incidence of different types of complications.
RESULTS
Seven studies that included 634 eyes were eligible. For the primary outcome, the usage of APC significantly improved the closure rate of MH in vitrectomy (odds ratio [OR] = 5.34, 95% confidence interval, 2.83-10.07, P < 0.001). Postoperative visual acuity did not significantly differ between the APC group and similar baseline controls (SMD = -0.07, 95% confidence interval, -0.35 to 0.22, P = 0.644). For the secondary outcome, using APC did not result in additional complications regarding postoperative retinal detachment or the recurrence of MH.
CONCLUSION
The use of APC in vitrectomy was associated with a superior closure rate of the hole and no additional complications; therefore, it is effective and safe in MH surgery.
Topics: Humans; Retinal Perforations; Vitrectomy; Endotamponade; Retinal Detachment; Eye; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37607135
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003888 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Aug 2023Macular hole (MH) is a full-thickness defect in the central portion of the retina that causes loss of central vision. According to the usual definition, a large MH has a... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Macular hole (MH) is a full-thickness defect in the central portion of the retina that causes loss of central vision. According to the usual definition, a large MH has a diameter greater than 400 µm at the narrowest point. For closure of MH, there is evidence that pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling achieves better anatomical outcomes than standard PPV. PPV with ILM peeling is currently the standard of care for MH management; however, the failure rate of this technique is higher for large MHs than for smaller MHs. Some studies have shown that the inverted ILM flap technique is superior to conventional ILM peeling for the management of large MHs.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of pars plana vitrectomy with the inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus pars plana vitrectomy with conventional internal limiting membrane peeling for treating large macular holes, including idiopathic, traumatic, and myopic macular holes.
SEARCH METHODS
The Cochrane Eyes and Vision Information Specialist searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other databases, and two trials registries on 12 December 2022.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated PPV with ILM peeling versus PPV with inverted ILM flap for treatment of large MHs (with a basal diameter greater than 400 µm at the narrowest point measured by optical coherence tomography) of any type (idiopathic, traumatic, or myopic).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane and assessed the certainty of the body of evidence using GRADE.
MAIN RESULTS
We included four RCTs (285 eyes of 275 participants; range per study 24 to 91 eyes). Most participants were women (63%), and of older age (range of means 59.4 to 66 years). Three RCTs were single-center trials, and the same surgeon performed all surgeries in two RCTs (the third single-center RCT did not report the number of surgeons). One RCT was a multicenter trial (three sites), and four surgeons performed all surgeries. Two RCTs took place in India, one in Poland, and one in Mexico. Maximum follow-up ranged from three months (2 RCTs) to 12 months (1 RCT). No RCTs reported conflicts of interest or disclosed financial support. All four RCTs enrolled people with large idiopathic MHs and compared conventional PPV with ILM peeling versus PPV with inverted ILM flap techniques. Variations in technique across the four RCTs were minimal. There was some heterogeneity in interventions: in two RCTs, all participants underwent combined cataract-PPV surgery, whereas in one RCT, some participants underwent cataract surgery after PPV (the fourth RCT did not mention cataract surgery). The critical outcomes for this review were mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and MH closure rates. All four RCTs provided data for meta-analyses of both critical outcomes. We assessed the risk of bias for both outcomes using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2); there were some concerns for risk of bias associated with lack of masking of outcome assessors and selective reporting of outcomes in all RCTs. All RCTs reported postoperative BCVA values; only one RCT reported the change in BCVA from baseline. Based on evidence from the four RCTs, it is unclear if the inverted ILM flap technique compared with ILM peeling reduces (improves) postoperative BCVA measured on a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) chart at one month (mean difference [MD] -0.08 logMAR, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.20 to 0.05; P = 0.23, I = 65%; 4 studies, 254 eyes; very low-certainty evidence), but it may improve BCVA at three months or more (MD -0.17 logMAR, 95% CI -0.23 to -0.10; P < 0.001, I = 0%; 4 studies, 276 eyes; low-certainty evidence). PPV with an inverted ILM flap compared to PPV with ILM peeling probably increases the proportion of eyes achieving MH closure (risk ratio [RR] 1.10, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.18; P = 0.01, I = 0%; 4 studies, 276 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence) and type 1 MH closure (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.66; P = 0.03, I² = 69%; 4 studies, 276 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence). One study reported that none of the 38 participants experienced postoperative retinal detachment.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We found low-certainty evidence from four small RCTs that PPV with the inverted ILM flap technique is superior to PPV with ILM peeling with respect to BCVA gains at three or more months after surgery. We also found moderate-certainty evidence that the inverted ILM flap technique achieves more overall and type 1 MH closures. There is a need for high-quality multicenter RCTs to ascertain whether the inverted ILM flap technique is superior to ILM peeling with regard to anatomical and functional outcomes. Investigators should use the standard logMAR charts when measuring BCVA to facilitate comparison across trials.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Cataract; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myopia; Retina; Retinal Perforations; Retrospective Studies; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Visual Acuity; Vitrectomy
PubMed: 37548231
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015031.pub2 -
Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology.... Jun 2024To compare the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change, idiopathic macular (IMH) closure, and complications in IMH patients receiving combined phacovitrectomy and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To compare the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change, idiopathic macular (IMH) closure, and complications in IMH patients receiving combined phacovitrectomy and sequential surgery (vitrectomy followed by phacoemulsification).
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from their inception through February 2022. Randomized, controlled trials and observational studies that presented results of BCVA change, IMH closure, and surgery-related complications were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to calculate effect estimates with 95% CIs.
RESULTS
One randomized, controlled trials and 7 cohort studies with 585 patients were included. Overall, the meta-analyses of BCVA change (mean difference, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.10-0.04) and IMH closure (risk ratio = 1.04; 95% CI, 0.96-1.13) revealed no significant differences between combined phacovitrectomy and sequential surgery. The pooled risk ratios for various surgical complications such as postoperative retinal detachment, inflammation, and intraocular pressure elevation showed no significant differences between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Similar visual gain and IMH closure rates were achieved after both combined phacovitrectomy and sequential surgery, with similar complication risks. The anatomic and functional outcomes of combined surgery were not better than those of sequential surgery. These results could serve as a reference for future trials.
Topics: Humans; Vitrectomy; Retinal Perforations; Visual Acuity; Phacoemulsification; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 37253430
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2023.05.005 -
Ophthalmology. Retina Oct 2023To compare outcomes of scleral buckle (SB), pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), and combined PPV-SB to treat rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs) with inferior retinal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
TOPIC
To compare outcomes of scleral buckle (SB), pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), and combined PPV-SB to treat rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs) with inferior retinal breaks (IRBs).
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Rhegmatogenous retinal detachments with IRBs are not uncommon; their management is challenging with higher risk of failure. There is no consensus about their treatment, specifically whether SB, PPV, or PPV-SB should be performed.
METHODS
Systematic review and meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials, case-control, and prospective/retrospective series (if n > 50) in English were eligible. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched up to January 23, 2023. Standard systematic review methods were followed. The following outcomes at 3 (± 1) and 12 (± 3) months were evaluated: number of eyes with retinal reattachment after ≥ 1 surgeries, change in best-corrected visual acuity from preoperative to postoperative levels, and number of eyes with improvement of > 10 and > 15 ETDRS letters after surgery. Authors of eligible studies were asked for individual participant data (IPD) and IPD meta-analysis was undertaken. Risk of bias was assessed using National Institutes of Health study quality assessment tools. This study was registered prospectively in PROSPERO (CRD42019145626).
RESULTS
A total of 542 studies were identified: 15 were eligible and included and 60% were retrospective. Individual participant data was obtained from 8 studies (1017 eyes). Given that only 26 patients had received SB alone, these data were not considered in the analysis. There was no evidence for differences between treatment groups (PPV versus PPV-SB) in the probability of having a flat retina at 3 or 12 months postoperatively after 1 (P = 0.067; odds ratio [OR], 0.47; P = 0.408; OR 2.55; respectively) or > 1 (OR, 0.54; P = 0.21; OR, 0.89; P = 0.926; respectively) surgery. Pars plana vitrectomy-SB showed less improvement in vision postoperatively at 3 months (estimate, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.35; P = 0.044), but this difference was no longer observed at 12 months (estimate, -0.07; 95% confidence interval, -0.27, 0.13; P = 0.479).
CONCLUSION
Available evidence suggests a lack of benefit of adding SB to PPV to treat RRDs with IRBs. Evidence, however, comes mainly from retrospective series and, thus, despite the large number of eyes included, should be interpreted with caution. Further research is needed.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)
The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Topics: Humans; Retinal Detachment; Vitrectomy; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Visual Acuity; Retinal Perforations
PubMed: 37187441
DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2023.05.006 -
Ophthalmology. Retina Aug 2023Comparing the efficacy and safety between combined and sequential pars plana vitrectomy and phacoemulsification for macular hole (MH) and epiretinal membrane (ERM). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
TOPIC
Comparing the efficacy and safety between combined and sequential pars plana vitrectomy and phacoemulsification for macular hole (MH) and epiretinal membrane (ERM).
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
The standard of care for MH and ERM is vitrectomy, which increases the risk of developing cataract. Combined phacovitrectomy eliminates the need for a second surgery.
METHODS
Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched in May 2022 for all articles comparing combined versus sequential phacovitrectomy for MH and ERM. The primary outcome was mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 12 months follow-up. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool for observational studies (PROSPERO, registration number, CRD42021257452).
RESULTS
Of the 6470 studies found, 2 RCTs and 8 nonrandomized retrospective comparative studies were identified. Total eyes for combined and sequential groups were 435 and 420, respectively. Meta-analysis suggested no significant difference between combined and sequential surgery for 12-month BCVA (combined = 0.38 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]; sequential = 0.36 logMAR; mean difference = + 0.02 logMAR; 95% confidence interval = -0.04 to 0.08; P = 0.51; I = 0%; n = 4 studies, 398 participants), as well as absolute refractive error (P = 0.76; I = 97%; n = 4 studies, 289 participants), risk of myopia (P = 0.15; I = 66%; n = 2 studies, 148 participants), MH nonclosure (P = 0.57; I = 48%; n = 4 studies, 321 participants), cystoid macular edema (P = 0.15; I = 0%; n = 6 studies, 526 participants), high-intraocular pressure (P = 0.09; I = 0%; n = 2 studies, 161 participants), posterior capsule opacification (P = 0.46; I = 0%; n = 2 studies, 161 participants), posterior capsule rupture (P = 0.41; I = 0%; n = 5 studies, 455 participants), and retinal detachment (P = 0.67; I = 0%; n = 6 studies, 545 participants).
CONCLUSION
No significant difference was detected between combined and sequential surgeries for visual outcomes, refractive outcomes, or complications. Given that most studies were retrospective and contained a high RoB, future high-quality RCTs are warranted.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Topics: Humans; Phacoemulsification; Retinal Perforations; Epiretinal Membrane; Vitrectomy; Visual Acuity
PubMed: 37030392
DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2023.03.017