-
Scientific Reports Apr 2024Despite evidence suggesting the benefit of prophylactic regional antibiotic delivery (RAD) to sternal edges during cardiac surgery, it is seldom performed in clinical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Despite evidence suggesting the benefit of prophylactic regional antibiotic delivery (RAD) to sternal edges during cardiac surgery, it is seldom performed in clinical practice. The value of topical vancomycin and gentamicin for sternal wound infections (SWI) prophylaxis was further questioned by recent studies including randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to comprehensively assess the safety and effectiveness of RAD to reduce the risk of SWI.We screened multiple databases for RCTs assessing the effectiveness of RAD (vancomycin, gentamicin) in SWI prophylaxis. Random effects meta-analysis was performed. The primary endpoint was any SWI; other wound complications were also analysed. Odds Ratios served as the primary statistical analyses. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed.Thirteen RCTs (N = 7,719 patients) were included. The odds of any SWI were significantly reduced by over 50% with any RAD: OR (95%CIs): 0.49 (0.35-0.68); p < 0.001 and consistently reduced in vancomycin (0.34 [0.18-0.64]; p < 0.001) and gentamicin (0.58 [0.39-0.86]; p = 0.007) groups (p = 0.15). Similarly, RAD reduced the odds of SWI in diabetic and non-diabetic patients (0.46 [0.32-0.65]; p < 0.001 and 0.60 [0.44-0.83]; p = 0.002 respectively). Cumulative Z-curve passed the TSA-adjusted boundary for SWIs suggesting adequate power has been met and no further trials are needed. RAD significantly reduced deep (0.60 [0.43-0.83]; p = 0.003) and superficial SWIs (0.54 [0.32-0.91]; p = 0.02). No differences were seen in mediastinitis and mortality, however, limited number of studies assessed these endpoints. There was no evidence of systemic toxicity, sternal dehiscence and resistant strains emergence. Both vancomycin and gentamicin reduced the odds of cultures outside their respective serum concentrations' activity: vancomycin against gram-negative strains: 0.20 (0.01-4.18) and gentamicin against gram-positive strains: 0.42 (0.28-0.62); P < 0.001. Regional antibiotic delivery is safe and effectively reduces the risk of SWI in cardiac surgery patients.
Topics: Humans; Surgical Wound Infection; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Vancomycin; Gentamicins; Sternum; Cardiac Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 38678140
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60242-z -
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive &... Apr 2024Many options are available for reconstruction after deep sternal wound infections. However, these options have not been critically appraised. The aim of this systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Many options are available for reconstruction after deep sternal wound infections. However, these options have not been critically appraised. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the existing evidence on sternal rewiring versus flap reconstruction and pectoralis major muscle flaps (PMFs) versus greater omental flaps (GOFs).
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched. Outcomes of interest included mortality, treatment failure and length of hospital stay (LOS).
RESULTS
Fourteen studies were included. Nine studies compared flaps to rewiring, reporting on 618 patients. Patients treated with flaps had significantly lower mortality compared with patient treated with rewiring (Risk ratio [RR] 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.77, P < 0.01). Flap patients had significantly lower treatment failure compared with those who were treated with rewiring (RR 0.22, 95% CI: 0.14-0.37, P < 0.01). No statistically significant differences were observed in LOS between patients treated with flaps compared those treated with rewiring (standard mean difference -0.84, 95% CI: -1.91 to 0.24, P = 0.13). Five studies compared PMF with GOF, reporting on 599 patients. No statistically significant differences were found in mortality (RR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.24-1.68, P = 0.36), LOS (standard mean difference -14.52, 95% CI: -42.00 to 12.96, P = 0.30) or treatment failure (RR 1.37, 95% CI: 0.31-6.07, P = 0.68) in patients treated with PMF compared with patients treated with GOF.
CONCLUSIONS
Flap-based reconstruction demonstrated improved mortality and treatment outcomes compared to sternal rewiring. However, no significant differences were observed in outcomes between the PMF- and GOF-based reconstructions.
Topics: Humans; Surgical Wound Infection; Pectoralis Muscles; Surgical Flaps; Sternum; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 38442510
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.02.041 -
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery Feb 2024Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) constitutes a serious complication after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) constitutes a serious complication after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the dose-response relationship between glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level and the risk of DSWI after CABG.
METHODS
PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify potentially relevant articles. According to rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria, fourteen studies including 15,570 patients were enrolled in our meta-analysis. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was used as the summary statistic. The robust-error meta-regression model was used to synthesize the dose-response relationship.
RESULTS
Our meta-analysis shows that among patients undergoing CABG, preoperative elevated HbA1c was associated with the risk of developing DSWI (OR = 2.67, 95% CI 2.00-3.58) but with low prognostic accuracy (diagnostic OR = 2.70, 95% CI 1.96-3.73; area under the curve = 0.66, 95% CI 0.62-0.70) for predicting postoperative DSWI. Subgroup analyses showed the relationship became nonsignificant in patients without diabetes and studies adopting lower HbA1c thresholds. Dose-response analysis showed a significant nonlinear (p = 0.03) relationship between HbA1c and DSWI, with a significantly increased risk of DSWI when HbA1c was > 5.7%.
CONCLUSIONS
An elevated HbA1c level of > 5.7% was related to a higher risk of developing DSWI after CABG, and the risk increased as the HbA1c level grew. The association between HbA1c and DSWI was nonsignificant among nondiabetic patients while significant among diabetic patients.
Topics: Humans; Glycated Hemoglobin; Risk Factors; Coronary Artery Bypass; Surgical Wound Infection; Diabetes Mellitus; Sternum; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 38311780
DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-02549-6 -
The Ulster Medical Journal Jan 2024Sternal wound infection (SWI) has always been a significant risk in patients who undergo sternotomies as part of their cardiac surgical procedures. Computed tomography...
BACKGROUND
Sternal wound infection (SWI) has always been a significant risk in patients who undergo sternotomies as part of their cardiac surgical procedures. Computed tomography (CT) imaging is often used to diagnose and assess sternal wound infections. Its purpose includes identifying and locating infection and any sternal dehiscence.
METHODS
A systematic literature review across PubMed, Embase, and Ovid was performed according to PRISMA guidelines to identify relevant articles that discussed the utility of CT scanning for SWI, common features identified, patient outcomes and sensitivity/specificity (Figure 1).
RESULTS
25 papers were included. 100% (n=25) of the papers were published in peer-reviewed journals. CT scans in SWIs can be seen as a beneficial aid in diagnosing as well as determining the components of infection. Commonalities were identified such as fluid collection in the mediastinum, free gas, pleural effusions, and sternal dehiscence which point towards the presence of sternal wound infection.
CONCLUSION
CT scanning is a novel and emerging methodology for imaging in SWI and post-sternotomy complications, hence increased research is required to expand the literature on this area as well as the creation of guidelines and cut-offs or signs for radiology professionals to identify and determine the extent of infection.
Topics: Humans; Surgical Wound Infection; Retrospective Studies; Sternum; Sternotomy; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 38292500
DOI: No ID Found -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Dec 2023Aortic valve disease is a common condition easily treatable with cardiac surgery. This is conventionally performed by opening the sternum ('median sternotomy') and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Aortic valve disease is a common condition easily treatable with cardiac surgery. This is conventionally performed by opening the sternum ('median sternotomy') and replacing the valve under cardiopulmonary bypass. Median sternotomy is well tolerated, but as less invasive options become available, the efficacy of limited incisions has been called into question. In particular, the effects of reducing the visibility and surgical access have raised safety concerns with regard to the placement of cannulae, venting of the heart, epicardial wire placement, and de-airing of the heart at the end of the procedure. These difficulties may increase operating times, affecting outcome. The benefits of smaller incisions are thought to include decreased pain; improved respiratory mechanics; reductions in wound infections, bleeding, and need for transfusion; shorter intensive care stay; better cosmesis; and a quicker return to normal activity. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2017, with seven new studies.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via a limited sternotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement via median sternotomy in people with aortic valve disease requiring surgical replacement.
SEARCH METHODS
We performed searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase from inception to August 2021, with no language limitations. We also searched two clinical trials registries and manufacturers' websites. We reviewed references of primary studies to identify any further studies of relevance.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials comparing aortic valve replacement via a median sternotomy versus aortic valve replacement via a limited sternotomy. We excluded trials that performed other minimally invasive incisions such as mini-thoracotomies, port access, transapical, transfemoral or robotic procedures. Although some well-conducted prospective and retrospective case-control and cohort studies exist, these were not included in this review.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed trial papers to extract data, assess quality, and identify risk of bias. A third review author provided arbitration where required. We determined the certainty of evidence using the GRADE methodology and summarised results of patient-relevant outcomes in a summary of findings table.
MAIN RESULTS
The review included 14 trials with 1395 participants. Most studies had at least two domains at high risk of bias. We analysed 14 outcomes investigating the effects of minimally invasive limited upper hemi-sternotomy on aortic valve replacement as compared to surgery performed via full median sternotomy. Upper hemi-sternotomy may have little to no effect on mortality versus full median sternotomy (risk ratio (RR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45 to 1.94; 10 studies, 985 participants; low-certainty evidence). Upper hemi-sternotomy for aortic valve replacement may increase cardiopulmonary bypass time slightly, although the evidence is very uncertain (mean difference (MD) 10.63 minutes, 95% CI 3.39 to 17.88; 10 studies, 1043 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and may increase aortic cross-clamp time slightly (MD 6.07 minutes, 95% CI 0.79 to 11.35; 12 studies, 1235 participants; very low-certainty evidence), although the evidence is very uncertain. Most studies had at least two domains at high risk of bias. Postoperative blood loss was probably lower in the upper hemi-sternotomy group (MD -153 mL, 95% CI -246 to -60; 8 studies, 767 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Low-certainty evidence suggested that there may be no change in pain scores by upper hemi-sternotomy (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.19, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.04; 5 studies, 649 participants). Upper hemi-sternotomy may result in little to no difference in quality of life (MD 0.03 higher, 95% CI 0 to 0.06 higher; 4 studies, 624 participants; low-certainty evidence). Two studies reporting index admission costs concluded that limited sternotomy may be more costly at index admission in the UK National Health Service (MD 1190 GBP more, 95% CI 420 GBP to 1970 GBP, 2 studies, 492 participants; low-certainty evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The evidence was of very low to moderate certainty. Sample sizes were small and underpowered to demonstrate differences in some outcomes. Clinical heterogeneity was also noted. Considering these limitations, there may be little to no effect on mortality. Differences in extracorporeal support times are uncertain, comparing upper hemi-sternotomy to full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement. Before widespread adoption of the minimally invasive approach can be recommended, there is a need for a well-designed and adequately powered prospective randomised controlled trial. Such a study would benefit from also performing a robust cost analysis. Growing patient preference for minimally invasive techniques merits thorough quality of life analyses to be included as end points, as well as quantitative measures of physiological reserve.
Topics: Humans; Aortic Valve; Sternotomy; Quality of Life; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; State Medicine; Surgical Wound; Aortic Valve Disease; Pain; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38054555
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub3 -
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive &... Jul 2024
Meta-Analysis
Topics: Humans; Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy; Surgical Wound Infection; Sternotomy; Sternum
PubMed: 37980266
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.10.074 -
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive &... Jul 2024Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy has become a popular treatment option for wound healing. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the use of VAC therapy as a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy has become a popular treatment option for wound healing. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the use of VAC therapy as a bridge before the definitive treatment for the management of deep sternal wound complications.
METHODS
A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed in PubMed and Embase. Outcomes of interest included mortality, treatment failure, length of hospital stay (LOS), length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and cost of treatment.
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies involving 1980 patients were included in the quantitative synthesis of this meta-analysis. Patients treated with VAC had significantly lower overall mortality [1738 patients; Risk ratio [RR] = 0.36 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25, 0.51)], treatment failure [1210 patients; RR = 0.26 (95% CI: 0.19, 0.37)], LOS [498 patients; (standard mean difference = -0.44 (95% CI: -0.81, -0.07)] and ICU stay [309 patients; (standard mean difference = -0.34 (95% CI: -0.67, -0.01)] compared to that of non-VAC patients. VAC therapy was associated with reduced cost of treatment per patient compared with that of non-VAC therapies (reductions of 3600 USD, 6000 USD and 8983 USD in the reported studies).
CONCLUSIONS
VAC therapy as an adjunct in the definitive treatment of patients with deep sternal wound complications was associated with lower mortality, treatment failure, LOS, ICU stay and cost of treatment when compared with a non-VAC approach. Randomised controlled trials would be essential to confirm these findings.
Topics: Humans; Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy; Surgical Wound Infection; Sternotomy; Length of Stay; Wound Healing; Sternum; Surgical Wound Dehiscence
PubMed: 37951723
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.09.049 -
Clinical Case Reports Sep 2023Sternal fractures are commonly due to blunt force trauma and reduction is an invasive surgical procedure typically indicated for refractory pain sternal instability....
Sternal fractures are commonly due to blunt force trauma and reduction is an invasive surgical procedure typically indicated for refractory pain sternal instability. There were various modalities used for treatment and fixation of the sternal fractures. Sternal displacement fractures are traumatic injuries that may require surgical correction.
PubMed: 37663824
DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.7740 -
Surgery Nov 2023Despite guideline recommendations, routine application of topical antibiotic agents to sternal edges after cardiac surgery is seldom done. Recent randomized controlled... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Despite guideline recommendations, routine application of topical antibiotic agents to sternal edges after cardiac surgery is seldom done. Recent randomized controlled trials have also questioned the effectiveness of topical vancomycin in sternal wound infection prophylaxis.
METHODS
We screened multiple databases for observational studies and randomized controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of topical vancomycin. Random effects meta-analysis and risk-profile regression were performed, and randomized controlled trials and observational studies were analyzed separately. The primary endpoint was sternal wound infection; other wound complications were also analyzed. Risk ratios served as primary statistics.
RESULTS
Twenty studies (N = 40,871) were included, of which 7 were randomized controlled trials (N = 2,187). The risk of sternal wound infection was significantly reduced by almost 70% in the topical vancomycin group (risk ratios [95% confidence intervals]: 0.31 (0.23-0.43); P < .00001) and was comparable between randomized controlled trials (0.37 [0.21-0.64]; P < .0001) and observational studies (0.30 [0.20-0.45]; P < .00001; P = .57). Topical vancomycin significantly reduced the risk of superficial sternal wound infections (0.29 [0.15-0.53]; P < .00001) and deep sternal wound infections (0.29 [0.19-0.44]; P < .00001). A reduction in the risk of mediastinitis and sternal dehiscence risks was also demonstrated. Risk profile meta-regression showed a significant relationship between a higher risk of sternal wound infection and a higher benefit accrued with topical vancomycin (ß-coeff. = -0.00837; P < .0001). The number needed to treat was 58.2. A significant benefit was observed in patients with diabetes mellitus (risk ratios 0.21 [0.11-0.39]; P < .00001). There was no evidence of vancomycin or methicillin resistance; on the contrary, the risk of gram-negative cultures was reduced by over 60% (risk ratios 0.38 [0.22-0.66]; P = .0006).
CONCLUSION
Topical vancomycin effectively reduces the risk of sternal wound infection in cardiac surgery patients.
Topics: Humans; Vancomycin; Surgical Wound Infection; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Sternum
PubMed: 37414589
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.05.031