-
Breastfeeding Medicine : the Official... Oct 2023Breastfeeding has health benefits for both mothers and children. Nipple problems may result in the child being weaned prematurely before the recommended 6 months... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Breastfeeding has health benefits for both mothers and children. Nipple problems may result in the child being weaned prematurely before the recommended 6 months minimum period of exclusive breastfeeding. The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of topically applying olive oil and breast milk in treating nipple pain and soreness in breastfeeding mothers during the early postpartum period. A quasi-randomized controlled trial was conducted in a maternity ward of a medical center in northern Taiwan. Eighty breastfeeding mothers were recruited, and randomly assigned to the olive oil or breast milk group. Visual analogue pain scale (intensity of nipple pain) and nipple soreness scores were collected at 24, 48, and 72 hours after delivery. Differences in postintervention outcomes between groups were examined using the Generalized Estimating Equation model. The results indicated that both olive oil and breast milk groups reported a significant increase in the intensity of nipple pain and nipple soreness at 24, 48, and 72 hours after delivery. However, differences in the outcome measurements between olive oil and breast milk groups were statistically insignificant at -value >0.05. This study found that olive oil had similar effects on nipple pain and soreness to breast milk. In addition, most breastfeeding mothers provided positive feedback on using olive oil. Olive oil can be a safe, accessible, and alternative choice for breastfeeding mothers in treating nipple pain and soreness, especially early in the breastfeeding period. The Clinical Trail Registration Number: NCT03568370.
Topics: Female; Humans; Pregnancy; Breast Diseases; Breast Feeding; Mastodynia; Milk, Human; Mothers; Nipples; Olive Oil; Infant
PubMed: 37797219
DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2023.0081 -
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons... Apr 2024There has been an almost 100% increase in referrals to breast cancer diagnostic clinics in the past decade. Breaching of the two-week cancer referral target is now...
INTRODUCTION
There has been an almost 100% increase in referrals to breast cancer diagnostic clinics in the past decade. Breaching of the two-week cancer referral target is now commonplace, potentially delaying diagnoses of breast malignancy in many women. Almost one in five of these referrals are women with mastalgia, not a symptom linked to breast cancer. The objective of the study was the safe introduction of an advanced nurse practitioner-led telephone service for women with mastalgia to improve the service for women and create capacity for those with "red flag" breast symptoms.
METHODS
Referrals to clinic were triaged, women with mastalgia only were directed to a telephone-based assessment clinic and symptoms evaluated using a multidisciplinary created proforma.
RESULTS
Within 23 months, 1,427 women were assessed in the breast pain telephone assessment clinic: 863 (61%) were aged over 40 and 564 (39%) aged under 40. A total of 1,238 underwent telephone assessment. Reassurance and discharge only was needed for 365 (26%). The aetiology of pain was identified as musculoskeletal in 1,104/1,238 (89%) of patients, with only 39/1,238 (3.2%) identified as having true breast pain. Additional symptoms were mentioned by 264 women (18%) during the consultation; all immediately redirected back to a diagnostic clinic. Mammography was undertaken in 609 women (43%). Seven women (0.6%) were diagnosed with a breast malignancy. Patient survey indicated that 93% of patients were satisfied with the care received and 97% said they would recommend the service to a family member or friend.
CONCLUSIONS
Although face-to-face assessments for breast pain remain the standard practice in many breast units, data indicating the safety of a telephone assessment clinic, along with high levels of patient satisfaction, question whether services can be delivered differently.
Topics: Humans; Female; Adult; Middle Aged; Aged; Mastodynia; Breast Neoplasms; Referral and Consultation; Telephone; Nurse Practitioners
PubMed: 37642083
DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0056 -
Journal of the American College of... Oct 2023Despite rising popularity and performance, studies evaluating the use of large language models for clinical decision support are lacking. Here, we evaluate ChatGPT...
OBJECTIVE
Despite rising popularity and performance, studies evaluating the use of large language models for clinical decision support are lacking. Here, we evaluate ChatGPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer)-3.5 and GPT-4's (OpenAI, San Francisco, California) capacity for clinical decision support in radiology via the identification of appropriate imaging services for two important clinical presentations: breast cancer screening and breast pain.
METHODS
We compared ChatGPT's responses to the ACR Appropriateness Criteria for breast pain and breast cancer screening. Our prompt formats included an open-ended (OE) and a select all that apply (SATA) format. Scoring criteria evaluated whether proposed imaging modalities were in accordance with ACR guidelines. Three replicate entries were conducted for each prompt, and the average of these was used to determine final scores.
RESULTS
Both ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 achieved an average OE score of 1.830 (out of 2) for breast cancer screening prompts. ChatGPT-3.5 achieved a SATA average percentage correct of 88.9%, compared with ChatGPT-4's average percentage correct of 98.4% for breast cancer screening prompts. For breast pain, ChatGPT-3.5 achieved an average OE score of 1.125 (out of 2) and a SATA average percentage correct of 58.3%, as compared with an average OE score of 1.666 (out of 2) and a SATA average percentage correct of 77.7%.
DISCUSSION
Our results demonstrate the eventual feasibility of using large language models like ChatGPT for radiologic decision making, with the potential to improve clinical workflow and responsible use of radiology services. More use cases and greater accuracy are necessary to evaluate and implement such tools.
Topics: Humans; Female; Mastodynia; Radiology; Breast Neoplasms; Decision Making
PubMed: 37356806
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.05.003