-
Neurosurgical Focus Aug 2023Ovarian cancer is a rare origin of brain metastasis (BM), with an incidence of only 1%-3%. Consequently, the literature is sparse, and no treatment consensus guideline...
OBJECTIVE
Ovarian cancer is a rare origin of brain metastasis (BM), with an incidence of only 1%-3%. Consequently, the literature is sparse, and no treatment consensus guideline is available for ovarian BM. The authors conducted a systematic review of ovarian BM and performed a combined pooled cohort survival analysis with their case series.
METHODS
A systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science consistent with PRISMA guidelines along with an institutional retrospective chart review was conducted. Inclusion criteria for the systematic review included patients with confirmed BM and primary ovarian cancer, reported perioperative complications and outcomes, differentiated histology, and explicitly reported individual patient data. Reviews, commentaries, technical notes, and articles without English-language translations were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used independently by the first and second authors to assess the quality of each article. The authors performed univariate and multivariate analyses of several survival prognostic factors. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for significant prognostic factors in the univariate analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 48 patients with individual data across 34 studies and 8 patients from the authors' institution were included. All patients (n = 56) underwent resection for BM; 83.9% received adjuvant radiotherapy following surgery and 41.1% of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. The median progression-free survival was 12 months (range 2-43 months). The median overall survival was 9 months (range 1-49 months). On univariate analysis, a single BM and no extracranial metastasis conferred a survival benefit, while clear cell carcinoma as the primary histology corresponded to worsened OS. Multivariable analysis showed that age > 50 years (p = 0.002) and > 1 BM (p < 0.001) were risk factors for poor prognosis. Protective factors included the addition of the following multimodal adjuvant therapy with surgery: radiotherapy (p = 0.002), chemotherapy and radiotherapy (p = 0.005), and stereotactic radiosurgery (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS
Although the scarcity of published individual patient data hinders the determination of optimal management, the authors' analysis highlights that multimodal therapies, a single cranial lesion, and age < 50 years are associated with increased survival for patients with ovarian BMs.
Topics: Humans; Female; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Brain Neoplasms; Progression-Free Survival; Survival Analysis; Ovarian Neoplasms
PubMed: 37527683
DOI: 10.3171/2023.5.FOCUS23115 -
Cancer Oct 2023Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is gaining wider adoption for prostate cancer management but there remain significant toxicity risks when delivering prostate SBRT... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Acute toxicity comparison of magnetic resonance-guided adaptive versus fiducial or computed tomography-guided non-adaptive prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is gaining wider adoption for prostate cancer management but there remain significant toxicity risks when delivering prostate SBRT with standard techniques. Magnetic resonance-guided daily adaptive SBRT (MRg-A-SBRT) offers technological advantages in precision of radiation dose delivery, but the toxicity profile associated with MRg-A-SBRT compared to more standardly used fiducial or computed tomography-guided non-adaptive prostate SBRT (CT-SBRT) remains unknown.
METHODS
A meta-analysis to compare acute toxicity rates associated with MRg-A-SBRT and CT-SBRT for prostate cancer was performed in compliance with PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE (PubMed) and Google Scholar were searched for prospective studies of prostate SBRT that were published between January 1, 2018 and August 31, 2022. Random effects and fixed effects models were used to estimate pooled toxicity rates, and meta-regression was performed to compare toxicity between MRg-A-SBRT and CT-SBRT study groups.
RESULTS
Twenty-nine prospective studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria and included a total of 2547 patients. The pooled estimates for acute grade 2 or higher (G2+) genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity for MRg-A-SBRT were 16% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10%-24%) and 4% (95% CI, 2%-7%) and for CT-SBRT they were 28% (95% CI, 23%-33%) and 9% (95% CI, 6%-12%), respectively. On meta-regression, the odds ratios for acute G2+ GU and GI toxicities comparing MRg-A-SBRT and CT-SBRT were 0.56 (95% CI, 0.33-0.97, p = .04) and 0.40 (95% CI, 0.17-0.96, p = .04), respectively.
CONCLUSION
MRg-A-SBRT is associated with a significantly reduced risk of acute G2+ GU or GI toxicity compared to CT-SBRT. Longer follow-up will be needed to evaluate late toxicity and disease control outcomes.
PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY
Magnetic resonance imaging-guided daily adaptive prostate stereotactic radiation (MRg-A-SBRT) is a treatment that may allow for delivery of prostate radiation more precisely than other radiotherapy techniques, but it is unknown whether this reduces side effects compared to standardly used computed tomography-guided SBRT (CT-SBRT). In this systematic review and meta-analysis combining data from 29 clinical trials including 2547 patients, it was found that the risk of short-term urinary side effects was reduced by 44% and the risk of short-term bowel side effects was reduced by 60% with MRg-A-SBRT compared to CT-SBRT.
Topics: Male; Humans; Radiosurgery; Prostate; Prospective Studies; Prostatic Neoplasms; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
PubMed: 37485697
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34836 -
Neurosurgical Review Jul 2023Proton beam therapy is considered, by some authors, as having the advantage of delivering dose distributions more conformal to target compared with stereotactic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Proton beam therapy is considered, by some authors, as having the advantage of delivering dose distributions more conformal to target compared with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of proton beam for VSs, evaluating tumor control and cranial nerve preservation rates, particularly with regard to facial and hearing preservation.
METHODS
We reviewed, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) articles published between 1968 and September 30, 2022. We retained 8 studies reporting 587 patients.
RESULTS
Overall rate of tumor control (both stability and decrease in volume) was 95.4% (range 93.5-97.2%, p heterogeneity= 0.77, p<0.001). Overall rate of tumor progression was 4.6% (range 2.8-6.5%, p heterogeneity < 0.77, p<0.001). Overall rate of trigeminal nerve preservation (absence of numbness) was 95.6% (range 93.5-97.7%, I = 11.44%, p heterogeneity= 0.34, p<0.001). Overall rate of facial nerve preservation was 93.7% (range 89.6-97.7%, I = 76.27%, p heterogeneity<0.001, p<0.001). Overall rate of hearing preservation was 40.6% (range 29.4-51.8%, I = 43.36%, p heterogeneity= 0.1, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION
Proton beam therapy for VSs achieves high tumor control rates, as high as 95.4%. Facial rate preservation overall rates are 93%, which is lower compared to the most SRS series. Compared with most currently reported SRS techniques, proton beam radiation therapy for VSs does not offer an advantage for facial and hearing preservation compared to most of the currently reported SRS series.
Topics: Humans; Neuroma, Acoustic; Proton Therapy; Hearing; Cranial Nerves; Facial Nerve; Radiosurgery; Treatment Outcome; Follow-Up Studies; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37402894
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-023-02060-x -
Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Aug 2023Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an effective and safe modality for early-stage lung cancer and lung metastases. However, tumors in an ultra-central location... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Stereotactic body radiotherapy for Ultra-Central lung Tumors: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society practice guidelines.
BACKGROUND
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an effective and safe modality for early-stage lung cancer and lung metastases. However, tumors in an ultra-central location pose unique safety considerations. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the current safety and efficacy data and provide practice recommendations on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS).
METHODS
We performed a systematic review using PubMed and EMBASE databases of patients with ultra-central lung tumors treated with SBRT. Studies reporting local control (LC) and/or toxicity were included. Studies with <5 treated lesions, non-English language, re-irradiation, nodal tumors, or mixed outcomes in which ultra-central tumors could not be discerned were excluded. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed for studies reporting relevant endpoints. Meta-regression was conducted to determine the effect of various covariates on the primary outcomes.
RESULTS
602 unique studies were identified of which 27 (one prospective observational, the remainder retrospective) were included, representing 1183 treated targets. All studies defined ultra-central as the planning target volume (PTV) overlapping the proximal bronchial tree (PBT). The most common dose fractionations were 50 Gy/5, 60 Gy/8, and 60 Gy/12 fractions. The pooled 1- and 2-year LC estimates were 92 % and 89 %, respectively. Meta-regression identified biological effective dose (BED10) as a significant predictor of 1-year LC. A total of 109 grade 3-4 toxicity events, with a pooled incidence of 6 %, were reported, most commonly pneumonitis. There were 73 treatment related deaths, with a pooled incidence of 4 %, with the most common being hemoptysis. Anticoagulation, interstitial lung disease, endobronchial tumor, and concomitant targeted therapies were observed risk factors for fatal toxicity events.
CONCLUSION
SBRT for ultra-central lung tumors results in acceptable rates of local control, albeit with risks of severe toxicity. Caution should be taken for appropriate patient selection, consideration of concomitant therapies, and radiotherapy plan design.
Topics: Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Radiosurgery; Retrospective Studies; Lung; Dose Fractionation, Radiation; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37393758
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107281 -
Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Aug 2023A systematic review of treatment characteristics, outcomes, and treatment-related toxicities of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pulmonary oligometastases...
PURPOSE
A systematic review of treatment characteristics, outcomes, and treatment-related toxicities of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pulmonary oligometastases served as the basis for development of this International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) practice guideline.
METHODS
In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was performed of retrospective series with ≥50 patients/lung metastases, prospective trials with ≥25 patients/lung metastases, analyses of specific high-risk situations, and all randomized trials published between 2012 and July 2022 in the MEDLINE or Embase database using the key words "lung oligometastases", "lung metastases", "pulmonary metastases", "pulmonary oligometastases", "stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)" and "stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SBRT)". Weighted random effects models were used to calculate pooled outcomes estimates.
RESULTS
Of the 1884 articles screened, 35 analyses (27 retrospective-, 5 prospective, and 3 randomized trials) reporting on treatment of >3600 patients and >4650 metastases were included. The median local control was 90 % (Range: 57-100 %) at 1 year and 79 % (R: 70-96 %) at 5 years. Acute toxicity ≥3 was reported for 0.5 % and late toxicity ≥3 for 1.8 % of patients. A total of 21 practice recommendations covering the areas of staging & patient selection (n = 10), SBRT treatment (n = 10), and follow-up (n = 1) were developed, with agreements rates of 100 %, except for recommendation 13 (83 %).
CONCLUSION
SBRT represents an effective definitive local treatment modality combining high local control rates with low risk of radiation-induced toxicities.
Topics: Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Radiosurgery; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Radiation Injuries; Lung
PubMed: 37390723
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107284 -
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer Dec 2023This study aims to review the current evidence on the utility of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), with or without transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With or Without Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone in Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
PURPOSE
This study aims to review the current evidence on the utility of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), with or without transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (ESHCC) patients not amenable to standard curative treatment options.
METHODS
Literature search was conducted using PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Comparative studies reporting oncologic outcomes were included in the review.
RESULTS
Five studies (one phase II randomized controlled trial, one prospective cohort, three retrospective studies) compared SBRT versus TACE. Pooled analysis showed an overall survival (OS) benefit after 3 years (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.17-2.34, p = 0.005) which persisted in the 5-year data (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.06-2.22, p = 0.02) in favor of SBRT. RFS benefit with SBRT was also seen at 3 years (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.03-4.11, p = 0.04) which continued after 5 years (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.47-3.75, p = 0.0004). Pooled 2-year local control (LC) favored SBRT over TACE (OR 2.96, 95% CI 1.89-4.63, p < 0.00001). Two retrospective studies compared TACE + SBRT versus TACE alone. Pooled analysis showed significantly improved 3-year OS (OR 5.47; 95% CI 2.47-12.11, p < 0.0001) and LC (OR: 21.05; 95% CI 5.01-88.39, p ≤ 0.0001) in favor of the TACE + SBRT group. A phase III study showed significantly improved LC and PFS with SBRT after failed TACE/TAE versus further TACE/TAE.
CONCLUSIONS
Taking into account the limitations of the included studies, our review suggests significantly improved clinical outcomes in all groups having SBRT as a component of treatment versus TACE alone or further TACE. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further define the role of SBRT and TACE for ESHCC.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Liver Neoplasms; Radiosurgery; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Chemoembolization, Therapeutic; Combined Modality Therapy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37306936
DOI: 10.1007/s12029-023-00940-5 -
Pediatric Radiology Sep 2023Radiomics is the process of converting radiological images into high-dimensional data that may be used to create machine learning models capable of predicting clinical...
BACKGROUND
Radiomics is the process of converting radiological images into high-dimensional data that may be used to create machine learning models capable of predicting clinical outcomes, such as disease progression, treatment response and survival. Pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors differ from adult CNS tumors in terms of their tissue morphology, molecular subtype and textural features. We set out to appraise the current impact of this technology in clinical pediatric neuro-oncology practice.
OBJECTIVES
The aims of the study were to assess radiomics' current impact and potential utility in pediatric neuro-oncology practice; to evaluate the accuracy of radiomics-based machine learning models and compare this to the current standard which is stereotactic brain biopsy; and finally, to identify the current limitations of radiomics applications in pediatric neuro-oncology.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards, a systematic review of the literature was carried out with protocol number CRD42022372485 in the prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO). We performed a systematic literature search via PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Studies involving CNS tumors, studies that utilized radiomics and studies involving pediatric patients (age<18 years) were included. Several parameters were collected including imaging modality, sample size, image segmentation technique, machine learning model used, tumor type, radiomics utility, model accuracy, radiomics quality score and reported limitations.
RESULTS
The study included a total of 17 articles that underwent full-text review, after excluding duplicates, conference abstracts and studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria. The most commonly used machine learning models were support vector machines (n=7) and random forests (n=6), with an area under the curve (AUC) range of 0.60-0.94. The included studies investigated several pediatric CNS tumors, with ependymoma and medulloblastoma being the most frequently studied. Radiomics was primarily used for lesion identification, molecular subtyping, survival prognostication and metastasis prediction in pediatric neuro-oncology. The low sample size of studies was a commonly reported limitation.
CONCLUSION
The current state of radiomics in pediatric neuro-oncology is promising, in terms of distinguishing between tumor types; however, its utility in response assessment requires further evaluation which, given the relatively low number of pediatric tumors, calls for multicenter collaboration.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Child; Adolescent; Area Under Curve; Biopsy; Disease Progression; Machine Learning; Radiology; Multicenter Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37195305
DOI: 10.1007/s00247-023-05679-6 -
The Journal of Laryngology and Otology Nov 2023Stereotactic radiosurgery has been shown to be an effective method of managing vestibular schwannomas. The primary aim here is to establish the impact of pre-treatment... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Stereotactic radiosurgery has been shown to be an effective method of managing vestibular schwannomas. The primary aim here is to establish the impact of pre-treatment fast-growing vestibular schwannomas on the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery.
METHODS
PubMed, Medline and Embase databases were used. The ROBINS-I ('Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions') tool was utilised to assess for risk of bias. Proportionate meta-analysis and sub-analysis for fast-growing tumours were performed to explore the success rate of stereotactic radiosurgery in stabilising or decreasing the tumour burden in vestibular schwannomas.
RESULTS
Four moderate risk studies were included in the analysis. Overall, 91 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval = 0.83-0.97, < 0.01, = 80 per cent) of the tumours demonstrated successful size reduction or stabilisation following stereotactic radiosurgery. Nevertheless, the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery in reducing or stabilising fast-growing vestibular schwannomas decreased by 79 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval = 0.64-0.91, = 0.11, = 62 per cent).
CONCLUSION
Stereotactic radiosurgery has a statistically significant success rate in stabilising or decreasing the vestibular schwannoma size. This success rate is diminished in fast-growing vestibular schwannomas.
Topics: Humans; Neuroma, Acoustic; Radiosurgery; Microsurgery
PubMed: 37194631
DOI: 10.1017/S0022215123000786 -
Practical Radiation Oncology 2023Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has historically been considered a relative contraindication for pelvic radiation therapy (RT). To date, no systematic review has... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has historically been considered a relative contraindication for pelvic radiation therapy (RT). To date, no systematic review has summarized the toxicity profile of RT for patients with prostate cancer and comorbid IBD.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
A PRISMA-guided systematic search was conducted on PubMed/Embase for original investigations that reported gastrointestinal (GI; rectal/bowel) toxicity in patients with IBD undergoing RT for prostate cancer. The substantial heterogeneity in patient population, follow-up, and toxicity reporting practices precluded a formal meta-analysis; however, a summary of the individual study-level data and crude pooled rates was described.
RESULTS
Twelve retrospective studies with 194 patients were included: 5 examined predominantly low-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT) monotherapy, 1 predominantly high-dose-rate BT monotherapy, 3 mixed external beam RT (3-dimensional conformal or intensity modulated RT [IMRT]) + low-dose-rate BT, 1 IMRT + high-dose-rate BT, and 2 stereotactic RT. Among these studies, patients with active IBD, patients receiving pelvic RT, and patients with prior abdominopelvic surgery were underrepresented. In all but 1 publication, the rate of late grade 3+ GI toxicities was <5%. The crude pooled rate of acute and late grade 2+ GI events was 15.3% (n = 27/177 evaluable patients; range, 0%-100%) and 11.3% (n = 20/177 evaluable patients; range, 0%-38.5%), respectively. Crude rates of acute and late grade 3+ GI events were 3.4% (6 cases; range, 0%-23%) and 2.3% (4 cases; range, 0%-15%).
CONCLUSIONS
Prostate RT in patients with comorbid IBD appears to be associated with low rates of grade 3+ GI toxicity; however, patients must be counseled regarding the possibility for lower-grade toxicities. These data cannot be generalized to the underrepresented subpopulations mentioned above, and individualize decision-making is recommended for those high-risk cases. Several strategies should be considered to minimize the probability of toxicity in this susceptible population, including careful patient selection, minimizing elective (nodal) treatment volumes, using rectal sparing techniques, and employing contemporary RT advancements to minimize exposure to GI organs at risk (eg, IMRT, magnetic resonance imaging-based target delineation, and high-quality daily image guidance).
Topics: Humans; Male; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Prostatic Neoplasms; Radiotherapy Dosage; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37100389
DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.04.006