-
Journal of Molecular Histology Jun 2024The prevalence of TNBC in India is higher compared to western countries. There is a multitude of biomarkers associated with different clinical outcomes of TNBC with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The prevalence of TNBC in India is higher compared to western countries. There is a multitude of biomarkers associated with different clinical outcomes of TNBC with contradictory reports. Identification of a set of specific biomarkers from the very many number of proteins reported in the literature to predict prognosis of TNBC is an urgent clinical need.
METHODOLOGY
A systematic review of key molecular biomarkers in cohort studies that have been investigated for their role in breast cancer prognosis was conducted. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology was followed. A meta-analysis was used to evaluate their pooled hazard ratio (HR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) statistically. Immunohistochemical characterization of the meta-analyzed markers were performed in a cohort of 200 retrospective TNBC and 100 non TNBC patient tissues. Kaplan-Meier plot were used to evaluate disease free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Cox regression models were used to evaluate predictors of DFS and OS.
RESULTS
Using a meta-analytical approach, we consolidated the biomarker signatures associated with survival outcomes in breast cancers. The promising markers that emerged for the prediction of DFS and OS included E-Cadherin, Survivin, p53, MTA1, HIF1A, CD133, Vimentin and CK5/6. Evaluation of these markers in tumor tissue revealed that subcellular localization of p53, MTA1 and HIF1A had a significant association in predicting TNBC prognosis. Kaplan Meier plot revealed that p53 (OS p = 0.007, DFS p = 0.004), HIF 1 A (OS p = 0.054, DFS p = 0.009) and MTA1 (OS p = 0.043, DFS = p = 0.001) expression in the primary tumor tissue were found to be significantly correlated with poor OS and DFS, whereas expression of Survivin (DFS p = 0.024) and E Cadherin (DFS p = 0.027) correlated with DFS alone in TNBC. Univariate analysis revealed that p53, HIF1A and MTA1 could be independent prognostic markers.
CONCLUSION
Our study suggests cytoplasmic over expression of HIF1A, nuclear over expression of MTA1 and mutated p53 in the primary tumor tissue of TNBC have significance as markers predicting survival of TNBC patients.
Topics: Humans; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53; Repressor Proteins; Biomarkers, Tumor; Female; Trans-Activators; Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha Subunit; Histone Deacetylases; Prognosis; Kaplan-Meier Estimate
PubMed: 38613589
DOI: 10.1007/s10735-024-10190-9 -
Pathology, Research and Practice May 2024Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) poses diagnostic challenges due to its resemblance to benign pleural pathologies and different histological subtypes. Several... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) poses diagnostic challenges due to its resemblance to benign pleural pathologies and different histological subtypes. Several immunohistochemistry markers have been employed to aid in accurate diagnosis.
METHODS
The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of various immunohistochemistry markers in malignant pleural mesothelioma diagnosis and its histological subtypes. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched the literature for articles on using different immunohistochemical markers in MPM and its histological subtypes. EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, and Virtual Health Library were searched for studies published up to August 2023. We used the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) criteria to assess the quality of the included articles. Meta-analyses were performed to determine prevalence using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
103 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising a diverse range of immunohistochemistry markers. EMA and desmin-loss exhibited high sensitivity (96% and 92%, respectively) in distinguishing malignant pleural mesothelioma from benign pleural pathologies. Specificity was notably high for both BAP1-loss and survivin expression at 100%. Subtype-specific analyses demonstrated that EMA and HEG1 were sensitive markers for epithelioid mesothelioma, while GLUT1 showed high sensitivity for sarcomatoid mesothelioma. In cases comparing epithelioid mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma, CAM5.2 and calretinin displayed high sensitivity, while WT1 and BAP1-loss demonstrated exceptional specificity for malignant epithelioid mesothelioma. In the case of sarcomatoid mesothelioma and sarcomatoid lung carcinoma, GATA3 exhibited the most heightened sensitivity, while GATA3 and D2-40 displayed the best specificity for sarcomatoid malignant mesothelioma diagnosis.
CONCLUSION
Immunohistochemistry markers are essential in accurately diagnosing malignant pleural mesothelioma and its histological subtypes. This systematic review and meta-analysis provide a comprehensive insight into the diagnostic performance of these markers, facilitating their potential clinical utility in the discrimination of malignant pleural mesothelioma from other pleural pathologies and the differentiation of malignant pleural mesothelioma subtypes.
Topics: Humans; Mesothelioma, Malignant; Biomarkers, Tumor; Immunohistochemistry; Pleural Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Diagnosis, Differential
PubMed: 38603842
DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155276 -
Urologic Oncology May 2024Early detection, diagnosis, and treatment take on critical significance in preventing and treating bladder cancer. As indicated by numerous studies, survivin can serve... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Early detection, diagnosis, and treatment take on critical significance in preventing and treating bladder cancer. As indicated by numerous studies, survivin can serve as a biomarker of bladder cancer, whereas the results of a wide variety of studies have been controversial. This paper is to assess the accuracy of survivin in the diagnosis of bladder cancer by a meta-analysis. The studies regarding the diagnosis of bladder cancer using survivin were systematically retrieved from the CNKI, WanFang, CBM, VIP, Web of science, cochrane library and pubmed were extracted, and the literature quality was assessed. Meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 16.0 MP. 2,082 relevant studies were searched, and 40 studies were finally covered for meta-analysis. The pooled specificity and pooled sensitivity of survivin mRNA was 0.95 (95%CI: 0.91, 0.97) and 0.94 (95%CI: 0.88, 0.97). The pooled specificity and pooled sensitivity of survivin protein reached 0.95 (95%CI: 0.90, 0.97) and 0.87 (95%CI: 0.78, 0.92). The pooled positive likelihood ratio, pooled negative likelihood ratio, the area under the curve, and diagnostic odds ratio for survivin mRNA reached 17.7 (95%CI: 10.3, 30.6), 0.07 (95%CI: 0.04, 0.12), 0.98 (95%CI: 0.97, 0.99) and 266 (95%CI: 114, 621), respectively. For survivin protein was 16.4 (95%CI: 7.9, 33.9), 0.14 (95%CI: 0.08, 0.24), 0.97 (95%CI: 0.95, 0.98) and 117 (95%CI: 38, 357), respectively. Survivin takes on great significance in diagnosing bladder cancer. However, due to some limitations in the number and quality of covered studies, this conclusion should be validated through additional higher quality clinical studies.
Topics: Humans; Survivin; Biomarkers; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; RNA, Messenger; Odds Ratio
PubMed: 38418270
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.018 -
International Journal of Molecular... Jul 2023The objective of the study was to compare the expression of immunohistochemical (IHC) markers of oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) (non-transformed group) to those of oral... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Comparison of Immunohistochemical Markers in Oral Submucous Fibrosis and Oral Submucous Fibrosis Transformed to Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
The objective of the study was to compare the expression of immunohistochemical (IHC) markers of oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) (non-transformed group) to those of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) transformed from OSMF (transformed group). The search for comparative cross-sectional studies was carried out in PubMed and Scopus abiding to the PICO criteria, where expression of IHC markers in OSMF were compared with that of OSCC transformed from OSMF. The cellular distribution, number of positive cases, staining intensity, and mean immunoreactive score (IRS) of each IHC marker were evaluated in both groups. A total of 14 studies were included in the systematic review, in which immunoexpression of 15 epithelial and 4 connective tissue biomarkers were evaluated. Expression of β1-integrin, OCT-3, CD1a, CD207, survivin, Dickkopf-1, COX-2, hTERT, CTGF, MDM2, Ki-67, and α-SMA were increased during transformation of OSMF to OSCC. Conversely, expression of PTEN and lysyl oxidase decreased during transformation of OSMF to OSCC. Expression of a group of epithelial markers, such as COX2, hTERT, CTGF, survivin, MDM2, and p53, was 38 times lower in the non-transformed group cases compared to transformed group cases (95% CI: 58% to 10%; = 0.01; and I = 90%). Meta-analysis of all markers involved in cell metabolism/apoptosis, which included β1-integrin along with the above markers also suggested 42 times lower expression in the non-transformed group as compared to the transformed group (95% CI: 58% to 10%; = 0.01; and I = 90%). Sub-group analyses on cytoplasmic and nuclear epithelial markers were inconclusive. Meta-analysis of connective tissue markers was also inconclusive. No publication bias was found. Instead of delving into numerous markers without a strong basis for their use, it is advisable to further study the markers identified in this study to explore their clinical utility.
Topics: Humans; Oral Submucous Fibrosis; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Mouth Neoplasms; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Survivin; Cross-Sectional Studies; Integrin beta1; Head and Neck Neoplasms
PubMed: 37511530
DOI: 10.3390/ijms241411771