-
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Jun 2024Perineal lacerations are a very common complication of post-partum. Usually, the repair of 1st and 2nd-grade lacerations is performed after the administration of local... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Perineal lacerations are a very common complication of post-partum. Usually, the repair of 1st and 2nd-grade lacerations is performed after the administration of local anesthesia. Despite the great relevance of the problem, there are only a few studies about the best choice of local anesthetic to use during suturing. We performed a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of a local anesthetic spray during the suturing of perineal lacerations in the post-partum.
METHODS
We compared the spray with the standard technique, which involves the infiltration of lacerated tissues, using the NRS scale. 136 eligible women who had given birth at University Hospital of Udine were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive nebulization of Lidocaine hydrochloride 10% spray (experimental group) or subcutaneous/submucosal infiltration of mepivacaine hydrochloride (control group) during suturing of perineal laceration.
RESULTS
The lacerations included 84 1st-grade perineal traumas (61.7%) and 52 2nd-grade perineal traumas (38.2%). All the procedures were successfully completed without severe complications or serious adverse reactions. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of blood losses or total procedure time. Moreover, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of NRS to none of the intervals considered. Regarding the application of the spray in the B group, in 36 cases (52.9%) it was necessary to improve the number of puffs previously supposed to be sufficient (5 puffs). Just in 3 cases, an additional injection was necessary (4.4%).
CONCLUSIONS
Our study demonstrates that lidocaine spray alone can be used as a first line of local anesthetic during the closure of I-II-grade perineal lacerations, as it has comparable efficacy to mepivacaine infiltration.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
The trial was recorded on https://clinicaltrials.gov . Identification number: NCT05201313. First registration date: 21/01/2022. Unique Protocol ID: 0042698/P/GEN/ARCS.
Topics: Humans; Female; Perineum; Lidocaine; Lacerations; Anesthetics, Local; Adult; Mepivacaine; Suture Techniques; Pregnancy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38914976
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06640-7 -
Veterinary Journal (London, England :... Jun 2024Local anaesthetics (LAs) can have detrimental effects on rat, bovine, canine, and human tendon tissues and cells. Currently, there has been no available data on the...
Local anaesthetics (LAs) can have detrimental effects on rat, bovine, canine, and human tendon tissues and cells. Currently, there has been no available data on the impact of these drugs on equine tenocytes. Even if LA injection for managing painful tendon conditions in horses is limited, it is usually used via intra-articular, intrasynovial, perineural, and intrathecal as well as for lameness examinations. In this in vitro study, the cytotoxic effects of LAs, including lidocaine, mepivacaine, and bupivacaine on equine tenocytes, in the presence and absence of platelet rich plasma (PRP), were investigated. PRP accelerates tissue healing and can exert cytoprotective effects on different cell types exposed to different stressful conditions, including drugs. Results indicated that the exposure to LAs significantly reduced tenocytes viability in dose- and time-dependent manners while PRP was able to counteract their cytotoxic effects. Furthermore, microscopy and flow cytometry analyses revealed apoptosis and necrosis in equine tenocytes exposed to these drugs, that were both reduced when PRP was in the medium. These findings highlight the importance of considering the tenocyte toxicity associated with intrathecal and intraneural LA injections, as they might affect tenocytes or reduce the efficacy of associated therapies. Moreover, this study also highlights the protective effects of PRP, which could make LA injections safer.
PubMed: 38849026
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2024.106159 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2024Numerous scientific papers have compared different treatment options in the management of myofascial pain syndrome. This study evaluated the efficacy of Extracorporeal...
Numerous scientific papers have compared different treatment options in the management of myofascial pain syndrome. This study evaluated the efficacy of Extracorporeal ShockWave Treatment (ESWT) and mesotherapy in patients with Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS) in terms of improvement in pain, functional capacity, and quality of life. A case-control study was conducted on 54 patients, who were randomized into 2 groups: group A, consisting of 27 patients, who were treated with 5 sessions of focal ESWT on a weekly basis; and group B, consisting of 27 patients, who underwent 5 sessions of mesotherapy with Thiocolchicoside fl 4 mg/2 mL and Mepivacaine fl 10 mg/1 mL on a weekly basis. Patients were evaluated at enrollment (T0), after 5 weeks, at the end of rehabilitation treatment (T1), and at a follow- up 30 days after the end of treatment (T2), by administering rating scales (Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) - Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) - Short Form-36 (SF-36)). The results showed that focal ESWT and Mesoterapy are two valid and effective treatment options in reducing algic symptoms and improving short- and long-term quality of life. However, the use of ESWTs, despite being mildly painful but tolerated, has been shown to be superior to mesotherapy in terms of pain reduction and increased functional capacity.
PubMed: 38841584
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1388922 -
American Journal of Obstetrics and... May 2024Fear of pain associated with intrauterine device (IUD) placement has been identified as a significant barrier to the adoption of long-acting reversible contraception,...
BACKGROUND
Fear of pain associated with intrauterine device (IUD) placement has been identified as a significant barrier to the adoption of long-acting reversible contraception, contributing to lower utilization of the most effective reversible contraceptive methods.
OBJECTIVE
To assess whether instillation of intrauterine mepivacaine before IUD placement alleviates pain more effectively than a placebo.
STUDY DESIGN
We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving nulliparous women undergoing IUD placement. An intrauterine instillation of 10 mL of 20 mg/mL mepivacaine or 0.9 mg/mL sodium chloride was administrated through a hydrosonography catheter 2 minutes prior to IUD placement. Pain scores were assessed using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) at prespecified time points. Primary outcome measured the difference in VAS pain scores between the intervention group and the placebo group during IUD placement. Secondary outcomes included VAS pain scores at instillation and 10 minutes after placement, tolerability of the placement pain, as well as acceptability of the analgesia method.
RESULTS
We enrolled 151 participants, with 76 assigned to the mepivacaine group and 75 to the placebo group. The mean VAS pain score during IUD placement showed a difference of 13.3 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.75-20.87; P<.001): the mepivacaine group had a mean of 53.9 mm (standard deviation [SD] 22.8), while the placebo group had a mean of 67.2 mm (SD 22.4). After adjusting for each individual provider's impact, the difference in mean pain scores remained statistically significant (12.2 mm 95% CI 4.85-19.62; P<.001). A greater proportion of women in the intervention group reported tolerable pain during placement with 70/75 participants (93.3%) compared to 53/66 participants (80.3%) in the placebo group (P=.021).
CONCLUSION
The intrauterine instillation of mepivacaine results in statistically significant reduction in pain score among nulliparous women during IUD placement. Although the precise clinical impact of this pain reduction method remains uncertain, the observed reduction in pain score result in a higher proportion of women reporting tolerable pain. This finding and the high acceptance as a pain reduction method thereby suggests clinical relevance. Intrauterine instillation of mepivacaine is a possible strategy to increase IUD utilization, particularly among nulliparous women who are at high risk of unintended pregnancy.
PubMed: 38796037
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.05.038 -
Stomatologiia 2024Was to evaluate the use of Ketorol Express as a preventive analgesia to increase the effectiveness of local anesthesia in providing emergency dental care to patients...
THE AIM OF THE STUDY
Was to evaluate the use of Ketorol Express as a preventive analgesia to increase the effectiveness of local anesthesia in providing emergency dental care to patients with arterial hypertension.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study was conducted on the basis of the state autonomous healthcare institution of the Moscow region «Royal Dental Clinic» with the participation of 83 people. The patients were divided into two groups. In group 1, Ketorol Express was prescribed as a preventive analgesia in a dosage of 20 mg before local anesthesia. Patients of group 2 underwent dental interventions without the use of preventive analgesia. A 3% solution of mepivacaine was used as a local analgesic solution. For a subjective assessment of the effectiveness of anesthesia, use a visual analog scale. All patients had their blood pressure and heart rate measured before and after the interventions and hemodynamic parameters were continuously monitored during emergency dental care.
RESULTS
In group 1, the effectiveness of combined anesthesia with the infiltration method of local anesthetic administration was 93±1.17%, according to the patient, 94±1.47%, according to the doctor, with the conductive method of anesthesia at the mandibular orifice - according to the patient it was 91±1.01%, according to the doctor 92± 1.36%. In group 2, when providing emergency dental care with the infiltration method of administration of 3% mepivacaine the anesthesia was effective in 80±1.97% of cases according to the patient and in 80±1.17% of cases according to the doctor, with the conductive method of anesthesia at the mandibular orifice, the effectiveness of anesthesia according to the patient was 82±1.11%, according to the doctor 85±1.23%.
CONCLUSION
The results of the study demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the effectiveness of local anesthesia performed with a 3% solution of mepivacaine in patients with arterial hypertension due to the use of preventive analgesia with Ketorol Express at a dosage of 20 mg (2 tablets of 10 mg) in emergency dental care with registration and analysis of changes in hemodynamic parameters.
Topics: Humans; Hypertension; Anesthesia, Local; Male; Mepivacaine; Female; Anesthesia, Dental; Middle Aged; Anesthetics, Local; Adult; Dental Care; Blood Pressure
PubMed: 38741532
DOI: 10.17116/stomat202410302132 -
Journal of the American Veterinary... May 2024To compare the efficacy of low-volume (5-mL) locoregional retrobulbar anesthesia ("retrobulbar block") by use of 3 commercial local anesthetic formulations.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the efficacy of low-volume (5-mL) locoregional retrobulbar anesthesia ("retrobulbar block") by use of 3 commercial local anesthetic formulations.
ANIMALS
8 healthy adult mares.
METHODS
A block-randomized, masked, controlled design was used. A single ultrasound-guided retrobulbar block was performed with 2% lidocaine, 2% mepivacaine, or 0.5% bupivacaine (n = 5 eyes/group). Contralateral eyes served as untreated controls. End points performed at baseline and time intervals up to 24 hours postblock included the following: assessment of neurophthalmic reflexes/responses, intraocular pressure, and vertical pupil diameter measurement, corneal and periocular esthesiometry, and observation for adverse effects.
RESULTS
Low-volume block did not result in increased intraocular pressure or other adverse effects at any time point in any treatment group. Statistically significant corneal anesthesia (P < .001) was observed 1 minute after block in all groups, persisting through 4 hours after lidocaine or mepivacaine block and through 24 hours after bupivacaine block. Clinically significant periocular anesthesia was not observed in any group. Significant vertical pupil diameter increase (P < .05) was observed for up to 4 hours after lidocaine or mepivacaine block and 6 hours after bupivacaine block.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Low-volume retrobulbar block with any of the 3 local anesthetic drugs evaluated was not associated with adverse effects. In terms of efficacy, mepivacaine block showed no clinical advantage over lidocaine block. However, bupivacaine block induced comparatively rapid and sustained corneal anesthesia. In comparison to published findings using a larger injection volume, low-volume retrobulbar block with lidocaine produced clinically comparable corneal anesthesia. However, periocular soft tissue anesthesia was not achieved with any local anesthetic drug at low volume.
PubMed: 38701834
DOI: 10.2460/javma.24.02.0121 -
Journal of Personalized Medicine Mar 2024Nerves in patients with diabetic neuropathy (DN) show increased susceptibility to local anesthetics, potentially requiring a decreased dose. We investigated whether the...
Nerves in patients with diabetic neuropathy (DN) show increased susceptibility to local anesthetics, potentially requiring a decreased dose. We investigated whether the minimum effective anesthetic concentration (MEAC) of mepivacaine for successful axillary block is lower in patients with DN than in those without. This prospective observational study included patients with DN ( = 22) and without diabetes ( = 22) at a tertiary care center. Patients received an ultrasound-guided axillary block with 30 mL of mepivacaine for anesthesia. The mepivacaine concentration used in each patient was calculated using Dixon's up-and-down method. A block was considered successful if all four sensory nerves had a score of 1 or 2 within 30 min with no pain during surgery. The primary outcome was the MEAC of mepivacaine, and the secondary outcomes included the minimal nerve stimulation intensity for the musculocutaneous nerve and the occurrence of adverse events. The MEAC was 0.55% (95% CI 0.33-0.77%) in patients without diabetes and 0.58% (95% CI 0.39-0.77%) in patients with DN ( = 0.837). The MEAC was 0.98% (95% CI 0.54-1.42%) in patients without diabetes and 0.96% (95% CI 0.57-1.35%) in patients with DN ( = 0.949). The stimulation threshold for the musculocutaneous nerve was significantly different between groups (0.49 mA vs. 0.19 mA for patients with vs. without diabetes; = 0.002). In conclusion, the MEAC of mepivacaine for a successful axillary block is not lower in patients with DN.
PubMed: 38672980
DOI: 10.3390/jpm14040353 -
Daru : Journal of Faculty of Pharmacy,... Jun 2024This study aims to develop an AI-based prediction model for injection drugs that cause anaphylactic shock using Japanese Real-World Data (JADER database) and chemical...
BACKGROUND
This study aims to develop an AI-based prediction model for injection drugs that cause anaphylactic shock using Japanese Real-World Data (JADER database) and chemical structure-based analysis.
METHODS
Data sourced from the JADER database included adverse drug reaction reports from April 2004 to December 2020. Only drugs with an adverse reaction named "anaphylactic shock" were selected for analysis. For model building, various models were constructed to predict anaphylactic shock-inducing drugs, such as logistic regression, LASSO, XGBoost, RF, SVM, and NNW. These models used chemical properties and structural similarities as feature variables. Dimension reduction was applied using principal component analysis. The dataset was split into training (80%) and validation (20%) sets. Six different models were trained and optimized through fivefold cross-validation.
RESULTS
From April 2004 to December 2020, 947 drugs with the adverse reaction name "anaphylactic shock" were extracted from the JADER database. 320 drugs were excluded due to analytical challenges, and another 400 were removed due to their administration route. 227 drugs were finalized as target medicines. For model validation, the performance of each model was evaluated based on metrics like AUCs of ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity. Additionally, two ensemble models, constructed from the six models were assessed using bootstrap sampling. Interestingly, it was identified that mepivacaine structural similarity had the highest importance in the final model.
CONCLUSIONS
The study successfully developed an AI-based prediction model for anaphylactic shock inducing-injection drugs. The model would offer potential for drug safety evaluation and anaphylactic shock risk assessment.
Topics: Anaphylaxis; Humans; Japan; Databases, Factual; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Artificial Intelligence; Injections; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; East Asian People
PubMed: 38580799
DOI: 10.1007/s40199-024-00511-4 -
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia =... Mar 2024
PubMed: 38532192
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-024-02754-w -
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Mar 2024Injecting mixtures of local anesthetics with or without adjuvants is a common practise in regional and particularly obstetric anesthesia to decrease block onset time...
INTRODUCTION
Injecting mixtures of local anesthetics with or without adjuvants is a common practise in regional and particularly obstetric anesthesia to decrease block onset time and/or augment epidural analgesia for cesarean section. While evidence on the efficacy of this practise is equivocal, little is known about its safety in terms of the pharmacologic compatibility of local anesthetics.
METHODS
We assessed the grade of crystallization in individual mixtures of seven local anesthetics (bupivacaine, ropivacaine, lidocaine, procaine, chloroprocaine, mepivacaine, prilocaine) with or without four adjuvants (sodium bicarbonate, dexamethasone, clonidine, fentanyl) using a semiquantitative light microscopy scale (ranging from 0 to 5), repeatedly for up to 60 min and performed correlation analysis between grade of crystallization and initial solution pH.
RESULTS
Of the 50 mixtures tested, 26 showed grades of crystallization ≥4 at admixture and 41 showed grades of crystallization ≥4 after 60 min. The addition of adjuvants to local anesthetic mixtures did not substantially change the grades of crystallization. Bupivacaine has a slightly lower precipitation tendency, compared with ropivacaine. A moderate relationship was found between initial pH and grade of crystallization after 15 min for the adjuvant mixtures (R=0.33, p=0.04), but not at other time points.
DISCUSSION
The preparation of local anesthetic (±adjuvant) mixtures leads to high grades of crystallization, which increase over 60 min and appear independent of solution pH. The risk of mixing medications with unknown physical or chemical compatibility profiles in regional anesthesia should be critically appraised and its clinical significance elucidated in future translational research.
PubMed: 38443138
DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2023-105229