-
Annals of Vascular Surgery Jun 2024After autogenous arteriovenous (AV) access creation for end-stage renal disease, a majority of patients will continue on hemodialysis (HD), a minority will receive...
OBJECTIVES
After autogenous arteriovenous (AV) access creation for end-stage renal disease, a majority of patients will continue on hemodialysis (HD), a minority will receive definitive treatment with kidney transplantation, and a subset of patients will convert to peritoneal dialysis (PD). Our goal was to identify patient factors associated with early transition from HD to either kidney transplantation or PD.
METHODS
This is a case-control study of all patients with first-time AV access creation in the Vascular Quality Initiative (2011-2022) who had long-term follow-up. Patients who remained on HD after AV access creation were the control group while patients who received early kidney transplant or who converted to PD were the two case groups. Relationship among demographics, comorbidities, neighborhood social disadvantage, and functional status as they relate to renal replacement therapy modality was assessed.
RESULTS
There were 19,782 patients included; the average age was 62±15 years and 57% were male. During the follow-up period of a median 306 (71-403) days, 1.3% underwent a kidney transplantation and 2.3% underwent conversion to PD. On univariable analysis, rates of kidney transplantation or conversion to PD varied with race (P<.001), insurance status (P<.001), Area Deprivation Index (ADI) quintile (P<.001), and several medical comorbidities. On multivariable analysis, impaired ambulation, current smoking, Medicaid or Medicare insurance, Black race, heart failure, body mass index, and older age were associated with decreased transplantation rates. Conversion to PD was associated with ADI Q5, Q4, and Q3. Decreased conversion to PD was associated with impaired ambulation, Hispanic ethnicity, Black race, former smoking, medication-controlled diabetes, and older age.
CONCLUSION
Decreased kidney transplantation was associated with Black race and non-commercial health insurance but not ADI quintile, suggesting disparities exist beyond community-level access to care. Early kidney transplantation conveyed a 3-year survival benefit compared to HD and PD, which had similar survival. Further work is required to increase access to kidney transplantation and PD.
PubMed: 38942372
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.06.002 -
Quality Management in Health CarePatient experience is a key factor in measuring hospital performance, and the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey tool is used to...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Patient experience is a key factor in measuring hospital performance, and the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey tool is used to assess patient perceptions. Hospitals with positive patient experience tend to have a better quality of clinical care, lower readmission and mortality rates, and an overall shorter inpatient length of stay. Studies have identified several organizational determinants of high- and low-rated patient experiences, including hospital size, type, staffing levels, and patient demographics.This study aims to explore the determinants of consistently high- and low-rated patient experience, as well as factors associated with positive and negative changes in patient experience over time.
METHOD
The 2014 to 2019 American Hospital Association annual survey and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hospital Value-Based Purchasing database were used. A total of 2801 acute-care hospitals were included in this study. A series of multivariate logistic regressions were used to model the probability of "1" (being a superior hospital or an inferior hospital). In addition, a generalized linear mixed model for binary responses was used to analyze the change (probability of positive and negative change).
RESULTS
The results showed that most hospitals did not sustain superior or inferior performance, and competition decreased the likelihood of a hospital consistently performing well in terms of patient experience. Superior performance was associated with hospital ownership (P < .001), size (P = .026), location (P = .002), teaching status (P = .009), average Herfindahl-Hirschman Index value (P = .005), and Medicaid and Medicare patient population. On the other hand, inferior performance was associated with hospital ownership (P = .003), size (P < .001), teaching status (P = .003), safety net status (P = .020), and Medicaid and Medicare patient population.
CONCLUSION
This study aimed to examine the trends in hospital patient experience performance and the influence of hospital organizational characteristics on those trends. Our findings allow us to question the widely held belief that patient experience is a metric of differentiation and industry competition, suggesting that performance in this domain has not been utilized by most hospitals as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. The findings from this study highlight the importance of considering changes in performance over time and the need for significant organizational efforts to improve hospital performance in terms of patient experience.
Topics: Humans; United States; Patient Satisfaction; Hospitals; Quality of Health Care; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 38941580
DOI: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000470 -
JAMA Health Forum Jun 2024Sponsorship of promotional events for health professionals is a key facet of marketing campaigns for pharmaceuticals and medical devices; however, there appears to be...
IMPORTANCE
Sponsorship of promotional events for health professionals is a key facet of marketing campaigns for pharmaceuticals and medical devices; however, there appears to be limited transparency regarding the scope and scale of this spending.
OBJECTIVE
To develop a novel method for describing the scope and quantifying the spending by US pharmaceutical and medical companies on industry-sponsored promotional events for particular products.
DESIGN AND SETTING
This was a cross-sectional study using records from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid's Open Payments database on payments made to prescribing clinicians from January 1 to December 21, 2022.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
An event-centric approach was used to define sponsored events as groupings of payment records with matching variables. Events were characterized by value (coffee, lunch, dinner, or banquet) and number of attendees (small vs large). To test the method, the number of and total spending for each type of event across professional groups were calculated and used to identify the top 10 products related to dinner events. To validate the method, we extracted all event details advertised on the websites of 4 state-level nurse practitioner associations that regularly hosted industry-sponsored dinner events during 2022 and compared these with events identified in the Open Payments database.
RESULTS
A total of 1 154 806 events sponsored by pharmaceutical and medical device companies were identified for 2022. Of these, 1 151 351 (99.7%) had fewer than 20 attendees, and 922 214 (80.0%) were considered to be a lunch ($10-$30 per person). Seven companies sponsored 16 031 dinners for the top 10 products. Of the 227 sponsored in-person dinner events hosted by the 4 state-level nurse practitioner associations, 168 (74.0%) matched events constructed from the Open Payments dataset.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
These findings indicate that an event-centric analysis of Open Payments data is a valid method to understand the scope and quantify spending by pharmaceutical and medical device companies on industry-sponsored promotional events attended by prescribers. Expanding and enforcing the reporting requirements to cover all payments to all registered health professionals would improve the accuracy of estimates of the true extent of all sponsored events and their impact on clinical practice.
Topics: Humans; Cross-Sectional Studies; United States; Drug Industry; Marketing; Conflict of Interest; Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.
PubMed: 38941087
DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1581 -
JACC. Advances Apr 2024Statins are highly effective for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and mortality. Data on the benefit of statins in adults with heart...
BACKGROUND
Statins are highly effective for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and mortality. Data on the benefit of statins in adults with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and without ASCVD are limited.
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to determine whether statins are associated with a lower risk of mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in HFpEF.
METHODS
Veterans Health Administration data from 2002 to 2016, linked to Medicare and Medicaid claims and pharmaceutical data, were collected. Patients had a new HFpEF diagnosis and no known ASCVD or prior statin use at baseline. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to evaluate the association of new statin use with outcomes (all-cause mortality and MACE). Propensity score overlap weighting (PSW) was used to balance baseline characteristics.
RESULTS
Among 7,970 Veterans, 47% initiated a statin over a mean 6.0-year follow-up. At HFpEF diagnosis, mean age was 69 ± 12 years, 96% were male, 67% were White, 14% were Black, and mean EF was 60% ± 6%. Before PSW, statin users were younger with more prevalent metabolic syndrome, arthritis, and other chronic conditions. All characteristics were balanced after PSW. There were 5,314 deaths and 4,859 MACE events. After PSW, the hazard for all-cause mortality for statin users vs nonusers was 22% lower (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.73-0.83). The HR for MACE was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.74-0.84), 0.69 (95% CI: 0.60-0.80) for all-cause hospitalization, and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.59-0.88) for HF hospitalization.
CONCLUSIONS
New statin use was associated with reduced all-cause mortality, MACE, and hospitalization in Veterans with HFpEF without prevalent ASCVD.
PubMed: 38939680
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100869 -
JACC. Advances Apr 2024Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among adults with type 2 diabetes. Currently, available MACE prediction models...
BACKGROUND
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among adults with type 2 diabetes. Currently, available MACE prediction models have important limitations, including reliance on data that may not be routinely available, narrow focus on primary prevention, limited patient populations, and longtime horizons for risk prediction.
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to derive and internally validate a claims-based prediction model for 1-year risk of MACE in type 2 diabetes.
METHODS
Using medical and pharmacy claims for adults with type 2 diabetes enrolled in commercial, Medicare Advantage, and Medicare fee-for-service plans between 2014 and 2021, we derived and internally validated the annualized claims-based MACE estimator (ACME) model to predict the risk of MACE (nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and all-cause mortality). The Cox proportional hazards model was composed of 30 covariates, including patient age, sex, comorbidities, and medications.
RESULTS
The study cohort comprised 6,623,526 adults with type 2 diabetes, mean age 68.1 ± 10.6 years, 49.8% women, and 73.0% Non-Hispanic White. ACME had a concordance index of 0.74 (validation index range: 0.739-0.741). The predicted 1-year risk of the study cohort ranged from 0.4% to 99.9%, with a median risk of 3.4% (IQR: 2.3%-6.5%).
CONCLUSIONS
ACME was derived in a large usual care population, relies on routinely available data, and estimates short-term MACE risk. It can support population risk stratification at the health system and payer levels, participant identification for decentralized clinical trials of cardiovascular disease, and risk-stratified observational studies using real-world data.
PubMed: 38939660
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100852 -
JACC. Advances Oct 2023Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is strongly recommended for a spectrum of cardiovascular conditions and procedures including aortic valve replacement.
BACKGROUND
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is strongly recommended for a spectrum of cardiovascular conditions and procedures including aortic valve replacement.
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to characterize patient and hospital factors associated with CR participation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and determine which factors explain hospital-level variation in CR participation.
METHODS
We linked clinical and administrative claims data from patients who underwent TAVR at 24 Michigan hospitals between January 1, 2016 and June 30, 2020 and obtained rates of CR enrollment within 90 days of discharge. Sequential mixed models were fit to evaluate hospital variation in 90-day post-TAVR CR participation.
RESULTS
Among 3,372 patients, 30.6% participated in CR within 90-days after discharge. Several patient factors were negatively associated with CR participation after TAVR including older age, Medicaid insurance, atrial fibrillation/flutter, dialysis use, and slower baseline 5-m walk times. There was substantial hospital variation in CR participation after TAVR ranging from 5% to 60% across 24 hospitals. Patient case mix did not explain hospital variation in CR across hospitals with median OR numerically increasing from 2.11 (95% CI: 1.62-2.67) to 2.13 (95% CI: 1.61-2.68) after accounting for patient-level factors.
CONCLUSIONS
Less than 1 in 3 patients who underwent TAVR in Michigan participated in CR within 90-days of discharge. Although several patient factors are associated with CR participation, hospital-level variation in CR participation after TAVR is not explained by patient case mix. Identifying hospital processes of care that promote CR participation after TAVR will be critical to improving CR participation after TAVR.
PubMed: 38938330
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100581 -
Telemedicine Journal and E-health : the... Jun 2024Patient portals can improve access to electronic health information and enhance patient engagement. However, disparities in patient portal utilization remain, affecting...
Patient portals can improve access to electronic health information and enhance patient engagement. However, disparities in patient portal utilization remain, affecting disadvantaged communities disproportionately. This study examined patient- and provider-level factors associated with portal usage among Medicaid recipients in a large federally qualified health center (FQHC) network in Texas. Deidentified electronic medical records of patients 18 years or older from a large Texas FQHC network were analyzed. The dependent variable was a binary flag indicating portal usage during the study period. Independent variables included patient- and provider-level factors. Patient-level factors included sociodemographic, geographic, and clinical characteristics. Provider characteristics included primary service line, provider type, provider language, and years in practice. Because the analysis was at the individual level, a multivariable logistic regression model focused on adjusted associations between independent variables and portal usage. The analytic sample consisted of 9,271 individuals. Compared with individuals 18-39 years, patients 50 years and older had lower odds (50-64 OR: 0.60, < 0.001; 65+ OR: 0.51, < 0.001) of portal usage. Males were less likely to use portals (OR: 0.44, = 0.03), and compared to Non-Hispanic Whites, Non-Hispanic Black (OR: 0.86, = 0.02) and Hispanics (OR: 0.83, < 0.001) were significantly less likely to use portals. Individuals with 1 or more telemedicine consults had a two-times greater odds of portal usage (OR: 1.97, < 0.001). Compared to individuals who had clinic visits in December 2018, portal usage was significantly higher in the pandemic months (March 2020-November 2020, all 's < 0.01). Importantly, the behavioral health service line had the greatest odds (OR: 1.52, < 0.001), whereas the dental service line had the lowest odds (OR: 0.69, = 0.01) compared to family practice. No other provider characteristics were significant. Our finding of significant patient-level factors is important and can contribute to developing appropriate patient-focused health information technology approaches to ensure equitable access and maximize the potential benefits of patient portals in health care delivery.
PubMed: 38938215
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2024.0194 -
Telemedicine Journal and E-health : the... Jun 2024To compare telemedicine versus office visit use at two Medicaid-focused pediatric primary care clinics. Retrospective cohort study from March 15, 2020 - March 15, 2021...
To compare telemedicine versus office visit use at two Medicaid-focused pediatric primary care clinics. Retrospective cohort study from March 15, 2020 - March 15, 2021 at two Medicaid-focused pediatric primary care clinics. Site A and Site B care for different populations (Site B care for mostly immigrant families with preferred language Spanish). Outcomes included the percent of visits conducted through telemedicine and reason for visit. Descriptive statistics, univariable and multivariable mixed multilevel logistic regression, were used to assess relationship between patient demographics and telemedicine use. Out of 17,142 total visits, 13% of encounters at Site A ( = 987) and 25% of encounters at Site B ( = 2,421) were conducted using telemedicine. Around 13.8% of well-child care ( = 1,515/10,997), 36.2% of mental health care ( = 572/1,581), and 25.0% of acute care/follow-up ( = 1,893/7,562) were telemedicine visits. After adjustment for covariates, there was no difference in odds of a patient having any telemedicine use by preferred language, sex, or payor. Patients 1-4 years of age had the lowest odds of telemedicine use. At Site A, patients who identified as Non-Hispanic Black (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24-0.45), Hispanic/Latinx (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.24-0.66), or other race/ethnicity (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.23-0.55) had lower odds of telemedicine use in comparison to Non-Hispanic White. Telemedicine was successfully accessed by Medicaid enrollees for different types of pediatric primary care. There was no difference in telemedicine use by preferred language and payor. However, differences existed by age at both sites and by race/ethnicity at one site. Future research should explore operational factors that improve telemedicine access for marginalized groups.
PubMed: 38938205
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0707 -
Psychiatric Services (Washington, D.C.) Jun 2024Algorithms for guiding health care decisions have come under increasing scrutiny for being unfair to certain racial and ethnic groups. The authors describe their...
Algorithms for guiding health care decisions have come under increasing scrutiny for being unfair to certain racial and ethnic groups. The authors describe their multistep process, using data from 3,465 individuals, to reduce racial and ethnic bias in an algorithm developed to identify state Medicaid beneficiaries experiencing homelessness and chronic health needs who were eligible for coordinated health care and housing supports. Through an iterative process of adjusting inputs, reviewing outputs with diverse stakeholders, and performing quality assurance, the authors developed an algorithm that achieved racial and ethnic parity in the selection of eligible Medicaid beneficiaries.
PubMed: 38938093
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230359 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Jun 2024Innovation has fueled the shift from inpatient to outpatient care for orthopaedic joint arthroplasty. Given this transformation, it becomes imperative to understand what...
BACKGROUND
Innovation has fueled the shift from inpatient to outpatient care for orthopaedic joint arthroplasty. Given this transformation, it becomes imperative to understand what factors help assign care-settings to specific patients for the same procedure. While the comorbidities suffered by patients are important considerations, recent research may point to a more complex determination. Differences in reimbursement structures and patient characteristics across various insurance statuses could potentially influence these decisions.
METHODS
Retrospective binary logistic and ordinary least square (OLS) regression analyses were employed on de-identified inpatient and outpatient orthopaedic arthroplasty data from Albany Medical Center from 2018 to 2022. Data elements included surgical setting (inpatient vs. outpatient), covariates (age, sex, race, obesity, smoking status), Elixhauser comorbidity indices, and insurance status.
RESULTS
Patients insured by Medicare were significantly more likely to be placed in inpatient care-settings for total hip, knee, and ankle arthroplasty when compared to their privately insured counterparts even after Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) removed each individual surgery from its inpatient-only-list (1.65 (p < 0.05), 1.27 (p < 0.05), and 12.93 (p < 0.05) times more likely respectively). When compared to patients insured by the other payers, Medicare patients did not have the most comorbidities (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Medicare patients were more likely to be placed in inpatient care-settings for hip, knee, and ankle arthroplasty. However, Medicaid patients were shown to have the most comorbidities. It is of value to note Medicare patients billed for outpatient services experience higher coinsurance rates.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
III.
Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Male; Female; Insurance Coverage; United States; Inpatients; Middle Aged; Aged; Medicare; Medicaid; Orthopedic Procedures; Outpatients
PubMed: 38937773
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04734-8