-
Pharmacotherapy Nov 2023Prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy (PIRRT) is gaining popularity as a renal replacement modality in intensive care units, but there is a relative lack of... (Review)
Review
Prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy (PIRRT) is gaining popularity as a renal replacement modality in intensive care units, but there is a relative lack of guidance regarding antimicrobial clearance and dosing when compared with other modalities. The objectives of this systematic review were to: (1) identify and describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) of relevant antimicrobials used in critically ill adults receiving PIRRT, (2) evaluate the quality of evidence supporting these data, and (3) propose dosing recommendations based on the synthesis of these data. A search strategy for multiple databases was designed and executed to identify relevant published evidence describing the PK of antimicrobials used in critically ill adults receiving PIRRT. Quality assessment, evaluation of reporting, and relevant data extraction were conducted in duplicate. Synthesis of PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) outcomes, dosing recommendations from study authors, and physicochemical properties of included antibiotics were assessed by investigators in addition to the quality of evidence to develop dosing recommendations. Thirty-nine studies enrolling 452 patients met criteria for inclusion and provided PK and/or PD data for 20 antimicrobials in critically ill adults receiving PIRRT. Nineteen studies describe both PK and PD outcomes. Vancomycin (12 studies, 171 patients), meropenem (7 studies, 84 patients), and piperacillin/tazobactam (5 studies, 56 patients) were the most frequent antimicrobials encountered. The quality of evidence was deemed strong for 7/20 antimicrobials, and strong dosing recommendations were determined for 9/20 antimicrobials. This systematic review updates and addresses issues of quality in previous systematic reviews on this topic. Despite an overall low quality of evidence, strong recommendations were able to be made for almost half of the identified antimicrobials. Knowledge gaps persist for many antimicrobials, and higher quality studies (i.e., population PK studies with assessment of PD target attainment) are needed to address these gaps.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Intermittent Renal Replacement Therapy; Critical Illness; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Vancomycin; Renal Replacement Therapy
PubMed: 37596844
DOI: 10.1002/phar.2861 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Jul 2023and spp. are two common bacterial pathogens populating the human microbiota. We possess scant data on how interacts with spp. in the gut microbiota in subjects... (Review)
Review
and spp. are two common bacterial pathogens populating the human microbiota. We possess scant data on how interacts with spp. in the gut microbiota in subjects colonized with or during a infection. We carried out a systematic review of studies on spp. and 's interaction in the gut microbiota and on the effect of spp. gut colonization on CDI development. Studies on spp. and 's interaction in the gut microbiota and on the effect of spp. gut colonization on CDI were searched using the search terms "clostridium", "clostridioides", "difficile" and "enterococcus" on the MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases. PubMed was searched until 1 May 2023. An English language restriction was applied. The risk of bias in the included studies was not assessed. Quantitative and qualitative information was summarized in textual descriptions. Fourteen studies, published from August 2012 to November 2022, on and spp.'s interaction in the gut microbiota met the inclusion criteria. The studies included in our systematic review reported evidence that the spp. intestinal burden represents a risk factor for the occurrence of CDI. There is supporting evidence that spp. play a role in CDI development and clinical outcomes.
PubMed: 37568399
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12154997 -
Emerging infections in vulnerable hosts: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Elizabethkingia anophelis.Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases Dec 2023This systematic review aimed to explore the recent trends in the epidemiology, risk factors, and antimicrobial susceptibility of two emerging opportunistic pathogens,...
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
This systematic review aimed to explore the recent trends in the epidemiology, risk factors, and antimicrobial susceptibility of two emerging opportunistic pathogens, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Elizabethkingia anophelis .
RECENT FINDINGS
Since 2020, numerous outbreaks of S. maltophilia and E. anophelis have been reported worldwide. Most of these outbreaks have been associated with healthcare facilities, although one outbreak caused by E. anophelis in France was considered a community-associated infection. In terms of antimicrobial susceptibility, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ), levofloxacin, and minocycline have exhibited good efficacy against S. maltophilia . Additionally, cefiderocol and a combination of aztreonam and avibactam have shown promising results in in vitro susceptibility testing. For E. anophelis , there is currently no consensus on the optimal treatment. Although some studies have reported good efficacy with rifampin, TMP-SMZ, piperacillin/tazobactam, and cefoperazone/sulbactam, minocycline had the most favourable in vitro susceptibility rates. Cefiderocol may serve as an alternative due to its low minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against E. anophelis . The role of vancomycin in treatment is still uncertain, although several successful cases with vancomycin treatment, even with high MIC values, have been reported.
SUMMARY
Immunocompromised patients are particularly vulnerable to infections caused by S. maltophilia and E. anophelis , but the optimal treatment strategy remains inconclusive. Further research is necessary to determine the most effective use of conventional and novel antimicrobial agents in combatting these multidrug-resistant pathogens.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Minocycline; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; Vancomycin; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination; Anti-Infective Agents; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Cefiderocol
PubMed: 37548375
DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000953 -
International Journal of Antimicrobial... Oct 2023To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vancomycin with the other anti-Gram-positive bacteria antibiotics in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vancomycin with the other anti-Gram-positive bacteria antibiotics in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.
METHODS
We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases until August 2022 for studies that compared vancomycin with other antibiotic regimens for treating Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Clinical and microbiological responses, adverse events, relapse rate and mortality were considered.
RESULTS
Fifteen randomized controlled trials and nine retrospective studies were included. The efficacy and safety data of vancomycin differed from those of the comparators group. After subgroup analysis, the differences came mainly from the trials compared with daptomycin. Compared to daptomycin, vancomycin showed a lower microbiological cure rate (OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.41∼0.82, I = 0%, P = 0.002) and clinical cure rate (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.42∼0.68, I = 3%, P < 0.00001), as well as more adverse events (OR = 3.21, 95% CI = 1.43∼7.19, I = 59%, P = 0.005).
CONCLUSION
The efficacy of vancomycin in treating Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia is still excellent but slightly inferior in adverse events. However, this does not affect its use as a first-line drug. Daptomycin is expected to be a better antimicrobial drug.
Topics: Humans; Vancomycin; Staphylococcal Infections; Daptomycin; Bacteremia; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Staphylococcus aureus; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
PubMed: 37543121
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106946 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Jul 2023Unlike other adverse drug reactions, visceral organ involvement is a prominent feature of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome and... (Review)
Review
Unlike other adverse drug reactions, visceral organ involvement is a prominent feature of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome and correlates with mortality. The aim of this study was to systematically review cases published in PubMed-indexed, peer-reviewed journals in which patients had renal injury during the episode of DRESS syndrome (DS). We found 71 cases, of which 67 were adults and 56% were males. Female sex was associated with higher mortality. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was present in 14% of patients who developed acute kidney injury (AKI) during DS. In 21% of cases, the kidneys were the only visceral organ involved, while 54% of patients had both liver and kidney involvement. Eosinophilia was absent in 24% of patients. The most common classes of medication associated with renal injury in DS were antibiotics in 34%, xanthine oxidase inhibitors in 15%, and anticonvulsants in 11%. Among antibiotics, vancomycin was the most common culprit in 68% of patients. AKI was the most common renal manifestation reported in 96% of cases, while isolated proteinuria or hematuria was present in only 4% of cases. In cases with AKI, 88% had isolated increase in creatinine and decrease in glomerular filtration (GFR), 27% had AKI concomitantly with proteinuria, 18% had oliguria, and 13% had concomitant AKI with hematuria. Anuria was the rarest manifestation, occurring in only 4% of patients with DS. Temporary renal replacement therapy was needed in 30% of cases, and all but one patient fully recovered renal function. Mortality of DS in this cohort was 13%, which is higher than previously reported. Medication class, latency period, or pre-existing CKD were not found to be associated with higher mortality. More research, particularly prospective studies, is needed to better recognize the risks associated with renal injury in patients with DS. The development of disease-specific biomarkers would also be useful so DS with renal involvement can be easier distinguished from other eosinophilic diseases that might affect the kidney.
PubMed: 37510691
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12144576 -
Surgery Nov 2023Despite guideline recommendations, routine application of topical antibiotic agents to sternal edges after cardiac surgery is seldom done. Recent randomized controlled... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Despite guideline recommendations, routine application of topical antibiotic agents to sternal edges after cardiac surgery is seldom done. Recent randomized controlled trials have also questioned the effectiveness of topical vancomycin in sternal wound infection prophylaxis.
METHODS
We screened multiple databases for observational studies and randomized controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of topical vancomycin. Random effects meta-analysis and risk-profile regression were performed, and randomized controlled trials and observational studies were analyzed separately. The primary endpoint was sternal wound infection; other wound complications were also analyzed. Risk ratios served as primary statistics.
RESULTS
Twenty studies (N = 40,871) were included, of which 7 were randomized controlled trials (N = 2,187). The risk of sternal wound infection was significantly reduced by almost 70% in the topical vancomycin group (risk ratios [95% confidence intervals]: 0.31 (0.23-0.43); P < .00001) and was comparable between randomized controlled trials (0.37 [0.21-0.64]; P < .0001) and observational studies (0.30 [0.20-0.45]; P < .00001; P = .57). Topical vancomycin significantly reduced the risk of superficial sternal wound infections (0.29 [0.15-0.53]; P < .00001) and deep sternal wound infections (0.29 [0.19-0.44]; P < .00001). A reduction in the risk of mediastinitis and sternal dehiscence risks was also demonstrated. Risk profile meta-regression showed a significant relationship between a higher risk of sternal wound infection and a higher benefit accrued with topical vancomycin (ß-coeff. = -0.00837; P < .0001). The number needed to treat was 58.2. A significant benefit was observed in patients with diabetes mellitus (risk ratios 0.21 [0.11-0.39]; P < .00001). There was no evidence of vancomycin or methicillin resistance; on the contrary, the risk of gram-negative cultures was reduced by over 60% (risk ratios 0.38 [0.22-0.66]; P = .0006).
CONCLUSION
Topical vancomycin effectively reduces the risk of sternal wound infection in cardiac surgery patients.
Topics: Humans; Vancomycin; Surgical Wound Infection; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Sternum
PubMed: 37414589
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.05.031 -
Journal of Global Antimicrobial... Mar 2024Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a hereditary recessive disease that affects the mucous clearance of the lungs and allows bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus to settle in the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a hereditary recessive disease that affects the mucous clearance of the lungs and allows bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus to settle in the lung and cause infection. This study examined the prevalence of antibiotic resistance of S. aureus in cystic fibrosis infection using a systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
A comprehensive and systematic search of related articles was conducted through the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases until March 2022. The weighted pooled resistance rate of antibiotics was analysed with Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation in the Stata software version 17.1 using the Metaprop command.
RESULTS
In this meta-analysis, 25 studies were used based on criteria to evaluate the pattern of S. aureus resistance in CF. Vancomycin and teicoplanin were the most effective options for treatment of CF patients; the highest level of antibiotic resistance observed was to erythromycin and clindamycin.
CONCLUSION
High levels of resistance to most of the antibiotics studied was observed. The high levels of antibiotic resistance observed are worrisome and indicate the need to monitor antibiotic use.
Topics: Humans; Staphylococcus aureus; Cystic Fibrosis; Prevalence; Staphylococcal Infections; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Resistance, Microbial
PubMed: 37211214
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2023.05.006 -
Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) Sep 2023To organize, categorize, and create a quick reference guide for the use of intravitreal antibiotic alternatives to the standard combination of vancomycin and ceftazidime...
PURPOSE
To organize, categorize, and create a quick reference guide for the use of intravitreal antibiotic alternatives to the standard combination of vancomycin and ceftazidime for the treatment of endophthalmitis.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The authors searched for all available information regarding intravitreal antibiotics in the last 21 years. Manuscripts were selected according to relevance, level of information, and the available data regarding intravitreal dose, potential adverse effects, bacterial coverage, and relevant pharmacokinetic information.
RESULTS
The authors included 164 of 1810 manuscripts. The antibiotics were classified according to their class into fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins, glycopeptide and lipopeptide, penicillins and beta-lactams, tetracyclines, and miscellaneous. The authors also included information regarding intravitreal adjuvants for the treatment of endophthalmitis and one ocular antiseptic.
CONCLUSION
The treatment of infectious endophthalmitis is a therapeutic challenge. The current review summarizes the properties of possible intravitreal antibiotic alternatives that should be considered in cases of suboptimal response to initial treatment.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Vancomycin; Endophthalmitis; Ceftazidime; Cephalosporins; Intravitreal Injections; Eye Infections, Bacterial
PubMed: 36893433
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003773 -
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Aug 2023Conventionally, vancomycin trough levels have been used for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Owing to the increasing evidence of trough levels being poor surrogates of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Conventionally, vancomycin trough levels have been used for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Owing to the increasing evidence of trough levels being poor surrogates of area under the curve (AUC) and the advent of advanced pharmacokinetics software, a paradigm shift has been made toward AUC-guided dosing. This study aims to evaluate the impact of AUC-guided versus trough-guided TDM on vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Google scholar, and Cochrane library databases; articles published from January 01, 2009, to January 01, 2021, were retrieved and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Studies that evaluated trough-guided or AUC-guided vancomycin TDM and vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity were included. Random-effects models were used to compare the differences in nephrotoxicity.
RESULTS
Of the 1191 retrieved studies, 57 were included. Most studies included adults and older adults (n = 47, 82.45%). The pooled prevalence of nephrotoxicity was lower in AUC-guided TDM [6.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.9%-9.5%] than in trough-guided TDM (17.0%; 95% CI: 14.7%-19.2%). Compared with the trough-guided approach, the AUC-guided approach had a lower risk of nephrotoxicity (odds ratio: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.32-0.89). The risk of nephrotoxicity was unaffected by the AUC derivation method. AUC thresholds correlated with nephrotoxicity only within the first 96 hours of therapy.
CONCLUSIONS
The AUC-guided approach had a lower risk of nephrotoxicity, supporting the updated American Society of Health-System Pharmacists guidelines. Further studies are needed to evaluate the optimal AUC-derivation methods and clinical utility of repeated measurements of the AUC and trough levels of vancomycin.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Vancomycin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Area Under Curve; Drug Monitoring; Retrospective Studies; Microbial Sensitivity Tests
PubMed: 36728329
DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000001075 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Science :... Jan 2024Focus on reviewing a vigorous research effort to improve the safety profile of vancomycin powder (VP) and its optimal dose in reducing periprosthetic joint infection... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing intrawound vancomycin powder and povidone iodine lavage in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection of hip and knee arthroplasties.
BACKGROUND
Focus on reviewing a vigorous research effort to improve the safety profile of vancomycin powder (VP) and its optimal dose in reducing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the need of the hour. This systematic review and meta-analysis attempt to explore the ongoing use of VP and VP + povidone iodine (PI) lavage to prevent PJI of hip/knee arthroplasties and highlights its challenges among the orthopedic community about the existence of the major organism and its frequency in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients.
METHODS
We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE databases regarding the outcomes of vancomycin powder (VP) and VP + povidone iodine (PI) combination in preventing periprosthetic joint infection of hip and knee arthroplasties.
RESULTS
In 5 of 7 studies, the combination of vancomycin powder (VP) and povidone iodine (PI) lavage have shown a lower risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in acute and high-risk hip and knee arthroplasties patients, with less or without serious adverse events and readmissions; while four of seven studies using VP-only found increasing rates of PJI in primary total knee arthroplasty and partial hip replacement in elderly patients with comorbidities, and significantly causes aseptic wound complications compared to the control group.
CONCLUSIONS
Intra-articular vancomycin powder (VP) and povidone iodine (PI) lavage showed a significant reduction of periprosthetic joint infection in primary and revision total joint arthroplasty. Before its widespread use in clinical settings, prospective randomized studies and, most importantly, its long-term efficacy and safety are recommended.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Vancomycin; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Povidone-Iodine; Powders; Therapeutic Irrigation; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Prospective Studies; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthritis, Infectious; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36470703
DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2022.11.013