-
Sante Publique (Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy,... 2024Health professionals’ social responsibility in health resists translation into skills that can be taught and implemented concretely in professional practice.
INTRODUCTION
Health professionals’ social responsibility in health resists translation into skills that can be taught and implemented concretely in professional practice.
PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH
This study, conducted by the Réseau International Francophone pour la Responsabilité Sociale en Santé (RIFRESS), aims to develop a consensus on the components of doctors’ social responsibility in health from the perspective of experts in medical education. Its findings are intended to inform the creation of a skills profile. A three-round Delphi consensus method was used, with an open first round and closed second and third rounds. Mesydel software was used to organize the process and to do the qualitative analysis of the first round. SPSS was used for consensus analysis for rounds 2 and 3.
RESULTS
Thirty-four experts responded to the study. During the first round, 62 codes emerged, grouped into 13 themes. From the initial analysis, 40 items were submitted for the Delphi round 2. Of these 40 items, 23 came out consensual after the second round, as did 13 of the 18 resubmitted items after the third. Examples of items that emerged as consensual are eco-responsibility, advocacy, defense of the common good, critical analysis of practice, and collaborative leadership.
CONCLUSIONS
The present study represents a much-needed effort to concretely define the components of doctors’ social responsibility in health. Local context must be taken into account when using these findings. They can help to train tomorrow’s doctors to better meet the priority health needs of society in a profoundly changing world.
Topics: Delphi Technique; Humans; Social Responsibility; Internationality; Consensus; Female; Male
PubMed: 38906818
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online Mar 2024The aim of this study was to establish the consensus recommendations among hand surgeons who were experts in the use of collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) on the...
PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to establish the consensus recommendations among hand surgeons who were experts in the use of collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) on the appropriate treatment of Dupuytren disease in well-defined patient populations with varying degrees of disease severity and functional impairment.
METHODS
A three-round, blinded, modified Delphi process examined panelists' approaches to CCH treatment of metacarpophalangeal (MP) or proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint contractures involving one or two fingers with varying degrees of severity. Clinical scenarios related to poor-quality skin, postfasciectomy scarring, boutonnière deformity, closed capsulotomy, and blood thinner use were also presented for panelist consideration. Panelists provided responses to clinical scenarios using a 5-point Likert scale or a yes/no response. Consensus was defined as ≥66.7% panelist agreement or disagreement.
RESULTS
Twenty panelists completed round 1; 19 of the 20 panelists completed rounds 2 and 3. Panelists achieved a high level of consensus for using CCH for the treatment of patients with palpable cords and varying severity contractures representing one- or two-finger MP joint contractures, most one- or two-finger PIP joint contractures, and most combined MP and PIP joint contractures. Consensus for the treatment of PIP joint contractures was mostly achieved, but clinical scenarios related to recurrent PIP contracture with poor-quality skin and/or significant postfasciectomy scarring, boutonnière deformity, PIP contractures >70°, closed capsulotomy, and blood thinner use were modified, and then most (95.3%) statements reached consensus for agreement in round 2. In round 3, open-ended responses indicated that panelists considered CCH appropriate for most patients with Dupuytren disease.
CONCLUSIONS
Consensus-based findings among expert hand surgeons with substantial CCH experience indicated that CCH has a wide-ranging application for the treatment of Dupuytren disease in patients with varying degrees of disease severity and functional impairment.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic V.
PubMed: 38903838
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.10.011 -
Pediatrics Jul 2024To develop guidance for pediatric clinicians on how to discuss race and racism in pediatric clinical settings.
OBJECTIVE
To develop guidance for pediatric clinicians on how to discuss race and racism in pediatric clinical settings.
METHODS
We conducted a modified Delphi study from 2021 to 2022 with a panel of pediatric clinicians, psychologists, parents, and adolescents with expertise in racism and child health through scholarship or lived experience. Panelists responded to an initial survey with open-ended questions about how to talk to youth about race and racism. We coded the responses using qualitative methods and presented them back to the panelists. In iterative surveys, panelists reached a consensus on which themes were most important for the conversation.
RESULTS
A total of 29 of 33 panelists completed the surveys and a consensus was reached about the concepts pediatric clinicians should consider before, during, and after conversations about race and racism and impediments clinicians may face while having these discussions. Panelists agreed that it was within the pediatric clinician's role to have these conversations. An overarching theme was the importance of having background knowledge about the systemic nature of racism. Panelists agreed that being active listeners, learning from patients, and addressing intersectionality were important for pediatric clinicians during conversations. Panelists also agreed that short- and long-term benefits may result from these conversations; however, harm could be done if pediatric clinicians do not have adequate training to conduct the conversations.
CONCLUSIONS
These principles can help guide conversations about race and racism in the pediatric clinical setting, equipping clinicians with tools to offer care that acknowledges and addresses the racism many of their patients face.
Topics: Humans; Racism; Child; Pediatrics; Communication; Delphi Technique; Physician-Patient Relations; Adolescent; Pediatricians; Racial Groups; Female; Male
PubMed: 38903051
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2023-063767 -
BMC Primary Care Jun 2024Primary Health Care (PHC) plays a crucial role in managing the COVID-19 pandemic, with only 8% of cases requiring hospitalization. However, PHC COVID-19 data often goes...
BACKGROUND
Primary Health Care (PHC) plays a crucial role in managing the COVID-19 pandemic, with only 8% of cases requiring hospitalization. However, PHC COVID-19 data often goes unnoticed on European government dashboards and in media discussions. This project aims to examine official information on PHC patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe, with specific objectives: (1) Describe PHC's clinical pathways for acute COVID-19 cases, including long-term care facilities, (2) Describe PHC COVID-19 pandemic indicators, (3) Develop COVID-19 PHC activity indicators, (4) Explain PHC's role in vaccination strategies, and (5) Create a PHC contingency plan for future pandemics.
METHODS
A mixed-method study will employ two online questionnaires to gather retrospective PHC data on COVID-19 management and PHC involvement in vaccination strategies. Validation will occur through focus group discussions with medical and public health (PH) experts. A two-wave Delphi survey will establish a European PHC indicators dashboard for future pandemics. Additionally, a coordinated health system action plan involving PHC, secondary care, and PH will be devised to address future pandemic scenarios.
ANALYSIS
Quantitative data will be analysed using STATA v16.0 for descriptive and multivariate analyses. Qualitative data will be collected through peer-reviewed questionnaires and content analysis of focus group discussions. A Delphi survey and multiple focus groups will be employed to achieve consensus on PHC indicators and a common European health system response plan for future pandemics. The Eurodata research group involving researchers from 28 European countries support the development.
DISCUSSION
While PHC manages most COVID-19 acute cases, data remains limited in many European countries. This study collects data from numerous countries, offering a comprehensive perspective on PHC's role during the pandemic in Europe. It pioneers the development of a PHC dashboard and health system plan for pandemics in Europe. These results may prove invaluable in future pandemics. However, data may have biases due to key informants' involvement and may not fully represent all European GP practices. PHC has a significant role in the management of the COVID-19 pandemic, as most of the cases are mild or moderate and only 8% needed hospitalization. However, PHC COVID-19 activity data is invisible on governments' daily dashboards in Europe, often overlooked in media and public debates.
Topics: COVID-19; Humans; Europe; Primary Health Care; Pandemics; Surveys and Questionnaires; SARS-CoV-2; Delphi Technique; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 38902681
DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02413-5 -
Pediatric Research Jun 2024'Neonatal encephalopathy' (NE) describes a group of conditions in term infants presenting in the earliest days after birth with disturbed neurological function of...
BACKGROUND
'Neonatal encephalopathy' (NE) describes a group of conditions in term infants presenting in the earliest days after birth with disturbed neurological function of cerebral origin. NE is aetiologically heterogenous; one cause is peripartum hypoxic ischaemia. Lack of uniformity in the terminology used to describe NE and its diagnostic criteria creates difficulty in the design and interpretation of research and complicates communication with families. The DEFINE study aims to use a modified Delphi approach to form a consensus definition for NE, and diagnostic criteria.
METHODS
Directed by an international steering group, we will conduct a systematic review of the literature to assess the terminology used in trials of NE, and with their guidance perform an online Real-time Delphi survey to develop a consensus diagnosis and criteria for NE. A consensus meeting will be held to agree on the final terminology and criteria, and the outcome disseminated widely.
DISCUSSION
A clear and consistent consensus-based definition of NE and criteria for its diagnosis, achieved by use of a modified Delphi technique, will enable more comparability of research results and improved communication among professionals and with families.
IMPACT
The terms Neonatal Encephalopathy and Hypoxic Ischaemic Encephalopathy tend to be used interchangeably in the literature to describe a term newborn with signs of encephalopathy at birth. This creates difficulty in communication with families and carers, and between medical professionals and researchers, as well as creating difficulty with performance of research. The DEFINE project will use a Real-time Delphi approach to create a consensus definition for the term 'Neonatal Encephalopathy'. A definition formed by this consensus approach will be accepted and utilised by the neonatal community to improve research, outcomes, and parental experience.
PubMed: 38902453
DOI: 10.1038/s41390-024-03303-3 -
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi =... Jun 2024Colorectal cancer is the second most common malignant tumor in China, with rectal cancer accounting for approximately 50% of all cases. While neoadjuvant therapy is...
Colorectal cancer is the second most common malignant tumor in China, with rectal cancer accounting for approximately 50% of all cases. While neoadjuvant therapy is essential for diagnosis and treatment, proctectomy with radical resection remains indispensable. Especially for middle and low rectal cancer, the length of the distal resection margin is critical for prognosis, organ preservation, and postoperative quality of life. However, determining a "safe" margin to ensure the radical resection (R0) while maximizing the function of the anal sphincter poses a significant challenge for surgeons. Aiming at this, we conducted a comprehensive review of authoritative guidelines and literature domestically and internationally. We divided the issues related to resection margin in proctectomy into three chapters: (1) the concept and definition of the resection margin; (2) the evaluation of the resection margin in preoperative, intra-operative, and post-operative stages; and (3) radical resection of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. With the help of the Delphi method, the expert group voted twice for 14 recommendations and finally established the "Chinese Expert Consensus for Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Surgery (2024 version)". This consensus serves as a valuable reference for clinicians to carry out proctectomy of rectal cancer, which can improve patient's quality of life without affecting their prognosis.
Topics: Humans; China; Consensus; Delphi Technique; Margins of Excision; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Proctectomy; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Rectal Neoplasms
PubMed: 38901985
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240403-00123 -
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi Jun 2024Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is classified as group 4 pulmonary hypertension, characterized by pulmonary arterial thrombotic occlusion leading...
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is classified as group 4 pulmonary hypertension, characterized by pulmonary arterial thrombotic occlusion leading to vascular stenosis or obstruction, progressive elevation of pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary arterial pressure, ultimately leading to right heart failure and even death. Recent years have seen rapid progress in the diagnostic and therapeutic in CTEPH field. More and more patients with CTEPH have been accurately diagnosed and assessed in time. Nevertheless, there is still a lot of work to do in the popularization of CTEPH diagnostic and therapeutic technique and the building of CTEPH expert center. To better guide clinical practice in our country, Pulmonary Embolism & Pulmonary Vascular Diseases Group of the Chinese Thoracic Society, Pulmonary Embolism & Pulmonary Vascular Disease Working Group of Chinese Association of Chest Physicians, National Cooperation Group on Prevention & Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism & Pulmonary Vascular Disease, National Expert Panel on the Development of a Standardized Framework for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension, convened multidisciplinary experts for deliberation and Delphi expert consensus to develop the "Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (2024 edition) ". These guidelines systematically evaluate domestic and international evidence-based medical research on CTEPH and propose recommendations tailored to clinical practice in our country. The key areas covered include definitions, epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and assessment, treatment, and management, with the aim of further standardizing the clinical diagnosis and treatment of CTEPH in our country.
Topics: Humans; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Pulmonary Embolism; Chronic Disease; China
PubMed: 38901977
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240116-00117 -
The Journal of Investigative Dermatology Jun 2024Methods for describing and reporting the clinical and histological characteristics of cutaneous tissue samples from patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) are not...
Methods for describing and reporting the clinical and histological characteristics of cutaneous tissue samples from patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) are not currently standardized, limiting clinicians' and scientists' ability to uniformly record, report, and communicate about the characteristics of tissue used in translational experiments. A recently published consensus statement outlined morphological definitions of typical HS lesions, but no consensus has been reached regarding clinical characterization and examination of HS tissue samples. Here we aimed to establish a protocol for reporting histopathologic and clinical characteristics of HS tissue specimens. This study was conducted from May 2023 to August 2023. Experts in clinical care, dermatopathology, and translational research were recruited, and a modified Delphi technique was used to develop a protocol for histologic reporting and clinical characterization of submitted tissue specimens from HS patients. A total of 27 experts participated (14 dermatologists, 3 fellowship-trained dermatopathologists, 3 plastic surgeons, 3 general surgeons, and 4 research scientists) in creating and reviewing protocols for the clinical and histopathological examination of HS tissue specimens. The protocols were formatted as a synoptic report and will help consistently classify specimens in biobanks based on histological features and more accurately report and select samples used in translational research projects.
PubMed: 38901775
DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2024.02.041 -
American Journal of Speech-language... Jun 2024Despite general agreement on the importance of person-centered care in speech-language pathology, guidelines for developing person-centered interventions for those with...
PURPOSE
Despite general agreement on the importance of person-centered care in speech-language pathology, guidelines for developing person-centered interventions for those with dementia are limited. This study aimed to obtain expert opinion on the components of a person-centered augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention for persons with dementia.
METHOD
A modified electronic Delphi technique was employed in a single round. A purposively sampled panel of experts was invited to provide their opinion on three open-ended questions related to (a) the elements of person-centered care, (b) communication supports, and (c) the interaction outcomes of a person-centered intervention. Thirty-one experts from nine countries participated on the panel. The majority were speech-language pathologists primarily involved in research. Qualitative written data were coded and analyzed using content analysis.
RESULTS
Nine components were identified across the three open-ended questions: (a) the unique characteristics of the person with dementia, (b) working with a person with dementia, (c) preserving personhood, (d) a different view on person-centered care, (e) a range of communication supports, (f) supportive conversational partners, (g) designing communication supports, (h) interaction outcome measure, and (i) meaningful interaction outcomes.
CONCLUSION
This study identified nine components that are useful in guiding speech-language pathologists in crafting future person-centered AAC interventions for people with dementia.
PubMed: 38901000
DOI: 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00317 -
JAMA Network Open Jun 2024There has been an emerging trend of podcast use in medical education over the past decade. With the increasing number of podcasts and learners' interest in trauma...
IMPORTANCE
There has been an emerging trend of podcast use in medical education over the past decade. With the increasing number of podcasts and learners' interest in trauma surgery, it is vital to validate the quality of these podcasts.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the quantity and quality of podcast episodes on trauma surgery.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This cross-sectional study identified trauma surgery podcasts published globally on the Google, Apple, and Spotify platforms as of May 31, 2023. An initial screening excluded podcasts not fulfilling the inclusion criteria (published as of May 31, 2023, and covering clinical knowledge or mentorship on general trauma surgery). A 10-item checklist developed from a modified Delphi consensus method was created to assess the podcasts' credibility, content, and design as indicators of quality. Data extracted from each podcast episode included the duration, setting, host and guest credentials, and fulfillment of quality indicators. Data were analyzed on August 13, 2023.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The quality of each podcast was assessed using the 10-question checklist. A score of at least 80% in credibility (4 of 5 points), 75% in content (3 of 4 points), and 100% in design (1 of 1 point) was required to classify a podcast episode as having good quality.
RESULTS
The initial search identified 204 podcasts on trauma surgery, of which 55 podcasts met the inclusion criteria. All 55 podcasts were published after 2014, with the majority hosted by males (85% [61 of 72 hosts]), based in the US (91% [50 of 55 podcasts]), and focused on clinical knowledge (80% [44 of 55 podcasts]). Podcast hosts and guests predominantly held a Doctor of Medicine degree (83% [113 of 136]), with 72% [46 of 64] of guests identifying as practicing trauma surgeons. While all 55 podcasts had excellent quality in terms of content and design, 20% (11 of 55) of podcasts were rated poorly on credibility. Credibility was further reduced for 60% (33 of 55) of podcasts because of nondisclosure of conflicts of interest.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this cross-sectional study of trauma surgery podcasts, most had good-quality content and design, but there was a lack of explicit conflict of interest disclosure. Content producers need to disclose their conflicts of interest appropriately to ensure credibility and improve the quality of their podcasts.
Topics: Humans; Cross-Sectional Studies; Webcasts as Topic; Traumatology; Delphi Technique; Acute Care Surgery
PubMed: 38900427
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15636