-
Indian Journal of Pediatrics Dec 2023India contributes the highest absolute number of stillbirths in the world. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize the burden, timing and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
India contributes the highest absolute number of stillbirths in the world. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize the burden, timing and causes of stillbirths in India. Forty-nine reports from 46 studies conducted in 21 Indian states and Union Territories were included. It was found that there was no uniformity/standardization in the definition of stillbirths and in the classification system used to assign the cause. The share of antepartum stillbirths was estimated to be two-third while remaining were intrapartum stillbirths. Maternal conditions and fetal causes were found to be the leading cause of stillbirth in India. The maternal condition was assigned as the commonest cause (25%) followed by fetal (14%), placental cause (13%), congenital malformation (6%) and intrapartum complications (4%). Approximately 20% of the stillbirths were assigned as unknown or unexplained. This review demonstrates that there is a paucity of quality stillbirth data in India. Other than the state level differences in stillbirth rates, no other data is available on inequities in stillbirths in India. There is an urgent need for strengthening availability and quality of stillbirth data in India on both stillbirth rates as well as the causes. There is a need to conduct additional research to know the timing of the stillbirths, causes of death and actual burden. India needs to strengthen stillbirth audits along with registry to find out the modifiable factors and delays for making country specific preventive strategies. The policy makers, academic community and researchers need to work together to ensure accelerated and equitable reduction in stillbirths in India.
Topics: Humans; Female; Pregnancy; Stillbirth; Placenta; Risk Factors; Prenatal Care; India
PubMed: 37556034
DOI: 10.1007/s12098-023-04749-9 -
PLoS Medicine Jul 2023Ethnic and socioeconomic inequalities in obstetric outcomes are well established. However, the role of induction of labour (IOL) to reduce these inequalities is...
Induction of labour at 39 weeks and adverse outcomes in low-risk pregnancies according to ethnicity, socioeconomic deprivation, and parity: A national cohort study in England.
BACKGROUND
Ethnic and socioeconomic inequalities in obstetric outcomes are well established. However, the role of induction of labour (IOL) to reduce these inequalities is controversial, in part due to insufficient evidence. This national cohort study aimed to identify adverse perinatal outcomes associated with IOL with birth at 39 weeks of gestation ("IOL group") compared to expectant management ("expectant management group") according to maternal characteristics in women with low-risk pregnancies.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
All English National Health Service (NHS) hospital births between January 2018 and March 2021 were examined. Using the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) dataset, maternal and neonatal data (demographic, diagnoses, procedures, labour, and birth details) were linked, with neonatal mortality data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Women with a low-risk pregnancy were identified by excluding pregnancies with preexisting comorbidities, previous cesarean section, breech presentation, placenta previa, gestational diabetes, or a baby with congenital abnormalities. Women with premature rupture of membranes, placental abruption, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, amniotic fluid abnormalities, or antepartum stillbirth were excluded only from the IOL group. Adverse perinatal outcome was defined as stillbirth, neonatal death, or neonatal morbidity, the latter identified using the English composite neonatal outcome indicator (E-NAOI). Binomial regression models estimated risk differences (with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)) between the IOL group and the expectant management group, adjusting for ethnicity, socioeconomic background, maternal age, parity, year of birth, and birthweight centile. Interaction tests examined risk differences according to ethnicity, socioeconomic background, and parity. Of the 1 567 004 women with singleton pregnancies, 501 072 women with low-risk pregnancies and with sufficient data quality were included in the analysis. Approximately 3.3% of births in the IOL group (1 555/47 352) and 3.6% in the expectant management group (16 525/453 720) had an adverse perinatal outcome. After adjustment, a lower risk of adverse perinatal outcomes was found in the IOL group (risk difference -0.28%; 95% CI -0.43%, -0.12%; p = 0.001). This risk difference varied according to socioeconomic background from 0.38% (-0.08%, 0.83%) in the least deprived to -0.48% (-0.76%, -0.20%) in the most deprived national quintile (p-value for interaction = 0.01) and by parity with risk difference of -0.54% (-0.80%, -0.27%) in nulliparous women and -0.15% (-0.35%, 0.04%) in multiparous women (p-value for interaction = 0.02). There was no statistically significant evidence that risk differences varied according to ethnicity (p = 0.19). Key limitations included absence of additional confounding factors such as smoking, BMI, and the indication for induction in the HES datasets, which may mean some higher risk pregnancies were included.
CONCLUSIONS
IOL with birth at 39 weeks was associated with a small reduction in the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, with 360 inductions in low-risk pregnancies needed to avoid 1 adverse outcome. The risk reduction was mainly present in women from more socioeconomically deprived areas and in nulliparous women. There was no significant risk difference found by ethnicity. Increased uptake of IOL at 39 weeks, especially in women from more socioeconomically deprived areas, may help reduce inequalities in adverse perinatal outcomes.
Topics: Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Parity; Stillbirth; Cesarean Section; Cohort Studies; Ethnicity; State Medicine; Placenta; Labor, Induced; England; Socioeconomic Factors
PubMed: 37471395
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004259 -
BJOG : An International Journal of... Jan 2024Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries have high stillbirth rates compared with high-income countries, yet research on risk factors for stillbirth in SSA remain scant. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries have high stillbirth rates compared with high-income countries, yet research on risk factors for stillbirth in SSA remain scant.
OBJECTIVES
To identify the modifiable risk factors of stillbirths in SSA and investigate their strength of association using a systematic review.
SEARCH STRATEGY
CINAHL Plus, EMBASE, Global Health and MEDLINE databases were searched for literature.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Observational population- and facility-level studies exploring stillbirth risk factors, published in 2013-2019 were included.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
A narrative synthesis of data was undertaken and the potential risk factors were classified into subgroups.
MAIN RESULTS
Thirty-seven studies were included, encompassing 20 264 stillbirths. The risk factors were categorised as: maternal antepartum factors (0-4 antenatal care visits, multiple gestations, hypertension, birth interval of >3 years, history of perinatal death); socio-economic factors (maternal lower wealth index and basic education, advanced maternal age, grand multiparity of ≥5); intrapartum factors (direct obstetric complication); fetal factors (low birthweight and gestational age of <37 weeks) and health systems factors (poor quality of antenatal care, emergency referrals, ill-equipped facility). The proportion of unexplained stillbirths remained very high. No association was found between stillbirths and body mass index, diabetes, distance from the facility or HIV.
CONCLUSIONS
The overall quality of evidence was low, as many studies were facility based and did not adjust for confounding factors. This review identified preventable risk factors for stillbirth. Focused programmatic strategies to improve antenatal care, emergency obstetric care, maternal perinatal education, referral and outreach systems, and birth attendant training should be developed. More population-based, high-quality research is needed.
Topics: Pregnancy; Female; Humans; Infant; Stillbirth; Prenatal Care; Perinatal Death; Pregnancy Complications; Africa South of the Sahara
PubMed: 37272228
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17562 -
American Journal of Perinatology May 2024This study was aimed to investigate delivery management of patients with antepartum stillbirth.
OBJECTIVE
This study was aimed to investigate delivery management of patients with antepartum stillbirth.
STUDY DESIGN
Using data from fetal death certificates and linked maternal hospital discharge records, we identified a population-based sample of patients with singleton antepartum stillbirth at 20 to 42 weeks of gestation in California in 2007 to 2011. Primary outcomes were intended mode of delivery and actual mode of delivery. We used multivariable regressions to examine the association between patient demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics and their mode of delivery. Separate analysis was performed for patients who had prior cesarean delivery versus those who did not.
RESULTS
Of 7,813 patients with singleton antepartum stillbirth, 1,356 had prior cesarean, while 6,457 had no prior cesarean. Labor was attempted in 51.8% of patients with prior cesarean and 93.7% of patients without prior cesarean, with 76.2 and 95.8% of these patients, respectively, delivered vaginally. Overall, 18.9% of patients underwent a cesarean delivery (60.5% among those with prior cesarean and 10.2% among those without prior cesarean). Multivariable regression analysis identified several factors associated with the risk of cesarean delivery that were not medically indicated. For instance, among patients without prior cesarean, malpresentation (of which the vast majority was breech presentation) was associated with an increased likelihood of planned cesarean (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 3.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.53-4.22) and cesarean delivery after attempting labor (adjusted OR = 3.09, 95% CI: 2.25-4.25). For both patients with and without prior cesarean, delivery at an urban teaching hospital was associated with a lower likelihood of planned cesarean and a lower likelihood of cesarean delivery after attempting labor (adjusted ORs ranged from 0.28 to 0.56, < 0.001 for all).
CONCLUSION
Over one in six patients with antepartum stillbirth underwent cesarean delivery. Among patients who attempted labor, rate of vaginal delivery was generally high, suggesting a potential opportunity to increase vaginal delivery in this population.
KEY POINTS
· In singleton antepartum stillbirths, 18.9% underwent cesarean delivery.. · Rate of vaginal delivery was high when labor was attempted.. · Both clinical and non-clinical factors were associated with risk of cesarean delivery..
Topics: Humans; Female; Stillbirth; Pregnancy; Cesarean Section; Adult; Risk Factors; Delivery, Obstetric; California; Multivariate Analysis; Young Adult; Gestational Age; Logistic Models
PubMed: 35850142
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750795