-
The Journal of Maternal-fetal &... Dec 2023Women's choice of birth following a cesarean delivery either includes a trial of elective repeat cesarean section (ERCS) or a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC). No... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Women's choice of birth following a cesarean delivery either includes a trial of elective repeat cesarean section (ERCS) or a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC). No comprehensive overview or systematic summary is currently available.
METHODS
EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to 1 February 2020. Studies reporting the safety of TOLAC and ERCS in pregnant women with prior cesarean delivery were included. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 15.0. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were adopted as the effective measures.
RESULTS
A total of 13 studies covering 676,532 cases were included in this meta-analysis. The results demonstrated that the rates of uterine rupture (OR = 3.35, 95%CI [1.57, 7.15], = 81%), neonatal asphyxia (OR = 2.32, 95%CI [1.76, 3.08], = 0%) and perinatal death (OR = 1.71, 95%CI [1.29, 2.25], = 0%) were higher in the TOLAC group compared with the ERCS group. The rates of peripartum hysterectomy (OR = 0.70, 95%CI [0.44, 1.11], = 62%), blood transfusion (OR = 1.24, 95%CI [0.72, 2.12], = 95%), and puerperal infection (OR = 1.11, 95%CI [0.77, 1.60], = 95%) showed no significant differences between the two groups.
CONCLUSION
TOLAC is associated with a higher risk of uterine rupture, neonatal asphyxia, and perinatal death compared with ERCS. Nevertheless, it should be noted that the risks of all complications were small in both groups. This information is important for healthcare providers and women choosing the delivery type.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Female; Pregnancy; Humans; Cesarean Section; Cesarean Section, Repeat; Trial of Labor; Perinatal Death; Uterine Rupture; Asphyxia; Vaginal Birth after Cesarean; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37217450
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2214831 -
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Sep 2023The authors discuss the incidence, the embryological development, the classification, the presentation and the treatment options of this rare reproductive tract... (Review)
Review
The authors discuss the incidence, the embryological development, the classification, the presentation and the treatment options of this rare reproductive tract abnormality. In the past, the treatment proposed almost unanimously was hysterectomy and subsequent construction, when necessary, of a neovagina. In recent decades, numerous experiences of conservative therapies have accumulated that allow the restoration of menstrual function and in some rare cases even the achievement of a pregnancy. However, complications associated with recanalization of the cervix frequently resulted in the need for repeated surgery, risk of serious and sometimes fatal ascending infection. This review aims to analyze the most recent and significant experiences of conservative surgery in this field to provide an accurate picture of the various techniques and their outcomes, especially from the point of view of fertility. Conservative surgery should now be considered as the first-line treatment option. On the other hand, it is not possible to draw conclusions on the superiority of one technique over another among the various conservative options. This would require large series with adequate follow-up, which unfortunately are not available.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Cervix Uteri; Surgery, Plastic; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Hysterectomy; Vagina; Congenital Abnormalities
PubMed: 36305896
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06825-5