-
Oncology Research and Treatment Jun 2024Stomach cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer worldwide, especially in the population over 65 years, the survival rate is less in comparison with young...
INTRODUCTION
Stomach cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer worldwide, especially in the population over 65 years, the survival rate is less in comparison with young people, the evaluation of geriatric assessment would be key for assessing the prognosis of these patients.
METHODS
A search was performed in the OVID, EMBASE and PUBMED databases, and after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, four (4) articles were analyzed.
RESULTS
In the included studies, the MGA battery was not implemented, but rather easily measurable scales as nutritional status, functional status, cognitive and behavioral disorders, comorbidities, and polypharmacy, some authors proposed through the assessment of overall survival is not explicit among the included studies, patients with gastric cancer and mild, moderate, severe, and total dependence had a higher mortality than independent patients (39% HR 1.39; 95% CI 1.09-1.7), 68% (95% CI: 1.46-1.93), 187% (HR 2.87 95% CI: 2.47-3.34), and 234% 95% CI: 2.81-3.97), respectively. The Zhou study showed an association between sarcopenia, assessed by imaging studies, and a longer hospital stay in days (16 [9] vs. 13 [6], p 0.004). The study by Pujara found that polypharmacy (OR 2.36 CI 1.08-5.17) and weight loss greater than 10% in the past 6 months were associated with greater postoperative morbidity at 90 days (OR 2.36 CI 1.08-5.17, (OR 11.21 IC 2.16-58.24).
CONCLUSION
Geriatric assessment dependency appear to be prognostic markers of survival in patients with gastric cancer, however, higher quality studies in this specific population are required to support the systematic use of this assessment for the choice of appropriate therapy according to the patient.
PubMed: 38870920
DOI: 10.1159/000539774 -
Critical Reviews in Toxicology Jun 2024Over the past several decades, there have been many epidemiology studies on talc and cancer published in the scientific literature, and several reviews and meta-analyses... (Review)
Review
Over the past several decades, there have been many epidemiology studies on talc and cancer published in the scientific literature, and several reviews and meta-analyses of talc and respiratory, female reproductive, and stomach cancers, specifically. To help provide a resource for the evaluation of talc as a potential human carcinogen, we applied a consistent set of examination methods and criteria for all epidemiology studies that examined the association between talc exposure (by various routes) and cancers (of various types). We identified 30 cohort, 35 case-control, and 12 pooled studies that evaluated occupational, medicinal, and personal-care product talc exposure and cancers of the respiratory system, the female reproductive tract, the gastrointestinal tract, the urinary system, the lymphohematopoietic system, the prostate, male genital organs, and the central nervous system, as well as skin, eye, bone, connective tissue, peritoneal, and breast cancers. We tabulated study characteristics, quality, and results in a systematic manner, and evaluated all cancer types for which studies of at least three unique populations were available in a narrative review. We focused on study quality aspects most likely to impact the interpretation of results. We found that only one study, of medicinal talc use, evaluated direct exposure measurements for any individuals, though some used semi-quantitative exposure metrics, and few studies adequately assessed potential confounders. The only consistent associations were with ovarian cancer in case-control studies and these associations were likely impacted by recall and potentially other biases. This systematic review indicates that epidemiology studies do not support a causal association between occupational, medicinal, or personal talc exposure and any cancer in humans.
PubMed: 38868996
DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2351081 -
Journal of Robotic Surgery Jun 2024The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the comparative efficacy of robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery in treating gastric cancer among patients... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the comparative efficacy of robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery in treating gastric cancer among patients characterized by a high visceral fat area (VFA). In April 2024, we conducted a comprehensive literature review using major international databases, such as PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. We restricted our selection to articles written in English, excluding reviews, protocols without published data, conference abstracts, and irrelevant content. Our analysis focused on continuous data using 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and standard mean differences (SMDs), while dichotomous data were assessed with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. We set the threshold for statistical significance at P < 0.05. Data extraction included baseline characteristics, primary outcomes (such as operative time, major complications, lymph node yield, and anastomotic leakage), and secondary outcomes. The meta-analysis included three cohort studies totaling 970 patients. The robotic-assisted group demonstrated a significantly longer operative time compared to the laparoscopic group, with a weighted mean difference (WMD) of - 55.76 min (95% CI - 74.03 to - 37.50; P < 0.00001). This group also showed a reduction in major complications, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.48 (95% CI 1.09-5.66; P = 0.03) and fewer occurrences of abdominal infections (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.41-7.14; P = 0.005), abdominal abscesses (OR 3.83, 95% CI 1.53-9.57; P = 0.004), anastomotic leaks (OR 4.09, 95% CI 1.73-9.65; P = 0.001), and pancreatic leaks (OR 8.93, 95% CI 2.33-34.13; P = 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed between the groups regarding length of hospital stay, overall complications, estimated blood loss, or lymph node yield. Based on our findings, robot-assisted gastric cancer surgery in obese patients with visceral fat appears to be correlated with fewer major complications compared to laparoscopic surgery, while maintaining similar outcomes in other surgical aspects. However, it is important to note that robot-assisted procedures do tend to have longer operative times.
Topics: Humans; Laparoscopy; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Stomach Neoplasms; Operative Time; Treatment Outcome; Obesity, Abdominal; Postoperative Complications; Gastrectomy; Anastomotic Leak
PubMed: 38833096
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02002-9 -
The American Journal of Gastroenterology Jun 2024Ultra-processed food (UPF) intake has been associated with a higher risk of obesity, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. The initial data on the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Ultra-processed food (UPF) intake has been associated with a higher risk of obesity, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. The initial data on the relationship between UPF consumption and cancer risk were derived from retrospective observational studies with conflicting results. This systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies aimed to investigate the association between UPF consumption and gastrointestinal cancer risk.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for prospective cohort studies that compared the highest vs the lowest level of UPF consumption according to NOVA food classification and reported the risk of gastrointestinal cancers by subsite. The association with cancer was quantified as hazard ratios (HR) using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
Five prospective cohort studies were included in this review comprising 1,128,243 participants (241,201 participants in the highest and 223,366 in the lowest levels of UPF consumption). The mean follow-up ranged from 5.4 to 28 years. The highest UPF consumption was significantly associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (HR 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.21; P = 0.01; I2 = 31%), colon cancer (HR 1.12; 95% CI 1.02-1.23; P = 0.02; I2 = 0%), and non-cardia gastric cancer (HR 1.43; 95% CI 1.02-2.00; P = 0.04; I2 = 0%) compared with the lowest UPF intake. However, no association was found between high UPF consumption and hepatocellular, esophageal, pancreatic, gastric cardia, and rectal cancer.
DISCUSSION
The highest level of UPF consumption was significantly associated with colorectal and non-cardia gastric cancer.
Topics: Humans; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Fast Foods; Risk Factors; Colorectal Neoplasms; Stomach Neoplasms; Food, Processed
PubMed: 38832708
DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002826 -
European Journal of Gastroenterology &... Jul 2024Sporadic fundic gland polyps (FGPs) progress, albeit rarely, to dysplasia and cancer. Two meta-analyses, including 8 and 11 studies, concluded that proton pump...
Sporadic fundic gland polyps (FGPs) progress, albeit rarely, to dysplasia and cancer. Two meta-analyses, including 8 and 11 studies, concluded that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were associated with FGPs. Intervention is considered unnecessary when FGPs have a background of PPIs use. Both meta-analyses, however, disregarded known confounders: age, sex, endoscopy indications, study design (prospective or retrospective), duration of PPI use, and H. pylori infection. Confounders are known to invalidate meta-analyses. We followed PRIXMA guidelines and searched the literature for studies on FGPs in PPI-users and PPI-nonusers. In the 22 studies searched, we compared FGPs in PPI-users (n = 6534) and PPI-nonusers (n = 41 115). Heterogeneity was significant (Cochran Q = 277.8, P < 0.0001; I2 = 92.8%), annulling meta-analysis performed by blanket tallying. To offset the above confounders, we matched PPI-users and PPI-nonusers by (a) age and sex (n = 4300 and 29 307, respectively) and (b) their propensity scores derived from the confounders (n = 2950 and 4729, respectively). After both matching, FGPs were not significantly different between PPI-users and PPI-nonusers [odds ratio (OR) = 1.1, P = 0.3078; OR = 0.9, P = 0.3258, respectively]. Furthermore, FGP frequency did not correlate with increasing duration of PPI use (Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients = 0.1162, 0.0386, P < 0.6064, 0.8646, respectively); it was not significantly different between any of the duration periods of observation, namely, <10, 10-20, 20-40, >40 months, nor was it significantly different between PPI-users and PPI-nonusers within each duration period (P > 0.05). We conclude that PPIs are not associated with FGPs, implying that a background history of PPI use is not a justification for nonintervention in the management of FGPs.
Topics: Humans; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Polyps; Female; Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic; Risk Factors; Male; Stomach Neoplasms
PubMed: 38829941
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002788 -
Frontiers in Microbiology 2024The study aims to systematically identify the alterations in gut microbiota that observed in gastric cancer through comprehensive assessment of case-control studies.
OBJECTIVES
The study aims to systematically identify the alterations in gut microbiota that observed in gastric cancer through comprehensive assessment of case-control studies.
METHODS
The systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted to identify case-control studies that compared the microbiomes of individuals with and without gastric cancer. Quality of included studies was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). Meta-analyses utilized a random-effects model, and subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess study heterogeneity. All data analyses were performed using the "metan" package in Stata 17.0, and the results were described using log odds ratios (log ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
A total of 33 studies involving 4,829 participants were eligible for analysis with 29 studies provided changes in α diversity and 18 studies reported β diversity. Meta-analysis showed that only the Shannon index demonstrated statistical significance for α-diversity [-5.078 (-9.470, -0.686)]. No significant differences were observed at the phylum level, while 11 bacteria at genus-level were identified significant changed, e.g., increasing in [5.474, (0.949, 9.999)] and [5.095, (0.293, 9.897)] and decreasing in and with the same [-8.602, (-11.396, -5.808)]. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the changes of 9 bacterial genus were robust. Subgroup analyses on countries revealed an increasing abundance of and in Koreans with gastric cancer, whereas those with gastric cancer from Portugal had a reduced . Regarding the sample sources, the study observed an increase in and in the gastric mucosa of people with gastric cancer, alongside and . However, the relative abundance of decreased compared to the non-gastric cancer group, which was indicated in fecal samples.
CONCLUSION
This study identified robust changes of 9 bacterial genus in people with gastric cancer, which were country-/sample source-specific. Large-scale studies are needed to explore the mechanisms underlying these changes.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Unique Identifier: CRD42023437426 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023437426.
PubMed: 38812681
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1406526 -
Quality of Life Research : An... May 2024This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the impact of global quality of life (QOL) on mortality risk in patients with cancer, considering cancer type... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the impact of global quality of life (QOL) on mortality risk in patients with cancer, considering cancer type and timepoint of QOL assessment.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted using Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Scopus databases from inception to December 2022. Observational studies that assessed QOL and examined mortality risk in patients with cancer were extracted. Subgroup analyses were performed for cancer types and timepoints of QOL assessment.
RESULTS
Overall, global QOL was significantly associated with mortality risk (hazard ratio: 1.06, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-1.07; p < 0.00001). A subgroup analysis based on cancer type demonstrated that lung, head and neck, breast, esophagus, colon, prostate, hematologic, liver, gynecologic, stomach, brain, bladder, bone and soft tissue, and mixed type cancers were significantly associated with mortality risk; however, melanoma and pancreatic cancer were not significantly associated with mortality risk. Additionally, global QOL was associated with mortality risk at all timepoints (pretreatment, posttreatment, and palliative phase); pretreatment QOL had the largest impact, followed by posttreatment QOL.
CONCLUSION
These findings provide evidence that QOL is associated with mortality risk in patients with cancer at any timepoint. These results indicate the importance of evaluating the QOL and supportive interventions to improve QOL in any phase.
PubMed: 38811448
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03691-3 -
Medicine May 2024Advanced gastric cancer (AGC) that does not respond to first-line therapy poses a challenge to clinical management. The objective of this study was to compare the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Advanced gastric cancer (AGC) that does not respond to first-line therapy poses a challenge to clinical management. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with S-1 in second-line and above treatment of AGC.
METHODS
Cochrane Library, Science Direct, EMBASE, PubMed, and CNKI were searched for randomized controlled trial until August 2023. Only patients who met "Standardized Diagnosis and Treatment Guide for Gastric Cancer" were included in the study. The accurate data and distinguishing between follow-up time and drug dose were extracted to reduce heterogeneity and the risk of bias of the included trials was evaluated according to the Cochrane Handbook. Finally, the survival benefit of the treatment was evaluated based on clinical response rate, survival period, biochemical index, and adverse event occurrence in the trial.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis included 29 randomized controlled trials involving 2149 participants. Statistically significant increases in clinical effective rate (odds ratios = 2.61, 95% confidence interval [2.13-3.20], P < .00001) and disease control rate (odds ratios = 3.16, 95% confidence interval [2.54-3.94], P < .00001) were found when apatinib combined with S-1, and also had obvious advantages in reducing tumor markers and regulating immune factors. In addition, apatinib combined with S-1 significantly increased the risk of hypertension but reduced damage to liver function, while the improvement of other adverse events was not pronounced.
DISCUSSION
Apatinib combined with S-1 is more effective and safe for second-line and above treatment of AGC. This study minimized the conclusion bias caused by the basic data sources, but more high-quality studies are still needed to validate these conclusions.
Topics: Humans; Stomach Neoplasms; Oxonic Acid; Pyridines; Tegafur; Drug Combinations; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Antineoplastic Agents; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38787998
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038272 -
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology :... May 2024Poor oral health and oral dysbiosis were found to be associated with cancers, especially of the gastrointestinal (GI) system. But the cause-and-effect relationship and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Poor oral health and oral dysbiosis were found to be associated with cancers, especially of the gastrointestinal (GI) system. But the cause-and-effect relationship and the effect of the risk are not yet known due to scarcity of literature. Understanding such risk relationship can contribute to an integrated multi-disciplinary approach for GI cancer prevention.
AIM
The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the role of oral dysbiosis on increasing the risk of digestive system cancers.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effect of poor oral health on increasing the risk of gastrointestinal cancers.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic search following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines in databases PubMed, Elsevier, Wiley's online library and Web of Science from inception to February 2023 to include recent cohort studies that assessed the association between poor oral health and the risk of cancer. We assessed bias using the New Castle Ottawa scale. We used inferential statistics to describe the effect of oral dysbiosis on gastrointestinal cancers. We performed a sub-group analysis to assess the effect of oral conditions on individual cancers.
RESULTS
We included 10 longitudinal studies in the meta-analysis. The overall effect size of poor oral health and GI cancer risk was hazard's ratio (HR) =1.30 (95% CI: [1.14, 1.46]) (p<0.001) (I = 68.78). Sub-group analysis indicated that poor oral health increases the risk of esophageal cancer HR=1.61 (95% CI: [1.37, 1.85]), stomach cancer HR=1.33 (95% CI: [1.08, 1.58]), pancreatic cancer HR=1.90 (95% CI; [1.29, 2.50]) and colorectal and hepatocellular carcinoma HR=1.16 (95% CI: [1.08, 1.23]).
CONCLUSION
The meta-analysis indicated that poor oral health was significantly associated with increasing the risk of GI cancers.
PubMed: 38767806
DOI: 10.1007/s12664-024-01546-w -
BMC Cancer May 2024Immunotherapy or apatinib alone has been used as third-line adjuvant therapy for advanced or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) tumors, but the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Immunotherapy or apatinib alone has been used as third-line adjuvant therapy for advanced or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) tumors, but the efficacy of combining them with each other for the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEJ is unknown; therefore, we further evaluated the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy combined with apatinib in patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEJ.
METHODS
The main search was conducted on published databases: Embase, Cochrane library, PubMed.The search was conducted from the establishment of the database to December 2023.Clinical trials with patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEJ and immunotherapy combined with apatinib as the study variable were collected. Review Manager 5.4 software as well as stata 15.0 software were used for meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 651 patients from 19 articles were included in this meta-analysis. In the included studies, immunotherapy combined with apatinib had a complete response (CR) of 0.03 (95% CI: 0.00 -0.06), partial response (PR) of 0.34 (95% CI: 0.19-0.49), stable disease (SD) of 0.43 (95% CI: 0.32-0.55), objective response rate (ORR) was 0.36 (95% CI: 0.23-0.48), disease control rate (DCR) was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74-0.86), and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.29 (95% CI: 4.05-4.52), median Overall survival (OS) was 8.79 (95% CI: 7.92-9.66), and the incidence of grade ≥ 3 TRAEs was 0.34 (95% CI: 0:19-0.49). PR, ORR, DCR, median PFS and median OS were significantly higher in the immunotherapy and apatinib combination chemotherapy group (IAC) than in the immunotherapy combination apatinib group (IA). And the difference was not significant in the incidence of SD and grade ≥ 3 TRAEs.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis shows that immunotherapy combined with apatinib is safe and effective in the treatment of advanced or metastatic G/GEJ, where IAC can be a recommended adjuvant treatment option for patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEJ. However, more large multicenter randomized studies are urgently needed to reveal the long-term outcomes of immunotherapy combined with apatinib treatment.
Topics: Humans; Pyridines; Stomach Neoplasms; Immunotherapy; Esophagogastric Junction; Esophageal Neoplasms; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38760737
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12340-4